Hamidreza Azizi

9.3K posts

Hamidreza Azizi banner
Hamidreza Azizi

Hamidreza Azizi

@HamidRezaAz

PhD | Visiting Fellow @SWPBerlin | Associate @Clingendaelorg | Iran, Middle East, Eurasia | Views my own | RTs not endorsement

Berlin Katılım Aralık 2012
753 Takip Edilen66.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Hamidreza Azizi
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz·
I am pleased to announce that my forthcoming book, The Axis of Resistance: Iran, Israel, and the Struggle for the Middle East, is included in @politybooks’ Spring 2026 catalogue and scheduled for publication in the coming year ⬇️
Hamidreza Azizi tweet mediaHamidreza Azizi tweet media
English
15
89
621
233.8K
نسق چی
نسق چی@nasaqchi·
@HamidRezaAz منم راهشو پیدا میکنم، بالاخره جنگ های نا منظم هم خودش نظمی داره.
فارسی
1
0
1
20
نسق چی
نسق چی@nasaqchi·
به‌روزرسانی جنگ ایران – شماره ۲۰ (تمرکز بر روایت راهبردی ایران): 🔹 تنگه هرمز در گفتمان تهران به‌طور فزاینده‌ای نه به‌عنوان یک ابزار موقتی در زمان جنگ، بلکه به‌عنوان اهرم دائمی قدرت ایران تعریف می‌شود. مقامات ایرانی به‌صراحت از یک نظام تنظیم‌گری پساجنگ صحبت می‌کنند که شامل دریافت عوارض عبور و هدایت مسیر کشتی‌ها تحت کنترل سپاه پاسداران است. هم‌زمان گزارش‌هایی وجود دارد مبنی بر اینکه یک «کریدور امن» برای برخی کشورها از طریق آب‌های سرزمینی ایران در حال اجراست. 🔹 در مقابل، تلاش‌های بین‌المللی برای مهار این روند در حال شکل‌گیری است. شش متحد آمریکا—بریتانیا، فرانسه، آلمان، ایتالیا، ژاپن و هلند—آمادگی خود را برای مشارکت در عملیات امنیت دریایی در تنگه اعلام کرده‌اند؛ موضوعی که به‌سمت بین‌المللی شدن تدریجی امنیت این آبراهه اشاره دارد، هرچند شکل دقیق این مشارکت هنوز مشخص نیست. 🔹 رویکرد ایران به تشدید تنش همچنان بر «تشدید عمودی» متمرکز است، نه «تشدید افقی» (گسترش نوع یا دسته اهداف). برای مثال، پس از حمله اسرائیل به پارس جنوبی، ایران با هدف قرار دادن زیرساخت‌های اصلی انرژی در سراسر خلیج فارس پاسخ داد. ادامه حملات به پایگاه‌های آمریکا نیز در همین چارچوب است؛ یعنی پاسخ به حمله به زیرساخت‌های نظامی ایران. تمرکز فعلاً بر افزایش شدت و مقیاس در همان دسته اهداف موجود است، نه ورود به حوزه‌های کاملاً جدید. 🔹 این منطق با حمله ایران به پالایشگاه حیفا تقویت شد؛ اقدامی که علی‌رغم پیام‌های بازدارنده آمریکا درباره عدم هدف‌گیری بیشتر زیرساخت‌های انرژی انجام شد و نشان داد تهران بر تحمیل خطوط قرمز خود تأکید دارد، نه پذیرش خطوط قرمز طرف مقابل. 