Lazarillo

21.5K posts

Lazarillo banner
Lazarillo

Lazarillo

@ILiketoCope

Katılım Mart 2021
1.8K Takip Edilen943 Takipçiler
Cole Kennelly
Cole Kennelly@ColeGotTweets·
@cmsholdings For us, mostly deals with TradFi firms now or visibility for BVIV via speaking I’m not aggressively doing the conference circuit, just 2-3 travels per year and attend the ones in NYC (home) Not sure what the Buenos Aires to Abu Dhabi to Cannes etc people are doing lol
English
1
0
8
970
Operation Epic CMS
Operation Epic CMS@cmsholdings·
People who are still doing the conference circuit what exactly is your goal there is it a social scene for you because I’m skeptical there’s alpha at these things
English
32
3
120
14.3K
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
@Ksidiii Show evidence that markets knew about the Vid in 2019 lol There was no public news until Jan 2020, and there was a huge push to understate it (by the same people who exaggerated it months later)
English
3
0
2
391
Kris Sidial🇺🇸
Kris Sidial🇺🇸@Ksidiii·
I think there’s a big misconception when it comes to large market moves. Many people take a theoretical view that “the market prices everything in.” But if you look at history, you’ll see that some of the largest market declines have come well after the catalyst was already widely known. 1.COVID-19: It’s called COVID-19 because it was identified in 2019. Yet markets didn’t fully digest the ramifications until mid-March, when economies were already shutting down. 2.GFC: Before the major collapse in Q3 and Q4 of 2008, it was already known in 2007 that cracks were forming. There were multiple warnings pointing to a potential mortgage crisis. Credit began to slowly reprice, and then it all unraveled at once. 3.Volmageddon: Prior to the February 2018 blowout, it was widely known among derivatives traders that these ETPs could fail. Portfolio managers were openly arguing with issuers at major derivatives conferences. 4.“Liberation Day”: Weeks before Trump announced tariffs, the market was aware he had a plan in place. In fact, markets initially rallied a few percent within seconds of the announcement, then went on to decline 20%. My point is that there’s a cognitive bias that leads people to believe the market is all-knowing, smarter than everyone, and always prices everything in. But during major volatility events, it’s often only at the very end that the market fully accepts the fear. This is likely because humans naturally are optimistic creatures. It’s embedded into our DNA.
English
50
59
598
58.7K
CSPTrading.eth
CSPTrading.eth@CSP_Trading·
Not to be outdone by Polymarket, Kalshi also has a big announcement to make! Convicted pedophile and early Kalshi team member/friend of Tarek, Avraham Eisenberg, is getting out soon! For those who may not know, Avraham setup the Kalshi socials they still use to this day!
CSPTrading.eth tweet media
English
1
0
40
5.9K
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
Won't hurt Buttfinessed Making false predictions is great for cult leaders. It filters for true believers He's been claiming for years Bitfinex secretly controls Binance, FTX, Coinbase, etc, so now he'll claim whichever Big 4 is part of the conspiracy Bigger conspiracy: more engagement
English
1
0
1
88
zerolore
zerolore@zerolore·
@EvgenyGaevoy The poor guy has been wrong for like 8 years straight imagine
English
2
0
13
812
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
You mentioned "trusting the right people" And there are tons of trust assumptions Stables are based on trust Almost every perp dex is controlled by the team (can freeze accounts, transfer funds, do rollbacks etc) Cloud and RPCs etc are not decentralized either Most of crypto is very far from Bitcoin or Ethereum
English
0
0
1
25
charles ⛩️ 🥷
charles ⛩️ 🥷@carldlfr·
@ILiketoCope @Lyskey Infra is trustless. Your choices are your own. Tech is fair, tokenomics are another thing. Blockchain design didn’t fail, you trusting others with your money did.
English
1
0
0
24
Brother Lyskey 🥷
One of the most asymmetric bet in crypto (and overall) since the early days, yet very few people are doing it, is creating content focused on a single ecosystem. I call it asymmetric because the downside is almost zero: you only invest your time (and maybe a few dollars), but the upside can easily reach six figures. And you’re lucky if you start now. With AI flooding the space, most creators have gotten lazy. It’s easier than ever to stand out. You just need to: 1. Find an ecosystem you truly believe will still be around in 2-3 years minimum (mine was, and still is, Starknet). 2. Spend hours every day reading, watching podcasts, and talking with people in this ecosystem. 3. Gather everything you learn. 4. Start posting your insights with one goal: help others save time. 5. Become the go-to person to follow in that niche. With motivation, discipline, and perseverance, you only need a few months of growth before you start seeing plenty of remote, well-paid job opportunities along the way. On top of that, you will learn, build your own brand, and connect with valuable people. Just do things.
Brother Lyskey 🥷 tweet media
English
6
2
28
822
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
@carldlfr @Lyskey I don't think it can be saved, or that it's worth saving Blockchains were made to remove the need for trust, not to find trustworthy bookies Gov tokens are just fake stocks for fake businesses
English
1
0
1
18
charles ⛩️ 🥷
charles ⛩️ 🥷@carldlfr·
@ILiketoCope @Lyskey We’re the ones that make it less scummy so if we leave there is nothing left. That’s just sad. We can still build great things by learning from what went wrong and trusting the right people.
English
1
0
1
27
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
@carldlfr @Lyskey I'd rather make love to a blender than help another crypto project. Pure scum "industry"
English
1
0
2
29
charles ⛩️ 🥷
charles ⛩️ 🥷@carldlfr·
@Lyskey A token can be 99% down. That doesn't just erase the amount of opportunities it has given out of people. History doesn't remember, that's why we are here to change it. We are not f* leaving.
English
1
0
0
23
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
@joshdr83 He'll be back soon. He just wanted to make sure Khamenei is in Hell
English
0
0
0
25
Morgan Wright
Morgan Wright@morganwright_us·
Many years ago, as a Kansas State Trooper, I had the opportunity to meet Chuck Norris. Unfortunately, it was on a traffic stop: Speeding 85 in a 55. Fortunately, Mr. Norris let me off with a warning.
Morgan Wright tweet media
English
233
2.3K
39.3K
432.6K
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
@cmsholdings Best prediction he ever made At least he was spiritually correct
English
0
0
1
199
Operation Epic CMS
Operation Epic CMS@cmsholdings·
I still remember when Balajo said btc was going to 1mm in two weeks
English
14
10
221
13.7K
Lazarillo retweetledi
Jake Chervinsky
Jake Chervinsky@jchervinsky·
It took a year for the Senate to confirm a new CFTC Chairman, but it was worth the wait. @ChairmanSelig announced today that the CFTC is working on new regulations for perpetual derivatives and onchain markets. You heard right. DeFi perps are coming to the USA. Hyperliquid 🇺🇸
Hyperliquid Policy Center@HyperliquidPC

