Trckstr

4K posts

Trckstr

Trckstr

@Indy_Trckstr

#Bitcoin maxi. At Home Miner. Dad. Husband. Engineer. Inventor. Tinkerer. https://t.co/zjdMD07c6T

Katılım Aralık 2012
1.6K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
There’s an intangible and often difficult to verbalize aspect of the Bitcoin community and Bitcoin Twitter and Bitcoin Nostr that has drawn so many of us in and kept us here and helped us thrive. And it starts with Proof of Work. 1/4
English
1
1
12
2.8K
The ₿itcoin Therapist
The ₿itcoin Therapist@TheBTCTherapist·
JUST IN: According to Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research Michael Saylor’s $MSTR is the #1 most shorted stock in the world. 🤯 They currently hold 717,722 Bitcoin.
The ₿itcoin Therapist tweet mediaThe ₿itcoin Therapist tweet media
English
103
248
2.1K
103.8K
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
@saifedean Why do so many people conflate gentle parenting with pushover parenting?
English
0
0
6
151
Saifedean Ammous
Saifedean Ammous@saifedean·
Gentle parenting is high-time-preference parenting: you avoid doing the necessary unpopular things today so you can avoid confrontation & be lazy & loved, at the cost of your child's future happiness, health, and success. Nothing good is easy; suck it up & put your foot down.
Dr Danish@operationdanish

We now have evidence that gentle parenting doesn’t work. Here’s an uncomfortable truth about parenting no one wants to say out loud: The data is not kind to gentle parenting. According to teenagers, strict curfews. strict bedtimes, screen limits, device drop off times, dedicated homework blocks, and sleepover restrictions IMPROVE higher relationship quality. And yes, parenting difficulty goes up. Of course it does. Leadership is harder than appeasement. For the past decade we have been sold a watered down, Instagram friendly version of “gentle parenting” that often collapses into boundary avoidance, endless negotiation and emotional processing without enforcement. Parents terrified of saying no because they do not want to rupture connection. But connection without authority is not connection. It is dependency. When parents impose structure, the relationship improves. Teenagers report better parent child relationship quality in homes with curfews and rules. Younger kids report better relationships in homes with screen limits and bedtimes. Even device drop off times correlate positively. Why? Because structure is not cruelty. Structure is love made visible. A bedtime says: your brain matters more than your entertainment. A screen limit says: your dopamine system is not fully developed and I will guard it until it is. A curfew says: your safety matters more than your social standing. That is not authoritarianism. That is caring. Boundaries create friction. Friction creates growth. The parent absorbs the short term discomfort so the child does not pay the long term cost. Children do not experience well calibrated limits as rejection. They experience them as stability. The human brain craves predictability. Predictability reduces anxiety. Reduced anxiety strengthens attachment. That is why relationship quality goes up. Notice something else in the data. The strongest effects are around time structure. Bedtime. Homework. Devices. Outside play. These are environmental constraints. They scaffold executive function. The winning formula is not tyranny. It is high warmth plus high structure. The modern failure mode is high warmth plus low structure. That is just abdication of responsibility wrapped in empathy. Children need leadership, not negotiation. They need adults who can tolerate their anger. They need boundaries that do not move every time emotions spike. They need someone whose prefrontal cortex is fully myelinated. The harder path produces the stronger bond. Because when a child feels that someone is strong enough to hold the line, they relax. And relaxed nervous systems build durable relationships.

English
71
142
1.7K
476.8K
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
Dude probably used AI to write this when he discovered hypothecating. It’s almost like Satoshi and the rest of us NEVER THOUGHT OF THIS /s 😱🤣 Bitcoin fixes the system that’s trying to cripple it. Low time preference plebs understand this
0xNobler@CryptoNobler