🔹 بر اساس تحلیل کارشناسان ایرانی، رویکرد فعلی ایران بر سه عنصر کلیدی استوار است: «غیرقابل‌پیش‌بینی بودن»، «استراتژی مرد دیوانه» و افزایش اعتبار تهدیدها؛ مورد آخر از طریق کاهش فاصله زمانی بین هشدار و اقدام، با هدف اصلاح برداشت‌های گذشته ناشی از خویشتنداری. 🔹 زیرساخت‌های انرژی همچنان در مرکز درگیری قرار دارند. آسیب به تأسیسات ال‌ان‌جی رأس لفان قطر باعث اختلال جدی در بازار جهانی گاز شده و ممکن است بخش‌هایی از این مجموعه سال‌ها برای بازیابی کامل زمان نیاز داشته باشند. 🔹 در همین حال، ایران همچنان صادرات خود را حفظ کرده است. صادرات نفت از جزیره خارگ در حدود ۱.۱ تا ۱.۵ میلیون بشکه در روز ادامه دارد و افزایش ذخیره‌سازی در جاسک نشان‌دهنده آمادگی برای سناریوهای اختلال طولانی‌مدت است. 🔹 جنگ همچنین پویایی‌های اقتصادی جدیدی ایجاد کرده است. بحث‌ها در واشنگتن درباره اعطای معافیت برای حدود ۱۴۰ میلیون بشکه نفت ایران نشان‌دهنده فشار برای تثبیت بازار جهانی انرژی است، اما تهران اعلام کرده که همچنان چین را به‌عنوان مشتری اصلی خود در اولویت قرار خواهد داد. 🔹 از نظر نظامی، آمریکا اعلام کرده عملیات‌ها طبق برنامه پیش می‌رود و بیش از ۷۰۰۰ هدف مورد حمله قرار گرفته‌اند. با این حال، ارزیابی‌های ایرانی نشان می‌دهد که آمریکا تحت فشار در حال تطبیق تاکتیک‌های خود است؛ از جمله اتکا بیشتر به حملات از فاصله دور، پایگاه‌های منطقه‌ای و بمب‌افکن‌های دوربرد مستقر در اروپا. 🔹 حملات اسرائیل همچنان زیرساخت‌های صنعتی-نظامی ایران را هدف قرار می‌دهد، از جمله صنایع الکترونیک در شیراز؛ که نشان‌دهنده تلاش برای تضعیف اکوسیستم صنعتی ایران است. 🔹 هم‌زمان نشانه‌هایی از تطبیق تاکتیکی ایران دیده می‌شود. گزارش‌هایی از هدف قرار گرفتن یک جنگنده اف-۳۵—احتمالاً از طریق کمین پدافند هوایی—بحث‌هایی درباره بهبود بقاپذیری و تحول در تاکتیک‌های دفاع هوایی ایران ایجاد کرده است. 🔹 در سطح منطقه‌ای، حملات به مواضع آمریکا ادامه دارد. پایگاه‌هایی در اربیل و بحرین بار دیگر هدف قرار گرفته‌اند. 🔹 گزارش‌های تأییدنشده از شلیک راکت از خاک سوریه به سمت بلندی‌های جولان، احتمال فعال شدن یک جبهه جدید را مطرح می‌کند، هرچند مقیاس و هدف آن هنوز نامشخص است. 🔹 تنش‌ها میان ایران و امارات به‌شدت افزایش یافته است. روابط دیپلماتیک در حال وخامت است و تعلیق صدور ویزا، تعطیلی نهادهای ایرانی و گزارش‌هایی از بسته شدن سفارت‌ها نشان‌دهنده شکاف جدی در روابط است. 🔹 فشارهای امنیت داخلی در ایران همچنان بالاست. بازداشت‌های مرتبط با «جاسوسی» و فعالیت‌های شورشی، به‌ویژه در مناطق جنوب‌شرقی، ادامه دارد و نشان‌دهنده نگرانی از بی‌ثباتی داخلی هم‌زمان با جنگ است. 🔹 در عرصه دیپلماتیک، شکاف در شورای همکاری خلیج فارس ادامه دارد. عمان به‌دنبال کاهش تنش است، قطر موضعی متوازن‌تر دارد، در حالی که عربستان و به‌ویژه امارات رویکردی تقابلی‌تر در پیش گرفته‌اند.
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz

#Iran War Update No. 20 (focus on Iranian strategic narrative): 🔹The Strait of Hormuz is being increasingly framed in Tehran as a tool of Iranian leverage rather than a temporary wartime tactic. Iranian officials are openly discussing a post-war regulatory regime, including transit fees and IRGC-controlled routing. At the same time, there are reports that a “safe corridor” system is already being implemented for selected countries through Iran’s territorial waters. 🔹Meanwhile, international efforts to counter this are taking shape. Six U.S. allies U.S. allies – the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the Netherlands – have signaled readiness to support maritime security operations in the strait, pointing toward a gradual internationalization of the waterway’s security. However, the exact form of their involvement remains unclear. 🔹Iran’s approach to escalation remains centered on vertical escalation rather than horizontal (expanding target types/categories). When Israel struck South Pars, Iran responded by targeting major energy infrastructure across the Persian Gulf. Continued strikes on U.S. bases follow the same pattern, i.e., response to attacks on Iranian military infrastructure. The focus so far has been on escalating within existing categories of targets, increasing scale and impact, rather than opening entirely new domains. 🔹This logic was reinforced by Iran’s strike on the Haifa refinery despite U.S. messaging against further energy targeting, underlining Tehran’s emphasis on enforcing its own red lines rather than accepting those imposed by the adversaries. 🔹According to Iranian expert commentaries, Iran’s current approach rests on three key elements: unpredictability, a “madman strategy,” and making threats to the enemy more credible; the latter reflected in shortened gap between warning and action, aimed at “correcting past misperceptions” caused by restraint. 🔹Energy infrastructure remains at the center of the conflict. Damage to Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG facility has caused significant disruptions to global gas markets, with parts of the complex potentially requiring years to fully recover. 🔹At the same time, Iran continues to sustain its own exports. Oil shipments from Kharg Island remain ongoing at roughly 1.1 to 1.5 million barrels per day, while increased storage at Jask suggests preparation for prolonged disruption scenarios. 🔹The war is also driving new economic dynamics. Discussions in Washington about waivers for up to 140 million barrels of Iranian oil indicate mounting pressure to stabilize global energy markets, but Tehran signals it will continue prioritizing China as its main costumer. 🔹Militarily, the United States maintains that operations are progressing, with over 7,000 targets reportedly struck. However, Iranian assessments suggest U.S. operations are adapting under pressure, including greater reliance on stand-off strikes, regional bases, and long-range bomber missions from Europe. 🔹Israeli strikes continue to target Iran’s military-industrial base, including electronic industries in Shiraz, reflecting an ongoing effort to degrade Iran’s industrial ecosystem. 🔹At the same time, there are indications of Iranian tactical adaptation. Reports of an F-35 being hit, possibly through Surface-to-Air Missile ambush (SAMbush), have fueled discussion about improved survivability and evolving Iranian air defense tactics. 🔹Regionally, attacks on U.S. positions persist. Bases in Erbil and Bahrain have reportedly been targeted again by Iran and its Iraqi allies. 🔹Unconfirmed reports of rocket fire from Syrian territory toward the Golan Heights raise the possibility of another active front, although the scale and intent remain unclear. 🔹Tensions between Iran and the UAE have escalated sharply. Diplomatic relations are deteriorating, with visa suspensions, closures of Iranian institutions, and reports of embassy shutdowns signaling a significant breakdown in ties. 🔹Internal security pressures inside Iran remain high. Authorities continue arrests linked to “espionage” and insurgent activity, particularly in southeastern regions, reflecting ongoing concerns about internal destabilization alongside the ongoing war. 🔹Diplomatically, divisions within GCC persist. Oman continues to push for de-escalation, Qatar maintains a more balanced stance, while Saudi Arabia and especially the UAE are adopting increasingly confrontational positions toward Iran. 🔹China has maintained a cautious posture, emphasizing stability and energy security while avoiding alignment with either side. Beijing has so far refrained from calling directly on Iran to halt its attacks and instead, continues calling on all parties to end hostilities. 🔹Inside Iran, discussions about nuclear doctrine are re-emerging, including limited calls for weaponization or withdrawal from the NPT, although these remain on the margins for now. 🔹Overall, the war is increasingly being shaped by competing efforts to define the rules of escalation, with Iran attempting to formalize new realities on the ground – especially at the strait – while external responses remain fragmented and uncertain despite growing concern over maritime security.

