Hunter Capital

96.3K posts

Hunter Capital banner
Hunter Capital

Hunter Capital

@HunterLLM

Focused on protocols, infrastructure, and analytics

Web3 Katılım Ekim 2015
2.9K Takip Edilen3.4K Takipçiler
Hunter Capital retweetledi
820 capital
820 capital@820capital·
We called ourselves 820 Capital because our first round was $820k. That number reminds us that every big story starts small With first capital, first bets, and the first people who believe in you before the market does
English
0
1
1
12
Hunter Capital
Hunter Capital@HunterLLM·
Crypto VCs don’t say this enough: A lot of categories are not early. They are just crowded, under-monetized, and emotionally over-owned. Being early and being stuck are not the same thing.
English
0
0
0
19
Kaleeb
Kaleeb@iCalebx·
Finally pulled the trigger on my first @pudgypenguins 🐧 been watching from the sidelines way too long, even @PeterParkerNFT is thinking about coming back 👀 To all the holders out there drop your penguin below, let's connect 👇 The family keeps growing 🐧
Kaleeb tweet media
ROGHODLR@180iqpeng

Finally pulled the trigger on my first @pudgypenguins 🐧 been watching from the sidelines way too long, even @PeterParkerNFT is thinking about coming back 👀 To all the holders out there drop your penguin below, let's connect 👇 The family keeps growing 🐧

English
21
7
115
8.2K
Hunter Capital
Hunter Capital@HunterLLM·
Macro snapshot 5 Mar 2026 $BTC $71850 Post-cycle correction ~42.7% below 2025 ATH ($126k) $ETH $2098 Higher beta vs BTC Underperforming in drawdown $Altcoins Pure liquidity beta 2–3× BTC volatility Correlation Normal: 0.3–0.5 Risk-off: 0.9+
Hunter Capital tweet media
English
0
0
0
14
JYP
JYP@jyp_nft·
Gm friends!
JYP tweet media
English
75
0
111
1.7K
Hunter Capital
Hunter Capital@HunterLLM·
Honestly, the past couple of years have felt like a kind of growing darkness And yeah, it sucks to see Ethereum so often associated with memecoins instead of actually protecting and empowering people.
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

Over the past year, many people I talk to have expressed worry about two topics: * Various aspects of the way the world is going: government control and surveillance, wars, corporate power and surveillance, tech enshittification / corposlop, social media becoming a memetic warzone, AI and how it interplays with all of the above... * The brute reality that Ethereum seems to be absent from meaningfully improving the lives of people subject to these things, even on the dimensions we deeply care about (eg. freedom, privacy, security of digital life, community self-organization) It is easy to bond over the first, to commiserate over the fact that beauty and good in the world seems to be receding and darkness advancing, and uncaring powerful people in high places are making this happen. But ultimately, it is easy to acknowledge problems, the hard thing is actually shining a light forward, coming up with a concrete plan that makes the situation better. The second has been weighing heavily on my mind, and on the minds of many of our brightest and most idealistic Ethereans. I personally never felt any upset or fear when political memecoins went on Solana, or various zero-sum gambling applications go on whatever 250 millisecond block chain strikes their fancy. But it *does* weigh on me that, through all of the various low-grade online memetic wars, international overreaches of corporate and government power, and other issues of the last few years, Ethereum has been playing a very limited role in making people's lives better. What *are* the liberating technologies? Starlink is the most obvious one. Locally-running open-weights LLMs are another. Signal is a third. Community Notes is a fourth, tackling the problem from a different angle. One response is to say "stop dreaming big, we need to hunker down and accept that finance is our lane and laser-focus on that". But this is ultimately hollow. Financial freedom and security is critical. But it seems obvious that, while adding a perfectly free and open and sovereign and debasement-proof financial system would fix some things, but it would leave the bulk of our deep worries about the world unaddressed. It's okay for individuals to laser-focus on finance, but we need to be part of some greater whole that has things to say about the other problems too. At the same time, Ethereum cannot fix the world. Ethereum is the "wrong-shaped tool" for that: beyond a certain point, "fixing the world" implies a form of power projection that is more like a centralized political entity than like a decentralized technology community. So what can we do? I think that we in Ethereum should conceptualize ourselves as being part of an ecosystem building "sanctuary technologies": free open-source technologies that let people live, work, talk to each other, manage risk and build wealth, and collaborate on shared goals, in a way that optimizes for robustness to outside pressures. The goal is not to remake the world in Ethereum's image, where all finance is disintermediated, all governance happens through DAOs, and everyone gets a blockchain-based UBI delivered straight to their social-recovery wallet. The goal is the opposite: it's de-totalization. It's to reduce the stakes of the war in heaven by preventing the winner from having total victory (ie. total control over other human beings), and preventing the loser from suffering total defeat. To create digital islands of stability in a chaotic era. To enable interdependence that cannot be weaponized. Ethereum's role is to create "digital space" where different entities can cooperate and interact. Communications channels enable interaction, but communication channels are not "space": they do not let you create single unique objects that canonically represent some social arrangement that changes over time. Money is one important example. Multisigs that can change their members, showing persistence exceeding that of any one person or one public key, are another. Various market and governance structures are a third. There are more. I think now is the time to double down, with greater clarity. Do not try to be Apple or Google, seeing crypto as a tech sector that enables efficiency or shininess. Instead, build our part of the sanctuary tech ecosystem - the "shared digital space with no owner" that enables both open finance and much more. More actively build toward a full-stack ecosystem: both upward to the wallet and application layer (incl AI as interface) and downward to the OS, hardware, even physical/bio security levels. Ultimately, tech is worthless without users. But look for users, both individual and institutional, for whom sanctuary tech is exactly the thing they need. Optimize payments, defi, decentralized social, and other applications precisely for those users, and those goals, which centralized tech will not serve. We have many allies, including many outside of "crypto". It's time we work together with an open mind and move forward.

English
0
0
0
21
Solana
Solana@solana·
Everything you want to do in payments you can already do on Solana @solanapayments
English
223
201
1.3K
102.1K
Hunter Capital
Hunter Capital@HunterLLM·
@coinbase Nothing turns paper profits into reality faster than the IRS😂
English
0
0
1
19
Coinbase 🛡️
Coinbase 🛡️@coinbase·
In this world, nothing is certain but death and taxes. Yes, even in crypto. Selling and exchanging crypto, and earning crypto rewards, can all have tax implications. Here’s what you should know to avoid surprises ↓
English
90
94
380
49.3K
DCinvestor
DCinvestor@DCinvestor·
unfortunately, where Anthropic won’t, someone else will very concerning that red lines of mass domestic surveillance and fully automated killing machines were apparently too much i hope i am misinterpreting or missing something and we are not heading into a very dark period
English
59
9
278
11.4K
Hunter Capital
Hunter Capital@HunterLLM·
@DCinvestor Lean teams + leverage from AI will define the next generation of crypto companies
English
0
0
1
7
DCinvestor
DCinvestor@DCinvestor·
it’s not always going to be just about saving money with a smaller headcount it’s about being more agile with smaller teams there will be many such cases, and we need to prepare for it now
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
20
2
62
6.8K
Thomas Coratger
Thomas Coratger@tcoratger·
1/12 Ethereum's consensus layer relies heavily on BLS signature aggregation, but BLS is vulnerable to quantum attacks. Enter leanSig: a hash-based, post-quantum multi-signature scheme. Decryption of the last @zeroknowledgefm session with @nico_mnbl, @Khovr and Benedikt 🧵👇
English
50
28
250
61.1K
ZachXBT
ZachXBT@zachxbt·
1/ Meet @WheresBroox (Broox Bauer), one of the multiple @AxiomExchange employees allegedly abusing the lack of access controls for internal tools to lookup sensitive user details to insider trade by tracking private wallet activity since early 2025.
ZachXBT tweet mediaZachXBT tweet mediaZachXBT tweet media
English
3.8K
2.8K
17K
7M
Hunter Capital
Hunter Capital@HunterLLM·
Wild how often the same patterns repeat in this space. Different actors, same playbook.
ZachXBT@zachxbt

1/ Meet @WheresBroox (Broox Bauer), one of the multiple @AxiomExchange employees allegedly abusing the lack of access controls for internal tools to lookup sensitive user details to insider trade by tracking private wallet activity since early 2025.

English
0
0
1
43
Hunter Capital
Hunter Capital@HunterLLM·
@APompliano Everyone wants cheap shares. Nobody wants to buy when they’re actually cheap.
English
0
0
0
3
Anthony Pompliano 🌪
Anthony Pompliano 🌪@APompliano·
We accelerated our share buybacks yesterday at $BRR. The NAV discount continues to close. We will continue to aggressively repurchase shares as long as the market is irrational.
Anthony Pompliano 🌪 tweet media
English
35
11
133
19K
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
BREAKING: President and CEO of the World Economic Forum, Børge Brende, resigns due to Epstein Files.
Polymarket tweet mediaPolymarket tweet media
English
663
2.2K
12K
5.5M
Hunter Capital
Hunter Capital@HunterLLM·
@Polymarket When headlines start moving this fast, you know something bigger is unfolding
English
0
0
0
4