John Davenant

795 posts

John Davenant banner
John Davenant

John Davenant

@JDavenant

English academic and Bishop of Salisbury from 1621

Katılım Ocak 2025
106 Takip Edilen153 Takipçiler
John Davenant
John Davenant@JDavenant·
@nabdowney @CovenantReform2 @dominicptaranto No, you just need to understand that baptism began in the Old Covenant and signified spiritual cleansing. The people of Israel didn’t need to ask John what he meant when he said “Repent and be baptized,” because they already knew what he meant. See Heb. 9:10 “washings”.
English
0
0
0
15
I Cinque ⚓️
I Cinque ⚓️@dominicptaranto·
It is literally impossible to make a case for exclusive credobaptism from Scripture.
English
8
0
21
2.3K
John Davenant retweetledi
Sean McGowan
Sean McGowan@irishpresby·
What happened to my friend @ZacharyGarris was a travesty of justice. Not only did they convict and suspend him from ministry for what can only be described as a few “mildly harsh tweets” at best, but at trial they did not even admit any evidence for the second charge nor did they have any witnesses testify thus taking away the right of Garris to defend himself. This whole things comes across as pure malicious law fare. It must been made right. #PCA
English
32
70
615
26.1K
John Davenant
John Davenant@JDavenant·
@CovenantReform2 @dominicptaranto Infants were baptized: For I do not want you to be unaware, brothers, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea, and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, — 1 Corinthians 10:1-2
English
1
0
4
50
John B. Carpenter
John B. Carpenter@CovenantReform2·
@dominicptaranto Actually, baptism is not a sign of the covenant. No where does scripture suggest that baptism serves as a covenant sign, like circumcision (including Col. 2:11 which doesn't even mention literal circumcision). Baptism is for "disciples" (Mt 28:19), not "members of the covenant".
English
1
0
0
104
John Davenant
John Davenant@JDavenant·
It is possible to highly revere the divines and the process of framing the confession and catechisms while at the same time saying they were wrong in barring children from the Supper. Calvin did this with Augustine & Cyprian on paedocommunion, just in the opposite direction.
🇺🇸 𝕭𝖑𝖆𝖈𝖐 𝕽𝖔𝖇𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖌𝖎𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖙 ♱@BlkRobeRegiment

Honestly, my assessment is that the Westminster Divines were way more knowledgeable than myself and my own theorizing. It was also a consensus document, not written by merely one man. I have found peace in the simplicity of that.

English
1
0
8
268
John Davenant
John Davenant@JDavenant·
WCF 27.5 “The sacraments of the Old Testament in regard to the spiritual things thereby signified and exhibited, were, for substance, the same with those of the new.” — 1 Cor 10:1-4 Paedocommunion is firmly established in the Old Covenant and not overturned in the New.
English
1
2
11
799
John Davenant
John Davenant@JDavenant·
@iansenius @SarumCatholike God admitted them to it under the Old Covenant, and still admits them under the New. If they’re a part of the body, they are welcome to it.
English
1
0
0
26
Iansenius
Iansenius@iansenius·
@SarumCatholike @JDavenant Habitual faith is not sufficient for worthy reception. Infants can only have faith habitually so they don’t have the means necessary for the worthy reception of the sacrament.
English
2
0
0
47
John Davenant
John Davenant@JDavenant·
@RyanHurst171 And if a revision like that can be okay despite diverging from the tradition and original confession, then so can the adjustment of including all baptized members at the Table.
English
1
0
0
7
John Davenant
John Davenant@JDavenant·
@RyanHurst171 You know that both the original and revised teach universal principles about the magistrate, not circumstantial/prudential applications. Your confession teaches no civil magistrate of any commonwealth can exercise the same authority and power that it’s given in the original.
English
1
0
0
10