Eric James, CD

1.2K posts

Eric James, CD banner
Eric James, CD

Eric James, CD

@InklessEJ

Kicking your cat all over the place — feel the beat of the tangerine just like a one-winged dove. 🎶 Veteran and transplant recipient; living new life. 🎗️💚

Victoria, British Columbia Katılım Ekim 2016
143 Takip Edilen44 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
Politicians in BC are using Indigenous communities as political props. The NDP virtue signalled with DRIPA then ran when it got expensive. Conservatives want full repeal. Neither is offering anything real. New Zealand solved this 157 years ago. #BCpoli municipalfly.ca/p/stop-consult…
English
1
0
0
160
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@AnthonyRussoBC @iainblackbc I am still curious about his proposed 20% income tax cut and I have not got an answer... #BCpoli x.com/InklessEJ/stat…
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ

I enjoy breaking down policy in my spare time so let's dive in. On his website Black says the following about his tax cut proposal: "We will cut personal income tax rates by 20% to spur investment, attract jobs, improve affordability, and give you greater financial freedom." Now this is somewhat unclear as to whether this means for a specific bracket, some brackets totalling 20%, or across the board. But it reads like across the board in its simplicity, so let's go with that. I've included one image here of the current personal tax rates in BC expected for the 2026 tax year (one rate is still pending a change in the Legislature that will undoubtedly pass). In this image you can see the savings for each tax bracket. Now, I hope we all know how tax brackets work — that they fill like buckets up to your particular earnings. So in order to get a picture of what a single mother with low income, a single young man taking home a median wage, a typical BC household, and a wealthy individual would each save, we need to break things down. This is our second image. And this is where things start to fall off the rails for me. A broad 20% cut across the board clearly favours the wealthy. In fact not just favours — in this case the wealthy person saves as much per month in taxes as the typical BC family would save all year. And what that family saves is a pittance really, at $91/month. Black claims his tax plan will spur investment. However, no family is going to start investing with an extra $91 per month. And the wealthy person likely already has investments, with little likelihood that they would invest all $15,870 back into businesses within BC. Black also claims the cut would attract jobs. This is partially true. High income earners like doctors, lawyers, and executives might very well come to BC and set up shop. But the bulk of where job creation is sorely needed in BC — within the middle class — is not going to suddenly arrive in droves. Especially when we consider that the middle income bracket in BC already has the lowest provincial tax rate in Canada, and we don't see jobs popping up all of a sudden today. Black further claims his cuts will improve affordability. Again, at $91/month I do not think that family is going to feel like life is more affordable. The wealthy person might. But they are wealthy, so affordability was never really their problem to begin with. Lastly, Black deploys a rather generic claim about his tax cut proposal giving people more financial freedom. I do not think the single mother with an extra $35/month feels more financially free, nor the young worker taking home an extra $46/month, nor the family pocketing their $91/month. And wealthy people — well, financial freedom has already come, hasn't it. My beef with this tax cut, beyond the weak claims being made by Black, is that it puts more money into the pockets of people who do not need it while putting only a marginal amount into the pockets of those who do — and it also robs the provincial coffers of the money needed to actually make a real difference by paying down debt and funding social programs. If there is one thing conservatives ought to be airtight on it is sound fiscal policy. When you are barely making ends meet, it is hardly the time to stop working overtime. It is a financial double whammy from Black, and hardly a plan to get BC back on track. #BCpoli

English
0
0
1
88
Eric James, CD retweetledi
Anthony Russo
Anthony Russo@AnthonyRussoBC·
This is Straight to the Point, a direct, unedited conversation with @iainblackbc where we cut the fluff and get into the hard questions, many of them submitted by you. Where do you stand on Iain after this? #bcpoli
English
4
6
13
854
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@BoostersSeat @vancolour He made my cigar not burn properly and canoe over the course of this thread. Damn it Eby why are you so against chill Sunday afternoons.
GIF
English
0
0
1
7
Mo Amir 🪬
Mo Amir 🪬@vancolour·
EJ, my dear, the Whitecaps play at BC Place, a public asset. Games generate revenue for the province, in addition to creating local jobs and business for the local hospitality sector. The real attack on Eby is why Vancouver is becoming less viable for major sports franchises.
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ

What does a conservative have to offer a multimillion dollar franchise caught in a location predicament because the owners want to cash out? Absolutely nothing. It's a business and if it isn't viable to keeop here it should go. No government required. #BCpoli

English
9
0
37
4.6K
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
Another one who can’t explain how or why Eby is responsible for the Whitecaps issue. I did read his posts like he asked. He’s an avid fan who wants us all to foot the bill to keep his beloved sports team in Vancouver. Again, a conservative has nothing to offer here. #BCpoli
nick@navsteets

@InklessEJ @vancolour I just told you. They renovated BC Place. Jeez. No wonder Mo finished with ya. You're clearly challenged intentionally to engage without spazzing out.

