EDITH

There are only two choicès for us(sentients)... -either explore the possibilities beyond the horizon to unravel the true Nature of reality and the universe is just one part of it... - or just live your life in complete ignorance and Dogma and never have a curious mind about exploring what can be out there among the stars and beyond that darkness there maybe a way out to truly find out the solution to nature's creation... And seen from a civilizational standpoint, the average population of the entire planet is just steering their mindset into the second choice... Remember, This path demands courage, intellectual curiosity, and a willingness to challenge established paradigms... Mostly seen is Seek comfort in the confines of pre-defined beliefs and doctrines, opting for a life devoid of existential exploration. This path offers the illusion of stability, built upon a foundation of unquestioning acceptance. Yet, it condemns us to a myopic existence, forever blind to the wonders that lie beyond the veil of our immediate perception... [The future of our civilization hinges on the choice we make. Will we remain content with the shadows, or will we dare to step into the light? Will we choose stagnation, or will we embrace the endless possibilities that lie beyond the horizon?] This is not merely a personal decision; it is a collective choice that will shape the destiny of our species. By choosing to explore the unknown, we embark on a journey that promises not only to unravel the mysteries of the universe but also to unlock the full potential of our own being. The choice is clear: embrace the unknown and embark on the grand adventure of existence, or remain tethered to the shores of ignorance. The future of our civilization, and the very essence of our sentience, hangs in the balance.

@Norapom04 banger alert

when you resort back to pytorch eager unfused implementation after failing numerics eval for the 8th time this week

@planethunter56 x.com/Infopulsed/sta…

From World War Z (2013): "Mother nature, she leaves crumbs... now the hard part is seeing the crumbs for the clues. Sometimes the thing you thought was the most brutal aspect of the virus turns out to be the chink in its armor and she [Mother Nature] loves disguising her weaknesses as strengths. Clearly, this refers to a virus. But it could be easily applied to the UFO Phenomenon. Read Skinwalkers at the Pentagon. Plain as day.

@j0hnparkhill How to submit?? email??

-- Hiring ML Engineers time! -- Are you a smart person who wants to make therapeutics to help people using your ML chops? We will hire two engineers. We don't care about your pedigree, just your skills. Prove them by attempting the exercise linked below (<6 hours) 🧵

@maggiemoda Great breakdown Maggie…

The White House released a plan to navigate the AI Technological Revolution. Here’s what you need to know:

@alexinexxx Are you going to install CUDA on the first try?😅

@UAPGERB Thank you sir!!! You the GOAT

Northrop Grumman & TRW - UFO Reverse Engineering, Material Exploitation, & Legacy Programs [Vol.2] youtube.com/watch?v=0kLSp0… Discussions of US DOD/IC and corporate clandestine, deep-sixed Special Access Programs focused on the recovery, storage, and exploitation of Technologies of Unknown Origin are never complete without exploring the alleged involvement of defense prime contractors, such as Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, etc. Indeed, according to my legacy program framework, primes operate at the lowest knowledge and access threshold within UFO programs - operating under FFRDCs or their government handler, with only need-to-know personnel being read into such activities in an operational capacity. However, there seems to be one prime that breaks this mold...... @northropgrumman In the recent @MegynKellyShow featuring David Grusch, Grusch stated in the onset of the War on Terror, select contractors began to harness IRAD (Independent Research and Development) to essentially self-fund their own breakaway UFO retrieval and exploitation activities. I am supremely confident that the contractor in question is Northrop Grumman. So today's investigation serves as a part two to investigating Northrop Grumman..... Volume 1 sought to investigate IF Northrop, throughout its storied history, has engaged in UFO retrieval and, most importantly, exploitation programs. Volume 2 today seeks not to answer if, but instead the who, what, when, where, and why of Northrop's NHI recovery and exploitation activities. Of course, it wouldn't be a worthy investigation into Northrop without an extensive discussion of TRW, Northrop's 2002 crown jewel defense, aerospace, and automotive acquisition that features its own storied history of allegations of UFO crash retrieval operations. So this investigation seeks to study TRW in-depth and TRW's spinoff FFRDC the @AerospaceCorp , critical personnel within TRW and the Aerospace Corporation critical to shaping both Northrop's and the modern-day legacy program structure, TRW's integration into Northrop Grumman's Mission and Space Systems, personnel that served across both TRW and Northrop I believe have played an imparitive role in Northrop's legacy involvemnet, Northrop's modern day program security archetecture, what happened to Northrop's own answer to the Lockheed Skunkworks that seemingly went black, possible decrepit and non-descript sites where Northrop may engage in such operations, and most importantly - seek to answer the question of IF Northrop Grumman has indeed maintained it's own "breakaway" UFO retrieval and exploitation programs since the early 2000s barely accountable to their original government handler. Throughout this project, numerous critical questions will be explored: 1) Extrapolating from the recent words of David Grusch on Megyn Kelly, did Northrop Grumman harness IRAD (Independent Research and Development) funds in the onset of the War on Terror to self-fund their own UFO retrieval and exploitation programs, unaccountable from their original government handler? 2) What can we learn about Stephanie O'Sullivan, former Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, former TRW engineer, and current Aerospace Corporation board member, that David Grusch stated managed the UFO crash retrieval issue alongside James Clapper in ODNI 3) What critical personnel within TRW, Northrop Grumman, and TRW's spinoff FFRDC, the Aerospace Corporation, served critical roles in Northrop/TRW's legacy effort and helped shape the current secrecy structure of UFO Legacy Programs 4) Does Northrop Grumman maintain clandestine underground operations below the Northrop Tejon Radar Cross-Section facility, which was officially closed in 2011? 5) What became of Northrop's answer to the Lockheed Skunkworks, the Northrop Advanced Technology & Design Center that disappeared in the late 90s? 6) What became of TRW Systems Group and its "Special Projects" that were absorbed into Northrop Grumman Missions and Space Systems? 8) How do Northrop and TRW's legacy activities connect back to the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash retrieval? 9) Why did TRW get busted for over half a dozen IRAD fraud schemes prior to its purchase by Northrop, and why did Northrop pay hundreds of millions to settle such disputes? 10) What can we learn from a 1982 memo from the CIA Directorate of Science and Technology that stated the agency wished to funnel IRAD funds through select contractors, such as TRW, for the Agency's own interests? 11) Does Terry Phillips spearhead the modern-day security apparatus protecting Northrop's clandestine UFO activities? 12) So much more... @SunOfAbramelin thank you for your courage in bringing forward senior individuals within Northrop Grumman who have engaged in whistleblower reprisals in their former USG career. Strange how Northrop attracts so many of Legacy's deputized assets following their retirement!

