DreamBackfield.com

98.8K posts

DreamBackfield.com banner
DreamBackfield.com

DreamBackfield.com

@IntoPitt

Unbiased no koolaid #Pitt Panthers CEG publisher - 3 degrees at #pitt- #PittAlumni #pittpanthers #upitt #pittfootball #pittsburghpanthers #h2p

Pittsburgh, PA Katılım Kasım 2013
4.8K Takip Edilen4K Takipçiler
The Notorious R.O.B.
The Notorious R.O.B.@robolivermd·
@IntoPitt @Genetics56 Incorrect There are only a few programs that are worth the trouble as a brand: Clemson, FSU, UVA, NC, +/- Miami None of the rest move the needle on media rights
English
1
0
0
23
Big Ten information and news
Big Ten information and news@Genetics56·
How would a sale of the ACC to the Big Ten work? What would be a projected cost? How would schools be selected in a sale? First things first, what is a conference sale since there is no stock purchase or asset sale? In a conference-to-conference sales transaction, it would be a negotiated realignment transaction structured as a bulk membership transfer, media-rights assignment, and conference dissolution/amendment. It would mirror corporate M&A in logic (valuation, synergies, due diligence). A sale would need to run through conference and university governances. Exit-fee buyouts (the biggest direct cost): Under the March 2025 FSU/Clemson settlement, ACC exit fees are now fixed and declining each year until 2030. For a deal executed in FY2026–27: $165M in 2025–26 → $147M in 2026–27 → down to $75M flat from 2030–31 onward. For 9 schools, that’s roughly $1.3 to 1.5 billion total if done immediately (declining over time). The Big Ten could absorb or reimburse a portion of these fees as an “inducement payment” to make the deal attractive, similar to how conferences have quietly helped with buyouts in past realignments. Transferring rights to Big Ten partners (Fox/NBC/CBS) would likely require ACC (ESPN too or no ?) consent or a buyout/renegotiation. Total cost would likely be around $2B. There is no legal mechanism for one conference to sell itself outright. The process would unfold like this (modeled on past realignments but scaled up): ACC internal vote: ACC presidents vote to amend bylaws or dissolve the conference for the selling subset. Requires supermajority (historically 2/3 or higher) Individual school approvals: Each university’s board of trustees/regents (and state governors for public schools) must approve. Public universities face political scrutiny. Big Ten invitation and vote: Big Ten extends formal invitations; existing members vote (often unanimous in practice for major moves). Media-rights assignment: Schools assign their pro-rata share of the ESPN contract to the Big Ten’s media partners, with ACC's approval Closing: Effective date TBA (start of a new FY obviously) This is essentially a bulk realignment + conference wind-down, not a true corporate merger. How Would It Be Determined Which Schools Are Included? The Big Ten would cherry-pick, not take the whole ACC. Criteria would mirror corporate M&A target selection: High strategic value Academic/AAU fit Market size This would be the largest consolidation in college athletics history - a negotiated realignment transaction structured as a bulk membership transfer, media-rights assignment
Big Ten information and news tweet media
Big Ten information and news@Genetics56

Should the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) consider selling themselves to the Big Ten? College athletics in 2026 is no longer an “amateur sport," it is a high-stakes, consolidating industry at the top end of D1 where the rules of corporate finance and M&A apply directly. In any consolidating industry, larger scale drives down per-unit costs. A 28-school Big Ten would spread fixed and semi-fixed expenses across far more members. Conferences function like businesses in any other industry. In the college athletics world of our economy, they compete for media revenue, talent, sponsors, and post-season championships. The data that was presented in the past couple of weeks from a board meeting of a school in the ACC indicated a schools budget being $250M+ FY2027 budget vs. stagnant ACC distributions of ~$44–45M today, projected to only reach $73M by 2036) plus the latest 2026 NFL Draft numbers (Big Ten + SEC = 60%+ of all picks, with the Big Ten surging to 68 total selections) show the classic “rich-get-richer” flywheel that precedes industry consolidation. 1. Economies of Scale - Massive Cost Efficiencies and Margin Expansion Media-rights leverage: One coast-to-coast footprint (California to Florida to New Jersey to the Midwest) creates a single, must-have inventory for networks. Current Big Ten deals already dwarf the ACC’s; a merged entity could renegotiate or extend at premium rates. NIL/revenue-share infrastructure: Shared compliance, scouting GM offices, transfer-portal analytics platforms, and athlete-compensation funds become dramatically cheaper per school. FSU is already spending Power-Two levels on football operations and revenue sharing; the ACC’s smaller pie forces every dollar to be squeezed from university subsidies instead of new revenue. Olympic/non-revenue sports: The Big Ten has a historic strength here. Adding ACC programs instantly deepens competition and Title IX compliance without the $4–5M annual cuts FSU trustees are already eyeing. Result: Operating margins improve, freeing cash for facilities, coaching, and recruiting instead of deficit spending. 2. Revenue Synergies - Immediate and Structural Uplift Classic M&A revenue synergy: ACC schools currently receive roughly $44–45M in conference distributions; Big Ten schools are already at $63M+. A partial merger would instantly move the 9 ACC schools into the $70M–$130M range projected for the Power Two by the mid-2030s. This is textbook horizontal integration: eliminate the “revenue gap” that is forcing FSU to run a $250M business on a $45M conference subsidy. 3. Market Power and Competitive Moat Brand valuation: ACC schools individual “enterprise value” (TV ratings, boosters, facilities) would accrete dramatically inside the Big Ten umbrella, just as USC/UCLA/Oregon/Washington saw their media payouts jump upon arrival. This is not “selling out” — it is applying standard M&A logic to an industry that is already consolidating whether the ACC likes it or not. The numbers FSU’s own AD presented to the Board of Trustees last week (spending like a Power-Two program while earning like a mid-major) are the exact warning sign that triggers a strategic review in any corporate boardroom. Consolidation is how lagging players become part of the winning conference. The alternative is slow bleed, continued subsidy pressure, and eventual irrelevance.

English
12
3
21
13.6K
Bad Rad Brad
Bad Rad Brad@B1OBEY0ND·
@IntoPitt You had one good season. Hang the banner. Miami just played in the national championship, retard.
English
1
0
1
106
Boneyardigans
Boneyardigans@UConnFanDotCom·
This gentleman has fabricated in his mind a scenario where we go to the B12 in hoops-only (no) pending a new on-campus football stadium (also, no).
Jim Williams@JWMediaDC

@BearcatMTA Matt my point is UConn will be a member of the big 12 in 2030. If it is only for hoops or all sports will really be decided by a real commitment to football that starts with an on campus stadium.

English
1
0
17
4K
Kevin Groden
Kevin Groden@dubv01·
@IntoPitt @Moore_CFB You weren’t alive for that 😂 Fuck, you weren’t alive for either of them 😂 😂 😂 But you can sure ask grandad about them accomplishments.
English
1
0
0
15
Moore College Football
Throwback Thursday. Rich Rodriguez left West Virginia for Michigan. Bill Stewart took over and delivered one of the all-time pregame speeches before the 2008 Fiesta Bowl vs Oklahoma. “Leave no doubt tonight… they shouldn’t have played the old gold and blue. Not this night.”
English
12
46
801
177.4K
Swess Mybalzich
Swess Mybalzich@swess_ball·
The future of Big 12 basketball would be so high if this happened
Swess Mybalzich tweet media
English
22
2
102
11.9K
Lycan7hropyHD
Lycan7hropyHD@Lycan7hropyHD·
@IntoPitt As for me the last time I thought about Pitt was when Jerome Lane shattered a backboard. I just can’t remember a time I saw one of their games or thought they were relevant in any way.
English
1
0
0
30
GumbyWVU
GumbyWVU@gumbywvu·
@swess_ball @mgtnquasar As much fun as it would be to beat them twice a year, adding pitt would be a huge net negative to the Big 12 overall.
English
2
0
5
355
DreamBackfield.com
DreamBackfield.com@IntoPitt·
@dubv01 @Moore_CFB Yeah true I’ll settle for the natty 1976 You guys have? What ? Fiesta bowl champs! lol PS we’ve won the fiesta bowl too 1979
English
1
0
0
20
Kevin Groden
Kevin Groden@dubv01·
@IntoPitt @Moore_CFB That game is STILL a better win than you’ve ever seen in your lifetime 😂 The one time you made it to a bcs game you got murdered. Nice attempt at a troll but you just magnified your team’s ineptitude 😂
English
1
0
1
28
DreamBackfield.com
DreamBackfield.com@IntoPitt·
#pitt lady hoops Alabama transfer Alancia Ramsey, a 6-foot junior forward.
DreamBackfield.com tweet media
English
0
2
19
613
DreamBackfield.com
DreamBackfield.com@IntoPitt·
@SVPanther1 Investing money in sports we have no shot of winning isn’t because we don’t have money It’s a bad idea because what’s the effen point?
English
1
0
0
63
J. Byron Fleck
J. Byron Fleck@SVPanther1·
@IntoPitt Thought you said money was no issue in Pitt At athletics. What changed?
GIF
English
2
0
0
76