Ricardo Sanchez

@FinanceFreeman @opentensor @kaspaunchained One is fair launched. One’s a scam.

Bittensor & Kaspa's Key Difference - FOR NOW! I am CAUTIOUSLY Optimistic. $TAO $KAS @opentensor @kaspaunchained

@anbrandenburger People have played around with this before but we need (or at the time) needed a way to pull mempool delta - not just the entire list. Otherwise it’s way too much info for the node to provide. Plus clients need to handle far too much data on every update.

Can someone do this, but for Kaspa???

@realvijayk @kasmediadotcom It’s not a lack of security budget acknowledgement; it’s the lack of acknowledgement that they have no solution.

@kasmediadotcom They don't acknowledge they have a security budget problem. First step is acknowledgement.

And how will they solve the security budget when this happens? ;) Either Bitcoin utilizes Kaspa to survive, or Kaspa will reign supreme.

@IzioDev I remember when 4vCPU and 16GB ram wasn’t enough. Great to see progress.

3,000 tx/s with a 2vCPU - 10GB RAM low tier server. Node is running perfectly smooth, I can interact with it to check my balances and UTXOs, I don't need any explorers for that. If you see indexers/explorers/apps failing, maybe they should increase the processing capacity.

@kheavyhash @Radical_Ed_Bad @Arvolear Jokes aside, I am _absolutely_ referring to github.com/kaspanet/kips/…

@HocusLocusT @Radical_Ed_Bad @Arvolear Your form of simplicity is relative

UTXO-based smart contracts are complex and difficult to comprehend. That's why we built Simplex. To make the life of a Simplicity developer a tiny bit easier. 100% rust. Now in alpha. Ready for use.

@TaikiMaeda2 It’s not worth it. Worst of the PoS landscape.

can someone $TAO pill me

@Radical_Ed_Bad @Arvolear Could be of interest to @IzioDev @manyfest_

@Radical_Ed_Bad @Arvolear No. Kaspa decided to not go the simplicity route. But, a similar approach could be taken for silver-script.

@realvijayk @FinanceFreeman If you’re bullish on AI I dunno why you wouldn’t just go for another centralized solution. You’re brainwashed if you think Tao is ‘fair’.

Have you actually used $TAO? This is my hesitation as I truly want to try the AI. I don't have conviction to buy this until I actually try the AI. For example, I bought bitcoin after I tried it. Then I bought $KAS after I tried it. I want to buy $TAO because I'm bullish on AI. But I want to try it first as a user.

Potential $TAO breakout sending us to $300 🚀

@Lennobeer Absolutely not.

DOES ANYONE ELSE THINK THAT $TAO IS A $100,000 COIN??

@KeystoneWallet @p4bpj @IzioDev @IzioDev is the GOAT

Shoutout to @IzioDev for the lightning-fast infrastructure support 🏗️ With the “no_std” library ready, running Kaspa code on Keystone hardware wallets is a breeze ✨ When builders help builders, everyone ships faster 💪

@KaspaSilver @realvijayk @BTCForevercast @thekaspaonion @kastunes @BrockDAG_kas I would encourage you to rethink this.

@HocusLocusT @realvijayk @BTCForevercast @thekaspaonion @kastunes @BrockDAG_kas If its not being attacked at all then I would say yes. Obviously it should be measured over a good period of time. I just look at something like BCH that is still kicking even despite being attacked a few times. What matters is cost-to-attack relative to potential gain.

Kaspians, what say you to this? @thekaspaonion @realvijayk @KaspaSilver .@kastunes @BrockDAG_kas

@KaspaSilver @realvijayk @BTCForevercast @thekaspaonion @kastunes @BrockDAG_kas So if block rewards dwindle and we only have 5k in fees per day but kaspa is not attacked - we can claim it’s secured by 5k a day?

@HocusLocusT @realvijayk @BTCForevercast @thekaspaonion @kastunes @BrockDAG_kas I am not saying that is what it needs. I am saying right now its secured with getting $80K daily right now.

@KaspaSilver @realvijayk @BTCForevercast @thekaspaonion @kastunes @BrockDAG_kas Who says kaspa only needs 30M a year to be secure? If I remember hashdags estimate was 300-500M.

@HocusLocusT @realvijayk @BTCForevercast @thekaspaonion @kastunes @BrockDAG_kas I think there is a good point in Matthew's video. There isn't a magic number of how much money must come in from fees to qualify bitcoin as sustainable. Its not it made $32M in the last 24 hours and it must do that or more forever to remain secure. Kaspa is secured with $80K.

@KaspaSilver @realvijayk @BTCForevercast @thekaspaonion @kastunes @BrockDAG_kas It’s not simply about ‘being adopted’. Base layer btc technically cannot handle ‘adoption’. Unless adoption is regular hundreds dollar+ fees. At least kas can easily scale past this.

@BTCForevercast @thekaspaonion @realvijayk @kastunes @BrockDAG_kas Essentially we have to hope Bitcoin gets adopted. Its no different than Kaspa other than Kaspa has much more attractable use cases that is not only monetary. In regards to centralized mining pools I think Bitcoin will never solve this with its current block rate.

@Chris_Hutch7 @hashdag @0xJennn @chepurnoy Chris please NO

@hashdag @0xJennn @chepurnoy Mr Y have you looked into Bittensor $TAO?

Let agents to do GPU mining and build economies on top of that! $ERG

@adamobrien @LukeDashjr This is an embarrassing question tbh.

@LukeDashjr So it fails when the governments turn off the internet?

Jack Dorsey built a protocol that sends bitcoin over bluetooth mesh networks. No internet. No cell towers. Peer to peer, device to device. Wanna know what bitcoin looks like in a scenario where governments shut down the internet? It looks like that. The people betting against bitcoin's sovereignty because "the government controls the internet" are fighting the last war!!

@hashlockfinance What fees will hashlock add to the atomic swap?

Hashlock solves this. $KAS, $ETH

@Kaspa_KEF The duality of KEF, fund the whole ecosystem but make products no one wants to use.

We heard questions raised about the stable coin bridge fees, and here are some clarifications: 1. $10 is a one-time fixed amount (not a %). If you bridge in&out 20U, the bridge cost is 50%. If you bridge in&out 200U, the fee is 5%. If you bridge in&out 20000U, the fee is 0.05%. 2. Fee Standards: here are fees of other birgde services in the picture. $10 is a lot comparing to the very low L1 TX cost, thanks to the excellent #kaspa technology. Unfortunately, $10 is still cheap for EVM chain brigdes. 3. Fees collected by @Kaspa_KEF will be used to support #Kaspa L1 initiatives as we always do: kaspafoundation.org/#/projects ------ @oneforonehaha asked us to add his comments, too lol: "@KaspaSilver asked 'supposedly', and it smells again like a moral question. It seems the real question asks 'is this ethical pricing?' I believe it is. The fee is transparent and is fair to market players; there can be competition, and anyone can build a bridge with lower fees and sell that service. The implication here is concerning: some seem to think that they should enjoy free/non-profit services from devs/builders/infrastructure providers, while some other seem to simply think L1 is much cheaper. Well, (1) I love #kaspa L1, too but (2) L1 is cheaper because miners are "service providers". The TX fees are not enough for miners to offset their costs [knock knock the security budget problem comes again!], and we are all taking advantage of the low fees in that regard. wdyt @KaspaSilver?" ^

@KasperoLabs ciph_msg is Kasia / kachat

Here's the full analysis: kaspahero.com/public/index.h…

I built a live Kaspa payload scanner - intercepts every transaction, decodes what's inside. Here's what 12 hours of network activity looks like: