HEX Famous

How to get RICH in #Crypto #HEX on #PulseChain

@FastAbdoul OKX wallet supports pulsechain so we still win

Translation: DeBank/Rabby probably did not drop PulseChain for political reasons. They likely dropped it because their infrastructure was getting hammered by PulseChain data/indexing load, especially storage reads (Infrastructure hard to work with). Fixable according to @SIN3R6Y ! Wen fix? Care to comment @InternetMoneyio ?

✅️ Don't send her an unsolicited Riff Raff freestyle videos 🕊

@worldlibertyfi Literally all u had to do was unlock his tokens he paid for lol

Today, we are filing a lawsuit against Justin Sun for defamation. Sun has launched a coordinated media smear campaign against World Liberty Financial and refused to stop even when confronted with the truth. Here's the story.🧵

@Hexologist31 Epic. Is that in the works

and if you liked that lets do the bridge while were at it

How hard with this look for go.hex . com And PulseX

@GigaTheMinter @RichardHeartWin Wait we only have 1 bridge?

@RichardHeartWin I made u a video ❤️ this is the original - the one you forked from - upgradabilityowner! It's a multisig wallet :) #code" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">etherscan.io/address/0x42F3… required 8/15 sigs not a single EOA it does not have a timelock thats true

Richard Heart teaches you how bridges work. Example. Chain A to Chain B. Coins lock on Chain A. MAGIC Coins mint on Chain B. What's this MAGIC step? Chain B doesn't know what's happening on Chain A, so TRUST must be introduced. You have to TRUST validators to not collude with each other to lie about what happened on Chain A. Validators could lie about how much went in on chain A, and inflation bug chain B, then some could bridge back the inflated coins and empty the original coins locked on Chain A. What if a validator dies? What if a validator gets hacked? What if a validator tries to get others to collude with him to lie? What if a validator holds his validating ransom. Some people think that there should be a timelock over the power to try and fix the above problems. LOL. What's the counter balance to the above problems? More trust. You might want some mechanism to add / remove, subtract the quantity of validators needed. In the end, every single bridge has social risk, just like every single chain has social risk. They're computers, run by humans, on networks, and none of those 3 things is perfect. You can only buy down the risk of the original sin of chain B not knowing the true state of chain A, by spreading validation geographically, and across parties and hope for the best, but you can't completely eliminate the risk. The largest hacks in crypto history have been bridge hacks. So now ask yourself, why in this bearest of bear markets does Richard have to teach you about bridges and risks again, for the umpteenth time? As though something has changed? I've been telling you these same exact things over and over again. But I guess some need reminding, or prefer to talk about risk in every thread about benefits. Makes you wonder. TLDR: All bridges are risk, and when done well, that risk appears to be far lower than centralized exchange risk. You're welcome for the education. Again. P.S. Some people have swapped bridged in tokens for native tokens, and enjoyed the experience. P.P.S. I think some folks find it far easier to post negatively than positively. If y'all one of those, work on yourself. Consider it personal development.

@FastAbdoul @RichardHeartWin Best game ever youtu.be/_ouejDOElfQ?si…

@RichardHeartWin I am willing to debate the merit of real time vs turn based RPGs.

Time for the cryfag beat down part two. Who's next?

I personally can't wait for the god candles but I also know that won't happen till eth probably hits 8k for the sake of sac value purposes. I do understand Gary's point of view. But I also understand your point of view about the risk. If u did bridge and park if anything happened that would be the end basically and extremely hard to recover.

Personally I don't like bridge risk, and I don't like stable coin admin key risk, but it sounds like you're trying to bait me, at elementary school level to uh, do what? Bridge lots of money in and let it sit? Perhaps you should lobby for me to bridge in and market buy instead? But that wouldn't really make sense for the argument you're making, because as noted in the P.P.S of my original post, when you swap from bridged to native, you're not actually using the bridge anymore are you? So just say it, say you want me to god candle. TLDR: Even if you don't use the bridge, you still have some risk because if a bridge gets rekt, it has market effects. P.S. Your weak post is basically cryfagging. You cry about things lamely, without really explaining what the problem is or what might solve it. Lame post. Do better. P.P.S. I am in the blockchain for replacing trust with poof where possible, and I prefer native tokens to bridged in tokens when possible.

