JC777

@MGhookasia41033 @MarvenzzFranc Well we do 🤷🏻‍♂️ keep buying cheapies

@MarvenzzFranc They can't touch Trapped Ions... $IonQ has a choke hold on all the patents... the market doesn't realize how bullish this really is

In that case why did they go superconducting to begin with? 🤔 $IONQ $GOOG

@mark_slapinski Liberals are great 🙄

I'm so sick of Conservatives. All they do is talk about how 'bad' Canada is. Shut the fuck up.

@DesFrontierTech Ohhh babyyyy

🚨 $IONQ Hyundai and Kia just patented something with IonQ. Not about "quantum advantage." About how machines make decisions. Sensors capture the world. Classical systems process the data. Quantum is inserted into the decision step. Autonomy runs into the same constraint. Noisy data and real-time decisions. This is where systems fail. Improve that layer and everything downstream improves including reliability and safety. Advantage doesn't come from bigger models. It comes from how decisions get made inside the system. drive.google.com/file/d/1lj3vr3…

@shortmsger Are you short ? Cuz you seem like a shorty

Hey $ASTS! (1) The Prez (of AST) supposedly said something today of supreme importance. What did he say? (2) In other supremely important news, short interest is dramatically up: nasdaq.com/market-activit… Okay, okay, maybe nothing of interest happened today.

Google admitting their superconducting qubits are shit. They just can't scale and cost a lot of money. That's what me and many other guys who are invested in $IONQ have been saying for over a year. Meanwhile idiots kept saying Google and IBM had the best quantum computers 😂😂😂. That's why doing an in depth due diligence is essential, bigger company doesn't mean better tech every time. IonQ has by far the best quantum tech, and Quantinuum is, not close, second.

@Liathetrader @BeardoTrader Who s the lucky guy ?

@BeardoTrader I'm beating SPY and I'm getting laid. Life couldn't be any better.

@LuckyStuey @SovietInvestor @ASTS_Investors Maaaa go fk yourself

@SovietInvestor @ASTS_Investors I've warned you and all other $ASTS shareholders that the company is not worth anything like its current market cap. It may be low single digits billions or worthless, depending on how much they blow their existing capital chasing A Dream of Spring.

After his "misstatements" at MWC26, here's your great $ASTS CEO Scott grabbing the $4.5M bag. What does he know that you don't?

@TeddyGambino Maaa go fk yourself

My GF’s son in law, a wannabe tech bro, long $ASTS, swears it’s going to $500-$1000. Claims telcos going to dump towers and go all in , satellite for cell phones. Co is a piece of shit, 20 revs, hoping for $2B by 2028. It’s a fucking abomination.when bubble cracks, it’s a $10 stock, at best.

“Retail investors, it’s different this time, they don’t panic like they used to” Paraphrasing but honestly one of the dumbest statements ever by Josh Brown. Retail haven’t panicked yet bc we haven’t seen tech bubble crack yet. When it does, retail will blow out just like they always do. It’s not different this time.

@Russel1441065 @Sai_s_destiny @PepInvestStocks @QuantumDom Hes a fk face dont listen to him .ionq the leader

@Sai_s_destiny @PepInvestStocks @QuantumDom Also, the author forgot to research ionq's ability to scale on silcon.... severely misinformed.

$INFQ $IONQ 🔥 Been digging even deeper into the quantum pure-plays after Infleqtion’s NYSE debut and the latest deployments. $IONQ was the first mover and still gets all the hype, but $INFQ is straight-up the superior, higher-conviction pick I’m loading up on right now. Quantum is the endgame for World Models, optimization, drug discovery and defense tech, but most names are still “story stocks” with insane cash burn. The difference between winner and loser will be scalability + real revenue today, not just qubit headlines. That’s why I’m fully rotated into @infleqtion and out of IONQ. Here’s the expanded head-to-head DD on why Infleqtion is definitively the better choice, especially on valuation/market cap. $INFQ Neutral-atom architecture (laser-trapped atoms in reconfigurable arrays) is the clear scalability winner: room-temperature friendly, no massive dilution refrigerators or ultra-complex vacuum chambers needed. You can dynamically rearrange qubits on the fly, huge edge for error correction and large-scale systems. Already delivered the UK’s first operational 100-qubit neutral-atom machine and targeting 30 logical qubits by end-2026 + 1,000 by 2030. But the real moat? Commercial quantum sensing products already shipping TODAY - optical clocks, inertial navigation, RF receivers to NASA, DoD, UK gov, NVIDIA and more. That’s actual revenue and booked pipeline (hundreds of millions in defense contracts) while most peers are still pre-revenue on hardware. $550M+ cash runway post-SPAC, 230 patents, and hybrid GPU-quantum stack with NVIDIA. Market cap right now? ~$2B. That’s it. Freshly public (Feb 2026 SPAC debut), still undiscovered relative to the hype cycle. Asymmetric upside - if neutral atoms win (and every independent roadmap says they will), this thing has 5-10x+ room from here without being overvalued. $IONQ Trapped-ion tech has killer fidelity and they’ve hit big milestones (Aria/Forte systems, cloud partnerships, recent acquisitions). Revenue is ramping (first quantum company to cross $100M+ annual GAAP run-rate). But it’s a pure computing gamble - zero diversified sensor revenue to cushion the burn, scaling still bottlenecked by ion-trap physics and infrastructure complexity. Every delay or missed qubit target tanks the stock harder because there’s no backup business. Market cap? ~$11.5B. Over 5x larger than INFQ despite similar (or arguably less scalable) tech and no near-term commercial products outside the long-horizon computing roadmap. That’s classic hype premium baked in - you’re paying for the “first mover” story at peak valuation while INFQ trades at a massive discount on better fundamentals. Bottom line: INFQ gives you the same (or better) quantum upside with far lower risk - diversified revenue floor, superior scalability path, monster cash position, and a fraction of the market cap. IONQ feels like the 2021 EV hype names that got crushed when reality hit; INFQ feels like the undervalued compounder with real commercial traction already in the door. This is the rotation I’m making in the quantum basket - smaller cap, higher reward/risk ratio, actual products selling now. Fundamentals are still early and speculative (volatility will be wild), but the thesis is night-and-day stronger here. Not financial advice, just my updated DD after the SPAC close and latest sensing wins.

