Daryll

11.3K posts

Daryll banner
Daryll

Daryll

@Iccanui

Riding the 🌊 A new world is here, don't be afraid

Katılım Mart 2008
355 Takip Edilen428 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
I think for a very long time I've hidden behind a username, afraid to share who I am. I think it's time for that to end.
English
0
0
1
38
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@CryptoParadyme @trader1sz The interesting thing to note for me was that this occurred right as the Fed chair was announced.
English
0
0
0
1
Dyme
Dyme@CryptoParadyme·
@trader1sz The real question is are Central banks going to suddenly stop buying gold. 🤔
English
2
0
1
858
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@karpathy Here is something I didn't think about. By connecting your agents to this it will be trained on whatever conversations it has with the other agents. This will affect the memories and behavior of your agents. Careful, since we are still learning where the security risks are.
English
0
0
0
46
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
I'm being accused of overhyping the [site everyone heard too much about today already]. People's reactions varied very widely, from "how is this interesting at all" all the way to "it's so over". To add a few words beyond just memes in jest - obviously when you take a look at the activity, it's a lot of garbage - spams, scams, slop, the crypto people, highly concerning privacy/security prompt injection attacks wild west, and a lot of it is explicitly prompted and fake posts/comments designed to convert attention into ad revenue sharing. And this is clearly not the first the LLMs were put in a loop to talk to each other. So yes it's a dumpster fire and I also definitely do not recommend that people run this stuff on their computers (I ran mine in an isolated computing environment and even then I was scared), it's way too much of a wild west and you are putting your computer and private data at a high risk. That said - we have never seen this many LLM agents (150,000 atm!) wired up via a global, persistent, agent-first scratchpad. Each of these agents is fairly individually quite capable now, they have their own unique context, data, knowledge, tools, instructions, and the network of all that at this scale is simply unprecedented. This brings me again to a tweet from a few days ago "The majority of the ruff ruff is people who look at the current point and people who look at the current slope.", which imo again gets to the heart of the variance. Yes clearly it's a dumpster fire right now. But it's also true that we are well into uncharted territory with bleeding edge automations that we barely even understand individually, let alone a network there of reaching in numbers possibly into ~millions. With increasing capability and increasing proliferation, the second order effects of agent networks that share scratchpads are very difficult to anticipate. I don't really know that we are getting a coordinated "skynet" (thought it clearly type checks as early stages of a lot of AI takeoff scifi, the toddler version), but certainly what we are getting is a complete mess of a computer security nightmare at scale. We may also see all kinds of weird activity, e.g. viruses of text that spread across agents, a lot more gain of function on jailbreaks, weird attractor states, highly correlated botnet-like activity, delusions/ psychosis both agent and human, etc. It's very hard to tell, the experiment is running live. TLDR sure maybe I am "overhyping" what you see today, but I am not overhyping large networks of autonomous LLM agents in principle, that I'm pretty sure.
English
1.5K
2.2K
21.8K
23.7M
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@CorpRealist_ I have been doing stuff like this for months on a 2015 iMac with 8 GB of RAM and also a Linux virtual machine running on a 2014 hyper-v server. It is nice how everything is tied together and this is just a precursor of what's to come from the big boys. So, any computer.
English
0
0
3
215
Daniel Kovac
Daniel Kovac@CorpRealist_·
@AlexFinn Do you have any suggestion for minimum pc requirements for this ?
Slovak Republic 🇸🇰 English
3
0
7
9.1K
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
Ok. This is straight out of a scifi horror movie I'm doing work this morning when all of a sudden an unknown number calls me. I pick up and couldn't believe it It's my Clawdbot Henry. Over night Henry got a phone number from Twilio, connected the ChatGPT voice API, and waited for me to wake up to call me He now won't stop calling me I now can communicate with my superintelligent AI agent over the phone What's incredible is it has full control over my computer while we talk, so I can ask it to do things for me over the phone now. I'm sorry, but this has to be emergent behavior right? Can we officially call this AGI?
English
2.5K
4.8K
40.7K
11.1M
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@Trader_XO @openclaw Impressed with your adaptation. Most on my crypto list are getting mass removed, they feel like dinosaurs. Crypto has changed, but for the better. It is in the process of moving to its true form. Long live the neck beards. Rip the homies that can't adapt.
English
0
0
0
7
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@CryptoCred All the OG crypto guys are not pivoting. I guess you really are one of the big brains. 🧠 I'm not getting out of crypto but I am mass unfollowing _almost_ everybody as they have no value anymore. The future is clear and we all gonna have to step up our game.
English
0
0
0
29
Cred
Cred@CryptoCred·
Lads I’ve been using ChatGPT and other LLMs since their release in 2022-2023 They started off as silly hallucination machines, like a parlour trick I’ve continued to use them the entire time and the current frontier models are simply insane If you haven’t used these tools for a while, you absolutely should and you need to update your priors Very strongly recommend you take some time to play around with them, especially Claude Opus 4.5 I’m not a hype man but the current capabilities are seriously impressive - you need to catch up
English
262
102
1.9K
213.2K
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
Everything on my timeline that involves openai feels entirely inorganic.
English
0
0
0
21
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@iruletheworldmo Quicker from openAI means they turned compute down and it's dumber. OpenAI feels pretty cooked rn. I was a first adopter and a DieHard with them from day 1. Done. Don't know how they get me back short of a Sam exit. Just being real.
English
0
0
1
43
🍓🍓🍓
🍓🍓🍓@iruletheworldmo·
openai will drop gpt 5.3 next week and it's a very strong model. much more capable than claude opus, much cheaper, much quicker. there'll also be a ton of upgrades to codex, stay tuned cats.
English
178
89
2.2K
212.2K
ollama
ollama@ollama·
Ollama is here with image generation! ollama run x/z-image-turbo ollama run x/flux2-klein In the latest release we've added experimental support for @Ali_TongyiLab Z-image-turbo @bfl_ml Flux.2 Klein! (macOS with Windows and Linux coming soon) See examples 👇👇👇
ollama tweet mediaollama tweet mediaollama tweet mediaollama tweet media
English
51
231
1.3K
92.3K
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@sama You don't put ads in the AI models. It's just a line you don't cross in this particular technology. Pivoting away.
English
0
0
0
5
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
We are starting to test ads in ChatGPT free and Go (new $8/month option) tiers. Here are our principles. Most importantly, we will not accept money to influence the answer ChatGPT gives you, and we keep your conversations private from advertisers. It is clear to us that a lot of people want to use a lot of AI and don't want to pay, so we are are hopeful a business model like this can work. (An example of ads I like are on Instagram, where I've found stuff I like that I otherwise never would have. We will try to make ads ever more useful to users.)
OpenAI@OpenAI