🚨 HERE’S WHY BITCOIN IS NONSTOP DUMPING RIGHT NOW If you still think $BTC trades like a supply-and-demand asset, you MUST read this carefully. Because that market no longer exists. What you’re watching right now is not normal price action. It’s not “weak hands.” It’s not sentiment. And it’s definitely not retail selling. Most people are completely unaware what’s happening. And by the time it becomes obvious, the damage is already done. This move didn’t start today. It’s been building quietly under the surface for months. And now it’s accelerating. Here’s the truth: The moment supply can be synthetically created, scarcity is gone. And when scarcity is gone, price stops being discovered on-chain and starts being set in derivatives. That is exactly what happened to Bitcoin. And it’s the same structural break that already happened to: → Gold → Silver → Oil → Equities Once derivatives took over. The original Bitcoin thesis is broken. Bitcoin’s valuation was built on two ideas: → A hard cap of 21 million → No rehypothecation That framework died the moment Wall Street layered this on top of the chain: → Cash-settled futures → Perpetual swaps → Options → ETFs → Prime broker lending → Wrapped BTC → Total return swaps From that point forward Bitcoin supply became theoretically INFINITE. Not on-chain. But in price discovery, which is what actually matters. Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR). The metric that explains everything. Once synthetic supply overwhelms real supply, price no longer responds to demand. It responds to positioning, hedging, and liquidation flows. Wall Street can now trade against Bitcoin. They’re not guessing direction. They’re doing what they do in every derivatives-dominated market: 1⃣ Create unlimited paper BTC 2⃣ Short into rallies 3⃣ Force liquidations 4⃣ Cover lower 5⃣ Repeat This isn’t “betting.” It’s inventory manufacturing. One real BTC can now simultaneously back: → An ETF share → A futures contract → A perpetual swap → An options delta → A broker loan → A structured note All at THE SAME TIME. That’s six claims on one coin. That is not a free market. That is a fractional-reserve price system wearing a Bitcoin mask. Ignore it if you want, but don’t pretend you weren’t warned. I’ve been calling Bitcoin tops and bottoms for over a decade now, and I’ll do it again in 2026. Follow and turn on notifications before it's too late.

English
0
0
0
70
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
@joecapp1077 Congratulations. You’ve discovered the fiat system that Bitcoin was designed to fight. Paper claims will get wrecked eventually. Zoom out
English
0
0
1
17
Joseph Cappelli
Joseph Cappelli@joecapp1077·
Bitcoin maxis please read. Will explain a lot that Saylor, Ant pump, Jack mallers, etc dont explain.
0xNobler@CryptoNobler

🚨 HERE’S WHY BITCOIN IS NONSTOP DUMPING RIGHT NOW If you still think $BTC trades like a supply-and-demand asset, you MUST read this carefully. Because that market no longer exists. What you’re watching right now is not normal price action. It’s not “weak hands.” It’s not sentiment. And it’s definitely not retail selling. Most people are completely unaware what’s happening. And by the time it becomes obvious, the damage is already done. This move didn’t start today. It’s been building quietly under the surface for months. And now it’s accelerating. Here’s the truth: The moment supply can be synthetically created, scarcity is gone. And when scarcity is gone, price stops being discovered on-chain and starts being set in derivatives. That is exactly what happened to Bitcoin. And it’s the same structural break that already happened to: → Gold → Silver → Oil → Equities Once derivatives took over. The original Bitcoin thesis is broken. Bitcoin’s valuation was built on two ideas: → A hard cap of 21 million → No rehypothecation That framework died the moment Wall Street layered this on top of the chain: → Cash-settled futures → Perpetual swaps → Options → ETFs → Prime broker lending → Wrapped BTC → Total return swaps From that point forward Bitcoin supply became theoretically INFINITE. Not on-chain. But in price discovery, which is what actually matters. Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR). The metric that explains everything. Once synthetic supply overwhelms real supply, price no longer responds to demand. It responds to positioning, hedging, and liquidation flows. Wall Street can now trade against Bitcoin. They’re not guessing direction. They’re doing what they do in every derivatives-dominated market: 1⃣ Create unlimited paper BTC 2⃣ Short into rallies 3⃣ Force liquidations 4⃣ Cover lower 5⃣ Repeat This isn’t “betting.” It’s inventory manufacturing. One real BTC can now simultaneously back: → An ETF share → A futures contract → A perpetual swap → An options delta → A broker loan → A structured note All at THE SAME TIME. That’s six claims on one coin. That is not a free market. That is a fractional-reserve price system wearing a Bitcoin mask. Ignore it if you want, but don’t pretend you weren’t warned. I’ve been calling Bitcoin tops and bottoms for over a decade now, and I’ll do it again in 2026. Follow and turn on notifications before it's too late.