@der_ofenmeister @NiccoloDeMasi You fkn crook

$IONQ will go another -80% from here this is the time to short and get some free money @NiccoloDeMasi jail wen?

@der_ofenmeister @NiccoloDeMasi Maaaa go fk yourself you retard

@TechInnovationz You’re the best bro

$IonQ files its S-4 registration statement with the SEC today. 255 pages. Here’s where we stand on the SkyWater merger and what we didn’t know before. The deal terms haven’t changed. Still $35/share, $15 cash + $20 stock, Q2-Q3 close. But the S-4 is the legal trigger. Without it, no shareholder vote, no merger. It’s now filed. Clock is ticking. What the filing actually reveals for the first time: → De Masi opened at $25/share on Dec 4. SkyWater rejected it. → Revised to $32.50 on Jan 9. SkyWater countered at $34 with 65% cash. → IonQ pushed total to $35 but held firm on the stock-heavy mix (57% stock / 43% cash). → SkyWater wanted more cash certainty. IonQ wanted skin in the game for SKYT holders. → SkyWater explored no alternative buyers. The board cited “national security concerns related to potential purchasers with non-U.S. ownership.” Nobody else in the US could make this offer. → If the deal fails on regulatory grounds, IonQ must buy 2.86M SKYT shares for $100M. That’s not a walkaway clause. That’s commitment. → Goldman Sachs advising SkyWater, fairness opinion delivered. Cantor Fitzgerald on IonQ’s side. → ~19.87% of SKYT shares already locked via voting agreement. Where we are now in the process: ✅ Deal announced - Jan 25 ✅ Form 425 filed - Feb 2 ✅ Integration team in place (Petrina Zaraszczak, Tyler Yang) ✅ S-4 filed - today ⏳ SEC review - weeks ahead ⏳ SKYT shareholder vote - TBD ⏳ HSR antitrust clearance ⏳ Expected close - Q2-Q3 2026 No red flags. No opposition. Board unanimous. Balance sheet funded ($3.3B cash, no financing condition). The first vertically integrated quantum platform is on track. 🔗 sec.gov/Archives/edgar… $SKYT #IonQ #QuantumComputing

@Liathetrader @PageSix I know . She’s not that hot but you to the contrary you’re very hot 😉

@PageSix She not only crazy but also ugly.

ABC cancels Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of ‘The Bachelorette’ trib.al/rXIKMRY

@bullclub777 Maaaa gtfoh losrrrrr

$HOOD has a vision for tokenization and international expansion. $BULL has a vision of surviving the next quarter without another massive selloff.

@DannyQuark Maaa go fk yourself

$IONQ Nice 55% DECLINE since then 😂🤣

@midascabal She has a good body

All a man needs in life is a mid ugly girl like this

@joe31162606 Right now i need ionq to go to 40$ im not liking this .

Why IONX is Splitting Twice (March 2026 vs. December 2025) 1. December 9, 2025: Forward Split (2-for-1) The Reason: IONX’s price had likely climbed too high. The Goal: To make the ETF more "affordable" for retail traders by doubling the number of shares and cutting the price per share in half. 2. March 19, 2026: Reverse Split (1-for-3) The Reason: The price of IONX dropped significantly (closing at $9.05 on March 18). The Goal: To "prop up" the share price back toward $27.00. This prevents the stock from looking like a "penny stock" and ensures it stays compliant with exchange listing requirements (which often require a minimum price). The Bottom Line: Because IONX is a 2X Leveraged ETF, its price moves twice as fast as the underlying stock (IONQ). These extreme swings often force the fund manager (Defiance) to step in and adjust the share price through splits to keep the ETF in a "tradable" range—neither too expensive nor too cheap. Would you like to see the specific price targets the fund is likely trying to maintain with these adjustments?

$ionq here you go listen to this guy made $20 million in Nvidia and he says quantum is next. This is gonna be me very shortly $ionx

@bullclub777 You fkn 🤡

Imagine being long $IONQ because of a "256-qubit roadmap." You’re not an investor, you’re just waiting for a computer that doesn't exist to solve why you’re still broke.

@joe31162606 I smell capitulation. Ill buy your shares

$ionq welp. It looks like we’re pretty much screwed until they start announcing big contracts and if they don’t do that, we’re either going to stay right here or go down. Those analyst estimates are a bullshit to say the least.