CFTC @ChairmanSelig laid out an exciting roadmap for the Commission's top priorities at @MilkenInstitute's Future of Finance 2026 today: "I view Project Crypto as a historic initiative between the agencies to upgrade and modernize our rules and regulations and future-proof them for technologies like crypto...." "Many of the firms want to move onchain. The prior administration drove a lot of these firms and the liquidity offshore. The perpetuals markets are a great example of this. We've had perpetual futures contracts in crypto assets for a very long time[,] but they've developed offshore[.] We've got to bring that back to the United States. We need to have that liquidity here in the U.S...." "We're working towards getting perpetual futures, true perpetual futures, not long-dated contracts, here in the U.S. within the next month or so.... We're also working towards onchain markets, so we're looking to have clear guidance as to what sort of digital wallets would implicate our regulations. The prior administration really went after firms that were just offering software products...." "We're also working towards regulations that accommodate onchain software systems, so decentralized finance protocols and other types of blockchain networks.... We're going to make sure it's very clear as to what implicates the CFTC's regulations and what doesn't, and to the extent that an onchain software system or front-end does implicate our rules or regulations, we're modernizing and future-proofing those rules so that there's a place for all of that." HPC applauds Chairman Selig's forward-thinking approach to regulation and stands ready to support his crucial work ensuring that decentralized markets for perpetual derivatives thrive in the United States. 🇺🇸

