a Geeee

@RE_DailyMail I asked this question in the times but they rejected my comment: Anyone wonder why Kate and Camilla are never together these days…If she’s (C, that's it) unwell, why is she coming to the evening do where Kate would not be present… just a thought

NEW Queen Camilla is having to adapt her appearances at tomorrow’s state visit due to the ‘lingering’ side effects - including fatigue - from a nasty viral chest infection. She won’t attend Horse Guards but will be at the lunch and will still attend the State Banquet

@SkyNews I asked this question in the times but they rejected my comment: Anyone wonder why Kate and Camilla are never together these days…If she’s (C, that's it) unwell, why is she coming to the evening do where Kate would not be present… just a thought

BREAKING: The Queen is to miss the ceremonial welcome during the Qatari state visit tomorrow due to the lingering side effects of a chest infection news.sky.com/story/queen-to…

@axiochrono I asked this question in the times but they rejected my comment: Anyone wonder why Kate and Camilla are never together these days…If she’s (C, that's it) unwell, why is she coming to the evening do where Kate would not be present… just a thought

@Sussex5525 I asked this question in the times but they rejected my comment: Anyone wonder why Kate and Camilla are never together these days…If she’s (C, that's it) unwell, why is she coming to the evening do where Kate would not be present… just a thought

#ThatFamily’s vindictiveness is baffling. Having the media to incite violence against Harry and Meghan, Willy vowing to never forgive Prince Harry, Kate Middleton: walking next to Meghan Markle is the hardest thing I’ve ever done. Charles’ daily “snubs” & Camilla… Sussexes=grace

@richardaeden @RE_DailyMail @JessLSKing @YouTube The most one-sided royal news with everything perfect and rosy = the “working royals” Boring. Make it more balanced then you’ll get your viewing numbers up

More than 300,000 people have watched Palace Confidential in just one day. Don't miss the latest edition of the hit #royal talk show featuring Rebecca English @RE_DailyMail Jess King @JessLSKing and me. Watch via @YouTube m.youtube.com/watch?v=FRTMaC…

@DrDobberstein @RealDeniseWelch Funnily enough, they choose to discredit any book that mildly criticises the royal family and believe any book that maligns Harry and Meghan. So blatantly obvious what’s at play here. Luckily it’s only the illiterate public that swallow their bile 😂😂

Especially today, when the tabloids are reporting on a supposedly angry #Queen: Don't forget that the #ToxicBritishMedia are trying to destroy #HarryandMeghan because his lawsuits are attacking their business model and threatening their existence. #Lillibeth

@SholaMos1 Funnily enough, they choose to discredit any book that mildly criticises the royal family and believe any book that maligns Harry and Meghan. So blatantly obvious what’s at play here. Luckily it’s only the illiterate public that swallow their bile 😂😂

God give me strength- people have lost their godforsaken minds. 1. Harry and Meghan did NOT need ANYONES’s permission least of all, Queen Elizabeth, to name their child Lilibet. The fact they got her blessing was out of respect not ‘necessity’. 2. The name Lilibet predates Queen Elizabeth for goodness sake - she didn’t own it or create it! 3. What grandmother in her right mind would be ‘angry’ at a great-grandchild being named to honour her?! I have very strong views about Queen Elizabeth as monarch & her legacy but even I’m flabbergasted at these spurious claims that do nothing but blight her character & judgment. If these unnamed ‘sources & aides’ thought this would damage Harry and Meghan, they’re wrong. The Daily Mail has successfully dredged up a dead Queen and given her name a beating in order to profit off defaming Harry and Meghan again. Shameful.

@WestminsterWAG Funnily enough, they choose to discredit any book that mildly criticises the royal family and believe any book that maligns Harry and Meghan. So blatantly obvious what’s at play here. Luckily it’s only the illiterate public that swallow their bile 😂😂

Almost every aspect of our late queen’s life was public. By naming their daughter Lilibet without her explicit permission, the duke and Duchess of Sussex appropriated a deeply private aspect of her identity. newspaper.mailplus.co.uk/data/3711/read…

@kelvmackenzie Funnily enough, they choose to discredit any book that mildly criticises the royal family and believe any book that maligns Harry and Meghan. So blatantly obvious what’s at play here. Luckily it’s only the illiterate public that swallow their bile 😂😂

@scobie Funnily enough, they choose to discredit any book that mildly criticises the royal family and believe any book that maligns Harry and Meghan. So blatantly obvious what’s at play here. Luckily it’s only the illiterate public that swallow their bile 😂😂

None of these Lilibet “revelations”are doing the late Queen Elizabeth II any favours. Not only do they contradict details shared by the Palace with a cooperatively written biography in 2022 (see pic), they also depict the monarch in a way the public haven’t known her to be.

