One
11.1K posts


@mehdirhasan We are living through “The Apprentice: President edition” and it’s so exhausting
English

@stelzner_n1150 It helps distract from Epstein and other criminal activity by Trump
English

@ImBreckWorsham What the actual hell happened to this account?
You have gone completely insane.
Are you seriously simping for IRAN right now????
What the hell happened to you?!!!!
You've totally lost it.
English

#PresidentialAddress THIS is why we voted for Trump. Deal with it.
English

To be clear, the Japanese don't give criminals citizenship
They deport them
Because they're not idiots or insane
End Wokeness@EndWokeness
Justice KBJ: "If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it's allegiance." Her case for birthright citizenship:
English

@katieleebarlow @grok why does the @ACLU think Americans should allow birthright citizenship when it’s obviously being abused?
Allowing illegals to be on welfare because their children are American 🇺🇸 by birthright only !

English

@acathleen5 @KagedBeast33 @katieleebarlow The kids aren’t going to have the same exact beliefs as their parents you dimwit
English

@KagedBeast33 @katieleebarlow Are you ok with communist/ Islamist / third world coming here illegally - 30 M - having kids then voting in our elections all while getting welfare ?

English

@rochellewentz @katieleebarlow Thankfully your opinion is irrelevant and the constitution affirms birthright citizenship
English

It’s easy.
If you’re not a legal citizen, youre subject to the jurisdiction of the country you came from. It doesn’t matter where you’re domiciled. It doesn’t matter if you intend to BE domiciled. The parents’ legal status, supported by proper documents, determines citizenship of the child. Barrett et al are purposely confusing the issue, likely because they know the left will go nuts if they follow the actual wording and intent. They remember what happened after Roe was overturned and are too cowardly let that happen again.
English

@Harrystwaddle @GotDOCG @RepMarkHarrisNC “Subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means undivided political allegiance. Not mere physical presence.
You can hiss and yell and scream all you want. You’re still wrong.
English

@KyleFSB8096 @DietCheddar @CKDeGods @GeraldoRivera Probably because the President has never read the constitution.
English

@Harrystwaddle @DietCheddar @CKDeGods @GeraldoRivera The central argument is that it isn't technically "prior to". The case for the children of uninvited aliens has never been argued in the Supreme court or clearly addressed in law.
English

The president is right. The 14th Amendment was originally intended to embrace slaves and the children of slaves. Its passage in 1868, made it unconstitutional to deny citizenship to all children born here. Example: Despite odious attempts over the years to deny them, all Native Americans are (the original) citizens. So are all other babies who in Bruce Springsteen’s words were “Born in the USA.”
English

@mattvanswol @MaryLTrump According to Trump logic the anchor baby owes allegiance to their parents’ country of birth. So yes that makes Donald Trump the descendant of anchor babies. Just shows how stupid you are because you didn’t think through any of this whatsoever.
English

This is actually a complete lie which is funny because it shows she is dumb.
An anchor baby is a child born in America to non-citizen parents.
Mary is confusing "my grandfather's parents were immigrants" with "my grandfather was an anchor baby."
Those are two completely different things
Fred Trump (Donald's dad) was born in New York in 1905.
HIS father, Friedrich had already been an American citizen since 1892.
English

Don't be silly, I mean it was common in the 19th century. The Helio-centric solar system was centuries prior.
Prior to the 14th amendment, citizenship was either granted by the government or passed down by citizen parents. The exception was Slaves and Natives. Natives didn't even get full citizenship until the 20's.
English

@Harrystwaddle @GotDOCG @RepMarkHarrisNC But according to you they are U.S. citizens, even though their parents aren’t.
Are they somehow DUAL citizens of both the United States AND the home country of their parents?
English

@StreetCitizen @GotDOCG @RepMarkHarrisNC It’s “subject to the jurisdiction of” NOT “subjects” you dumbass
English

@Harrystwaddle @GotDOCG @RepMarkHarrisNC Illegal immigrants have not naturalized the lawful way, therefore they are not U.S. “subjects.”
U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark affirmed citizenship for children whose parents were legal permanent residents (Green Card holders today).
English

@KyleFSB8096 @DietCheddar @CKDeGods @GeraldoRivera It was a common belief that the Earth is the center of the universe, what’s your point?
English

@Harrystwaddle @DietCheddar @CKDeGods @GeraldoRivera It was common then that citizenship was inherited from the father.
English












