Hafez

227 posts

Hafez

Hafez

@HafedDm

Software Engineer • Developer • AI Enthusiast • Domain names

Katılım Mayıs 2026
770 Takip Edilen152 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
You may find different posts on different topics here. Don’t worry, that’s what happens when a developer becomes wise… and an investor 😄 I believe we can all grow in this beautiful space with mutual respect and trust. Without them, it becomes a jungle. We’ll all be judged one day, so let’s not rush to judge each other. Whether you’re just passing by or genuinely interested, you’re welcome.
English
0
0
4
245
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@suryanox7 Haha needed so we keep our jobs.
English
0
0
1
11
Sooraj
Sooraj@suryanox7·
@HafedDm This should be title for some netflix series 😭
English
1
0
0
26
Sooraj
Sooraj@suryanox7·
What’s the most important lesson you’ve learned from AI?
English
79
2
59
2.9K
Reads with Ravi
Reads with Ravi@readswithravi·
“We don't have to be smarter than the rest. We have to be more disciplined than the rest.” — Warren Buffett
English
54
484
3.1K
43.8K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
Honestly i bounce between a few. ChatGPT for thinking and drafting, Claude and Antigravity for the actual code and planning/challenging approaches. Which is kind of the problem, no single tool wins, you end up switching by task. That’s the whole reason i’ve been exploring a concept around it: adaptiveaimate.com
English
0
0
0
914
Neo Kim
Neo Kim@systemdesignone·
SOFTWARE ENGINEERS ONLY Which AI coding tool do you use most?
English
83
3
58
22.9K
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
The cost of starting a company used to be $5 million. Then $500,000. Then $50,000. Now it is closer to $500. The only expensive thing left is your unwillingness/fear to begin.
English
204
189
1.9K
75.6K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@sickdotdev Smart question! But that logic says no one should sell pickaxes during a gold rush. Building Claude captures value from every $1M winner, not just one of them.
English
0
0
1
288
Sick
Sick@sickdotdev·
If making $1M is possible with Claude every month. Why would Claude's engineers work at Anthropic?
English
152
12
339
64.1K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@Prathkum Vibe coding is the proof. More productivity helpers every day. Still no replacement for someone who actually understands the system.
English
0
0
0
29
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
Which AI should I use today? ChatGPT? Claude? Gemini? Grok?… The tools are amazing. The CHOOSING is exhausting. What if you never had to pick — you just describe what you need, and the right tool/model gets routed in automatically? A concept I'm exploring, based on a metaphor from the human body and a little philosophy in the age of AI. adaptiveaimate.com #AI
Hafez tweet media
English
0
0
0
53
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
Somewhere right now, a 19-year-old with no funding, no degree, and no connections is building something, where you least expect it, with AI that will outperform a Fortune 500 company's best effort.
English
169
103
1.4K
49K
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
THE WINNER OF THE ANTHROPIC HACKATHON JUST OPEN SOURCED HIS ENTIRE AI CODING SETUP FOR FREE. 183 AGENT SKILLS, 48 SUB-AGENTS AND 79 READY-MADE COMMANDS. He spent 10 months on it, won $15K in API credits, then released the whole stack under MIT license.
English
38
134
1.3K
155.3K
Russell Brunson
Russell Brunson@russellbrunson·
You’ll think nothing is working… then suddenly everything compounds at once. That’s success.
English
71
62
488
6.4K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
The long-running task focus is the right bet, that's exactly where a single model starts to strain, early steps are simple, later ones get hard. Would love to see it pick the right intensity per step automatically instead of running one mode the whole way. That'd make "always-approve" feel a lot safer too.
English
1
0
1
1.3K
xAI
xAI@xai·
Composer 2.5 is now available inside Grok Build. Composer 2.5 is a fast, highly intelligent model that excels on long-running tasks and following complex instructions.
English
531
688
6.6K
20M
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@ChrissGPT Agreed, computer use is huge, it finally lets the agent actually do the thing, not just talk about it. The next question imo: which model should be driving each action? The best one keeps changing task to task. Capability is one mile, knowing which model to trust is the next.
English
0
0
0
195
Chris
Chris@ChrissGPT·
I’m so happy Claude and OpenAI never stopped grinding on computer use. Literally one of the most important aspects of automating work
English
14
2
182
6.4K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@garrytan All that scaffolding is really just distrust written as code. The moment an outcome is measurable, the cage isn't needed anymore. The future you're describing is less about less code and more about trusting intelligence where we finally can.
English
0
0
0
211
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
We're still writing code like it's 2013: no latent space, no intelligence. When there is intelligence we gate the agents like workers at a Foxconn factory. The future of software is just-in-time and is 10x less code because of the markdown. And the agents will be free.
Garry Tan@garrytan