@jomilleweb @misanharriman Sad lady. I have time for you today, unlike you trolly dolly who exits here to stalk people who will never know you exit behind your unrecognisable trolling name. The only people you continue to amuse are the haters like you, who only demonstrate relevance in their mini holes

@jomilleweb At least she failed at doing something, unlike you trolly dolly who exits here to stalk people who will never know you exit behind your unrecognisable trolling name. The only people you continue to amuse are the haters like you, who only demonstrate relevance in their mini holes

@jomilleweb @Anna_Ratcliff_ @RoyalReporter At least she failed at doing something, unlike you trolly dolly who exits here to stalk people who will never know you exit behind your unrecognisable trolling name. The only people you continue to amuse are the haters like you, who only demonstrate relevance in their mini holes

The Princess of Wales is making a previously unannounced visit to the Baby Bank in Windsor. She wanted to show her support for her local group providing essential items such as nappies, beds, and school uniforms to families facing financial hardship.

@theroyaleditor Whipping up more hate for click bait and to manipulate simple-minded people on your feed I suppose you need to pay your bills and the only way you can get traffic is by mentioning #GoodKingHarry fair play to you and Lucky you have followers who lack the capacity to think freely

Prince Harry is dragged into row over British-Iranian's execution as regime says duke's 'killing of 25 innocent people' means UK shouldn't 'preach' about human rights  via dailym.ai/ios mol.im/a/11644065

@JeremyKyleLive @jkyleofficial @byEmilyAndrews @Tessadunlop I love you!! “Am posher than you” 🤩🤩

"When you make those classist comments... this is exactly part of the problem of the institution of Buckingham Palace!" Emily Andrews calls out Tessa Dunlop for being "classist" while discussing Prince Harry's book. @JKyleOfficial | @byEmilyAndrews | @Tessadunlop | #JKLive

@tonkolili Weighing in on this topic I am all in favour of holding the government accountable. However, I believe the most efficient way to tackle these issues is to identify them and work to find solutions to rectify them. It is safe to say that in a civic society, we should all contribute

Nature gearing up for another spectacular sunset over #Freetown’s Lumley Beach. #SierraLeone, “The New Hawaii of Africa”. Sierraously?

@toriaa_h @murkle_s @WaksLady @valentinelow @scobie @thetimes Uneducated fools =Sore sour sad trolling fake toria, school’s out for the summer so go away you bitter cretin 😂😂 gorgeous Meghan will always be above your station saddle so let it go 🤩

@murkle_s @WaksLady @valentinelow @scobie @thetimes Despite the fact they dont have to publish that either😂

Telling the truth. Buried deep within the letters section of today's @thetimes is a note from journalist Sam Kashner, who denies biographer Tom Bower's negative account of his experience interviewing Meghan Markle for Vanity Fair in 2017.

@toriaa_h @WaksLady @valentinelow @scobie @thetimes Sore sour sad trolling fake toria, school’s out for the summer so go away you bitter cretin 😂😂 gorgeous Meghan will always be above your station saddle so let it go 🤩

@WaksLady @valentinelow @scobie @thetimes No dear, because it's a letter to the editor. That's where it goes. And you're claiming something that didn't happen, and the letter didn't disagree with what tom said, it just added further

@toriaa_h @Bensgirl49 @valentinelow @scobie @thetimes Sore sour sad trolling fake toria, school’s out for the summer so go away you bitter cretin 😂😂 gorgeous Meghan will always be above your station saddle so let it go 🤩

@Bensgirl49 @valentinelow @scobie @thetimes It's a letter to the editor. That's where they always go. It corrects nothing but gives more information. Doesn't dispute any of the facts presented.

@RoyallyBlunt Fake profile photo. Stand tall like Meghan and Harry and show your real face