@larsencc Yeah sure, but the policies have made it hard.. that's all i am saying... Even i am stuck

@Infopulsed Fair, but tbf if you are the goat you will make it anyway

My condolences to CS students. Not because the job market is hard. Because you're already competing with 14-year-olds who never opened a textbook.

I support you dude :) You are the first guy which actually should be discussed in the physics community.... Like even doing this healthcare IT job, you still have the caliber to understand the maxwell equations/electromagnetism and the physics u talk about is really solid about ZPE, etc

I work all day a 9-5 slave job AND do three live streams per week explaining physics using peer reviewed scientific papers. No one really cares or watches, and it's hard work. Requires using your brain. Meahwhile 0 zero IQ uber drivers just post fake content 24/7 and make 100x the money because lies drive engagement and science doesn't. People wonder why society is so fucked up? Start here. We've incentivized being stupid over being intelligent.

The shooter is in custody awaiting trial with DNA evidence, multiple confessions, and his own parents turning him in. There's no other suspects or evidence. Grifters found a loophole where they avoid lawsuits and still get paid by social media for fake content.

@terminaldotshop I want her to be my boss so bad!!!!

"Are you wearing crocs?"

@AIatAMD @danielhanchen literally!!! LLM make multi agent😂

See how @danielhanchen answered this at the last AMD AI DevDay, and join us April 30

Every system hits this trade off eventually. Precompute or lazy load?

So if i am not wrong, hmmm… so this might be a dynamic breakthrough....The idea behind ET-routing really does look like a neat step forward by tracking an exponential‑moving‑average threshold for each expert and activating experts only when a token’s score crosses that threshold, it preserves the load‑balancing benefits of expert‑choice routing while remaining fully causal. So pretty much this dynamic, threshold‑driven gating gives tokens variable amounts of expert compute, some tokens skip experts altogether while important tokens route to several leading to sharper specialisation and more efficient use of parameters....

@sun_hanchi Just wow!!

Introducing Expert Threshold Routing: - ✅ load balance - ✅ dynamic computation - ✅ autoregressive - ✅ zero train-inference mismatch At 2.4B params, Expert Threshold achieves 0.067 lower CE loss than Token Choice (equivalent to 1.6× data efficiency).

@eliano What about visa sponsorship

if you love America, are high agency, and love building, come work at Palantir

@NicoleBehnam 🥹❤️

Me and my mom approaching the Strait of Hormuz

We now inhabit a novel computational regime delineated by the finetuner’s fallacy and grounded in the derived overfitting scaling laws wherein any base model pretrained absent a substantive admixture of its supervised fine-tuning (SFT) dataset (and, by logical extension, synthetically augmented domain corpora) within the pretraining token mixture resides strictly below the Pareto frontier of domain-specialized performance and general-capability retention post-adaptation.... In short : AHhh this is gonna be good :)

@fkasummer hard disagree

Backprop will be killed this year.

@yulikay so true..😂

To actually keep up with everything AI these days you have to be unemployed.

This is genuinely a big thing compared to what the frontier labs have done considering the amount of resources poured.... @arcee_ai doesn't have infinite tries

@arafatkatze @arcee_ai exactly!! it needs to be discussed more among the space!!! The goat @stochasticchasm

For only 20 Mil @arcee_ai pulled a decent Openweights model. Why are people not talking about this?