HEXscout

5K posts

HEXscout banner
HEXscout

HEXscout

@hexscout

The Ultimate Onboarding Tool and Portfolio Manager for $HEX and #PulseChain. Learn about us: https://t.co/xRsDuUChCA

Katılım Aralık 2022
376 Takip Edilen8.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
How it works, @RichardHeartWin? Take a look at @VitalikButerin. Starting with something as simple as the word “roadmap” would be an easy first step. “bUt nObOdY cAn PuBlIsH a RoAdMaP fOr PuLsEcHaIn BeCaUsE pUlSeChAiN iS dEcEnTrAlIzEd.” Nonsense. The PulseChain community can absolutely publish a non-binding, technical roadmap (subject to change).
Money Ape@TheMoneyApe

ETHEREUM IS GOING QUANTUM SAFE 🚨 VITALIK UNVEILS A 4-YEAR ROADMAP TO MAKE ETH FULLY QUANTUM RESISTANT BY 2029. 4 KEY VULNERABILITIES IDENTIFIED. 7 NETWORK FORKS PLANNED. THE BUILDING BLOCKS ALREADY EXIST. ETHEREUM GETTING READY FOR A BIG RALLY. 🚀

English
24
9
132
12.3K
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
Ich kenne zwei mutige Anwender (Lungenkrebs und Hirntumor), die es versuchten, doch leider haben sich bei beiden die Situationen nur weiter verschlechtert. Es wirkt in beiden spezifischen Fällen sogar so, als wirke das Mittel als Beschleuniger bei manch einem, nur leider in die falsche Richtung. Das soll und kann kein Allgemeinurteil werden, aber es zeigt auf, dass die Zeit noch nicht reif ist, pauschal zu hypen, sondern um sehr kritisch weiter zu beleuchten.
Deutsch
4
0
20
4.3K
henning rosenbusch
henning rosenbusch@rosenbusch_·
„Die CIA sieht sich heftigen Reaktionen ausgesetzt, nachdem ein geheimes Dokument mit einem potenziellen Heilmittel gegen Krebs nach 60 Jahren freigegeben wurde.“ (…) Das Dokument, das im Februar 1951 erstellt und 2014 freigegeben wurde, fasst eine sowjetische wissenschaftliche Arbeit zusammen, in der auffällige Ähnlichkeiten zwischen parasitären Würmern und Krebstumoren untersucht wurden. Die Forschung hob auch Experimente hervor, die zeigten, dass bestimmte chemische Verbindungen sowohl parasitäre Infektionen als auch bösartige Tumore bekämpfen können.“ Ivermectin, das „Pferdeentwurmungsmittel“, mit dem man den Nobelpreis für Humanmedizin gewonnen hat, ist so ein Antiparasitikum. Es ist nicht zur Krebsbehandlung zugelassen, aber in den üblichen Schwurblerkreisen wird es schon länger diskutiert... Das US-National Cancer Institute hat Anfang 2026 Untersuchungen angekündigt, um das Potenzial von Ivermectin wissenschaftlich abschließend zu prüfen. Nicht jeder findet das gut.
henning rosenbusch tweet media
Deutsch
56
737
2.3K
141.1K
D3XTER
D3XTER@D3XTERcrypto·
@hexscout Weren’t you dumping hard
English
1
0
0
57
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
So you’re saying everyone’s been able to watch for years that “just buying” doesn’t do anything. Correct, it’s basically burned capital. If that capital is supposed to accomplish something, it needs a foundation behind it. Making a vision and a roadmap tangible means giving people goals and hope. That’s just one of many areas where we’re falling short, even though it would be incredibly easy to implement.
English
0
0
6
285
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
How it works, @RichardHeartWin? Take a look at @VitalikButerin. Starting with something as simple as the word “roadmap” would be an easy first step. “bUt nObOdY cAn PuBlIsH a RoAdMaP fOr PuLsEcHaIn BeCaUsE pUlSeChAiN iS dEcEnTrAlIzEd.” Nonsense. The PulseChain community can absolutely publish a non-binding, technical roadmap (subject to change).
Money Ape@TheMoneyApe

ETHEREUM IS GOING QUANTUM SAFE 🚨 VITALIK UNVEILS A 4-YEAR ROADMAP TO MAKE ETH FULLY QUANTUM RESISTANT BY 2029. 4 KEY VULNERABILITIES IDENTIFIED. 7 NETWORK FORKS PLANNED. THE BUILDING BLOCKS ALREADY EXIST. ETHEREUM GETTING READY FOR A BIG RALLY. 🚀

