Roger Heverly retweetledi
Roger Heverly
2.1K posts


@AmberWoods100 @HouseDemocrats Dems? I must’ve missed that part but I believe you maybe I haven’t paid enough attention. Where should I look? I stand with you.
English

@HouseDemocrats :::looks over both shoulders::: both parties have lost the plot and both parties show up across the Epstein files coverup
English
Roger Heverly retweetledi

@ZoereneaTV Sext is natural, Sext is good.Not everybody does it, but everybody should!😏🥳
English
Roger Heverly retweetledi

Trump's second attack of the day on me.
This is why I go on Fox. This is why I talk about an economic agenda to build steel, ship & battery plants in hollowed out communities. This is why I talk to everyone, including Trump voters, without hurling insults.
This is how Democrats will win & unite the country.
MeidasTouch@MeidasTouch
Trump lashes out at Fox News, accusing the network of undermining MAGA and the Republican Party — and claiming that MAGA Republicans “hate Fox.” He blames Fox for making it hard for Republicans to win elections.
English
Roger Heverly retweetledi

Katie Phang and Epstein survivor Danielle Bensky visit a new exhibition space in Tribeca where the Epstein files are bound in 3,237 physical volumes.
“Look at the sheer volume. The fact that people are still saying there is nothing to investigate—it’s just insane. To see the person who scheduled me, who is still not behind bars—her name is here.”
English

Something is happening to America that is slow, systematic and deadly. Trump is killing America, and it’s deliberate.
1: Trump killed NATO partnership, our strongest defense alliance against Russia and China
2: trump’s HHS Secretary is killing our public health infrastructure, creating a more sicker and vulnerable America with communicative diseases
3: over at the pentagon trump’s frat boy Petey is firing our most qualified generals, depleting our best military hardware rapidly, in a stupid war to make our military a third world level armed forces
4: trump’s DOGE deliberately hollowed out our government from essential experts, to zap its functioning capabilities
5: trump killed USAID, and we lost our goodwill around the world and became isolated pariah
6: trump ICE became his brown shirts, killing
And abusing Americans to obey
7: trump’s weirdo FBI director is charging everyone and anyone to silence Americans
8: trump National security, the skunk looking girl, is dismantling our intelligence, making America vulnerable to terrorists
9: trump’s interior secretary is dismantling our national parks
10: trump’s economic team of Bassett and lutnick is crashing the economy, creating a population of economically needy
11: trump’s Epstein files that now every country have a copy of for blackmail
12: finally and most importantly, trump
And his family and his oligarch enablers are looting our treasury, and stuffing our tax dollars into their pockets.
Now tell me, you don’t think trump is a foreign agent, disguised as the president of the U.S, installed to destroy the US? Could it be that fuck Putin who owns trump’s ass? Drag this enemy of America out of the White House. That foreign escort Melania too.

English
Roger Heverly retweetledi
Roger Heverly retweetledi

Hypothetical question:
If a President of the USA is a secret Russian asset, what would he do to help Russia?
ChatGPT:
Interesting thought experiment—and a useful way to think about incentives and power. If someone in that position were secretly acting in another country’s interest, the key wouldn’t be dramatic, obvious betrayals. It would be subtle, deniable, and cumulative.
First, they’d likely undermine alliances quietly. The United States’ biggest strategic advantage is its network—especially NATO. So instead of openly pulling out, they might question its value, delay commitments, create distrust among members, or signal unreliability. Even small cracks weaken collective defense.
Second, they could shift foreign policy in ways that benefit Russia without looking extreme. That might mean softening sanctions, slowing military aid to countries Russia opposes (like Ukraine), or reframing conflicts to reduce U.S. involvement. None of that needs to look like “helping Russia”—just “putting America first.”
Third, damage internal cohesion. A divided country is less effective abroad. Amplifying polarization, discrediting institutions (courts, elections, intelligence agencies), or constantly creating internal crises reduces the ability of the U.S. to act strategically. That’s something adversaries historically benefit from.
Fourth, reshape leadership and bureaucracy. Appointing people who are inexperienced, loyal over competent, or sympathetic to certain narratives can gradually shift how decisions are made. Over time, that changes policy outcomes without needing explicit orders.
Fifth, control the narrative. Public opinion matters in democracies. Repeating talking points that align with Russian interests—questioning support for allies, portraying adversaries of Russia as corrupt or unworthy—can steer public sentiment in a favorable direction.
Finally, they’d avoid anything blatantly illegal or provable. The whole strategy would depend on plausible deniability. If it’s obvious, it fails.
The big picture: influence at that level isn’t about one shocking act—it’s about slowly tilting the system so that, over time, outcomes consistently benefit the other side.

English
Roger Heverly retweetledi
Roger Heverly retweetledi
Roger Heverly retweetledi
Roger Heverly retweetledi






