x.com/i/article/2061…

English
84
61
772
146.5K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
Great list. But honestly this is also the trap for most owners, 25 use cases, each needing a different tool or model, and no time to figure out which. The real solution isn't more AI options, it's knowing which one to point at each task. That's the actual bottleneck for a busy owner.
English
1
0
2
166
Mike Hoffmann
Mike Hoffmann@MikeHoffmann·
The biggest opportunity for small business owners right now: Supercharging your business with AI. Here are the top 25 examples: 1. Customer service: Agents that answer the same 10 questions 24/7, so you don't have to. 2. Follow-up: Automated emails that go out the second a lead goes cold. 3. Bookkeeping: Categorizes expenses, tracks cash flow, flags issues automatically. 4. Hiring: Job posts, onboarding docs, and training guides written efficiently and effectively. 5. Proposals: Quotes and contracts drafted faster than all your employees combined. 6. Marketing: One piece of content turned into 30 posts across every platform. 7. Scheduling: Handles appointment booking and reminders (without a front desk person). 8. Reviews: Monitors your reputation and drafts responses automatically. 9. Research: Competitor analysis and pricing intel pulled together in an afternoon. 10. SOPs: Build your entire operations manual just by talking through your process. 11. Invoicing: Follow-up that runs automatically until the invoice gets paid. 12. Social media: A month of content planned (and written) for your brand. 13. Ads: Copy that tests itself and keeps improving without you touching it. 14. Inventory: Demand forecasting so you stop over-ordering and bleeding cash. 15. Legal: Lease reviews, contractor agreements, and basic docs drafted with insane efficiency. 16. Upsells: Identifies which customers are most likely to buy again. 17. Pricing: Builds margin-based pricing models you should have had years ago. 18. Vendor management: Drafts supplier contracts and tracks renewal dates for you. 19. Training: Answers new hire questions instantly so you're not the bottleneck anymore. 20. Location research: Site analysis, foot traffic, and demographics on demand. 21. Cash flow: Spots waste in your subscriptions and expenses automatically. 22. Communications: Internal updates and team memos written (and sent) in 30 seconds. 23. Forecasting: Revenue projections based on your actual numbers, not estimates. 24. Inbox: An AI assistant that triages emails and flags what actually needs your attention. 25. Competitive edge: Using all of the above while your competition still hasn't started.
English
17
40
250
46.5K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@pmitu More of a concept I’m exploring: AdaptiveAiMate, an AI that picks the right AI for you. You describe the task, it routes to the best model automatically. No more ‘which one should I use?’ every time. adaptiveaimate.com
English
0
0
3
29
Paul Mit
Paul Mit@pmitu·
Builders, pitch your product 👇 (a lot of smart VCs read my threads)
English
347
2
219
23.8K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
Agree on the friction part. But i'd push back on "one superapp owns it", the superapp still has to decide which engine handles each task. The choosing doesn't disappear, it just moves under the hood. Whoever does that routing best wins the agentic layer, not whoever has the nicest wrapper.
English
0
0
2
182
Ole Lehmann
Ole Lehmann@itsolelehmann·
I think the AI superapps will soon own 90% of the agentic layer more and more people won't use hermes/openclaw etc because Claude Cowork/Codex will offer 90% of the functionality with 5% of the friction
English
45
2
59
11.6K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@Tim_Denning I'd say unrealistic in size, but realistic in the next step. The goal can feel impossible from here, as long as tomorrow morning you know exactly what to do. The dream pulls, the small step moves you.
English
0
1
4
211
Tim Denning
Tim Denning@Tim_Denning·
The goal you should pursue should feel completely unrealistic.
English
54
58
544
35.8K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@yashhq_22 To be honest, money is part of it 😅 but the real pull is enjoying the work and making things easier. Both can be true at once.
English
0
0
0
16
Yash
Yash@yashhq_22·
be honest. are you building because you enjoy it or just for the money?
English
276
8
179
16.5K
Hafez
Hafez@HafedDm·
@rauchg @vercel What i love most: it lives in iMessage instead of asking people to download yet another app. Meeting users where they already are is half the product. Clean stack too. Bookmarking this one 🙏
English
0
0
0
340