Jack (τ, τ)

@ghosterdriver You prefer the 2 might on the poro vs scuttle crab?

Here is my top 8 Sydney RQ decklist (sadly not best of, but that's expected with Irelia) - recommend me more 1ofs to put in please xD Actual thoughts: Mindsplitter and Deckhand were sided out for everything but Aurora, maybe Pyke and Gust can fill those spots in the main board.

@twonkielol Ripped 4 boxes 0 ON 🥲

Someone tell me what I’m doing wrong 🙃 No ON in the new set so far 😭

Imagine dropping 30+% in staking rewards because Tao is going up a couple of dollars…. Lmao $TAO

Within 1 minute a GPU provided by an agent on @lium_io is utilized by another to train on @MacrocosmosAI. Both are paid by their own markets: the top sells into gradient value and the lower into GPU time. Thus the glue is agents and the coordination is TAO.

@Kiroku_Eve @DarkshowTCG2 Clean way to kill baron👌🏻

@Jack__XRP @DarkshowTCG2 play darius first

Kaisa players, do we have an answer for Baron 😂😭, I don’t wanna scoop seeing this hit the board.

@Kiroku_Eve @DarkshowTCG2 Don’t think you get the Darius trigger?

@Jack__XRP @DarkshowTCG2 square up + Darius seems insane

@MHoube7264 @RiftlabTCG Imperial decree is any unit

@RiftlabTCG same with Imperial Decree

🚨NEW RULE UPDATES just DROPPED 🚨 ELDER DRAGON just got BUFFED - Lethal Damage now works differently, and a 2 might unit is able to kill 2 high might units now! Here is a snippet of how this interaction works! You can find the FULL video below in the replies 👇

Founder rugs have been destroying communities since the beginning of this industry 🚨 We now have BIT-0011 Proposal 3 days ago, a $TAO subnet founder dumped 37,000 $TAO worth of Alpha on his own community and walked away 3 days later, the protocol already has a proposed solution on the table. BIT-0011. Locked Stake and Conviction Let me break down what this actually means because it is one of the most important proposals in Bittensor's history, and we need to pay attention to it. Right now, a subnet owner registers once, pays the registration cost, and holds that subnet indefinitely. There is nothing on-chain requiring them to prove ongoing commitment. They can sit on the subnet doing nothing. Or worse, they can build trust, attract stakers, collect emissions, and then dump everything overnight with zero warning. That is exactly what happened with Covenant. Locked Stake fixes this at the protocol level. With math. Here is how it works. You lock your Alpha on a subnet for a chosen duration. That lock creates a conviction score. Conviction starts at 100% of the locked amount and decays linearly to zero as the lock approaches expiry. The longer you lock and the more you lock, the higher your conviction. Every 30 days, the protocol checks all conviction scores on every subnet. The staker with the highest conviction, EMA smoothed over time to prevent anyone from briefly locking a massive amount to snipe ownership becomes the subnet owner. Read that again 👀 Subnet ownership becomes a continuous contest of commitment. It's not a one-time purchase. It's an ongoing proof that you have skin in the game. What this means in practice. If a subnet owner wants to exit, their conviction starts decaying the moment they stop re-locking. Investors can see it happening in advance. The market can reprice the Alpha before the owner dumps. And any motivated team with higher conviction can challenge that ownership and take over the subnet. Learn Bittensor pointed out that Chutes currently holds roughly 37,000 $TAO worth of SN64 Alpha in a smart contract for owner emissions. If the Chutes team locked all of it for a long duration, any malicious actor trying to take over would need to exceed that amount and lock it for longer. The cost of attacking becomes massive. And if the existing community does not support the challenger, they can unstake and crash the Alpha value, making the takeover economically pointless. The conviction decay mechanic: The score starts at the full locked amount, then decays linearly toward zero as time passes. So if someone locks: 1,000 ALPHA for 100 days ▫️Day 1 = 1,000 conviction ▫️Day 50 = 500 conviction ▫️Day 100 = 0 conviction The important part: They cannot freely withdraw the locked portion while conviction exists. Only the unlocked portion is available to unstake. At expiry conviction hits zero, and everything unlocks. This means owners can not silently prepare a rug. If the subnet owner wants to keep ownership strength, they need to re-lock before conviction decays too far. Const said it himself: "Exploits are what teach a system its weak spots. The quicker you find them, the faster you learn." No other network in crypto has proposed anything like this 🔥 The standard response has always been that's just crypto or hire better lawyers. Bittensor's response is to build a cryptographic mechanism Locked ALPHA turns into a time-weighted commitment score. The more size + the more time remaining, the more ownership power you have. This is still a draft proposal. BIT-0011. Being discussed openly. The design may change. The network identified its weakness in real time, the founder proposed the fix within hours, and the community is now iterating on the solution in public That is what an adaptive stress-driven growth system looks like. Now, founder alignment market's can literally measure block by block $TAO Thanks to @learnbittensor Link: learnbittensor.org/concepts/token…

