Jeohdi

73.2K posts

Jeohdi banner
Jeohdi

Jeohdi

@HomeCookedMeel

What’s a limitation?

Mount Myōboku, NJ Katılım Nisan 2011
868 Takip Edilen782 Takipçiler
Jeohdi retweetledi
PartiKing
PartiKing@parti_king·
🚨 legal update 🚨 • attempted criminal homicide: 15–60 years • firearm charge enhancement: mandatory 6 years if convicted • aggravated assault: 3–15 years • reckless endangerment: 3–15 years • bond set at: $1.25 million 😳 more updates expected soon
PartiKing tweet mediaPartiKing tweet media
English
512
513
7.5K
651.1K
Jeohdi retweetledi
Field Marshal of the Han Dynasty
“I have black friends so I’m not racist” has always been an invalid argument created for distraction.
English
422
820
16.3K
96.4K
Jeohdi
Jeohdi@HomeCookedMeel·
I love this
English
0
0
0
38
Jeohdi
Jeohdi@HomeCookedMeel·
?!?!?!?
ZXX
0
0
0
51
Jeohdi retweetledi
Jeohdi retweetledi
Janerius Wickerson
Janerius Wickerson@TheMSeries1·
No amount of words can convey how far behind this country will be in every avenue for a number of years because of this administration and everyone associated with them with stuff like this happening.
Pubity@pubity

Donald Trump has fired the entire National Science Board, all 24 members, all at once. The board was responsible for deciding which scientific projects America should pursue and helping to direct the nation's technological future.

English
732
21.6K
96.7K
2.2M
Jeohdi
Jeohdi@HomeCookedMeel·
This is crazy
English
0
0
0
71
Jeohdi
Jeohdi@HomeCookedMeel·
Duh, literally.
AI Highlight@AIHighlight

🚨BREAKING: Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper that should be uncomfortable reading for every CEO automating their workforce right now. The argument is straightforward. Every company replacing workers with AI is also eliminating its own future customers. Laid off workers stop spending. Enough of them stop spending and nobody can afford to buy anything. The companies that fired everyone end up selling into an economy with no purchasing power left. Every executive can see this. The math is not complicated. But here is why nobody stops. If you do not automate, your competitor does. They cut costs, lower prices, take your market share, and you collapse anyway. So every company automates knowing it is collectively destructive because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives. The researchers proved this is a Prisoner's Dilemma playing out in real time. The numbers are already moving. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year. Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that within the next year the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI. Goldman Sachs deployed a coding tool that lets one engineer do the work of five. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 and AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half those cases. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income does not change a single company's incentive to automate. Capital income taxes adjust profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human. Collective bargaining cannot hold because automating is always the dominant strategy. They also identified what they call a Red Queen effect. Better AI does not solve the problem, it accelerates it. Every company chases faster automation to gain market share over rivals but at the end everyone has automated equally, the gains cancel out, and the only thing left is more destroyed demand. The one thing the math says could work is a Pigouvian automation tax. A per-task charge that forces companies to account for the demand they destroy each time they replace a worker. The conclusion is that this is not a transfer of wealth from workers to owners. Both sides lose. Workers lose income. Companies lose customers. It is a deadweight loss with no market mechanism to stop it on its own.

English
0
0
0
125
Jeohdi retweetledi
AI Highlight
AI Highlight@AIHighlight·
🚨BREAKING: Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper that should be uncomfortable reading for every CEO automating their workforce right now. The argument is straightforward. Every company replacing workers with AI is also eliminating its own future customers. Laid off workers stop spending. Enough of them stop spending and nobody can afford to buy anything. The companies that fired everyone end up selling into an economy with no purchasing power left. Every executive can see this. The math is not complicated. But here is why nobody stops. If you do not automate, your competitor does. They cut costs, lower prices, take your market share, and you collapse anyway. So every company automates knowing it is collectively destructive because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives. The researchers proved this is a Prisoner's Dilemma playing out in real time. The numbers are already moving. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year. Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that within the next year the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI. Goldman Sachs deployed a coding tool that lets one engineer do the work of five. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 and AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half those cases. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income does not change a single company's incentive to automate. Capital income taxes adjust profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human. Collective bargaining cannot hold because automating is always the dominant strategy. They also identified what they call a Red Queen effect. Better AI does not solve the problem, it accelerates it. Every company chases faster automation to gain market share over rivals but at the end everyone has automated equally, the gains cancel out, and the only thing left is more destroyed demand. The one thing the math says could work is a Pigouvian automation tax. A per-task charge that forces companies to account for the demand they destroy each time they replace a worker. The conclusion is that this is not a transfer of wealth from workers to owners. Both sides lose. Workers lose income. Companies lose customers. It is a deadweight loss with no market mechanism to stop it on its own.
AI Highlight tweet media
English
438
3.2K
10.3K
2.2M
Jeohdi
Jeohdi@HomeCookedMeel·
ZXX
0
0
0
83
Jeohdi retweetledi
Current Report
Current Report@Currentreport1·
BREAKING: 24 members of Congress have expressed support for impeaching President Trump or invoking the 25th Amendment to transfer presidential powers to the Vice President.
Current Report tweet mediaCurrent Report tweet media
English
2.8K
15.3K
88.3K
4.8M