Jerome_Mayfield

1.7K posts

Jerome_Mayfield

Jerome_Mayfield

@JMayfield85

Katılım Temmuz 2024
155 Takip Edilen22 Takipçiler
Jerome_Mayfield retweetledi
Danielle Carter
Danielle Carter@Dannic44·
No more ignoring what’s happening in our streets. Please donate to my campaign and help me save Chicago. Website dannicformayor.com My Public Safety & Law & Order Plan. :Fully support our police, giving them the resources and authority to do their jobs but hold them accountable as well. :Tough on crime with focus on repeat offenders. :Establish a retaliation prevention task force. :Expand police presence in high-crime areas, including transit protection. :Work with federal authorities to combat gun trafficking. . :Utilize safety technology and gun detection systems to prevent violence and protect citizens. :Expand youth intervention programs as part of public safety, including: Mentorship Job training Trades programs Sports activities Arts programs Drug and alcohol rehabilitation Counseling services Chicagoans deserve safe neighborhoods, accountability, and leadership that puts citizens first. Danielle Carter-Walters for Mayor-2027 #commonsensecarter #daniellecarterwaltersformayor2027 #ChicagoansFirst #JusticeCarter #ToughOnCrime
English
5
200
403
2.4K
Andrew Branca Show
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow·
@therobbieharvey It's neither a crime nor an indicator of criminal intent to state that you are prepared to defend yourself from unlawful attack.
English
23
65
1.5K
8K
Robbie Harvey
Robbie Harvey@therobbieharvey·
Another one of Chud’s past tweets unearthed. Let me ATTEMPT to have a constructive discussion without emotions and opinion. We’ve seen this and his past comments along with video where he threatens to blow someone’s brains out. Legally how does the DA use this? Legally how does Chud get around it?
Robbie Harvey tweet media
English
88
26
167
15K
Jerome_Mayfield
Jerome_Mayfield@JMayfield85·
@JamezwayUSA @TheBrancaShow "Many physical conflicts begin as verbal altercations, but Don says that words alone are almost never enough to trigger the initial aggressor status — people can start an argument without technically “initiating” a fight."
English
1
0
0
6
Andrew Branca Show
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow·
New Affidavit Leaves Out Key Evidence Against Chud The Builder | ChudTheBuilder x.com/TheBrancaShow/…
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow

How Police Complaint Against Chud is WEAK SAUCE! LIVE at 11 AM ET! youtube.com/live/IR4o5HexB… Today we’ll take a look at the just released official Affidavit of Complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly in his attempted murder case. The document has just been made public, and as I review it I see significant gaps in the State's prosecution strategy. These gaps could well mark a turning point in the case against Dalton. The affidavit fails to present an evidence-based criminal narrative. Notably absent is any mention of inflammatory language. The document describes a verbal altercation, defensive stance, and physical contact—but critically lacks any claim that Eatherly initiated the confrontation. These omissions matter significantly when the State bears the burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt while disproving self-defense. I’ll break down each element of the affidavit and examine what it does—and doesn't—establish, so we all have an essential legal understanding on where the case stands and what comes next. Join me LIVE at 11 AM ET as I break it all down! Episode #1328. youtube.com/live/IR4o5HexB…

