OmniLight

Yeah you see those stats about prehistory where like 40% of men and 80% of women reproduced. And then a lot of apologists for the status quo will act like what we see now was normal. No, none of that was based on female choice, it was based on the men who killed off other men

They should not obsess over blood testosterone levels and answer those questions:

@jagesuperhemlig @RealJohnShoe @KatHighsmith @frandalorian @RioVeradonir @HeidiBriones @frantagonist merely be a byproduct of that and one that's not especially important. Everyone, especially if you're a man, should be comfortable with the idea of being alone

@jagesuperhemlig @RealJohnShoe @KatHighsmith @frandalorian @RioVeradonir @HeidiBriones @frantagonist I guess I'm annoyed at how gynocentric society is. All actions oriented around women's perceptions. "Ascending", whatever you mean by that, to obsessively cater to women's preferences irritates me. You should be "ascend" in pursuit of some set of goals — attracting women should

She’s not getting it. We’re not saying she’s not good looking. We’re saying men in general are just better looking.

Any person following this account, especially men, expecting to receive consistent, good advice is very retarded

My wife has a lesbian aunt with a PhD in childhood development who likes to give parenting advice without having ever raised a child. She keeps leaving the baby gate at the top of the stairs open.

Kendi parası ve gücü olan başarılı kadınlar bile maddi durumu daha iyi olan bir erkeği tercih etme eğilimindedir. Bu durum, kadınların "toplum onları kısıtladığı için güçlü erkek aradığını" öne süren sosyal rol teorisini çürütür.

@bedriddenmaiden Then don't be one

nothing sounds more unappealing to me than to be a mother

The only quote from Sartre that's actually worth something

@RealJohnShoe @KatHighsmith @frandalorian @RioVeradonir @HeidiBriones @frantagonist This is only true if a variable is normally distributed. But it doesn't matter anyways. So what if women find men less attractive than men find women? Who cares. And if we really got into it, these are perceived attractiveness rankings, not necessarily objective beauty standards

@KatHighsmith @frandalorian @RioVeradonir @HeidiBriones @frantagonist That has nothing to do with "average." Half of all men should be above average by definition. What the fuck has ruined women's brains? Is it hormone drugs? SSRIs?

This is the limitation of the IQ-centered immigration argument, and I say this as someone who has written about IQ for years. Let us grant the central point. IQ differences exist within India, including between caste groups. Brahmins are more cognitively selected than lower-caste populations, but this does not make their average “European,” nor does it magically raise it to 100 by rhetorical convenience. Even if one foreign population were more intelligent than another, and Indians as a whole are not more intelligent than White Americans, that still does not establish America’s obligation to admit them. A nation is not a testing center, nor an employment agency. It does not exist to scour the world for useful outsiders and then reorder itself around their admission. Its first duty, and this is a sacred one, is to its own people. In this context, that means the historic American people: the White, European-descended people whose blood, sweat, and tears made this nation possible, and whose continued sacrifice still sustains it. The economy is legitimate only insofar as it serves the people and preserves the nation they made possible. A people is not merely a population within a state. It is the living substance from which a nation takes form, in a concrete racial and historical sense. The economy exists as a tool of national life, not as a master before which the nation must kneel. When economic utility becomes a justification for demographic transformation, it ceases to serve the nation and becomes an instrument against it. The question is not whether a potential immigrant group is intelligent or economically useful. The question is whether its admission strengthens the existing American people and preserves the nation as a distinct historical inheritance. The mass admission of Indians, or of any population fundamentally dissimilar to the founding stock of the nation, does not. American excellence is not an abstraction, nor is it the product of economic machinery. It is the accumulated expression of a people carried across generations. To replace that people is to sever the nation from the source of its own greatness. This is where the IQ argument collapses. It treats the problem as one of degree rather than kind, as if the only concern were admitting more or less capable foreigners. The deeper problem is mass demographic transformation itself. Better screening may produce a more competent foreign population, but competence does not resolve the political question, which is inseparable from the demographic one. Selection may improve the quality of a foreign slave caste, but it does not change the nature of the displacement now occurring in America and throughout the West. It only makes that displacement more efficient, and thus harder to reverse. A nation that accepts this logic has already forgotten what it exists to defend. It has mistaken itself for an economy with a flag, and its people for inputs in a labor market. But a nation is not an economic platform. It is a living inheritance, carried by a people across generations. Its purpose is to secure the future of its own people and preserve their posterity, not to manage their replacement with better paperwork. Its first obligation, and the one it has spent decades betraying, is to the American people themselves. No screening regime, however selective, can alter the essential question: whether America remains the inheritance of its historic people, or becomes an administrative territory open to anyone who can be made economically useful. This is the battle for the soul of the nation. Those who argue only for “higher quality” foreign replacements, measured by IQ, economic utility, or any other managerial metric, have already accepted the logic of replacement. They are not defending the nation. They are merely negotiating the terms under which it is being dissolved.

