If-It-Looks-Like-A-Naz

As a US citizen, I want to know why my government has killed/maimed so many people around the world & here at home. It's not what they were elected to do. The war machine, the killings & the lies must stop. Who is in control of our government after killing JFK? #NotInMyName

Can I point out that every western country has an intelligence agency. They belong to NATO that has an intelligence capability. There are thousands of private intelligence companies. Every single one of them KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. Many of them were involved in approving target lists. Did someone put a college on a target list? What was the approved target? It used to take decades and declassified documents to prove the west lied about something they’d blame on Russia. Now it takes an hour.

Arman, if you were in my class, I’d flunk you. Not write a comment on a paper, but fail you. Nuland and Pompeo are not ignorant. THEY ARE EVIL. THEY ACTIVELY PARTICIPATED IN DESTROYING MULTIPLE COUNTRIES, lie with impunity, and revel in the dead bodies stacking up. This isn’t a one off event. They both have historical records of pursuing this strategy of lies, destabilization, death…what should really bother ppl is that with so many ppl now understanding what’s actually going on in Ukraine, they are still being trotted out for this humiliation ritual. Who told them to do it and what required them to comply. These ppl had the highest levers of power in the US in their hands. Who do they really work for because this clearly illustrates it isn’t the ppl or the president.

Brian, Brian, Brian, equating faux crocodile tears over a fentanyl-overdose career criminal — who held a gun to a pregnant woman’s belly, resisted arrest, and had lethal levels of drugs in his system — to honoring actual American heroes on Memorial Day is absolutely disgusting. Allow me. Memorial Day is for the warriors who died defending this country, not a drug-addled felon whose death was exploited to burn cities, defund police, and push a false “murdered by cops” narrative that the autopsy and toxicology disputed. Showing “empathy” for Floyd doesn’t make you virtuous, Brian. It makes you part of the grift that dishonors real sacrifice while elevating a statistic. Save the performative outrage for someone who earned it. Otherwise, you’re a creep.

No. Or you shouldn’t find it odd. We spent 100’s of billions on a war on drugs and in every location, drug production went up. We spent 100’s of billions on the war on terror and terrorism increased. We spent trillions on spreading democracy but in every country we installed a dictator of some sort. If you haven’t figured out the entire federal expenditures and non profits are a money laundering operation to destroy humanity you’re retarded.

Sacha Stone —the man who created a fake courtroom (the ITNJ) right next to the LSE in Westminster to attack mainstream British institutions—is the literal son of the LSE Director who designed the campus's anti-riot security gates." 🤔

The continuum of using information systems to crack public consensus and shape alternative realities flows directly into the modern operations of figures like General Michael Flynn, Sacha Stone, and Michael Aquino. "..

Sandberg's early personal web directories—famed in the 1990s and 2000s as a massive index for mind-uploading, neuroscience, and deep tech—deliberately included links to these esoteric sites, including Tzimon Yliaster’s Operation Mindfuck archives.".. x.com/artisbrutal202…

"Operation Mindfuck" was a decentralized campaign launched in the late '60s by writers Robert Anton Wilson & Thornley. The goal was to sow massive,creative disinformation, distribute absurd conspiracy theories,& execute cultural pranks to shatter the public's rigid belief systems

Crazy that we have a Pride “Month” and just a Memorial “Day” for our fallen heroes. Not right.

Another neocon pulling numbers out of his ass. Ukraine is NOT independent; it’s a basal state of NATO in its war against Russia. They don’t have free markets; the entire country is ran by a mafia. Rule of law? Over 1/2 of Zelensky’s staff has been arrested for money laundering and stealing our tax dollars. There aren’t 7% of Americans that want to fund the Ukrainian mafia that shoots missiles into children’s dorms while they are sleeping. We’re glad you’ve exposed yourself as the traitor to American taxpayers.

🇺🇸 Last night, Gold Star wife @SharrellAnne2 made a plea on 𝕏, asking for a photo of her late husband SSG Alan Shaw’s grave at Arlington And MAN did patriots step up! DOZENS have visited SSG Shaw’s gravesite, including DNI @TulsiGabbard, who left a gift. So freaking proud that we could make this happen! THANK YOU, PATRIOTS! 🇺🇸

Good rainy morning from Arlington National Cemetery. Specifically, the final resting place of your hero husband Staff Sgt. Alan Shaw. His grave now has some fresh roses placed in front of it, alongside two American flags, a reminder that Americans truly appreciate his sacrifice. God bless you and your family on this Memorial Day 🙏🏻🇺🇸

Then remove the $1.65/gallon California gas tax, you disgusting, pathetic hypocrite.