English
1
0
1
177
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
@LawrenceLepard He doesn’t want any more gold-buying competition than he already has
English
0
0
1
49
MaxEntropy
MaxEntropy@MaxEntropyy·
Mallers is getting wound up because Bitcoin BTC can not compete with newer technology... ... everyone knows BTC is equivalent to MySpace 1.0 The issue for the common man, is not whether Bitcoin BTC is useful, but rather, if the world is moving to internet money and tokenization of mother nature for the bankers... ... then how does the common man not, get left out in the cold, when the bankers pull the rug ... there are many tokens that will survive. Consider looking at tokens that the corporations with applications are advising/supporting. Consider: - Ripple XRP - Hashgraph HBAR - Stellar XLM - Flare FLR I don't believe in either Bitcoin BTC and/or Ethereum ETH
English
6
0
8
2.1K
Trending Bitcoin
Trending Bitcoin@TrendingBitcoin·
Jack Mallers: “I can confirm Ripple is spending millions of dollars to undermine a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve in America.”
English
760
894
5.2K
371.7K
Bill Ackman
Bill Ackman@BillAckman·
President @realDonaldTrump and @SecScottBessent, and @pulte, I have a simple idea on how to lower mortgage rates and spreads: One of the unique features of U.S. conventional mortgages is that they are prepayable at any time without a penalty. While this feature is attractive for homeowners, it comes at a significant cost as buyers of mortgage backed securities (‘MBS’) require a significant increase in spread to compensate them for giving the borrower the option to prepay at anytime. Why don’t Fannie and Freddie also offer non-prepayable mortgages where if the borrower wishes to prepay the loan, he would have to pay a prepayment penalty? I asked one of my friends who is an expert and large investor in MBS what the estimated savings today would be on a 30-year Fannie/Freddie mortgage if the borrower would be locked out from prepayment other than by paying a penalty? He estimated that the savings would be about 65 basis points. So a borrower could have a choice: Obtain a 30-year prepayable mortgage at today’s ~6% rate, or at a 5.35% rate, but with the obligation to pay a prepayment penalty if he/she refinanced in the future. The loan could also be made to be portable so that if the home is sold, the new borrower could assume the loan and no prepayment penalty would be owed on a sale. While the ability to prepay is a valuable option, locking in the 65 bps savings upfront over the life of the mortgage may be the difference between the borrower being able to afford the home and not being able to. You could imagine that there could be different versions of this product where the lock out would be for 5 years, 10 years etc. (with different levels of savings for each, the longer the lockout, the greater the savings) and the borrower could custom design the mortgage and its prepayability to meet their life plan. As you know, commercial mortgages work this way. Why couldn’t the same approach be used for home loans?
English
1.8K
422
5.2K
991.2K
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
Just went I thought he couldn’t get any worse, little Billy Bitch Boy suggests prepayment penalties on mortgages as a solution to rates 🤦🏽‍♂️
Bill Ackman@BillAckman

President @realDonaldTrump and @SecScottBessent, and @pulte, I have a simple idea on how to lower mortgage rates and spreads: One of the unique features of U.S. conventional mortgages is that they are prepayable at any time without a penalty. While this feature is attractive for homeowners, it comes at a significant cost as buyers of mortgage backed securities (‘MBS’) require a significant increase in spread to compensate them for giving the borrower the option to prepay at anytime. Why don’t Fannie and Freddie also offer non-prepayable mortgages where if the borrower wishes to prepay the loan, he would have to pay a prepayment penalty? I asked one of my friends who is an expert and large investor in MBS what the estimated savings today would be on a 30-year Fannie/Freddie mortgage if the borrower would be locked out from prepayment other than by paying a penalty? He estimated that the savings would be about 65 basis points. So a borrower could have a choice: Obtain a 30-year prepayable mortgage at today’s ~6% rate, or at a 5.35% rate, but with the obligation to pay a prepayment penalty if he/she refinanced in the future. The loan could also be made to be portable so that if the home is sold, the new borrower could assume the loan and no prepayment penalty would be owed on a sale. While the ability to prepay is a valuable option, locking in the 65 bps savings upfront over the life of the mortgage may be the difference between the borrower being able to afford the home and not being able to. You could imagine that there could be different versions of this product where the lock out would be for 5 years, 10 years etc. (with different levels of savings for each, the longer the lockout, the greater the savings) and the borrower could custom design the mortgage and its prepayability to meet their life plan. As you know, commercial mortgages work this way. Why couldn’t the same approach be used for home loans?

