HugoND4

21.3K posts

HugoND4 banner
HugoND4

HugoND4

@HugoND4

Elections have consequences; stolen elections have catastrophic consequences. - Stephen K. Bannon When people stop talking, that’s when you get violence.

North Dakota, USA Katılım Şubat 2018
884 Takip Edilen702 Takipçiler
Rich Braun
Rich Braun@ActualBraun·
@3YearLetterman The people that run sports in this country - college and pro - seem determined to ruin everything that people like about sports.
English
1
0
3
76
Three Year Letterman
Three Year Letterman@3YearLetterman·
The on-campus game experience is college football’s best and most unique feature. No other sport, college or pro, has anything remotely like that If we’re just going play these games in a sterile, domed neutral site that fans hate, then what the hell is the point of this sport?
English
118
154
1.7K
97.2K
Phil Mackey 🎙
Phil Mackey 🎙@PhilMackey·
Raise your hand if you're still holding onto JJ McCarthy stock... 🤚🏼
English
333
68
2K
114.1K
VikingzFanPage
VikingzFanPage@vikingzfanpage·
Who does @alec_lewis think has the highest chance to throw a pass this season between Justin Jefferson, Jauan Jennings and Johnny Hekker: “Justin is the pick.”
VikingzFanPage tweet media
English
4
2
175
57.3K
HugoND4
HugoND4@HugoND4·
😉 Massie supporters across the country laughing at the results:
GIF
English
1
0
2
25
Luke
Luke@lukelivingood·
@sknihTtimreKMF @agronomist09 @HugoND4 Not grieving at all. I think it's funny that they had to spend $20 million to get Massie out. Most expensive primary in history.
English
2
0
2
23
HugoND4
HugoND4@HugoND4·
@notgaetti The funny thing is... it seemed like he hit even more than that! I couldn't open the newspaper or turn on the TV without an update that he hit another one.
GIF
English
0
0
2
47
HugoND4 retweetledi
Maxime Bernier
Maxime Bernier@MaximeBernier·
HERE IS THE QUESTION ALBERTANS WILL ANSWER ON OCTOBER 19: “Should Alberta remain a province of Canada or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?” Poilievre said Thursday that his party will campaign for Alberta to stay in Canada: “I want a strong Alberta within a united Canada, and all Conservatives will be campaigning for Canadian unity in Alberta.” If the “Remain” option wins, it means nothing changes. That's what @PierrePoilievre supports. He will work with the Liberals and promote the status quo: Ottawa’s centralizing vision. On the contrary, voting to start the legal process to organize a referendum on secession is the only way to have a “strong Alberta”. This vote will launch genuine negotiations for greater autonomy for Alberta. It will put a knife to the throat of these establishment politicians in Ottawa and give Albertans bargaining power. This would be an opportunity to bring about radical decentralization in Canadian federalism. That’s why the People’s Party is supporting Albertans and the “start” side.
English
34
83
311
10.8K
HugoND4
HugoND4@HugoND4·
@laralogan They think that if they ignore it, the 15-minute news cycle will move on. Fortunately, this movement/issue has staying power and they won't be let off the hook.
HugoND4 tweet media
English
1
0
3
62
Luke
Luke@lukelivingood·
@sknihTtimreKMF I think you're the only guy I know under 50 who sees it this way. You're either not following the right people on X or you're not listening to the right podcasts. Or your account got hacked. ;-) BTW Massie's opponent wants to reinstate the draft. You okay with that?
English
3
0
2
49
kevin smith
kevin smith@kevin_smith45·
These Spencer Pratt videos keep getting better and better
English
898
12.3K
62.9K
1.9M
Ban Ned
Ban Ned@BannedOver·
MAZE@mazemoore