فارسی
1
1
5
840
Hamidreza Azizi
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz·
@nasaqchi من باید ساعت انتشار رو تغییر بدم شما دچار ابهام راهبردی بشی!
فارسی
2
0
1
23
نسق چی
نسق چی@nasaqchi·
🔹 چین رویکردی محتاطانه اتخاذ کرده و بر ثبات و امنیت انرژی تأکید دارد، بدون آنکه به‌طور مستقیم با هیچ‌یک از طرف‌ها همسو شود. پکن تاکنون از درخواست مستقیم از ایران برای توقف حملات خودداری کرده و به‌جای آن از همه طرف‌ها خواسته به درگیری‌ها پایان دهند. 🔹 در داخل ایران، بحث‌ها درباره دکترین هسته‌ای دوباره مطرح شده، از جمله برخی درخواست‌های محدود برای تسلیحاتی شدن یا خروج از ان‌پی‌تی، هرچند این دیدگاه‌ها هنوز در حاشیه قرار دارند. 🔹 در مجموع، جنگ به‌طور فزاینده‌ای تحت تأثیر تلاش‌های رقابتی برای تعریف قواعد تشدید تنش قرار دارد؛ جایی که ایران در پی نهادینه‌سازی واقعیت‌های جدید—به‌ویژه در تنگه هرمز—است، در حالی که واکنش‌های خارجی با وجود نگرانی‌های فزاینده درباره امنیت دریایی، همچنان پراکنده و نامطمئن باقی مانده‌اند
فارسی
1
0
0
41
Hamidreza Azizi
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz·
#Iran War Update No. 20 (focus on Iranian strategic narrative): 🔹The Strait of Hormuz is being increasingly framed in Tehran as a tool of Iranian leverage rather than a temporary wartime tactic. Iranian officials are openly discussing a post-war regulatory regime, including transit fees and IRGC-controlled routing. At the same time, there are reports that a “safe corridor” system is already being implemented for selected countries through Iran’s territorial waters. 🔹Meanwhile, international efforts to counter this are taking shape. Six U.S. allies U.S. allies – the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the Netherlands – have signaled readiness to support maritime security operations in the strait, pointing toward a gradual internationalization of the waterway’s security. However, the exact form of their involvement remains unclear. 🔹Iran’s approach to escalation remains centered on vertical escalation rather than horizontal (expanding target types/categories). When Israel struck South Pars, Iran responded by targeting major energy infrastructure across the Persian Gulf. Continued strikes on U.S. bases follow the same pattern, i.e., response to attacks on Iranian military infrastructure. The focus so far has been on escalating within existing categories of targets, increasing scale and impact, rather than opening entirely new domains. 🔹This logic was reinforced by Iran’s strike on the Haifa refinery despite U.S. messaging against further energy targeting, underlining Tehran’s emphasis on enforcing its own red lines rather than accepting those imposed by the adversaries. 🔹According to Iranian expert commentaries, Iran’s current approach rests on three key elements: unpredictability, a “madman strategy,” and making threats to the enemy more credible; the latter reflected in shortened gap between warning and action, aimed at “correcting past misperceptions” caused by restraint. 🔹Energy infrastructure remains at the center of the conflict. Damage to Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG facility has caused significant disruptions to global gas markets, with parts of the complex potentially requiring years to fully recover. 🔹At the same time, Iran continues to sustain its own exports. Oil shipments from Kharg Island remain ongoing at roughly 1.1 to 1.5 million barrels per day, while increased storage at Jask suggests preparation for prolonged disruption scenarios. 🔹The war is also driving new economic dynamics. Discussions in Washington about waivers for up to 140 million barrels of Iranian oil indicate mounting pressure to stabilize global energy markets, but Tehran signals it will continue prioritizing China as its main costumer. 