English
24
9
132
12.3K
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
@FreeHexico @RichardHeartWin @VitalikButerin Facts. Simple as that. Nothing is standing in the way, except that you either have no vision or aren’t planning any technical progress the ecosystem could look forward to, and that impression is inevitably what most observers will take away.
English
0
0
3
279
⬢ FREE ⬢ HEXICO ⬢
⬢ FREE ⬢ HEXICO ⬢@FreeHexico·
@hexscout @RichardHeartWin @VitalikButerin A non-binding technical roadmap wouldn’t hurt decentralization. It would just clarify potential directions and make the community more visible. With PulseChain’s many moving parts, openly sharing some planned ideas could draw in more developers and spark greater contributions.
English
1
0
9
346
Richard Heart
Richard Heart@RichardHeartWin·
Hey LP providers. Consider bonding stable directly with PLS, PLSX, HEX. I'm curious what the PLSX and HEX charts look like if they don't have the majority of their liquidity in PLS. The fractured liquidity might cause more slippage, but allow each coin's merit to be more accurately valued? Heck, the liquidity is so low, if there was a good time to experiment, it'd probably be now? Here's a great thread for the thought experiment. Do remember, cryfags get le ban.
English
156
329
1.7K
109.9K
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
It can’t be celebrated enough how much effort you’re putting in, even though you’ve had to watch for so long that @RichardHeartWin doesn’t understand the seriousness of things like this at all and therefore simply ignores them. He doesn’t even grasp that people need goals, they need hope. Wishing you lots of strength and perseverance going forward.
English
0
0
8
331
Piteas 🔆
Piteas 🔆@piteasio·
We want to see Pulsechain rise from the ashes again. Not just because we want it… but because we believe we’ve earned it. That’s why we’re taking a stance. We’re going to put this idea back on the table and push it into the spotlight. What we said in the quoted post, or a similar campaign, could easily echo on a global scale. If you want to see unique products like ProveX launching on Pulsechain every single month, the formula isn’t complicated. + Bring devs, and community/users will follow. + Reward devs, and users will share in that upside. * More builders = more chain usage. * More usage = more transactions. * More transactions = more PLS/PLSX burns. It’s not rocket science. It’s incentives. For this to actually happen, all it really takes is for @RichardHeartWin to give the green light, back the idea, form a council, and delegate authority. Whatever technical support that council needs from us as developers, we’re ready. Or… we build it ourselves and just ask for your endorsement. Either way works. We just need alignment. Would be nice if we could actually communicate and jam on these ideas instead of guessing in the dark. Anyway guys. Wishing the whole community a strong week and a more positive vibe moving forward. 🥰
Piteas 🔆@piteasio

Lord @RichardHeartWin, Here’s an open, no-bs proposal we truly believe could benefit Pulsechain. No flattery, no empty praise. Straight to the point. Create a Pulsechain Foundation (just a suggestion, and we already own the domain), and lead it yourself. A foundation that rewards key protocols and incentivizes every product that brings real value to the chain. You know better than anyone, countless good devs are burned out and tired of being milked by VCs and leaders. They just want a place where building something actually good means getting recognized, by you. Here’s the play 👇 Create a form, public or private. Let protocols apply with their contract addresses. Measure their on-chain impact: gas usage, PLS/PLSX burn contribution, sybil-filtered metrics, and reward the ones that truly push the chain forward. Call it Builder Mining Rewards. More successful products = more transactions. More transactions = more PLS burned. Simple math, right? It’ll boost innovation, bring in new devs, attract fresh communities, and multiply Pulsechain’s utility. And while we’re talking rewards, imagine how much PLS gets burned in the process, it’s a win on every level. Let’s be honest. If you do this, the biggest beneficiaries would likely be PulseX and Piteas. So before anyone screams self-interest, here’s our promise: whatever we earn, we’ll happily share with our users. No greed here, just growth. Because when every protocol supports this model, the whole ecosystem wins fairly. You’ve seen all those grants programs from other chains and leaders... Millions spent, zero real value. VC puppets everywhere. Huge user bases, armies of devs and yet nothing that lasts. It’s easy to lose people, hard to win them back. But when a leader extends a hand, everyone listens. Your move, @RichardHeartWin. Will the Pulsechain Foundation rise under your command with Builder Mining Rewards?