After their bill had passed and millions of Epstein files were released, Massie and Khanna spent some time reviewing the files and then went straight to a press conference. They were in a massive hurry to declare that they "caught" the DOJ. They spent the majority of the press conference boasting about the "coverup" that they had discovered. Massie and Khanna said they found six men who were being protected in the files. They didn't take a couple days to sort it out and make sure that they were correct. Instead, they immediately held a press conference. Khanna praised Massie for using his "MIT logic" to find the "coverups." Massie was asked at the press conference how he knew that the men were guilty of crimes. Listen to his answer. It's gibberish. He said he found a list of 20 names and photos (including Epstein), saw some foreign names and figured out by the corresponding photos that they were men and therefore concluded they had to be guilty. The very next day Ro Khanna read these names on the House floor and then they both went on TV to talk about these six people. He and Massie ended up defaming innocent people. A politician found some redactions and photos, immediately held a press conference without knowing anything else about the what he had found, and then falsely accused innocent men. That's the least "libertarian" thing ever. It's exactly the type of thing that most libertarians would be outraged about but because it was Massie, they don't care.

QME
1
0
1
36
CBS News
CBS News@CBSNews·
Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is continuing to defend Rep. Thomas Massie after his Republican primary loss in Kentucky this week, telling CBS News that Massie’s push to release the Epstein files is “the reason that President Trump “turned on” him. “We wanted accountability, demanded accountability from the elites and primarily the Epstein class. And it was Thomas Massie that was following through on that exact mandate,” Greene says.
English
164
160
913
17.8K
HugoND4
HugoND4@HugoND4·
😆 He really needs to explain what happened on September 3, 2025. As you point out, if the victims were making a list, how could such a list not be complete by now, more than nine months later?
English
0
0
2
23
HugoND4 retweetledi
MAZE
MAZE@mazemoore·
After their bill had passed and millions of Epstein files were released, Massie and Khanna spent some time reviewing the files and then went straight to a press conference. They were in a massive hurry to declare that they "caught" the DOJ. They spent the majority of the press conference boasting about the "coverup" that they had discovered. Massie and Khanna said they found six men who were being protected in the files. They didn't take a couple days to sort it out and make sure that they were correct. Instead, they immediately held a press conference. Khanna praised Massie for using his "MIT logic" to find the "coverups." Massie was asked at the press conference how he knew that the men were guilty of crimes. Listen to his answer. It's gibberish. He said he found a list of 20 names and photos (including Epstein), saw some foreign names and figured out by the corresponding photos that they were men and therefore concluded they had to be guilty. The very next day Ro Khanna read these names on the House floor and then they both went on TV to talk about these six people. He and Massie ended up defaming innocent people. A politician found some redactions and photos, immediately held a press conference without knowing anything else about the what he had found, and then falsely accused innocent men. That's the least "libertarian" thing ever. It's exactly the type of thing that most libertarians would be outraged about but because it was Massie, they don't care.
English
438
2.6K
11.3K
517.4K
Dissident Wookie
Dissident Wookie@dissidentwookie·
@mazemoore Don't forget the list the "victims" were making Why is Massie covering up those names?
Dissident Wookie tweet media
English
2
0
70
2.2K
Robert A Wade
Robert A Wade@kellyz831·
Yeah what happened to reading a list of names.
MAZE@mazemoore

After their bill had passed and millions of Epstein files were released, Massie and Khanna spent some time reviewing the files and then went straight to a press conference. They were in a massive hurry to declare that they "caught" the DOJ. They spent the majority of the press conference boasting about the "coverup" that they had discovered. Massie and Khanna said they found six men who were being protected in the files. They didn't take a couple days to sort it out and make sure that they were correct. Instead, they immediately held a press conference. Khanna praised Massie for using his "MIT logic" to find the "coverups." Massie was asked at the press conference how he knew that the men were guilty of crimes. Listen to his answer. It's gibberish. He said he found a list of 20 names and photos (including Epstein), saw some foreign names and figured out by the corresponding photos that they were men and therefore concluded they had to be guilty. The very next day Ro Khanna read these names on the House floor and then they both went on TV to talk about these six people. He and Massie ended up defaming innocent people. A politician found some redactions and photos, immediately held a press conference without knowing anything else about the what he had found, and then falsely accused innocent men. That's the least "libertarian" thing ever. It's exactly the type of thing that most libertarians would be outraged about but because it was Massie, they don't care.

English
1
0
1
58