Cheyenne

@ChainDigger82 @FlashTrade I like the LP there with a "dividend" mode, jupiter definitely lost a lot of trust after the cancelled airdrop and honestly it is expensive & lending poor apy etc.

After Jupiter walked back the airdrop, I started looking for alternatives. Ended up using @FlashTrade more lately. • 0% fee limit orders (real orderbook) → Jupiter “limits” still pay swap + routing fees • More perp pairs → not just BTC / ETH / SOL • Lower entry fees on perps → ~0.05% vs ~0.06% (+ different funding model) Feels like this is flying under the radar.

@ChainDigger82 @rhea_finance @KelpDAO @DriftProtocol Happy for you bro, that you got your money back fron Rhea back. My money in drift lost forever

April DeFi Stress Test: A Tale of 3 Exploits Relentless transparency vs. Total silence. 90-100% recovery vs. 80-year IOU. @rhea_finance & @KelpDAO showed what "DeFi United" looks like. @DriftProtocol obliterated its reputation & damaged the whole ecosystem. Choose wisely.

@ChainDigger82 Lol, that would kill me

... was lucky enough to change my rsETH to stETH a month ago though... otherwise, I would "win a triple jackpot" in April... drift, rhea, rsETH 😳

~10 DeFi exploits in April. Not over yet. AI is making hacking easier. rsETH just exposed LST risks again. Everything is connected. One failure cascades. “Safe” isn’t safe anymore. I pulled most funds from protocols. LSTs → native staking. DeFi is getting more dangerous.

@ChainDigger82 True, it is scary

@cryptofergani Me

I am back as promised :) Time to start the $50 → $100,000 challenge It’s ZERO-RISK, I’ll cover $50 for each participant Last time it took me about 12 days, will try doing it faster this time If you want to follow along, comment "Me" below and I’ll send you an invite to the call group Gonna lock comments in 24 hours

@ChainDigger82 @DriftProtocol @RheaFinance Omg...i am sorry for you bro! Rhea's reaction is so great compare to drift

April isn’t even over and I’ve already been hit twice. @DriftProtocol: – ~2 weeks silence – IOU token on future fees @RheaFinance: – response in hours – postmortem <24h – working on compensation Same space. Very different care for users. Not happy to be involved in 2 exploits.

@ChainDigger82 @DriftProtocol Omg no way! 100% haircut lol ... We will never see any money.

So @DriftProtocol is relaunching, but let’s talk about the 'recovery' logic. The Insurance Fund—specifically designed to cover protocol risks—stays 100% intact for stakers. Meanwhile, low-risk vault users get 0% liquidity and a 'Recovery Token' backed by prayers?

@ChainDigger82 @solsticefi They definitely aim to pay nothing at the end

@ChainDigger82 Their communication is a joke, very very disapponting

This is how Solana DeFi loses its users — not just from exploits, but from how teams respond. SOL price is affected, Solana chain is losing TVL, ppl scared and migrating away from Solana... Some friends of mine left DeFi forever thanks to DRIFT...

Before exploit: asleep on security After exploit: asleep on communication At this point, it’s not incompetence — it’s indifference. @DriftProtocol still sleeping, according to their update speed. "Actively working" looks a lot like "actively ignoring" from this perspective.

@ChainDigger82 @DriftProtocol Ya, exactly, one would expect to apologize be the first reaction and be pinned on X, alongside with the information about timeframe of future payout of the rest of funds... They do not care about the users at all

In DeFi, exploits happen. But response defines the protocol. @DriftProtocol: – 2/5 multisig – no timelock – no refund clarity after 5 days – no accountability, no apology Security failed. Communication failed. This is destroying the last remaining trust in the team/protocol.

@ChainDigger82 Dividend yield sounds pretty interesting 😍

Another detail I like: The pool holds JitoSOL, so LPs also capture staking yield on top of trading fees. Recent ranges roughly: JLP → ~20–35% FLP / sFLP → ~40–50% average (with liquidation spikes) Curious what others prefer: Auto-compound LPs or Dividend yield?

Been testing perp LP vaults on Solana for months. Currently using both: • JLP (Jupiter) • FLP.1 / sFLP.1 from @FlashTrade Same core idea: LPs are the counterparty to traders → earning trading fees + trader losses. But FlashTrade added a clever twist 👇

@ChainDigger82 Meteora made LP easy, and good for DCA

DLMM liquidity is a trading strategy. Trend traders want momentum. LPs want chaos around the same price. DLMM loves chop 🦡

95% of DLMM LPs on Meteora make the same mistake: They LP trends. But DLMM actually performs best in CHOP. Bad for LP: 100 → 110 → 120 → 130 Good for LP: 100 → 104 → 98 → 103 → 97 Here’s a Badger Guide to LP-friendly markets 🦡👇

@ChainDigger82 I am on USDC+, missing there.

Different yield sources behind: • leveraged funding → mUSD • yield aggregation → pbUSDC / CRT • RWA credit → PST • treasury yield → USD* • reinsurance → ONyc Unfortunately the highest-yield vaults (mUSD & pbUSDC) are currently full. Anyone using other YBS on Solana?

I've been testing most yield-bearing stablecoin vaults on Solana over the past few months. Current yields roughly look like this mUSD (@mooncake_fi) ~22–23% pbUSDC (Piggybank) ~21% ONyc (@onrefinance) ~10.25% USD* (@perena) ~9.9% PST (@humafinance) ~8% CRT (@DeFiCarrot) ~5.5%

@ChainDigger82 Using Seeker! Its the best

Curious what others here are using daily: Ledger Trezor OneKey Seeker something else?

After years of using traditional HW wallets… I didn’t expect @solanamobile Seeker to replace them. But it did. If you’re active in Solana DeFi, this isn’t just another device — it’s a different experience entirely. The gap in UX is real.