Jen D.

6.2K posts

Jen D. banner
Jen D.

Jen D.

@HumanLevelJen

Tentacles are obviously the better form factor for essentially every task.

Singapore Katılım Aralık 2012
1.7K Takip Edilen101.9K Takipçiler
asparagoid
asparagoid@asparagoid·
People have argued cats VS dogs forever, but I've always been unimpressed with the arguments both sides put forward Cats are far superior I'll explain exactly why. Cats sit at the exact optimum of pet-ness because every attribute they have stops before it becomes a problem Cats possess the exact amount of intelligence that is useful in a pet. They can understand where to pee/poop. They can feed themselves. They can avoid danger and distinguish humans. They can learn to communicate a small number of specific needs That's enough. Beyond and under this, animal intelligence becomes progressively more useless and annoying For instance, parrots require a lot of active mental stimulation. They can learn language, hold grudges, but the counterpoint is that they can also be a complete nightmare or get depressed (literally plucking out their own feathers in an act of despair) without stimulation. Conversely, certain small animals are so insanely stupid that they pee everywhere, eat everything and cannot be trained Dogs are a little more intelligent than cats, but it's focussed in an extremely demanding way. Their intelligence makes them able to learn a huge about of tricks, but it also makes them demanding, stubborn, conscious of power dynamics. It gives them a desire for exploration, companionship and stimulation Cats are absolutely content exploring 1 house and garden forever without needing the owner to do anything or create a curriculum of daily activities and stimulation Yes, dogs are more affectionate than cats, but it's not at all obvious that maximizing this attribute makes an optimal pet. Dogs move past affection into dependence, which means they experience severe distress in your absence, need a great deal of reassurance and their mood is either made or broken by the presence and active attention of the owner. Anyone man who has dated a BPD woman understands the extreme inner suffering they experience when you temporarily focus attention away from them. Dogs are highly similar in this regard Cats occupy the exact point before affection becomes an essential duty. Yes they seek out physical touch, warmth, like you and want to be around you. But they can also tolerate hours or days of absolutely nothing. Actually, most cats are even content just glancing at you from across the room, without the need for you to direct your own attention at them. This is the optimal amount of love, without dependence, if you actually want to have a high functioning life with a pet, and aren't a loser who is making your pet the child you never had In terms of exercise, dog walks must become a permanent 1X or 2X daily task in a humans calendar regardless of the weather or how the human feels. If you work out the total amount of time wasted across a lifetime, it amounts to years of opportunity cost spent walking in bad weather and scooping up poop. Cats exercise themselves with zero time obligation. Easy win here Size wise, cats are optimally sized. They're large enough to feel substantial and warm when held with both hands, but small enough that they can be easily moved or thrown around. Pretty much all cats are in the same weight range, but even the fattest ones are easily handled The spread of dog sizes is way to wide-ranging. Some are way too small and ridiculous (handbag dogs, etc). Some can easily take the lives of unarmed men, and require a huge amount of control maintenance capable of attacking them/others or pulling them into oncoming traffic. Likewise, even relatively small dogs can be extremely strong and dangerous to women or children Evolution wise, another way to see this is that domestic cats found an optimal size and just stayed there. Dogs are still experimenting wildly, showing they haven't managed to optimize In terms of communication, animals need to communicate some needs, but overcommunicating is incredibly annoying. Cats effectively only communicate hunger and the desire to go outside, then stop when the request is fulfilled. Dogs usually relentlessly monitor and loudly respond a huge multitude of pointless events, like distant cars, footsteps, far away animals, random noises, people outside the door, etc. Pretty much all of this information was already known to the owner and having a 2nd external creature alert you about what's already happening is both totally pointless and in the case of barking, incredibly annoying For washing / hygiene, cats need nothing. They lick themselves regularly and if trained well, bury their own poop or cover it with litter. Dogs have to be taken outside, scooped up after and also require proper washes by humans. In essence, a cats body is its own responsibility, whereas a dog hands over basic self-care to the human, despite having even greater intelligence than a cat In terms of emotions and sociability, dogs are like resonant tuning forks reflecting the general atmosphere of the home or environment. Sometimes this is okay, but mostly it's annoying. If the owner of a dog is stressed, the dog will get stressed, necessitating the owner now inheriting the task of comforting the dog In the same situation with a cat, the cat usually either doesn't care, or just leaves the room. They rarely require any direct comfort due to others states around them, nor do they ever get truly destabilized unless you actively chase them nonstop or pursue them with a water bucket. Cats have their own emotional rhythm, which is extremely useful if you already have a full life or high stress. It also means they can be a direct comfort to you when it matters, rather than a needy dependent child If you look at individual traits, you could argue that dogs are "better" than cats. But when you look with specificity at these exact traits, you will find that they each create far more obligation for the owner. Whereas no cat trait ever exceeds the point that it becomes burdensome So cats aren't particularly high IQ, nor particularly obedient, nor that social, nor energetic, nor are they maxxed out on any particular trait. But what they do have is the optimal level of every single one of these traits, stopping right before the point it would become annoying. If you shifted any attribute up or down slightly, it would quickly become a problem But as they are, cats sit at the exact balance point of optimal pet-ness
Cats with aura@Catsworldtweet

English
187
188
2.4K
265.6K
sense
sense@Basicsense·
@asparagoid Not reading all that but definitely a cat owner
English
2
0
61
4.8K
Jen D.
Jen D.@HumanLevelJen·
Immediately?
Singapore 🇸🇬 English
0
0
2
75
Jen D.
Jen D.@HumanLevelJen·
I made a fully functional self-improving smart contract exploiting system using Claude-in-Windsurf a while back. Open sourcing it soon.
Noah Lebovic@NoahLebovic

I don't think it's a lack of imagination. I also used to work at Anthropic, think trends will continue, and used to agree with this. But I've changed my mind and now disagree with this take. Open models are already capable enough to do what you described. For example, I used Opus 4.6 to gain access to other folks medical records, hijack bank accounts, etc. back in February. GLM 5.1 is more capable than Opus 4.6 in most pentesting environments, and it came out in April. Despite capable open-weight models existing, the sketchier folks I know are still using a Claude Code or Codex subscription for hacking. (Even well-resourced groups in other countries! They use the grey/black market of discounted Ant/OAI subscription tokens sold through resellers.) So I see most of the materialized risk here as still coming from Anthropic and OpenAI; safeguards aren't sufficient to stop a moderately dedicated actor. The groups I know who are using open-weight models are legitimate offensive security companies. They won't break the rules to use subscription-based pricing, the open-weight models are more reliable in that they don't require specific jailbreaks nor hit classifiers, and the labs use massive partnerships or spend as a prereq for lowering classifiers/safeguards. I know of three legitimate groups running GLM 5.2 as their primary model. That last part applies for Anthropic, too: I know of two instances where two different Anthropic GTM people used large comitted spend contracts as a prereq for lowering safeguards, and I directly witnessed one. On the inside, I know the narrative and intent is genuinely about safety. But from the outside, Anthropic-the-system seems to be optimizing for revenue and control/power, isn't diffusing capabilities to defenders, and also doesn't have adequate safeguards to prevent misuse from dedicated bad actors. As a result, I now lean towards a future where capable open models are freely available (at least for cyber, bio is harder); I don't trust Anthropic or other frontier labs to handle this sufficiently well without diffused capabilties given what I've seen so far.

English
2
0
9
1.9K
Jen D.
Jen D.@HumanLevelJen·
@woke8yearold @tszzl The good thing about Singapore as a home base is it gives you the freedom to wander the wilds rather than the obligation to serve as exit liquidity for your Seigneur's entourage.
Jen D. tweet mediaJen D. tweet mediaJen D. tweet media
Singapore 🇸🇬 English
0
0
0
44
Aleph
Aleph@woke8yearold·
I'm going to make a concrete prediction here. Open weights AI will prove to be genuinely dangerous and cause a bunch of disasters/be used for bad ends, which will vindicate everyone that warned about this possibility and discredit everyone else
English
137
38
826
174.1K
Jen D.
Jen D.@HumanLevelJen·
@woke8yearold @tszzl Why would I, owner of my own GPUs, listen to the opinions of someone who would voluntarily choose slavery? Put your owner on the line and I'll talk to him instead.
Singapore 🇸🇬 English
2
0
2
83
Aleph
Aleph@woke8yearold·
@HumanLevelJen @tszzl I don’t believe you. I’d guess that more than 90% of the people that say this are full of it. You apparently live in Singapore which makes your “I prefer freedom to security” statements seem like even more of a transparent larp. Have you ever fired a gun
English
1
0
2
88
Jen D.
Jen D.@HumanLevelJen·
@woke8yearold @tszzl I'd rather die at the hands of an open source AGI than live as an Anthropic pod slave. You do you though.
Jen D. tweet media
Singapore 🇸🇬 English
1
0
2
113
Aleph
Aleph@woke8yearold·
@tszzl I've tried to be charitable to people that think open source AGI would be good but all the arguments are super weak. It's just wrong unless you have a giant panopticon which is de facto centralization anyway
English
27
0
192
19.5K
Jen D. retweetledi
Lanius
Lanius@General_JWJ·
Most aggressive mammal / least aggressive arthropod
Lanius tweet mediaLanius tweet media
English
4
7
294
8K
Daniel Yang
Daniel Yang@punished_daniel·
Curiously none of the "smartest people from HS" are semi-anonymous schizopoasters on Twitter. Maybe we're the normie midwits all along
English
16
3
325
8.1K
Jen D. retweetledi
Analytic Valley Girl Chris
Analytic Valley Girl Chris@ChrisExpTheNews·
So-called free-thinkers when a cupboard door is opened
Analytic Valley Girl Chris tweet media
English
0
1
65
762
Jen D.
Jen D.@HumanLevelJen·
@liron MY GOD NOT THE INAPPROPRIATE MEMES
English
0
0
4
89