@vajolleratzii @CryptoChat7 @RichardHeartWin Sir I think u are smoking crack. Rates are about to come down. End of year is the bull

@CryptoChat7 @RichardHeartWin Yeah and everyone will dump them the same way the second everyone realizes Bitcoin and Ethereum are going down the rest of this year

I’m probably the last person on #PulseChain who doesn’t blame @RichardHeartWin Every time he injected money it was sold down. Why would you keep wasting money when the holders will sell? Shakeout the scrubs and then he can inject more. We aren’t anywhere close yet $5m MC, Maybe

@LibertySwapFi But is pdai the fit?

Finally, they’re realizing this.

crypto desperately needs a decentralized stablecoin

@mrJackLevin @vende_diesel @gnoble79 Same here.

@vende_diesel @gnoble79 Perhaps you should just try it yourself. Otherwise keep watching the videos. I drive exclusively on FSD.

Last night was the biggest disaster in the history of Tesla. Let me walk you through what actually happened on that earnings call, because the headlines are doing you a disservice: Elon Musk got on the call and admitted (his words) that Hardware 3 "simply does not have the capability to achieve unsupervised FSD." He said he wished it were otherwise. He said the memory bandwidth is one-eighth of what Hardware 4 has. And that's the end of the conversation. Approximately 4 million Tesla vehicles on the road right now have Hardware 3. Many of those owners paid $8,000 to $15,000 for Full Self-Driving capability based on Musk's repeated promises (going back to 2016) that the hardware was sufficient for full autonomy. As recently as 2022, Musk was publicly assuring owners that HW3 had the processing power to get it done. BUT IT DIDN'T Those promises are now officially broken. The solution is a "discounted trade-in" toward a new car with Hardware 4. Not a refund or a free upgrade... A discount on buying ANOTHER Tesla. Investor Ross Gerber said it too - all HW3 owners got screwed, and with roughly 285,000 FSD purchasers affected, the potential liability runs into the BILLIONS. But that's not even the worst part. Musk was asked if the current FSD v14.3 was ready for unsupervised deployment. He said yes. Then immediately walked it back and admitted Tesla has "major architectural improvements" in the pipeline that would significantly improve safety. What he really means: the software isn't SAFE ENOUGH to deploy without a human watching. Full unsupervised FSD for consumer cars is pushed to Q4 2026. At the earliest... Maybe. How many times has this deadline been pushed? I've lost count. And trust me, I've seen a lot of broken promises. But this one takes the cake. Now let's talk about the numbers everyone is celebrating: Tesla reported $22.4 billion in revenue and $0.41 in non-GAAP earnings. A "double beat." The stock popped 4% after hours. Victory, right? WRONG Dig into the actual filing: The number one driver of operating income improvement wasn't cost reductions, wasn't volume growth, wasn't FSD revenue. It was - and Tesla listed this FIRST in their own shareholder letter - "one-time benefits related to warranty and tariffs." They released warranty reserves. They booked tariff refund windfalls. They stretched supplier payments by 10 days. They took on billions in new debt. Then they presented everything through non-GAAP metrics that strip out over $1 billion in stock-based compensation. GAAP net income was $477 million on $22.4 billion in revenue. That's a 2.1% net margin. On a $1.4 trillion market cap. Let me put that in perspective: 3.75 billion shares outstanding. Annualize the Q1 GAAP profit and you get roughly $1.9 billion. That's a trailing P/E ratio north of 700. Use the adjusted number - strip out stock comp, which is a REAL cost to shareholders through dilution - and you're still at around 250x earnings. All of this is extremely bad, but I didn't even talk about the CAPEX BOMB yet... 3 months ago, Tesla guided to "over $20 billion" in 2026 capital expenditure. Last night they raised it to over $25 billion. A $5 billion increase in a single quarter. That's 3x their historical annual capex run rate - $8.5 billion in 2025, $11.3 billion in 2024. The CFO confirmed on the call that Tesla expects NEGATIVE free cash flow for the rest of the year. So you have a company generating roughly $6 billion in annual free cash flow on a good year, and they're about to spend $25 billion. The math doesn't work. They will almost certainly need to issue equity. Which means dilution. Which means the $1.9 billion in annual earnings gets spread across even MORE shares. The core auto business is literally deteriorating in real time: Tesla delivered 358,000 vehicles in Q1 (missed estimates again). They produced 408,000. That's 50,000 cars sitting on lots that nobody bought. Inventory days jumped from 10 to 27 in just a few quarters. California (their most important US market) saw registrations crash 24% year over year. Their market share in the state fell from 9.2% to 7.7%. That's on top of a Q1 2025 that was ALREADY weak from Model Y retooling. They're declining off a decline. And here's what really kills the bull case... The entire valuation rests on robotaxis, Optimus robots, and autonomy. So let's put numbers on it: Waymo - the actual leader in autonomous driving with 15 million completed rides in 2025 alone, over 127 million autonomous miles driven, operating commercially across 6 US cities with plans to expand to 20 more - just raised $16 billion at a $126 billion valuation. That's the market's verdict on what the LEADING robotaxi company is worth. $126 billion. And Waymo is YEARS ahead of Tesla in actual deployment. Tesla has 3.75 billion shares outstanding. So even if you assign $126 billion in robotaxi value (giving Tesla full credit for matching Waymo despite being nowhere close) that's $33 a share. Add the auto business at generous auto-industry multiples, maybe $20 a share. Throw in energy storage and services, $10-15. Sum of the parts gets you to roughly $65-70 a share if you're feeling generous. Maybe $50 if you're not. The stock is $387. So what exactly are you paying for? You're paying for a STORY. You're paying for PROMISES that keep getting pushed back, technology that keeps falling short, and a business plan that requires spending $25 billion a year while the core product sells fewer units at declining margins in a market where California sales just fell 24% and the federal EV tax credit is gone. I managed the number one mutual fund in America. I founded two billion-dollar hedge funds. I've been doing this since 1981. And I am telling you: Tesla at $387 is one of the most egregious mispricings I have seen in my entire career. THE CRASH WILL BE EPIC

