최희철 Hee Cheul Choi

happy to share our recent work. Structure Directing Acid-Amine Salt Films for Imine-Linked Covalent Organic Framework Films by Chemical Vapor Deposition | Journal of the American Chemical Society pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja…

우리의 오늘은, 그날의 용기로부터.

Now in @InorgChem! Read the current research on MOF thin films by CVD in the new paper by Park, Choi, and Choe at: go.acs.org/bJy @Hee_cheul group @postech

@HRByon both look great

Sculpture about "mobile energy" @ Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 🇩🇪

He Made Up His Own Prayer of 1000 hail marys mcjeffentrailsofthecoming.blogspot.com/2017/10/he-mad…

Way to go Soo Bin! 👏 #EpsonTourChamp #Road2LPGA @ISLResortGolf

Congratulations Jeffrey Long of @UCBerkeley, newly inducted #NASmember! #NAS161 #chemistry

하버드대 시계 거꾸로 돌리기 실험 세줄요약: 1. 80대 노인 8명 뽑아서 여기는 59년도고 님들은 50대이며 올해 개봉된 영화인 마릴린먼로 주연 영화(실제 그때 개봉함)같이 보자, 올해 나온 음악을 같이 듣자. 59년도 신문을 매일아침 읽게 하며 시간여행(?) 실험 함 실제로 59년도 같이 꾸며진 곳에서 살게 함 2. 빨래, 청소, 설거지 다 본인이 하게함. 노인들은 반발함. 자기들은 늙어서 그런 거 할 수 없다고. 실제로 간병인 도움 없이 거동 불편한 노인도 있음. 님들은 스스로 청소할 수 있을만큼 충분히 젊다고 지금은 59년도이지 않냐고 하면서 청소시킴. 첨엔 궁시렁대던 노인들도 나중에는 수월하게 잘하고 즐기는 모습 보여줌. 3. 실험이 끝난 뒤 건강을 검사해보니 시력 청력 악력 기억력 지능 심지어 신체 나이까지 모든면에서 아주 젊어짐.

It still is unbelievable to watch

Wolfgang Pauli's "Pauli Effect": Wolfgang Pauli, a pioneer of quantum physics, was notorious for his seemingly disastrous effect on experimental equipment. Whenever he was near, technical equipment would malfunction or experiments would fail, which led to his colleagues jokingly dubbing this the "Pauli Effect". Pauli himself was aware of this reputation and even avoided certain labs to prevent mishaps.

Everybody after a long microscopy session twitter.com/SlenderSherbet…

We detailed the effects of transition metals on the synthesis, crystallinity and electronic properties of metal-octaaminophthalocynine-based 2D conductive MOFs in this recent study ⁦@acsnano⁩ . #conductiveMOF pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac…

Congratulations to Professor Mircea Dincă (@DincaGroupMIT), who has been named the winner of a 2023 Brown Investigator Award from the Brown Science Foundation, a @SciPhilOrg member. chemistry.mit.edu/chemistry-news…

포쓰의 날을 맞아 4월 25일 런던 트라팔가 광장에서 런던심포니와 사이먼래틀이 지휘한 스타워즈 주제가.

Students traveling to their first international conference

In this additional analysis, the Novavax shows 100% efficacy vs hospitalization (0/17312 in vax arm, 12/8140 in placebo arm). As previously noted, the nvx has a broader immune response that seems more protective, esp in older adults #ab005" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">sciencedirect.com/science/articl… twitter.com/Daniel_E_Park/…

Why sometimes you need the PI twitter.com/Figensport/sta…

"What software can I use to make 3D scientific illustrations?" I receive this question almost every day and below is my answer (long read)🧐 #sciart When it comes to creating scientific illustrations, 3D design software can be a powerful tool for creating accurate and visually engaging images. However, with so many different 3D design software options available, it can be challenging to decide which one is the best fit for your needs. Below I will discuss the pros and cons of some of the most popular 3D design software options for scientific illustrations. Blender Blender is a free and open-source 3D design software that is widely used in the scientific community. It offers a wide range of features, including modeling, animation, and rendering. One of the biggest advantages of Blender is its community support, which is highly active and constantly improving the software. Additionally, Blender can be used on a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. Pros: Free and open-source Wide range of features Community support Cross-platform compatibility Cons: Steep learning curve User interface can be overwhelming for beginners Limited compatibility with other software Maya Maya is a popular 3D design software used in the film and gaming industries, but it is also used in scientific illustration. It offers a range of features, including modeling, animation, and simulation. Maya is highly customizable and can be integrated with other software, making it a versatile tool for scientific illustrators. Pros: Wide range of features Highly customizable Integration with other software Strong community support Cons: Expensive licensing fees Steep learning curve Can be overwhelming for beginners Cinema 4D Cinema 4D is a 3D design software that is widely used in the advertising and motion graphics industries. It offers a range of features, including modeling, animation, and rendering. Cinema 4D has a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, making it a good option for beginners. Pros: User-friendly interface Wide range of features Integration with other software Strong community support Cons: Expensive licensing fees Limited features compared to other software Not as widely used in the scientific community SketchUp SketchUp is a 3D design software that is widely used in architecture and engineering, but it can also be used for scientific illustration. It offers a range of features, including modeling and rendering. SketchUp is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it a good option for beginners. Pros: User-friendly interface Easy to use Integration with other software Large library of 3D models available Cons: Limited features compared to other software Not as widely used in the scientific community Limited community support 3ds Max 3ds Max is a 3D design software that is widely used in the architecture, gaming, and visual effects industries, but it can also be used for scientific illustration. It offers a range of features, including modeling, animation, and rendering. 3ds Max is highly customizable and can be integrated with other software. Pros: Wide range of features Highly customizable Integration with other software Strong community support Cons: Expensive licensing fees Steep learning curve Can be overwhelming for beginners ZBrush ZBrush is a 3D design software that is widely used in the film, gaming, and digital sculpting industries, but it can also be used for scientific illustration. It offers a range of features, including digital sculpting and painting. ZBrush is known for its advanced sculpting tools and the ability to create highly detailed and organic shapes. Pros: Advanced sculpting tools Integration with other software Strong community support Large library of 3D models available Cons:Expensive licensing fees Limited features compared to other software Can be overwhelming for beginners In conclusion, when choosing 3D design software for scientific illustration, it's important to consider the specific features and capabilities that you need, as well as your budget and level of experience. Each software option has its own unique pros and cons, so be sure to do your research and choose the software that best fits your needs.

“Love your parents. We are so busy growing up, we often forget they are also growing old.”