FUU

@mxopalesque is a racist who silences the voices of black queer people when they prove her wrong

@anarcho_tux @SeventyThp Anarchist heroes at CHAZ/CHOP? Like who?

@SeventyThp Slander? Your anarchist heroes at CHAZ/CHOP shot an unarmed black teen dead and then covered it up so none of the people who shot him would be held responsible! npr.org/2026/06/14/nx-….

so called anarchist "community self defense" team when they encounter an unarmed Black teen:

@9999XP What do you think materialists believe in?

@Idkfu69 farfetched concept. We all have ideas every day, they influence how we see the world and interact with them. And we all have those moments when we think we were the first to think of something and then learn that someone else already came up with it. Therefore they are universal.

Highly dangerous position. Immediately excludes (intentionally or not I don't care) anyone who does not work/is not part of a nebulous workers movement

@9999XP Yeah ik this, I took a Philo101 class in college. Plato's Forms sound a lot like religious ideas. There’s a perfect, invisible, unchanging reality beyond the physical world, and everything we see around us is just an imperfect copy of it? Sounds like how Christians view heaven.

@Idkfu69 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of…

@9999XP Ok, but where does this essence come from? How do you know it's their essence? You could just as easily argue that these things mean what they do because society has conditioned us to accept those words and definitions.

@Idkfu69 It's essence does. Chair is "something to sit on". Democracy is "majority rule through voting" It can be a lot more complicated, but we are on twitter.

@9999XP Ok? But what proof do you have to support your idea?

@Idkfu69 Well I guess you are Aristoteles and I'm Plato.

@9999XP Then what defines the idea if not its historical conditions?

@MattCrossin @Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 I really am more of an idealist than a materialist lol. The specific historical conditions am idea emerged in are fine and dandy, but they don't define the idea in all situations throughout all of space and time.

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 That is an oversimplification, there’s much more nuance to that.

@Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 The essence of the idea of veganism is "don't eat animal products" anyone who follows these principles is a vegan. Their specific reasons don't matter. Anarchisms essence is "rejection of hierarchy". Anyone who follows it, even an alien in another galaxy, is an anarchist.

@9999XP Actually material reality is essential

@Idkfu69 @MattCrossin @_Do0p @boguswaves1 Ideas are essential. We call all chairs chairs because we know what the word means. No one cares who made the first chair. If someone who has never seen a chair or doesnt know about its history makes a chair, it is still just a chair.

@9999XP @MattCrossin @_Do0p @boguswaves1 Yeah, but this isn’t a reality in which we live, nor does it seem like a possibility in the near future.

@MattCrossin @Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 In the future anarchism could be completely forgotten, deleted from all records then reinvented under a different term, but it would still be the same idea as anarchism.

@9999XP @MattCrossin @_Do0p @boguswaves1 They can be developed anywhere and anytime, I don’t think anyone is denying that. But it’s a historical fact, that socialism and anarchism were developed in Europe.

@MattCrossin @Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 Socialism and Anarchism can be developed anywhere anytime, they are universal ideas and don't harken back to a specific thinker like Marxism. The reason we use european terms for them and associate them with europe is because of eurocentrism.

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 it with the latter, a modern political philosophy.

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 “I never said that it can't relate to those.” I don’t think anyone said you did. The problem is you’re imposing this label on early human societies when anarchism is a modern political philosophy and applying the label to the former, which lacked those ideas, risks conflating

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 That’s not a good comparison because veganism is generally a conscious lifestyle choice today, whereas someone in 3000 BC had to eat whatever was available in their environment. If they didn't consume animal products, that would likely reflect a lack of access more than anything.

@Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 I also don't care if veganism was coined in the 20th century by diet concious middle class people. If someone in 3000 BC didn't eat animal products then he was a vegan to me.

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 Bro, this is just a semantics argument. The "anarchism" used today is the modern equivalent of the "anarchy" those philosophers invoked. The point is you’re applying the term anarchism to early human societies when they were fundamentally different from what anarchists advocate

@Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 The name "anarchism". William Godwin didn't call himself an anarchist. Bakunin didn't use it for most of his life. Proudhon popularized it from its greek origins, but it took time to become ubiquitous.

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 It's not being “reduced” to "those people." It's conjoined with worker movements and organizations because that's where anarchism originated.

@Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 What I mean is that the current specific movement of anarchism of course strongly relates to those european thinkers, but reducing all anti-hierarchy thinking (for which anarchism is the general term) to those people flattens the idea and its historical significance.

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 Didn’t use what name? How does this relate to what I said?

@Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 The essence of anarchism as we use the word today is being non-hierarchical. If someone relates to the 19th-century european movement of anarchism (which didn't even use that name for decades) is another story of course.

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 You shouldn’t impose the anarchist label on societies that don’t identify that way. Would you classify the Zapatistas as anarchists when they have made it abundantly clear they don’t like being called that?

@Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 Well to me if you live without a state and without strict hierarchies you live in an anarchist way no matter what you call yourself

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 Depends on what the thing is. Early humans lived in ways that worked for their environment and needs. Some lived in a proto-egalitarian way. Some lived with hierarchies. But it wasn’t anarchist because the principles anarchists uphold today didn’t exist back then.

@Idkfu69 @_Do0p @boguswaves1 So things only start existing once someone gives them a name and writes them down in a book? How do you think the first humans lived or how do most animals live? Do you need a fully formed ideology a smart person wrote down to live a certain way?

@9999XP @_Do0p @boguswaves1 No it isn’t. It’s an ideology that came about in 19th century Europe during the Industrial Revolution.

@_Do0p @boguswaves1 Anarchism is as old as life on this planet

@VOLKSKRlEG @cdrcorl3 @soundslikedrt @zastavastava Your evidence only proves that antisemites (who weren’t uncommon at the time) were in Makhno’s army, not that Makhno himself was antisemitic.

@cdrcorl3 @soundslikedrt @zastavastava Lol.