@GenFlynn @RepLuna Yeah... I think we can all agree even the frogs in Venezuela saw this coming with the whole navy parked outside. Inside info or not everyone saw it coming within months

Congresswoman @RepLuna , I respect your logic but for those who serve in the military, especially this individual, we hold ourselves to a much higher standard than those in Congress. Congress should not get away with insider trading nor should you hold office forever (ie., term limits). But this service member placed military lives at severe risk with his foolish decisions. He should be and likely will be considered for courts-martial and very severe punishment under the UCMJ—a system of government that is wholly different than what we have in our civilian society. It actually holds people accountable and it is generally very fair. @SecWar @SeanParnellASW

@ChairmanSelig @CFTC @SDNYnews Yawn. Look at senate and the house. This is ridiculous. The whole navy was literally parked outside. Literally everyone new it was coming

I’ve been crystal clear: anyone who engages in insider trading in any of our markets will face the full force of the law. Today, the @CFTC took parallel action with @SDNYnews to charge an individual with insider trading involving event contracts. The @CFTC won’t tolerate insider trading in our markets, and our Division of Enforcement will continue to vigilantly police our markets for any illegal actions. Read more ⬇️ cftc.gov/PressRoom/Pres…

@BillMelugin_ @Ninya615 OPSEC I mean the whole navy was parked outside. Nothing happening bro lol

@Ninya615 It’s insider trading essentially by profiting off of classified info but more importantly it’s a serious OPSEC violation. That raid could have gone very badly if the enemy somehow found out the U.S. was coming.