English
25
45
364
46.3K
Jamjod Snaj
Jamjod Snaj@JamjodSnaj·
@jchervinsky Lighter can loophole itself into first US compliant perp dex thru its relationships with Robinhood and Coinbase.
English
3
0
1
296
Jake Chervinsky
Jake Chervinsky@jchervinsky·
When Chairman Selig says the CFTC will approve crypto perps in the next month, I'm guessing this means perps offered on centralized exchanges only. Right now, "perps" on CEXes are actually long-dated futures, a different product. Approval for DeFi perps will likely take longer.
English
17
5
124
10.4K
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
@shinobu_books @Steve_Sailer I've been in many apartments in Japan that have interior doorways 6ft or so Smashed my cranium many times Not very old apartments
English
1
0
3
198
eric ゑリッ久
eric ゑリッ久@shinobu_books·
@Steve_Sailer Japanese doorways through the ages: 1600~1868~5’5 1926~ 5’10 1980s~ 6’6 Nowadays ~7’5
eric ゑリッ久 tweet media
English
3
3
21
3K
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
@bandosei WW3? Which countries are going to support Iran?
English
0
0
0
48
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
@Lyskey Latin America is generally much better though, unless you need proximity to Singapore for crypto business
English
0
0
0
101
Brother Lyskey 🥷
Brother Lyskey 🥷@Lyskey·
I'm tweeting that from here btw
Brother Lyskey 🥷 tweet media
Brother Lyskey 🥷@Lyskey

