JC Sweaty

1.8K posts

JC Sweaty

JC Sweaty

@JC_Sweaty

Western Australia, Australia Katılım Kasım 2019
47 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@durbunumnerede @pegobry_en Every blue collar place I've worked is super loud. I have to stop work, and leave the immediate area to even hear a voice note or make a phone call. Everybody texts.
English
0
0
0
5
doğayı izleme sevgimi sorguluyorum
@pegobry_en this is people trying to communicate in ways that are easy. every blue collar I know or worked with are into voice memos because those people work with their hands it's convenience. you're trying to use verbal warfare tactics employed by the rich to make incorrect implications
English
0
0
0
37
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@sunblaze1480 @pegobry_en "Imagine complaing about having to type a text. You really hate other humans I guess, that you can't fathom dedicating 20 seconds to type." See how that works. The burden of being considerate lies on the sender not the receiver.
English
0
0
0
2
Gromcho
Gromcho@sunblaze1480·
@pegobry_en Imagine complaining about having tojsten to a 20 sec voice note. You really hate other humans I guess, that you can't fathom dedicating 20seconds.
English
1
0
0
266
Thomas Willett
Thomas Willett@ThomasWillett9·
Imagine hating trans people this much that you, as one of the most celebrated writers, deny the basic grammatical fact that ‘trans’ is an adjective. Transphobia truly rots the brain.
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Trouble is, 'trans' isn't an adjective. 'Trans woman' is a compound noun meaning 'man who wants to be considered a woman.' If the individual being described isn't trans, he's simply a man, whereas a bespectacled woman remains a woman even if she's not wearing glasses.

English
145
130
1.8K
32.5K
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Trouble is, 'trans' isn't an adjective. 'Trans woman' is a compound noun meaning 'man who wants to be considered a woman.' If the individual being described isn't trans, he's simply a man, whereas a bespectacled woman remains a woman even if she's not wearing glasses.
J.K. Rowling tweet media
English
983
3.7K
35.6K
706.3K
communico
communico@maidotsuki·
@jk_rowling So tall women arent women? Black women? Oh, hold on, that doesnt work. Seems like adjectives have no impact on whether or not someone is a woman and you’re just a hateful piece of shit. Funny that
English
3
0
62
648
tutti ✴︎
tutti ✴︎@hablatutti·
@jk_rowling @CaraPac46808618 “Trans” is an adjective babes, like “blonde woman”, “tall woman”. Is a blonde woman not a woman because of the word blonde? Are “tall women” a subset of men? I thought you were a writer and thus had a sense of how adjectives and nouns work? Bit silly, Joanne.
English
3
0
0
362
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@uncledoomer Are we ignoring that they're trying to replace NEET with fucking NILF??
English
0
0
2
63
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@kianthequark This thread is full of people who can't read. Literally says "in West Africa". Obviously you can source it without child labour elsewhere. He's literally partnered with Tony's.
English
0
0
0
1.7K
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@dripgrillionair @Australis_Felix I dunno man, there's alot more things that require a WWCC than just childcare or specifically working with kids. You'd probably wind up with more people being arrested for UK style thought crimes than being a danger to kids.
English
1
0
2
25
dripgrillionaire
dripgrillionaire@dripgrillionair·
@JC_Sweaty @Australis_Felix The WWCC only singles out those with a record. There’s no way it can filter out those who are under the radar. Is it worth letting children get hurt so we don’t discriminate against men? I’d say yes but will politicians open that can of worms?
English
1
0
1
20
Hyperborean Antipodean
Hyperborean Antipodean@Australis_Felix·
Sorry fellas but if you as a man even apply to work in a childcare role you should be put in a list and AFP immediately search all your electronic devices. Just the way it is. All non-pedos will be ok with this.
Econo ad absurdam@econoadabsurdam

@lowlandsapien Back in the old days we viewed any grown man who wanted to work with little kids with extreme suspicion, and while that rule might have been sexist and demeaning, there was a very good reason why we came up with it

English
9
0
70
4.3K
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@Kon__K Perhaps the police and ABS could start recording race-data of crimes to prove your hypothesis?
English
0
0
0
19
Kon Karapanagiotidis
Kon Karapanagiotidis@Kon__K·
I’d give you the data that shows male violence a/g women is a men’s issue not a cultural, class or religious one. But a waste of time. In manosphere men must be centred as its victims & saviours. Women as “needing to be saved” from non - white men, by you, who are the worst 🚩men
English
43
23
146
4.6K
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@Brocklesnitch @Chloepaige2011 Men make up 50% of the population and have killed 27 women. Trans make up <1% of the population. One trans person killing one woman makes them statistically outpace men in femicide.
English
0
0
0
8
Bec Shaw
Bec Shaw@Brocklesnitch·
@Chloepaige2011 again, a handful of examples that you are able to show actually proves how small the issue is. i would not be able to show you all of the stories of men killing their partners. you are small minded
English
2
0
3
77
Bec Shaw
Bec Shaw@Brocklesnitch·
Four women and girls killed in Australia in the last four days, 27 women murdered so far this year - any TERFs speaking up about this? Any so called feminists out for the protection of women interested in this or nah too busy harassing trans people about where they piss
English
79
274
2.2K
35.9K
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@CarrotFlavored @timj1994 @ChrisRGun @ShitpostRock No you're confusing 'ending a life' and 'murder'. Societies across time and to this day often have very different permission structures on which circumstances allow you to kill another human being. Some have a very low bar and are very permissive. Are they wrong and why?
English
0
0
0
5
JC Sweaty
JC Sweaty@JC_Sweaty·
@Spoogymonkey @Kintakus The logical arguments boiled down to; disease, its gross, or you shouldn't have sex with things you can't procreate with. Cool, good to know Atheists and Christians share the same position on homosexuals.
English
0
0
2
63
Alan
Alan@Spoogymonkey·
@Kintakus No, people GET the argument. Hes just saying that morality can only come from magic text. People brought him logical arguments why you don't fuck road kill which disproves his whole point. He's just a retard.
English
2
0
9
226
Kintak
Kintak@Kintakus·
The number of people I see totally misunderstanding this post is very concerning. He's not advocating for fornicating with roadkill. He's not advocating for giving up morality. He's not even SAYING atheists DO do these things. It's very simple: If you are not religious, why is it "wrong" to do this? He is asking you to, through the use of logic, explain where you get your "right" and "wrong" from. And it's very easy to answer it! "I don't believe in a universal morality, so it is not 'wrong' in that sense, but it is disgusting and abhorrent because of the exposure to disease. It also makes the person participating disgusting because they are not only made a potential carrier of that disease, but because it makes them the type of person that has no disgust response, so their character is of someone dangerous to themselves and others." If you are incapable of introspecting and articulating your beliefs, you do not have beliefs. You are not an atheist; you are simply not religious. You are running on instinct, and it reflects in your posts when you get mad for being asked to explain something.
Rock Solid@ShitpostRock

The best logical fallacy to give an atheist when discussing morals is to ask them why it's morally wrong to have intercourse with roadkill It's dead it will not feel anything, nobody will know and there are no victims If you ask a Christian or Buddhist why it's morally wrong, they will tell you it's because the body retains inherent dignity as part of God's creation (or the sacred flow of life), and desecrating it violates divine/natural order, harms your soul/karma, and shows disrespect, even if no one feels it or knows An atheistic worldview of this question taken to its extreme, concludes that intercourse with roadkill is tantamount to masturbation and nothing more

English
332
178
3.3K
151.7K