BREAKING: DOJ announces it has arrested a US Special Forces soldier who took part in the raid that captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro after the soldier allegedly pocketed $400,000 by betting more than $30,000 on Maduro’s removal on Polymarket. Name: GANNON KEN VAN DYKE

@StarPlatinum_ U are an idiot. Decentralized vs token contract functionality is a totally different thing lol

Centralization exposed inside Tron USDT 🚨 Here’s what is happening: Tether just executed the largest freeze in its history. More than $344,000,000 in USDT (TRC-20) blocked on Tron. By Tether itself. - Coordinated with OFAC and US law enforcement - Executed directly through the USDT smart contract - Funds are now visible but completely unusable This is how it works: - Tether has admin control over USDT contracts - Can blacklist any address - Can freeze balances instantly - Can permanently destroy funds Functions used: - addBlackList(address) - removeBlackList(address) - destroyBlackFunds(address) Now here’s where it gets interesting Timeline April 20 - Arbitrum freezes ~$71M linked to hackers April 21 - Justin Sun tweets: “the most decentralized blockchain in the world is Tron” April 23 - Tether freezes $344M on Tron No response from Justin Sun so far The irony writes itself Stay safe.

@shaneheartwin I love these. Superbowl ad yes

Do any of you even know what $HEX is? 🕊📜🤲🧎‍♂️

@LibertySwapFi @yourfriendSOMMI @BaconMoney420 Do u think that's going to happen?

@yourfriendSOMMI @BaconMoney420 When PLS is listed on Binance, we’ll see phenomenal FOMO coming into our chain.

❤️💛💚💙 🚨 JUST IN 🚨 Did Binance just hint at PulseChain, Richard Heart, and the "Heart StableCoin" (pDAI?)

@Grayscale Pulsechain

You don't own enough ___________.

@LibertySwapFi I like the idea. Drive traffic thru pulsechain

LibertySwap is excited to introduce StableSwap v1. StableSwap is built to provide deep liquidity for stablecoins, enabling seamless swaps between assets like DAI, USDC, USDT, USDS, and USD1. Users can swap across blockchains or within a single chain (such as PulseChain, Ethereum, or BNB Chain) quickly and efficiently. StableSwap is designed to be capital-efficient. Instead of locking liquidity across multiple blockchains, we primarily maintain liquidity on PulseChain and Ethereum while enabling instant movement of assets to other chains. This approach increases capacity and helps solve the liquidity constraints we previously experienced. The rollout will happen in 3️⃣ phases: 🎯StableSwap v1 Enables USDC (PulseChain) swaps to and from supported networks. Users can currently swap stablecoins between PulseChain and chains like Arbitrum, OP Mainnet, INK, and Unichain. Withdrawals from PulseChain to these networks are already live. Support for Solana and additional chains (Plume, Morph, Linea, Starknet, World Chain) is being deployed on our UI. 🎯StableSwap v2 Expands support to all major stablecoins across multiple blockchains, enabling broader cross-chain swaps for DAI, USDC, USDT, USD1, and other stablecoins. 🎯StableSwap v3 Introduces StablePool and StableSwap (DAI, USDC, USDT) within individual chains, including PulseChain, Ethereum, and BNB Chain. PulseChain will be the first. StableSwap will help maintain more consistent pricing across stablecoins on PulseChain.

PULSICANS!!!! $PLS I MISSED YOU ❤️❤️ I had to check on you today You have to do OVER 200X to ATH… Wow! Imagine if you had money to buy now, if you sold in Q4 Aah you didn’t because your messiah/influencers said 4 year cycle is broken and markets will keep rallying.. RT if you are bullish $PLS!!!!!!!

@stockplaymaker1 Actually people end up not using stops cause they are afraid of getting a PDT strike so they end up taking loses instead which may not recover lol

🚨Breaking: The SEC has approved getting rid of PDT rule 🤯 Now everyone under $25,000 can lose their full accounts $HOOD $BULL