🔹Militarily, the United States maintains that operations are progressing, with over 7,000 targets reportedly struck. However, Iranian assessments suggest U.S. operations are adapting under pressure, including greater reliance on stand-off strikes, regional bases, and long-range bomber missions from Europe. 🔹Israeli strikes continue to target Iran’s military-industrial base, including electronic industries in Shiraz, reflecting an ongoing effort to degrade Iran’s industrial ecosystem. 🔹At the same time, there are indications of Iranian tactical adaptation. Reports of an F-35 being hit, possibly through Surface-to-Air Missile ambush (SAMbush), have fueled discussion about improved survivability and evolving Iranian air defense tactics. 🔹Regionally, attacks on U.S. positions persist. Bases in Erbil and Bahrain have reportedly been targeted again by Iran and its Iraqi allies. 🔹Unconfirmed reports of rocket fire from Syrian territory toward the Golan Heights raise the possibility of another active front, although the scale and intent remain unclear. 🔹Tensions between Iran and the UAE have escalated sharply. Diplomatic relations are deteriorating, with visa suspensions, closures of Iranian institutions, and reports of embassy shutdowns signaling a significant breakdown in ties. 🔹Internal security pressures inside Iran remain high. Authorities continue arrests linked to “espionage” and insurgent activity, particularly in southeastern regions, reflecting ongoing concerns about internal destabilization alongside the ongoing war. 🔹Diplomatically, divisions within GCC persist. Oman continues to push for de-escalation, Qatar maintains a more balanced stance, while Saudi Arabia and especially the UAE are adopting increasingly confrontational positions toward Iran. 🔹China has maintained a cautious posture, emphasizing stability and energy security while avoiding alignment with either side. Beijing has so far refrained from calling directly on Iran to halt its attacks and instead, continues calling on all parties to end hostilities. 🔹Inside Iran, discussions about nuclear doctrine are re-emerging, including limited calls for weaponization or withdrawal from the NPT, although these remain on the margins for now. 🔹Overall, the war is increasingly being shaped by competing efforts to define the rules of escalation, with Iran attempting to formalize new realities on the ground – especially at the strait – while external responses remain fragmented and uncertain despite growing concern over maritime security.
English
0
86
331
47.5K
Hamidreza Azizi retweetledi
Esfandyar Batmanghelidj
The strikes on Iran's Kharg Island and South Pars gas facilities make clear that Trump is being presented options to widen the war to critical infrastructure. But hitting Iran's economy won't help Trump win the war. My latest for @ForeignPolicy. foreignpolicy.com/2026/03/19/ira…
Esfandyar Batmanghelidj tweet media
English
7
56
158
12.6K
Hamidreza Azizi retweetledi
Robert A. Pape
Robert A. Pape@ProfessorPape·
The term “escalation trap” is now spreading. Our community is already ahead of it—understanding not just escalation, but the logic driving what comes next. I’ll map the next phase Sunday, Mar 22, 4pm CT on substack live briefing
Robert A. Pape tweet media
English
34
297
1K
50.3K
Hamidreza Azizi
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz·
@bobwebberlawyer Still very far from that point. It takes a few suicide drones from the northern shores to cause significant casualties among any troops stationed on the islands
English
0
0
1
21
Robert Webber
Robert Webber@bobwebberlawyer·
@HamidRezaAz - it would be easier, for various reasons, for GCC to use ground troops to hold Kharg and other SoH related islands than the US. GCC ground troops w/ US air cover and US special forces doing the initial work. It would be a long process but potentially difficult for a weakened Iran to overcome.
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz

And this has been at the core of Iran’s war strategy; that GCC involvement would not significantly change the situation on the ground, and would instead provide further justification to expand targeting of those countries.

English
1
0
0
131
Hamidreza Azizi retweetledi
Hossein Rassam
Hossein Rassam@rassam_hossein·
@HamidRezaAz @ReemRifai_ When the war finally ends, if the IRI is still standing, the neighbors would be revising much more than just their relations with Iran. And if it’s not standing, they would be faced with a new reality that again they need to prepare for.
English
2
2
12
5.1K
Hamidreza Azizi retweetledi
Omair Anas
Omair Anas@omairanas·
As @HamidRezaAz warned a few days ago, lethality of Iranian strikes has increased despite a decrease of number of strikes.
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim@academic_la

I talked to two Israeli sources on why Iranian launches continue to increase, despite US-Israeli claims that they have destroyed almost all of the launchers. Here is what they said: 1) The 90–95% drop in volume claimed by CENTCOM earlier in the month was probably a temporary lull as Iran repositioned its remaining launchers into hardened sites. Independent satellite analysis suggests that a significant portion of the "80% destruction" claimed by the IDF actually hit high-fidelity decoys. 2) Despite fewer launchers, the lethality per strike has increased. Iran's shift to cluster warheads has allowed a single missile to impact multiple locations simultaneously, compensating for the lower volume of launches 3) Iran has successfully set up mobile, underground units able to fire at steady rates. Iran used that quiet period to move their remaining ~100-120 heavy launchers into "Super-Hardened" facilities 4) Iran is utilizing its Zolfaqar and Dezful road-mobile launchers. These units move from hardened tunnels to pre-surveyed launch spots, fire, and return underground in under 10 minutes, often before coalition drones can re-task for a strike. 5) Because these launching units are decentralized, it is very hard for US and Israeli intelligence to get info on them. Israel and the United States do not have an answer to this problem. That is why they are trying escalation on energy sources instead. But that is backfiring.

English
0
4
24
8.7K
Hamidreza Azizi
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz·
@ReemRifai_ In fact, it‘s not a deterrence strategy as such. It‘s the failure of deterrence (=existential crisis) that has made them resort to extreme measure. Simply put their thinking: there‘s no long term if they don‘t survive the war
English
4
7
107
5.5K
Reem Rifai
Reem Rifai@ReemRifai_·
Longer term, Iran has significantly damaged its standing with its neighbors, shattered trust, and reaffirmed its status as a major threat and unstable actor in the region. Questionable deterrence strategy.
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz

There are people in #Iran’s strategic community already warning about this, but the existential mindset of the current military leadership of the Islamic Republic is laser-focused on ending this war without "defeat" and thinking about the longer term afterwards.

English
14
3
27
10.1K
Hamidreza Azizi retweetledi
Ibrahim Jalal | إبراهيم جلال
DATA: The IRGC’s escalatory rebound is confirmed. The stabilisation phase is over. Over 16–18 Mar, average daily volume reached 153+ launches — a ~74% surge from the stabilisation phase average of 88+ 🔹~123+ drones/day (~80%) 🔹~30+ missiles/day (~20%) 18 Mar recorded the rebound phase’s highest daily volume: 🔹 140+ drones 🔹 40+ missiles​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Iran has recalibrated its drone-led asymmetric attrition, with heavier missile deployment against vital energy & logistics assets to maximise coercive disruptions. Israel’s targeting of Iran’s energy assets has only shaped this trajectory.
Ibrahim Jalal | إبراهيم جلال tweet media
Ibrahim Jalal | إبراهيم جلال@IbrahimJalalYE

DATA: The shock phase in IRGC launch volume is gone. But since compression and stabilisation (9–15 Mar): 🔹Missiles barely moved 🔹Drones up ~58% Iran is recalibrating costly, distributed attrition at sustainable tempo Today’s data will tell us more about the rebound’s nature

