
Instru
2.2K posts



🚨BREAKING: @RealCandaceO's own footage — the clip she used to defend Tyler Robinson — shows recoil she claimed wasn't there, perfectly timed to the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. Thank you for solving the case, Candace. In ten months, you never produced a shred of evidence that Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French Legionnaires, Israel, or TPUSA killed Charlie. This week, you produced footage of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk — blurry, because it's a camera recording a screen, but real. No wonder the defense fought to keep this out of the preliminary hearing. You can see him recoil as you hear the gunshot. You can see him run across the roof holding the gun wrapped in a towel. You can see him holding it as he jumps off the roof and walks across the grass. You've said footage of him assembling the rifle on that roof "does not exist." Fine — then release the full seven minutes he's up there, unedited, and let the public see for themselves. And hopefully the court eventually releases a high-resolution version. We know it's Tyler Robinson because there's more corroborating evidence here than in most murder convictions: He confessed multiple times. His parents and his boyfriend identified him in the footage, and he identified himself in one of his own confessions. Then he turned himself in. His car, his gun, his DNA, and his phone's Google Maps data all place him at the scene. He described exactly how the murder weapon was hidden — wrapped in a towel in the bushes — in texts to his boyfriend, before that detail was ever public. The list goes on. In ten months, the defense hasn't challenged any of it. If the confessions were fake, that's exactly how they'd have gotten this case thrown out. Thank you, too, for the Dairy Queen photo from that evening — showing his face in the same white-logo Hurley hat he's seen wearing on campus, a few minutes from where Charlie was shot. Ten months spent defending Charlie's accused killer, and slandering his wife, his friends, and his organization while making millions lying about his murder — and you finally produced real evidence. Unfortunately for you, it shows Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk. Charlie told us himself, seconds before he was murdered. A student asked him how many transgender Americans have been shooters in the last decade. Charlie's answer: "Too many." But thanks for the footage, Candace.










What if I told you this was NEW JERSEY

Candace Owens promised “explosive” evidence to blow the Charlie Kirk case wide open. In reality her "reporting" failed to mention: -The defense demanded the Losee Rooftop video be withheld, not the prosecution -That is not a "tactical military crawl," that's a retard scooting on a roof -There’s no explanation for who/what the person on the roof was supposedly "signaling" to -PLENTY of public footage already places Tyler Robinson on site -Not seeing a gun in this one specific clip proves nothing -A .30-06 recoil wouldn't cause a black eye -The medical examiner's report confirms the gunshot wound to the neck



Er det virkelig slik at alle som stiller spørsmål ved makt eller mistenker at det kan foregå konspirasjoner, har onde eller kyniske motiver? Må alle som utfordrer etablerte forklaringer, være ute etter oppmerksomhet eller egen vinning? Kan de ikke også være drevet av oppriktig bekymring, nysgjerrighet eller et ønske om å avdekke sannheten? Å tillegge mennesker motiver i stedet for å diskutere argumentene deres, fremstår for meg som både unyansert og intellektuelt dovent. Hva tenker dere?












Switch 2 modding scene makes new breakthrough, but Nintendo safe from piracy nintendoeverything.com/switch-2-moddi…
















