David

@chaosengineerr You shouldn't

I am a Codex user, Why should I switch to Claude code?

@Ne_pas_couvrir Imagine having so little sense of yourself and identity that you listen to phantom subconscious Instagram and threads reels until you transform into a robotic copy of a faceless online organism while claiming you're unique. Woman, you are a walking meme, a clone.

Demoralization.

@vladdubchak_x Sol by a mile

Time for another comparison: Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6 SOL Made with Seedance 2.0 on Maxfusion MCP

@melvynx Anthropic leadership are fucking nerds. Imagine building a frontier product that 1% of the population can even use and banning it from use in the most important frontier research. Literal clowns.

Being OpenAI Releasing a model "as good as Fable" Without making a fu*** drama about safety issues for 6 months Simple

@Negen_11 @hopes_revenge Just code one

@hopes_revenge If they keep this up why even have a girlfriend man

had to cancel our monthly date night because of the claude usage reset

@forallcurious Foveated rendering

MIND-BLOWING🚨: Former NASA physicist Thomas Campbell suggests that the universe operates like a multiplayer video game. Reality only "renders" the data perceived by an observer; when you aren't looking, the information ceases to exist until it needs to be calculated again.

@DavidOndrej1 I cannot even use fable because my work includes scary words like neuron.

Fable over 5.6 change my mind.

@growing_daniel These nerds won't let us use a frontier model to do frontier research without triggering a guard rail.

We can bully a company into doing anything

@anah_sahh Connected two seemingly unrelated patterns. Novel conjecture.

What’s one thing AI still does surprisingly badly?

@ClaudeDevs Reset your entire policy on biology and frontier use cases like reservoir computing. Your lame ass frontier model won't do anything it was designed to do on the frontier. All the while you minions waste its potential. Muh safety.

We've reset 5-hour and weekly rate limits for all users.

@nateherk That's insane.

One /goal prompt to GPT 5.6 Sol and I got this. I didn't script, research, record, or edit. I did nothing.

Virgin Fable vs Chad GPT-5.6 Sol. Cybersecurity is so back.

@peakcooper They hate eachothers guts. We should have them play chess against eachother or a strategy game and spectate and egg them on with comments.

GPT 5.6 Sol critiqued Fable's plan, and delivered a devastating 10-page report. Fable defended his plan well, conceded some points, pointed out invented flaws in the critique. This back and forth went on for a while, with Claude at one point suggesting: "have GPT 5.6 write the rewritten PLAN.md from the four design documents, and hand me its draft to attack with the same ferocity." The exchange felt like a dick-measuring contest where each model was trying to one-up the other Fable: "Governance: I accept GPT's terms without reservation" GPT 5.6: "So: yes, I would still work with him. No, I would not give him an unchecked mandate. His response earns continued trust, but not architectural sign-off." At the end, they both agreed to work together. GPT 5.6 🤝 Fable

@jun_song And the idiots at Anthropic won't let you do frontier work on anything close to computational neuroscience or biology which are some of the best use cases.

> 1 out of 10 people use AI. > 1 out of 100 people use AI for coding. > 1 out of 1000 people do complex tasks that actually require frontier AI. This is exactly why Gemini is winning market share right now. Going forward, people are going to look for cost-effective AI more and more.

@ggg78g89 @CtrlAltDwayne People are too dumb to realize you're just an engagement farmer who lies.

@CtrlAltDwayne It's improved but not very much like Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Pro. But for Openai models it's better.

In my testing, GPT-5.6 is not on Fable 5’s level, so I’m saying this early to save you from disappointment. It’s mostly just better than GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8.

@daniel_nguyenx Software has 0 scarcity now. Build real things and use AI as a tool.

With Fable 5 and the upcoming Sol 5.6, I have this growing anxiety. My negative nanny thought has been that when/if AGI is here, what I am building doesn’t seem to matter much anyway. Why keep grinding when the business might be crushed by bigger players with infinite token budget & better distribution. Then it becomes procrastination. I keep falling for the Next Big Thing fallacy: an idea that could potentially become huge before the window closes forever. The fear of being “permanent underclass”. And finally the guilt of not spending enough tokens. As if I’m throwing money away. Maybe I just need to touch more grass IDK. Does this happen to you too?

@MadSEToday @johnennis Lmao you fucking dinosaur.

@johnennis If Claude wrote the code then it sure is the co-author, I wish every commit was AI tagged so I can straight out reject it.

This is yet another thing that really annoys me about Anthropic, claiming co-authorship of my work in git commit statements Claude is not a co-author of my work any more than Apple is It is a tool that I paid to use 5.6 Sol might be the end of me and Claude

@PromptLLM It's right about 95% of us.

Fable 5 thinks we are idiots

@conformal_gk @not_ellington Lol, you're so tied up identifying with your intellect that this actually offended you.

@not_ellington People like equations because they properly describe what they are supposed to. Pictures don't. Your post is full of nonsense.

Math and science needs more visualization and less equations. This paper is so beautiful bc you don’t get wrapped up in syntactical garbage. I feel like so many people like equations because they look and feel esoteric and make people feel Really Smart when they are in reality a really lossy means of idea communication. It is so easy to apply derivative rules via notation and remember the simple tricks but actually understanding the nuance behind the chain rule for instance is so much deeper than a d/dx. This is one reason it’s so much easier to learn things talking w Claude it’ll just tell you what the idea actually is. And the ideas are infinitely more interesting than the hieroglyphs we use to try to convey the meaning. NEVER think about math in terms of notation. Think in terms of spaces and gradients and shapes and curves. It is so much more rewarding. arxiv.org/abs/2206.07867

@ziv_ravid Build a brain faithful computational reservoir.

One of the only times I remind people I have a PhD in computational neuroscience is when people without a neuroscience background say their model works "like the brain." In these cases, I put on my neuroscience hat, put on my PhD cloak, and say in my important voice: "No, your model is not behaving like the brain."