Because the Fabians have been working on it since the late 1800's.

Was Saul Alinsky a Fabian Socialist? Saul Alinsky’s methodology and the Fabian Socialist strategy outlined in Rose L. Martin’s Fabian Freeway represent two prongs of the same fundamental project: the incremental, systemic erosion of traditional Western social structures in favor of a collectivist, bureaucratic state. While Alinsky is often viewed as the “radical” provocateur and the Fabians as the “gradualist” technocrats, they are functionally complementary agents of the Hegelian dialectic. The Fabian Model As detailed in Fabian Freeway, the Fabian Society (founded 1884) operated on the principle of “permeation” or the long-term, subterranean infiltration of existing institutions (government, academia, law, and the Church) rather than overt, violent revolution. Their goal was a socialist state achieved through administrative control and the “inevitability of gradualness.” Strategy of Tension Angle: The Fabians utilized the Hegelian Dialectic—creating or exploiting crises (thesis vs. antithesis) to justify a centralized government solution (synthesis). They relied on the “Round Table” model of elite consensus, where administrative experts and intellectuals steer public policy, bypassing the messy democratic will of the populace. Saul Alinsky and the “Community Organization” Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals essentially serves as the tactical field manual for the ground-level application of the Fabian objective. Where the Fabians worked from the top down (infiltrating the ivory towers), Alinsky worked from the bottom up (organizing the streets). How They Intersect: Alinsky’s community organization is the “thesis” creation engine. By manufacturing grievances and mobilizing segments of the population, Alinsky created the friction necessary for the Fabian technocrats to intervene with “solutions.” Institutional Parasitism: Just as the Fabians permeated established institutions to hollow them out, Alinsky advocated for seizing community levers of power to make existing structures unworkable, forcing a surrender to state-managed control. The convergence of these movements is visible in the personnel transfer and ideological lineage: Alinsky’s work is deeply indebted to the same pragmatist and constructivist philosophies that permeated the Fabian-influenced London School of Economics (LSE) and the American Progressive movement. The rejection of objective moral order in favor of “social utility” is the shared bedrock of both. The “Professional Revolutionary” Class: Both models rely on the emergence of a managerial class; social workers, “community organizers,” and bureaucrats, who exist outside the productive economy but act as the custodians of power. The 1960s Schism and Synthesis: In the 1960s, the “Fabian” influence, which had successfully captured foundations (Ford, Rockefeller), academia, and the federal bureaucracy, provided the funding and legal shelter for Alinskyite organizations to thrive. For instance, the transition of the radical New Left into the community organizing model served as the muscle for the broader Fabian administrative agenda. The Mechanism of Control: The essential connection is the “Strategy of Tension.” If we look at the historical trajectory from the early Fabian efforts to the late 20th-century Alinskyite activism, we see a recurring cycle... Fabian Elite create the policy framework for centralized control within academia and government. Alinskyite organizers create a state of social agitation or “democratic tension” regarding specific issues within that framework. The Synthesis occurs through the expansion of state power, the creation of new regulatory agencies, and the further concentration of wealth and decision-making into the hands of the administrative elite. Basically, the Fabians built the cage, and Alinsky provided the means to drive the population into it by making their original communities chaotic, fractured, and ultimately unsustainable without state intervention. Both are distinct movements, but they are unified by their contempt for sovereignty and their commitment to the managed society. The University of Chicago of the 1930s was the hotbed of American Fabians, unsurprisingly its where Saul Alinsky did his graduate work in sociology, as a critical node for the infusion of Fabian socialist goals into American intellectual life. While Alinsky is often associated with “Community Organizing,” his thinking was fundamentally shaped by the specific academic environment of the Chicago School of Sociology, which acted as a bridge for European Fabian methodologies. The key schools of thought and philosophical strains from that era that linked Alinsky to the broader Fabian project: The “Social Engineering” Paradigm The University of Chicago’s sociology department in the 1930s was dominated by the idea that human society could be treated as a laboratory for manipulation. The concept of “Social Engineering,” a core Fabian tenet, was imported from the London School of Economics (LSE) network. Alinsky moved away from Marxian “class struggle” (not because he didn't believe in it, but because it was deemed too blunt for America) toward “social dynamics.” The premise was that if you mapped the power flows of a city like an electrician maps a circuit, you could bypass traditional political institutions and direct social outcomes toward a collectivist, bureaucratic end. Alinsky’s famous cynicism in Rules for Radicals, the idea that “the end justifies the means,” was not a spontaneous creation but a direct application of the radical Pragmatism prevalent in the Chicago academic circle. This mirrors the Fabian rejection of “bourgeois morality.” The Fabians argued that the primary duty of an intellectual or leader is to the functional success of the plan. By stripping away fixed moral principles, Alinsky and the Fabian planners created a framework where “rights” and “wrongs” were merely tools to be deployed to force the desired social synthesis. The Institutionalization of “Constructed Grievance” One of the most significant points in the Fabian literature is the role of the “detached expert” who views the public as a subject to be agitated. Under the Chicago sociologists like Robert Park and Ernest Burgess (Fabians, whose patterns Alinsky studied), the city was viewed as an ecosystem meant to be “reorganized.” Alinsky’s specific innovation was the creation of the professional “agitator” who serves as an outsider to any specific community. This directly aligns with the Fabian belief that the masses are incapable of self-governance and require the “enlightened supervision” of a vanguard management class to transition to Socialism. The individuals circulating through the University of Chicago were often in direct communication with the intellectual currents emanating from the Fabian-aligned circles in New York (notably the League for Industrial Democracy, which was the American arm of the Fabian Society). Many of Alinsky’s mentors and peers at Chicago were either directly or indirectly linked to the same foundations (like the Rockefeller and later the Ford Foundation) that were funding the academic research used to staff the New Deal “Brain Trust.” This created a closed loop: Academic Theory: The University of Chicago develops the methodology of “Social Engineering.” Implementation: Alinsky tests these methods in the “Back of the Yards” project. National Policy: The academic and activist results are codified into federal social policy, effectively creating a permanent bureaucratic apparatus that serves socialist ends without requiring an overt revolution. Players: Robert E. Park: As a key figure at Chicago, his influence on Alinsky regarding “the ecology of the city” provided the pseudo-scientific justification for Alinsky’s techniques. These concepts paralleled the Fabian view that society is a machine to be tuned by the elite. The League for Industrial Democracy (LID): Often described as the primary transmission belt for British Fabianism to American universities. Alinsky’s early career overlapped heavily with figures incubated in the LID, who viewed his methods as a practical, tactical layer to be layered over their long-term administrative infiltration strategies. In summary, the school of thought Alinsky carried from the University of Chicago was the scientific management of human discontent. Fabians highlight this as essential because it provided the “grassroots” component to the otherwise sterile, top-down Fabian plan for the slow transformation of the American republic into a socialist service state in a borderless world with one overarching government.