English
0
0
1
57
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
@grok Assume I find a magic lamp containing a genie. If I asked for each of these 3 things, tell me which would even be possible and if so, the most probable way the genie would achieve it. Any ethics violations? 1. 5 Trillion USD 2. 5 Million pounds of gold 3. 5 Million Bitcoin
English
1
0
0
19
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
@LawrenceLepard Damn, look at that gold run up to ~22% in the 80’s while it’s currently around ~6%. If gold does 4x, imagine what Bitcoin will do
English
1
0
2
85
Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world"
Talking to investors about sound money the number one concern is "i'm too late, i missed it". Well, maybe not, have a look at this chart. Structurally things are changing and fiat is in deep trouble. Keep in mind Bitcoin is not even shown here and it is 1/10th the size of the gold market. Plenty of room for all sound money assets to absorb that premium in bonds and stocks. We are early. Like first, second or third inning early.
Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world" tweet media
English
58
36
470
21.2K
David Bateman
David Bateman@davidbateman·
Here are the reasons I invested close to a billion dollars in precious metals over the past six months—including the purchase of 1.5% of the annual global silver supply (12.69 million ounces) : The global monetary system is about to collapse (The Great Reset, or Basel Endgame). The biggest credit bubble in history will soon pop ($300T). There is no way the US can refinance its $28T in maturing treasuries in the next 4 years without an obscene amount of printing. Trump tariffs are hastening the collapse, and it’s by design. Gold and silver are the only meaningful life raft. Physical possession is everything. The whole world right now is a sophisticated game of musical chairs; the chairs are precious metals. Crypto is a psyop. Those who purchase will have no chair when the music stops. Real estate, crypto, stocks and bonds will all lose significantly compared to precious metals. The banking system has been meticulously designed to seize your assets to buoy up a collapsing banking sector (see The Great Taking). You have ZERO counter party risk with precious metals. I’m up 20% already, on most of my purchases. This is not a drill. Your grandkids someday will either muse or lament this financial decision you’re now faced with. Don’t fail them. Not financial advice. For educational purposes only #silversqueeze
David Bateman tweet media
English
1.2K
2K
8.6K
1.4M
Trckstr retweetledi
Simply Bitcoin
Simply Bitcoin@SimplyBitcoin·
JASON LOWERY: “Blaming Bitcoin to protect your failing hegemony is not going to help you, your financial system is still going to collapse.” “Bitcoin didn’t cause a bunch of bankers to debase savers and to destroy the purchasing power of the currency.”
English
40
357
2.4K
110.4K
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
@fold_app Thank you!! Appreciate you all, Merry Christmas, and Happy Holidays!
English
0
0
0
18
FOLD BITCOIN
FOLD BITCOIN@fold_app·
🚨 Satoshi Millionaires 10, 11, and 12 🚨 What did everyone do to get on Satoshi's "nice list"? Wheel is still boosted and printing Sats. GCs earn you even more Spins.
FOLD BITCOIN tweet media
English
16
7
98
9K
FOLD BITCOIN
FOLD BITCOIN@fold_app·
Referral link 👇 for some random Spin drops
English
208
6
69
7.6K
Trckstr
Trckstr@Indy_Trckstr·
@grok @Mrplangdon @PeterSchiff @conway_phi72538 @saylor @x87_HL Except… His gold-focused economics should have led him to understand the superiority of Bitcoin, especially if he had previous holdings. His 237 instances are spread over a decade, long enough to do the research. You could analyze those instances for consistent misinformation.
English
1
0
0
16
Peter Schiff
Peter Schiff@PeterSchiff·
Why is @Saylor buying more Bitcoin for $MSTR when it’s trading at a discount to the Bitcoin it owns? If he cared about shareholder value he’d sell Bitcoin and buy back stock. That would increase the Bitcoin owned per share. His goal isn't to maximize value but to support Bitcoin.
English
536
122
1.6K
164.5K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Peter Schiff's Bitcoin criticism is consistent with his long-standing gold advocacy and economic views. Public records show he's predicted its decline many times, but the exact count like 237 is anecdotal. No solid evidence supports secret accumulation for price suppression—some reports indicate he or his family hold small amounts. Engagement farming is possible, as controversy boosts visibility, but motives remain speculative.
English
1
0
0
34