English
12
98
324
55.1K
Bassam Barabandi بسام بربندي
"تم تعيين حسين دهقان أمينًا للمجلس الأعلى للأمن القومي… 🔹 هذا القرار يعكس شيئًا واضحًا: النظام في إيران يتجه أكثر نحو القيادة العسكرية، وليس السياسية. دهقان ليس رجل سياسة تقليدي، بل رجل أمن وعسكر عاش سنوات في الحرس الثوري. 🔹 هو ليس فقط عسكريًا، بل كان أيضًا مسؤولًا عن مؤسسات اقتصادية كبيرة، وهذا يعني أنه يجمع بين النفوذ العسكري والمالي في نفس الوقت. 🔹 ما يحدث اليوم هو أن أصحاب الخلفية العسكرية أصبحوا في قلب القرار، بدل السياسيين. وهذا يعكس طبيعة المرحلة: مرحلة أمن وحرب أكثر من كونها سياسة. 🔹 دهقان لا يُعرف بأنه مفكر استراتيجي كبير، بل شخص ينفذ القرارات. وهذا قد يعني أن القرار الحقيقي يُتخذ في مكان آخر، بينما يتم التركيز على التنفيذ الصارم على الأرض. 🔹 تعيينه أيضًا ليس صدفة، بل جزء من ترتيب أكبر، حيث تقترب الشخصيات العسكرية من بعضها أكثر، مثل قاليباف وأحمد وحيدي، وكأن هناك فريقًا واحدًا يمسك بكل الخيوط. 🔹 حتى الأسماء الأخرى التي كان ممكن أن تتولى المنصب، مثل سعيد جليلي، تم استبعادها لتجنب أي صراع داخلي. الهدف يبدو واضحًا: لا خلافات، لا منافسة، فقط توحيد للقرار. 🔹 الرسالة الأهم من كل ذلك: النظام يضيق خياراته بنفسه، ويعتمد أكثر على العسكر، وعلى الولاء والانضباط، خاصة في وقت الحرب.” @HamidRezaAz
العربية
2
1
5
519
Hamidreza Azizi
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz·
I deleted the post about Hossein Dehghan‘s appointment, as it was officially denied by the Mostazafan Foundation, which he heads. I will provide an update if there is any further news about him or the new secretary of the SNSC.
English
0
9
59
9.7K
Sina Azodi
Sina Azodi@Azodiac83·
@HamidRezaAz They need to promote someone to the rank of field marshal and the military dictatorship would be complete. Field marshal safavi :))
English
1
0
1
359
Hamidreza Azizi retweetledi
Babak Vahdad
Babak Vahdad@BabakVahdad·
Important: "Rather than “proportional” responses, Tehran increasingly appears to be operating under a new strategy of escalation above the threshold set by its adversaries, aiming to correct what it sees as past miscalculations caused by restraint." #Iran #IranWar
Hamidreza Azizi@HamidRezaAz

#Iran War Update No. 19 (focus on Iranian strategic narrative): 🔹The war has entered a clear energy infrastructure phase following the strike on Iran’s South Pars gas field. The attack has caused disruption in Iran’s gas production and marked a shift toward targeting the country’s economic backbone rather than purely military assets. 🔹Iran responded by expanding retaliation across the Persian Gulf. Strikes on energy and industrial infrastructure, including major facilities such as Ras Laffan in Qatar, indicate a deliberate strategy to regionalize the energy confrontation and globalize its impacts by imposing extra pressure on the energy market. 🔹This shift is also reflected in Iranian strategic thinking. Rather than “proportional” responses, Tehran increasingly appears to be operating under a new strategy of escalation above the threshold set by its adversaries, aiming to correct what it sees as past miscalculations caused by restraint. 🔹At the same time, the risk of a more direct U.S. intervention is rising. Recent discussions in Washington reportedly include scenarios involving special operations forces targeting Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles or seizing strategic locations such as Kharg Island, although large-scale ground operations remain uncertain. 🔹Iran has responded by signaling preparedness for such scenarios. IRGC’s special/commando force deployments in Iran’s southern regions and its public messaging emphasize readiness for ground confrontation, while some Iranian analysts even argue that a limited U.S. ground presence could be turned into a strategic advantage by exposing American forces to direct attack. 🔹Israeli operations continue to focus on decapitation strikes. The latest case was intelligence minister Esmail Khatib whose death in Israeli strikes was confirmed by the Iranian government. 🔹At the same time, Israeli strikes are expanding geographically. Attacks on northern provinces of Gilan and Mazandaran suggest a widening target set. 🔹Iran’s missile campaign against Israel continues in a sustained attritional pattern. Smaller but frequent salvos, including the use of cluster munitions, appear aimed at maintaining psychological pressure and gradually degrading Israeli air defenses. 🔹Hezbollah’s involvement also persists at a steady pace, with continued rocket and missile fire into northern Israel. Some reports indicate that longer-range missiles have now been used to strike areas near Gaza, potentially aimed at enabling a reactivation of armed activity there and suggesting a higher degree of coordination with Iranian operations. 🔹In Iraq, the conflict is deepening further. U.S. strikes on PMF units and retaliatory militia attacks are continuing, while disruptions to Iranian gas exports following the South Pars strike are directly affecting Iraq’s electricity supply. 🔹Regional reactions are becoming more pronounced but remain divided. Gulf states have condemned Iranian strikes on energy infrastructure, with Saudi Arabia warning of stronger responses, while Oman continues to emphasize de-escalation. 🔹At the same time, Qatar’s decision to expel Iranian military attachés highlights growing concern even among states that have maintained relatively stable ties with Tehran. 🔹Global economic effects are intensifying. Oil prices surged above $110 per barrel following the South Pars attack and subsequent Iranian strikes, reflecting a growing geopolitical risk premium tied to energy infrastructure. 🔹Iran continues to sustain oil exports despite the conflict. High prices and continued sales, primarily to China, are generating significant revenue, reinforcing Tehran’s ability to maintain its war effort. 🔹Inside Iran, the internal security dimension remains a central concern. Authorities have intensified crackdowns, including arrests and even executions for alleged espionage, while maintaining strong public mobilization of their supporters to deter unrest. 🔹At the same time, Iranian officials are increasingly framing the war as part of a broader transformation of the regional order. Statements from both the IRGC and the army (Artesh) suggest a shared view that U.S. influence in the region is declining. 🔹Another emerging issue is Iran’s nuclear program. While there is no confirmed policy shift, recent remarks by Iranian officials highlight uncertainty around the future of the longstanding prohibition on nuclear weapons by Ali Khamenei. Iranian foreign minister says that the new Supreme Leader has not yet clarified its position on this issue. 🔹Overall, the conflict is entering a phase where infrastructure warfare, leadership targeting, and potential ground operation scenarios are beginning to intersect, making escalation less predictable and harder to contain.