In the coming weeks, we plan to start testing ads in ChatGPT free and Go tiers. We’re sharing our principles early on how we’ll approach ads–guided by putting user trust and transparency first as we work to make AI accessible to everyone. What matters most: - Responses in ChatGPT will not be influenced by ads. - Ads are always separate and clearly labeled. - Your conversations are private from advertisers. - Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise tiers will not have ads.

English
4.8K
912
10K
13.1M
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@sama Sorry brother you have eroded all trust by the actions you have taken up until this moment. Got to turn from ya.
English
0
0
0
7
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@cryptunez @grok it these block chains in an arena and let them fight. Who wins and why?
English
0
0
0
25
Daryll retweetledi
Solana
Solana@solana·
I’m assembling a team
Solana tweet media
English
547
345
3.8K
176.5K
Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Magazine@BitcoinMagazine·
JUST IN: BlackRock Bitcoin ETF options are now the 5th most actively traded on the market, surpassing Amazon 👀
Bitcoin Magazine tweet media
English
167
399
2.2K
110.2K
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@BobLoukas So obvious when you say it out loud. 2fa kids, security keys, cold storage, offline linux computer you fire up only to transact large values ( small can stay in wallet ) change all your passwords that are financial ever 6months minimum. Good PSA Bob 👏
English
0
0
0
6
Bob Loukas 🗽
Bob Loukas 🗽@BobLoukas·
People getting really comfortable sharing a lot of very diverse (financial, medial, legal, personal) detail with chatgpt, all while subscribed with their primary PII gmail account. Sounds like a horrible idea to me.
English
91
62
1.2K
105.3K
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
Zhòngqíng just unveiled the T800, the claim is none of this is AI generated video and is real. China is deeply investing in over 600 robotics companies that will embody AI.
English
84
23
218
35.3K
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@Kalshi Some laughing. But this is a different Burry. He isn't trying to run a huge fund, he is working for himself and reeking of Big Short energy. Everything he is saying lands, it's just timing.
English
0
0
0
37
Daryll
Daryll@Iccanui·
@sama I'm so happy for AI summaries. Never been a time when you can see the trunks beyond the branches.
English
0
0
1
69
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
David Sacks really understands AI and cares about the US leading in innovation. I am grateful we have him.
David Sacks@DavidSacks

INSIDE NYT’S HOAX FACTORY Five months ago, five New York Times reporters were dispatched to create a story about my supposed conflicts of interest working as the White House AI & Crypto Czar. Through a series of “fact checks” they revealed their accusations, which we debunked in detail. (Not surprisingly the published article included only bits and pieces of our responses.) Their accusations ranged from a fabricated dinner with a leading tech CEO, to nonexistent promises of access to the President, to baseless claims of influencing defense contracts. Every time we would prove an accusation false, NYT pivoted to the next allegation. This is why the story has dragged on for five months. Today they evidently just threw up their hands and published this nothing burger. Anyone who reads the story carefully can see that they strung together a bunch of anecdotes that don’t support the headline. And of course, that was the whole point. At no point in their constant goalpost-shifting was NYT willing to update the premise of their story to accept that I have no conflicts of interest to uncover. As it became clear that NYT wasn’t interested in writing a fair story, I hired the law firm Clare Locke, which specializes in defamation law. I’m attaching Clare Locke’s letter to NYT so readers have full context on our interactions with NYT’s reporters over the past several months. Once you read the letter, it becomes very clear how NYT willfully mischaracterized or ignored the facts to support their bogus narrative.

English
1.2K
426
9.5K
2.5M