English
38
46
359
13.2K
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
What works? 🔥 You don’t listen to builders More and more developers are leaving, not because of price, but because their feedback goes nowhere with you. Result: talent drain, lower quality, less momentum. 🔥 No stablecoin strategy PulseChain has no native stablecoin. The only multichain stable (hUSDC) that was gifted to the chain gets no meaningful liquidity, even though the community donated hundreds of millions. Result: weak DeFi utility, capital cannot park safely, many use cases stay unattractive. 🔥 No clear market positioning and no branding There is no clear sentence answering: What does PulseChain stand for versus other chains? 🔥 There is no real brand positioning. Without positioning, marketing cannot deliver a consistent message. Result: communication feels random, advertisers have no clear story, demand is not built. 🔥 No adaptive developer support No real DevRel structure (clear contacts, fast response, feedback loops). No visible grants or incentives program with transparent criteria. No reliable integration paths. Result: serious smart contract teams are discouraged immediately. 🔥 Technical stagnation and missing basics For three years, no meaningful chain updates and no visible technical momentum. 🚨 Not even one fully working explorer. The basic infrastructure is buggy. Result: no future signal. People do not want to bet on something that stays this stagnant and does not even offer a roadmap ⚠️ as a credibility anchor. 🔥 Amateur public presence pulsechain_com looks unprofessional and has poor usability. A professional offer for the ecosystem was made (less than $200k for a proper relaunch and strong positioning) and it gets ignored. Result: loss of trust from users, partners, and developers. 🔥 Wrong focus: X subcomments instead of execution You frame everything as market and price. You spend time on pointless comments on X that cannot move anything, instead of building foundations or talking with the devs. Result: no substance, no progress signals, no course correction. 🔥 You are demotivating the people who brought life to the chain Do you not notice how the people who actually brought life to the chain are getting demotivated and going quiet? You think you are enough, but you are wrong. Understand it, or you will end up as solo power at best, a brief flare in a better market. 🔥 It is not “just the market” We said months ago what is necessary. Keep ignoring it, but do not be surprised by the outcome. 🤷‍♂️ 🚨 No, @RichardHeartWin : it is not only market conditions or price. There are deeper structural issues that have been called out for a long time.
English
17
16
112
4.8K
Richard Heart
Richard Heart@RichardHeartWin·
S&P 500 all time highs. Gold all time highs. Bitcoin half off. Ethereum half off. Any other crypto you might own? More than half off. Weird. And sucks. If you want to win, you have to just keep doing what works. Sometimes the price really has no relation to how good your stuff is. Some times people are broke and just must press the red button, no matter how much they wish they could press green. Pulsechain has higher thoughput, lower fees, lower latency, flawless operation for 1000 days, pump dot tires launched, provex launched(beta), and on and on, but if people just have to press green instead of red, it is what it is. And it's that EVERYWHERE in crypto.
Richard Heart tweet mediaRichard Heart tweet mediaRichard Heart tweet mediaRichard Heart tweet media
English
122
342
1.7K
48K
Richard Heart
Richard Heart@RichardHeartWin·
I've been telling you Bitcoin was at the top of its S curve for several years now. Which means that, if you want to make mad gains, you might want to buy something better, with more potential. PulseChain is better. Ethereum is better. PLSX, HEX, and ProveX, when it comes out have, more potential as well.
Richard Heart tweet media
English
170
537
2.4K
84.1K
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
We already had a working version ourselves a long time ago, and we even offered it as a gift so it could be expanded as needed and connected to the required performance capacity. But even that wasn’t accepted. Instead, the chain has been allowed to look pathetic for almost three years now. To this day, PulseChain investors can’t even properly research their taxes independently in any explorer. This is a priority-one issue, yet it still hasn’t been fixed for all this time. It presents a miserable image to the outside world.
English
3
2
53
1.9K
HEXscout
HEXscout@hexscout·
After almost three years, we still don’t even have a fully functional PulseChain explorer. Don’t expect to be taken seriously by the broader market if even the most basic tool can’t run without errors. To this day, the Transfer tab still isn’t reliably functional on a consistent basis. It’s unfortunate that the community has been pointing this out for nearly three years without it being fixed. Do you really not grasp how much credibility is being damaged at a point like this?
English
19
19
194
7.2K
Richard Heart
Richard Heart@RichardHeartWin·
Price is a function of marketing and whether people decide to press green or red buttons. The actual quality and utility of the software however is not. PulseChain absolutely annihilates Bitcoin from a technical and opportunity perspective, which should make the marketing easier.
English
48
252
1.4K
37.1K