R1ns3d

memecoin trader Jack Duval tries to "onboard" a stock day trader streamer but the guy thinks Jack is trying to scam him "guys I know people are coming in from Jack's stream but make sure your DMs are off because they are probably going to try to scam you with memecoins" 😭

No crying in the Casino. Making it all back.

Woke up this morning to a $1.2mil portfolio. This started as a $38k joke 2 years ago. I posted it all here on X. I hope some of you followed and made money too. I’m in disbelief and maybe that’s the time to sell but I promised I won’t till Nancy Pelosi sells. Hopefully that’s not a mistake. Anyway happy Halloween 🫶🎃

YouTube is BANNING CRYPTO & NFTs starting November 17 But not fully. Youtube just changed its rules, and it’s going to DIRECTLY impact blockchain, NFT, and web3 gaming content across Youtube and Google YouTube now classifies “online gambling with digital goods that have monetary value” under its gambling policy : "This includes NFTs, tokens, skins, and in-game items that can be bought, sold, or traded for any monetary value or real money If your video depicts, promotes, or facilitates gameplay where players can win, lose, stake, or wager assets with real-world value, it’s now considered gambling content, expect takedowns, strikes, or age restrictions" They’re also tightening rules on social casino content, casino-style games like slots or roulette or any other gambling content will now be age-restricted, EVEN IF no real money is used This policy goes further though - Tutorials showing mints, wallet connections, or token purchases tied to assets with monetary value might get flagged - Sponsored content promoting token-based gameplay, drops, or marketplaces could violate ad and gambling rules So even if you’re not running a gambling site, your web3 integrations can trigger the same penalties; age restriction, removal and strikes In short ✅Gameplay = mostly safe ⚠️Anything that looks like staking, earning, or cashing out = high risk 💀Sponsored NFT/token videos = likely restricted or removed Tag a creator who should know about this ASAP

Re-opened my $MON Short. My reasoning is simple: - Too many CT 'KOLs' posting 2-10k USD $MON allocations (at current valuation) for contributing absolutely nothing to the project. Jito days are over, and even then you had to at least use the project. - $MON Claimers who feel the project is overvalued are likewise going to short here to lock in their bag at this extended valuation. - $MON team is Serial Milkers. They LOVE to hype with marketing. Tease you endlessly like a High School Girlfriend. Meanwhile we already see their insiders trading 'When Airdrop?' markets on Polymarket to lock in guaranteed profits. They have been working on this overhyped un-launched chain for years, with millions spent on R&D, Marketing, Discord operations, 'community operations', 'interns', etc....AND they have investors... And what do investors want to do after having their money locked up for 4 years during a bullmarket where $NVDA is up over 10x in that time, Gold is breaking out of 10yr ATH's, and people are shouting that the 4yr cycle in crypto is over? They want to SELL. Everyone on this team (devs, community, marketing, investors) wants to take some cash (and who can blame them honestly?). - FDV is probably overinflated. Berachain is a comparable we can look at. Albeit, a bit less hype, but they were also very good marketers and Serial Milkers. They also gave the majority of their allocations to team, NFT holders, and other people who would brag on CT....if I recall correctly, I think their Testnet participants got peanuts. Sound similar to $MON? (Again - they are giving away huge allocations to people on Twitter who did nothing for the project, never talked about the project until a month ago, meanwhile the team milked discord users for 3 years and testnet users for a year....). Anyways - $BERA launched around 3bil FDV in Feb into a market with arguably similar sentiment... $BERA is down about 75% from its peak and collapsed about 50% within a couple days of launching... - At 5.5bil FDV, $MON would launch at a higher valuation than $DOT, $AAVE, $PEPE, $NEAR, $APT, $ARB, $POL ($MATIC), $ATOM, $SEI, $KAS, etc.... Should $MON be valued higher than these projects? Honestly, their marketing and current hype is probably better than everything listed above, but at the end of the day they don't even have their mainnet launched yet and all these above projects (besides maybe $DOT) have some level of active users, network effects, a track record of not going to 0, and varying degrees of Product Market Fit. What would invalidate? - $MON delaying their launch, $BTC and $ETH making new ATHs in a devious December Santa Rally, 'Animal Spirits' returning to the market, and then $MON launching right in the middle of a retail/dumb money ferver. - $MON team figuring out a way to control the supply such that huge amounts can't be dumped (not sure how this would be done, but it would not surprise me at all for $MON Team to make most user allocations vested over some ridiculous time period... but honestly this is bearish too for sentiment and I'd expect that to drive even more shorting on perps)