Let me go deeper on this: Southeast Asia Is the Best Financial Move for Digital Nomads Most people in crypto spend their time chasing yield, airdrops, and the next gem. But the biggest wealth unlock is often much simpler: lifestyle arbitrage. If you lower your cost of living without lowering your quality of life, you increase your savings rate, your investing power, and your long-term upside, with WAY less risk than any onchain bet. That’s exactly why Southeast Asia is such a strong move for digital nomads. Personal experience 👇 I’ve been living in Southeast Asia for more than 4 years now, after spending ~20 years in Europe. And one thing became obvious: for a young digital nomad with no kids and no debt, Southeast Asia is quite impossible to beat. It gives you the best mix of: > low cost of living > high quality of life > better savings/investing power > convenience > extremely high day-to-day comfort 1) Cost of living vs. quality of life In many European cities, €2,000/month mostly covers rent, groceries, transport, and a few outings. In Southeast Asia, that same budget can support a very comfortable lifestyle for two in modern condos with: > pool > gym > security > sauna > nearby modern malls / cafés / restaurants / coworking Examples from my experience: > Chiang Mai: very affordable, amazing if you like nature, mountains, scooters, and a chill lifestyle (my favorite place in Thailand for a long stay). > Bangkok / Phuket / Pattaya: more expensive than Chiang Mai, but if you like parties, beaches, and nightlife, these three are a better fit. > Ho Chi Minh City: great for affordable modern condos, ultra-modern malls, sports, and walking (if you live outside the city center, otherwise it feels too chaotic imo). > Phnom Penh: housing are pricier for similar condo quality than Thailand & Vietnam, but many daily expenses are cheaper. Beyond rent, daily life is cheaper in all these cities than in any European city: > taxis > food delivery > restaurants > massages > cleaning help + a personal chef So you get a better investing power while having a better life. If you earn remotely (example: $5,000/month), your savings rate changes dramatically depending on where you live. - In Europe, after taxes + expenses, maybe you save ~20% - In Thailand / Vietnam / Cambodia, saving 50%+ is easy while living better That gap compounds hard over time. TL;DR: changing where you live can improve your life’s ROI more than chasing another speculative trade. 2) You save money, and gain quality of life Southeast Asia is not just cheaper, it often offers a more convenient, less stressful life. Some examples: > As a foreigner, you’re naturally less plugged into local political/media drama. That alone reduces mental noise a lot. > Services are faster and simpler. > Renting an apartment, getting around, and handling daily tasks often feels much more direct and less bureaucratic than in Europe (at least in France) > Outsourcing boring tasks becomes affordable > Cleaning, laundry, rides, and food prep can be outsourced for a fraction of what it costs in Europe. > If you live in a good condo, daily life is optimized by default: gym, pool, sauna, cafés, malls, coworking, restaurants, all within walking distance. That buys back a lot of time, focus, & energy, that can go into: > work > building > gym/health > rest/enjoyment 3) The time zone is a productivity hack One underrated advantage: Asia time zone. If you work with Europe / US teams your mornings in Asia are often quiet: > fewer messages > fewer calls > fewer distractions That makes mornings perfect for deep work: writing, strategy, content, planning, research. Then when Europe/US wakes up, you shift into: > meetings > coordination > DMs > Ops work It creates a natural rhythm: high-focus mornings, lower-focus afternoons. For remote work, that’s a huge edge. Honestly, I think it would be very hard for me to move back to another setup now. 4) Lifestyle + travel + nature Southeast Asia gives you access to very different environments at low cost: > big cities > paradise islands > mountains > beach towns > business hubs And it’s easy to move between them thanks to cheap flights and (luxury) buses. 5) Health, safety, and healthcare are better than many expect A lot of Europeans assume high taxes = better healthcare. It's total bullshit. From my own experience in Thailand, private hospitals are faster, more modern, cleaner, more efficient than public hospital in France. Safety-wise, I’ve personally never felt unsafe in most places I’ve lived in Asia (including in Myanmar, a country currently in civil war). On the contrary, I’ve often felt less safe in parts of Europe. I can't even imagine the difference for a woman. That said, three honest caveats: > I’m still young, so my healthcare needs are simpler > Air pollution can be a real issue in some cities/seasons (especially Bangkok/HCMC and Chiang Mai during burning season) > Food quality can be amazing, but you need to be very careful (especially if you care about nutrition quality, sourcing, supplements, etc.). Otherwise, most of the time you’ll end up eating food that’s bad for your health. TLDR From a digital nomad perspective, Southeast Asia is impossible to bet for an optimized lifestyle. You can literally optimized all in one: > saving > investing > focus > health > quality of life You buy back time. You reduce stress. You increase your investing power. For me, that’s the real financial move. Not another speculative trade. Lifestyle arbitrage.

English
8
0
40
3.4K
Lazarillo
Lazarillo@ILiketoCope·
They made plenty of mistakes, eg as I told them in 2021, must reinvest in growth instead of paying out profits And what happened to the Stark app they announced in 2022? But every single dex that has passed them is an airdrop farm (HL still is) The boss is one of the few honorable people I've encountered in crypto, but he's not aggressive or flamboyant But again, there's not much of a perp dex market without airdrops, (but they could've invested $200M in growth)
English
0
0
0
84
Lazarillo retweetledi
Hasu⚡️🤖
Hasu⚡️🤖@hasufl·
Let's be extremely clear. UST failed because it was a ponzi scheme. It was a criminal enterprise that lured depositors with promise of high yield, paid from the deposits of new entrants. There is no possible universe where it didn't go broke. Jane St. probably helped it along, but they were already complicit and morally bankrupt through their insider-support of said Ponzi to begin with.
zerohedge@zerohedge

And there it is: Jane Street was behind the 2022 crypto winter, destroying Terraform by first depegging the token and destroying the ecosystem, then pretending it would rescue Terra, while effectively it was soaking up what little value remained.

English
56
41
571
66.5K