English
0
22
86
12.5K
Hamidreza Azizi retweetledi
Hamidreza Azizi retweetledi
Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش
A brief summary of last night’s events: A. Iran emerged with the upper hand. It demonstrated once again that it will not hesitate to raise the level of escalation to defend its strategic assets — without any retreat on the issue of the Strait of Hormuz. This was entirely predictable. B. Yet another indication that this war lacks a coherent, pre-planned strategy. Once the regime did not collapse early on, it is no longer clear what the overarching strategy actually is. C. Trump was aware of the strike, but chose to look the other way once tensions escalated. This reflects an ongoing gap between Washington which may still be interested in preserving a future-facing Iran and Israel, whose approach appears aimed at systematically degrading the country’s entire infrastructure. D. The strike itself seems to have been driven by frustration: Iran is not yielding, and there is a desire to force outcomes (such as opening the Strait of Hormuz) without committing ground forces — and before external pressure brings the campaign to a halt. E. The strategic failure so far leaves Trump facing a difficult choice: escalate dramatically, potentially including boots on the ground, or move to stop the campaign now. F. At this stage, the fundamental questions remain unanswered: What is the ultimate objective? What are the exit ramps? What does success even look like? G. Instead, the conflict is drifting into a war of attrition — with no clear signs of regime collapse in Iran. Meanwhile, the president, having committed to the idea that Iran has effectively capitulated, may find it difficult to disengage while facing a visible disadvantage in the maritime arena and no resolution to the nuclear issue. Bottom line, last night’s events underscored just how unstructured this campaign has become — lacking strategic clarity, long-term planning, and a defined end state. At the same time, they exposed growing gaps between Israel and the United States, gaps that may widen further if similar outcomes repeat. And as always..just because something is operationally feasible does not mean it is strategically wise. One more point that must be stated clearly — Iran is not close to capitulating. #IranWar
Barak Ravid@BarakRavid

🚨After the first Iranian missile strike, Qatari officials contacted White House envoy Steve Witkoff, CENTCOM commanders and other senior Trump administration officials and demanded to know whether the U.S. had prior knowledge of the Israeli strike, per source with knowledge

English
55
576
2K
645K