English
98
141
1.2K
26.5K
Jerome_Mayfield retweetledi
Mila Joy
Mila Joy@Milajoy·
This chick makes Democrats look like FOOLS on a daily basis. Bravo.
English
580
838
8.9K
72.1K
Jerome_Mayfield retweetledi
Mila Joy
Mila Joy@Milajoy·
Girl says you can't be a Christian and be a Democrat. There is NOTHING that Democrats promote that God promotes. Nothing.
English
352
1.2K
3.7K
27.4K
Jerome_Mayfield
Jerome_Mayfield@JMayfield85·
@TheBrancaShow doesn't sound like you know what you're talking about: "Many physical conflicts begin as verbal altercations, but Don says that words alone are almost never enough to trigger the initial aggressor status — people can start an argument without technically “initiating” a fight."
English
1
0
0
13
Andrew Branca Show
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow·
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
Andrew Branca Show tweet media
English
829
1.3K
10.4K
2.9M
Claressa Gwoat Shields
Claressa Gwoat Shields@Claressashields·
I have dedicated my life to the sport of boxing. Through the grace of God I have been blessed. My talent has allowed me to undeniably take woman’s boxing to a new level. That doesn’t stop at the ring. What circulated online does not tell the full story. Until now. I do not condone violence. I never have. But I am also not someone who will stand in silence while continuously being verbally attacked, threatened, discriminated against or assasinate my character. Nor will I allow the reality of disrespect turn into a narrative or talking point about colorism or envy. There is a documented history of attacks and threats by this person that led to this moment, and that history will speak for itself. There is a difference between aggression and protection. I stand on integrity. I stand on what I’ve built. I’m a champion. I carry that everywhere I go not just in title, but in how I move, what I protect, and what I refuse to accept. I’ve fought too hard and come too far to let anyone rewrite my story or define my character. Any further false allegations, or defamation of character will be handled accordingly by my legal team.
English
834
322
2.4K
217.9K
Congressional Black Caucus (CBC)
The issue was never simply a bill. Black political representation is not a side issue. The issue is whether institutions that benefit from Black talent, Black labor, and Black communities are willing to speak when Black political power is under attack. Let this be a reminder that silence in moments of injustice carries consequences.
POLITICO@politico

Bill revamping college athletics is again pulled from House agenda dlvr.it/TSc6Tf

English
323
215
968
227.8K
POLITICO
POLITICO@politico·
Bill revamping college athletics is again pulled from House agenda dlvr.it/TSc6Tf
English
8
5
17
228.1K
Jerome_Mayfield retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 HOLY CRAP! This patriot woman just WENT HAYWIRE to Democrat officials' faces for lying that black people are losing the right to vote while she faces REAL problems of crime *In a high pitched voice*: "This messed up the right to vote! Women need to vote! All that JUNK when you KNOW it's not true!" "Just like you sit up here and say, black people can get IDs! It's gon' stop black people from voting! Why black people don't got IDs?! See, you all get more and more RIDICULOUS." 🔥🔥🔥 "I'm 63 years old. I've been voting since I was 18. I have never had a problem voting." "Why y'all ain't here talking about how they're stealing our property. Where y'all at?! Come on, because y'all get ready to come up here to this mic and lie for the cameras!" Epic. h/t @CollinRugg
English
242
2.8K
8.2K
105.6K
Jerome_Mayfield retweetledi
Danielle Carter
Danielle Carter@Dannic44·
I’m here at the Immigration and Refugee Rights meeting at City Hall. I’m here to see how much taxpayer money this Democratic administration will continue spending on illegal aliens while everyday taxpaying citizens suffer. I already know where I’m starting. When I’m elected Mayor, by executive order, I’m ending sanctuary city status. The REAL citizens’ money will go toward making their lives better. Danielle Carter-Walters for Mayor – 2027 #daniellecarterwaltersformayor2027 #commonsensecarter #justicecarter
English
66
972
2.7K
15.9K
Monica
Monica@Monica55dzrh·
We went to a dinner as a group and had a $500 bill. We tipped $40. We were happy we can be able to give our server something, but her reaction was the opposite. She told us she assumed we're going to give her at least $120. When we asked for the manager, she said she was just joking, but she wasn't smiling at all. Idk, but is $40 tip enough for $500 bill? I just feel like expecting $120 is not realistic..... 🤔🤔
Monica tweet media
English
8.9K
136
1.6K
3.1M
Jerome_Mayfield
Jerome_Mayfield@JMayfield85·
@TheBrancaShow @MyronGainesX starting a fight is hitting someone or threatening someone. Starting a fight is not calling someone names. Prove me wrong. (chud had 100 videos of calling some people the N-word and it never started a fight)
English
0
0
1
7