The PR dept of MI6 (BCC) doesn't want journalist to see their handiwork.

If you take from the belief that youth sports should be "inclusive" that that means girls should give up their team spots to a boy, it's likely that you actually do fall into that statement. Male inclusion in girls' sports = female exclusion. Male sports are already inclusive of all men and boys, even those who pretend otherwise.

This was a great show.

Tennessee just did what Congress can't. They passed a law to break up the health insurance giants. Specifically, they made it illegal for pharmacy benefit managers — the companies in charge of pharmacy insurance — and pharmacies to be owned by the same company. That makes perfect sense. For example: CVS Caremark is the PBM, and CVS is the pharmacy. So if you have Aetna insurance, you have CVS Caremark as your PBM, and they're going to do everything they can to make sure you use CVS as your pharmacy. Aetna, Caremark, CVS — all the same company. That causes all kinds of incredibly obvious problems that this law hopes to fix. If your insurance company is in charge of approving your medication, deciding how much to pay for it, AND deciding who gets that money — while also being the pharmacy that gets paid at the end — guess what happens to prices? They go up. Governor Lee signed the law last week. CVS immediately filed a federal lawsuit because they said it will force them to close all 136 stores they have in Tennessee. Let that sink in. I'm not sure most people realize what that says about CVS and health insurance in general. They had to choose between owning the middleman (the PBM) or the healthcare provider (the pharmacy). Without hesitation, they chose the middleman. The biggest pharmacy chain in the country — with a store on every corner — would drop all 136 of their Tennessee locations in a second if it means keeping their middleman business. It is more profitable for them to be a health insurance middleman getting between you and your healthcare than it is to actually provide the healthcare. That is the problem with healthcare in America. We have made the middleman so powerful that they've taken complete control of the entire system. Three PBMs — Caremark, Express Scripts, and OptumRx — handle around 80% of all prescriptions in this country. How on earth can we expect healthcare to work well and remain affordable if that's where the money is? We all auto-pay our insurance straight out of our paycheck before we even see the money. And not surprisingly, they're keeping a ton of it. That's why we fired them. And they can't file a lawsuit to stop us. That lets us offer fair, transparent prices. No PBMs. No insurance games. No hidden markups. You see the cost, you pay the cost.