@wanted4mogging If a woman was bad at riding or sucking you off, then yeah, it'd be a big whatever. If you got your asshole reamed, I don't think you'd be getting over it lol

personally if i got rареd i’d just get over it?? like waaah oh a sexual experience i didn’t enjoy, i’ve eaten food before i don’t too like but you don’t see me talking about trauma or whatever. it lasts a few minutes and then you never have to deal with it again like who cares??

@AltaiSchizo @Babygravy9 Wrong. There are a plethora of European cuisines that’re superior to what exists in the rest of the world. Worst Euro food is in Scandinavia and it’s still at least as good as most of the stuff you encounter outside of Europe

@IllustriousFlar @Babygravy9 white people don’t have good food lmao, only Italians do

I remember a friend of a friend was this insufferable Turkish guy called Deren who kept getting cucked by his girlfriend—anyway, he forced us all to go to this Turkish cafe in Stoke Newington called something like “Cafe Z” and I eventually settled on this dish, which is called “menemen” and when I didn’t finish it, he angrily took my plate and ate the rest while mumbling under his breath about the superiority of Turkish cuisine. It’s literally just scrambled eggs with tomato and paprika.

The whole "access to white people is not a human right" never really hit me until a group of black youths showed up at my HOA pool, which is deeply nestled inside our neighborhood, and not findable on google maps. They hopped the fence and were clearly seen and even video'd doing so. When confronted they just denied it, even with like 5 guys standing around telling them they say them and asking them to leave. Cries of racism and bigotry abounded. They kept pacing around refusing to leave until the police were called, at which time they left and vowed they'd come back. Things were complicated even more by a some obese half black woman who might legitimately be the only black person in the entire neighborhood came over and claimed they were her guests, even as she couldn't tell us what their names were. She was literally just operating on racial tribalism. The lesson is that you can have price barriers. You can have high HOA fees, with strict enforcement and literal gatekeeping. You can do every possible thing within the law, and still, white people will never be left alone.

@CryptoCyberia OpenBASED gf

@FischerKing64 I need to see more uses of the other -wits. Nitwit and dimwit more accurately describe many of the people I come across on this website, completely or just barely having any wit. Halfwit used in place of midwit for some variety

‘Skin suit’ is becoming another ‘midwit.’ It is the sad fate of every good term to be overused to the point where it loses its meaning. People should try to express themselves individually without resorting to these terms.

@alc_anthro @TheWiseCrow1 @zaelefty They are discrete. Even if you want to be technical and say it isn't binary, it is discrete. There is no spectrum of sex, no gradient. It is ternary at most

@IllustriousFlar @TheWiseCrow1 @zaelefty The categories are NOT discrete. There is no discrete categorization of biological sex that exclusively bins all humans into exactly one of two sex categories. You cannot have even a single outlier and call it binary.

Here’s your reminder that the bimodal differences between the sexes can only exist because sex is binary. A bimodal distribution has two modes and implies two groups being compared. Two separate distributions of a given trait. One for males. One for females.

@alc_anthro @TheWiseCrow1 @zaelefty And even then, sex is still not a spectrum. Those are still discrete categories.

@alc_anthro @TheWiseCrow1 @zaelefty Sex is binary. You're trying to obfuscate that which is intuitively obvious. You're intellectually dishonest. Humans can be dichotomized into categories called sexes, male or females, based on their genitalia. Intersex cases count for less than a two hundredths of a percent