English
1
0
0
89
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
You’re making no sense here man. How does a renovation mean the Whitecaps are not competitive to stay in Vancouver. Or is the argument you’re making that because we didn’t renovations that means we should be held hostage into keeping them here and spending more public money if that is what is required? Because that second argument doesn’t really make sense either. If we’ve spent x dollars and that didn’t keep them here why would another x dollars changed that? X is algebra, it’s a placeholder for whatever the figure actually is. Just in case I’m not clear enough here.
English
1
0
0
34
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@navsteets @vancolour Because they renovated BC Place the Whitecaps are having trouble finding a buyer after the current owners are looking to cash out. I’m dense remember so you’ll have to explain how this works to me because it doesn’t make sense on my end.
English
1
0
0
35
nick
nick@navsteets·
@InklessEJ @vancolour I just told you. They renovated BC Place. Jeez. No wonder Mo finished with ya. You're clearly challenged intentionally to engage without spazzing out.
English
1
0
1
139
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@navsteets @vancolour Well no you told me there are plenty of reasons that you have. I want to hear it from you. Take a dig at my followers that’s fine, you choose to engagement none the less. I am still waiting for those things Eby did to create this situation…43 followers and all.
English
1
0
0
36
nick
nick@navsteets·
@InklessEJ @vancolour That's ok no one outside of your 43 followers did either. Google how much they spent renovating BC Place for the WC. That's a start.
English
1
0
1
42
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@navsteets @vancolour Forgive me I didn’t know you existed prior to this exchange. What things can we blame the provincial government for? Can you speak for Mo here because he’s no longer interested in engaging on this topic? I am curious.
English
1
0
0
30
nick
nick@navsteets·
@InklessEJ @vancolour Are you dense? There is plenty of substantive blame to go towards the current government on this issue. Look at my feed and you'll find one! The fact that you couldn't is why the Conservatives continue to find themselves in opposition.
English
1
0
1
39
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@navsteets @vancolour Thank you for proving this whole exercise was a dig at conservatives blaming Eby for too many clouds in the sky. I guess I am truly the fool here for engaging him on the issue itself and answer his rhetorical question. My bad.
English
1
0
0
60
nick
nick@navsteets·
@InklessEJ @vancolour He literally wondered why the political opposition is not using an opportunity to attack the government like they do in every other instance. Why is this hard to grasp for you. They do it all the time. Blamed province for Hastings shutting down even though they weren't viable.
English
1
0
1
86
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
Gave an answer to his question, get condescension in return. Establish a boundary while engaging his points, get gaslit about being 'emotional.' Never did answer what Eby actually did to though. Mo Amir — big platform with nothing to actually say. Receipts below. #BCpoli
Eric James, CD tweet media
Mo Amir 🪬@vancolour

EJ, my dear, the Whitecaps play at BC Place, a public asset. Games generate revenue for the province, in addition to creating local jobs and business for the local hospitality sector. The real attack on Eby is why Vancouver is becoming less viable for major sports franchises.

English
0
0
0
111
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@vancolour Okay so you have nothing to offer. This was just a baseless dig at conservatives aka business as usual. I am also not being emotional. I told you cleanly and after I engaged your point not to be condescending toward me. It’s called establishing boundaries.
English
1
0
0
90
Mo Amir 🪬
Mo Amir 🪬@vancolour·
@InklessEJ We can’t have this conversation if you’re gonna be emotional on the Internet. Have a great rest of your Sunday, Eric ☀️
English
1
0
0
89
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@vancolour What do you see as being things Eby or the province government has done to create this issue? I am curious. You didn’t just call me EJ now did you Mo? Don’t play coy, your opening was unnecessarily condescending. I’ve told you not to do it again, it can just end there.
English
1
0
2
106
Mo Amir 🪬
Mo Amir 🪬@vancolour·
@InklessEJ You literally went by EJ last year 🤷🏾‍♂️ The name is still in your handle. Anyway, I think it’s foolish to ignore sectors of the economy shutting down or struggling in your biggest city, but we can agree to disagree.
English
2
0
0
146
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@jkenney I’ve noticed a trend on here that the most crazy here claim to be involved in Indigenous rights/law somehow. Can’t put my finger on why this is happening though…
English
0
0
0
189
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
@cselley It brilliantly cunning actually. You clinch the votes of those who wanted the World Cup in Canada. Then you clinch the votes of those shut out by cost and never wanted it to begin with. A political win-win. FIFA for everyone!
English
0
0
0
17
Chris Selley
Chris Selley@cselley·
Not much drives me crazier in Toronto these days than councillors trying to make political hay out of the crappiness of the World Cup THAT THEY VOTED FOR.
English
1
3
21
874
Eric James, CD
Eric James, CD@InklessEJ·
What does a conservative have to offer a multimillion dollar franchise caught in a location predicament because the owners want to cash out? Absolutely nothing. It's a business and if it isn't viable to keeop here it should go. No government required. #BCpoli
Mo Amir 🪬@vancolour

Wild how none of the BC Conservative candidates have spoken up about the Vancouver Whitecaps. It’s a gift-wrapped attack on David Eby. And every campaign has blown it, which really says something about how they have (or, rather, don’t have) their finger on the public pulse.

English
0
0
3
4.9K
Eric James, CD retweetledi
Dimitris Soudas 🇨🇦⚜️🇬🇷☦️ 13.12.1943
Simuler la décapitation d’un élu. Ce n’est pas un « stunt ». le Code criminel du Canada est clair. ⚖️ Article 264.1. Proférer des menaces. Même symboliques. Même sans paroles. ⚖️ Article 372. Messages menaçants. Surtout si c’est diffusé. ⚖️ Article 430. Méfait. Si ça cause une perturbation ou des dommages. Tout repose sur trois choses. 👉 Le contexte. 👉 La diffusion. 👉 La perception d’une personne raisonnable. La ligne est simple. Liberté d’expression oui. Intimidation et violence simulée. Non.
Pascal Paradis@pascalpparadis

Je dénonce la simulation d’une décapitation du ministre du Travail lors d’une manifestation cette fin de semaine à Montréal. Les images de cette simulation d’une violence inouïe qui ont été diffusées sont dégoûtantes. La liberté d’expression est fondamentale dans notre démocratie. Il y avait plein de façon de s’exprimer sur la gestion du gouvernement de la CAQ en matière de relations de travail. Mais pas celle-là, qu’on ne peut tolérer. J’exprime ma totale solidarité avec mon collègue Jean Boulet (@JeanBoulet10).

Français
14
19
96
4.4K