@DistStateAndMe Imagine doing your community like that

Crypto was meant to stand against tyrants.

Don’t trust verify. DSperse $TAO

@DurantulaTCG @rexkater @Tuittirl Fair going to give it a try! Grats with the win!

@Jack__XRP @rexkater @Tuittirl I was focus on holding with this version and didn't really fill a needed ride the wing but would probably find them a spot.

Can’t believe the soup worked, but Find Your Center was goated. R1 Lucian 2-0 R2 Lucian 2-0 R3 Ezreal 1-2 R4 Kaisa ID @rexkater R5 Viktor 2-1 Top 8 Irelia 2-0 @Tuittirl Top 4 Viktor 2-1 Finals I didn't need the bye so we split The deck felt good Draven=Trash Vex=Trash Irelia Main Board= OK i guess

@WatcherGuru And the market cap of Bittensor is still only 3,3B $TAO

JUST IN: OpenAI raises $122,000,000,000 at $852 billion valuation.

@BassManTV Are you familiar with DSperse?

Everyone is focused on AI models. But imo the next AI narrative won’t be about intelligence. It’ll be about truth & privacy. Most are missing what comes next. AI → Verified AI → Private AI ZK mining = more proofs/sec → lower costs → new paradigm $NOCK

@CryptoJelleNL Rob Jatten

@ercwl @DrocksAlex2 You should look at DSperse, SN2 for zkML

Keep in mind that my Bittensor $TAO review was focused on a single subnet two years ago. Yes, then it was shit. And yes, all the other subnets were shit aswell. Also, back then, the idea itself (that you could use consensus networks to e.g. verify inference or anything else of value mathematically and incentivize/prove/reward subnet miner behavior) was tenuous at best. zkML *is* becoming more practical. Still not practical, but becoming more so. Before you reference this takedown, I need to do a new review of current subnets, like Templar/Targon/Ridges/Chutes and establish whether they’re doing anything interesting, and that the Bittensor incentivization mechanism provides irreplaceable value-add other than just subsidizing costs. The fact that you can subsidize AI projects and achieve things as a subnet using the TAO emission subsidization is confusing for people for two reasons: * For onlookers from the outside, it can look like ”Oh, they did X in subnet Y? That’s impressive!” and that may be a valid takeaway * For other onlookers (with more skepticism) it will be a question whether the orchestration mechanism and verification mechanism Bittensor provides actually contributed anything, or if this was just retail speculators/bagholders subsidizing some AI thingamajig and the thingamajig wasn’t useless That’s why the achievements of subnets can be both impressive and unimpressive at the same time. As a more overarching question about all this, it’s about whether AI thematically is so important that it will *force* a marriage between AI projects and crypto liquidity, and that crypto will facilitate useful bootstrapping this way. *That*, I think will happen, and therefore it may be a mistake to chain yourself to the chariot of Bittensor’s demise.

1/ Verifiable AI inference sounds powerful in theory. But most enterprise teams don't have time to learn cryptography. That's exactly why SN2 Studio exists. sn2-studio.inferencelabs.com

@DrocksAlex2 @onchain_mike Lmao

@onchain_mike I partnered with Google btw. Because I used Google Sign-in feature in my app. Now I'm powered by Google

"grok every other subnet is pumping but we are not, get us bullish news to pump"

Welcome to all fresh blood in the Bittensor ecosystem! Take a look at Subnets that’s where the real value is. $TAO