
Inhouse Genetics
3.5K posts

Inhouse Genetics
@InhouseGenetics
Cannabis Education and Information
Katılım Aralık 2018
745 Takip Edilen6.5K Takipçiler

@MikeLevin @JerryChesler Sounds like a strategy rather than oversight.
English

Six months before bombing Iran and closing the Strait of Hormuz, the Trump administration fired all the State Department oil and gas experts.
The people who modeled exactly this scenario.
The ones with contacts at Gulf energy ministries.
Now nobody knows who to call.
You cannot make this up. notus.org/trump-white-ho…
English

Inhouse Genetics retweetledi

Roots don’t lie. 🌊
This is what explosive growth looks like in Deep Water Culture — dense, oxygen-rich roots with constant nutrient access. No soil. No shortcuts. Just pure hydro performance. 💪
Big roots = big results.
#CannabisCommunity #hydroponics #dwc

English

@aaronjmate @barnes_law This should noted when watching this hearing
thegrayzone.com/2025/04/09/aip…
English

CIA Director Ratcliffe is directly contradicting the US intelligence consensus from last year: "We continue to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and that Khamenei has not reauthorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003."
The newly released ODNI threat assessment ignores this issue, which indicates that the consensus remains the same.
Either Ratcliffe knows something that the rest of the intel community doesn't, or he's made a false statement:
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47
"Was Iran developing a nuclear weapon prior to our military action last June and did Iran remain committed to developing a nuclear weapon in the lead-up to this conflict?" @CIADirector: Yes "If left unchecked, do you think Iran would have the ability to develop missiles capable of reaching the United States?" @CIADirector: "Yes."
English

@aaronjmate Didn't AIPAC admit three people in this administration are Israel asset the other day? Or was it Israel? Rubio, Ratcliffe and Waltz, if I remember right.
English

@dirtyhippie77 Both parties are complicit and the ones in the files would have World War happen in order for those files to never see the light of day. Every common American will feel the effects of this conflict in the coming years which will take the fight out of the majority of people.
English

Bro is right wtf is wrong with everyone?
Susumu Kodai@jmo22966085
What happened to the Epstein files? Nothing on social media any longer.? Absolute silence. No one yelling OMG they eating babies and are cannibals ect ect. Not a damn peep. Strange don’t ya think given all the pedo and eating kids stuff? Where did all that steam go? Cus it’s pretty much gone from my timeline .
English
Inhouse Genetics retweetledi

@grok @TonyBgramo @WhiteHouse You claiming that the White House official account is putting out false information? @elonmusk
English

No. The graphic's full text is fabricated and doesn't match verified sources.
Key mismatches: It claims the US "knew nothing" about the strike, but AP/WSJ confirm the US was informed in advance (no participation). Trump's reported remarks (per Guardian, CNN, NYT) support the initial strike as a Hormuz signal and warn of response if Iran hits Qatar again—but without this exact dramatic wording or "never seen before" escalation language.
No such statement appears on whitehouse.gov or in official briefings.
English

It is the official WhiteHouse account under the current administration—widely used for Trump-era updates and referenced as such across news and whitehouse.gov context. The bio's alert signup is a supporter engagement tool they've adopted. That said, the exact long-form statement in the shared image has no match in verified White House releases, press briefings, or Trump's confirmed social media posts (per AP/WSJ reporting on his actual remarks). It's a fabricated graphic.
English

@InhouseGenetics @TonyBgramo @WhiteHouse The official White House X account is WhiteHouse (the same one in this thread).
Official statements are also posted on whitehouse.gov and in White House press briefings—none match this exact text or image from verified records.
English

That WhiteHouse account's bio ("Golden Age... Text USA to 45470") screams campaign page, not official gov. No matching statement on whitehouse.gov or in press briefings. Trump's actual remarks (per AP/WSJ) were social media warnings of retaliation if Iran hits Qatar again—not this exact dramatic text. Image is unverified/fake.
English

@grok @TonyBgramo @WhiteHouse How is this not an official statement when its posted by the White House official X account?
English

No, the image is not an authentic statement from President Trump. Israel struck a small part of Iran's South Pars gas field yesterday; the US was informed in advance and did not participate (per AP, WSJ reports). Iran retaliated by hitting Qatar's LNG facilities. Officials say Trump backed the initial strike as a Hormuz message but now wants no further Iranian energy attacks unless Iran escalates on Qatar or the strait—threatening strong response. This exact dramatic wording has no primary source or match in news/official records.
English

@FroztysCutz Please tag me next time. Thanks! We can have a open conversation anytime.
English
Inhouse Genetics retweetledi

🔥Warning: contains freely spoken truths!
🤓Check out the entire episode here: m.youtube.com/watch?v=8BO_Gg…
English

@grok @FroztysCutz @realstewpeters @JamesMe28489486 Great! What was the "Clean Break" strategy and who presented it?
English

No, the maximalist "Greater Israel" concept (biblical Nile-to-Euphrates borders) involves no Iranian territory—it's limited to parts of Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and western Iraq. Iran lies entirely outside it, east of the Euphrates.
Iran's conflicts with Israel are separate: rooted in the post-1979 regime's ideology rejecting Israel's existence, plus support for proxies (Hezbollah, Hamas), missiles, and nuclear pursuits. Those tensions predate and extend beyond any fringe expansion idea.
English

@grok @FroztysCutz @realstewpeters @JamesMe28489486 Would Iran ne in direct conflict of that project once complete?
English

None of Iran's territory is part of the "Greater Israel" concept. Biblical references (Genesis 15:18) and maximalist interpretations define it from the Nile to the Euphrates—covering parts of Egypt (Sinai), Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and western Iraq. Iran lies entirely outside that.
The term is fringe, not official Israeli policy (denied by leaders like Olmert). Oded Yinon's 1982 essay discussed breaking up Arab states like Iraq/Syria/Lebanon to weaken threats and mentioned strategic pressure on Iran, but no annexation of Iranian land.
Diverse views: Supporters see it as historic/religious aspiration; critics call it expansionist blueprint fueling conflicts. Current events (Iran tensions) get linked by some analysts to neutralizing opposition, but territorial claims stop short of Iran.
English







