Jackson Grassli Andersen

@Mitch_not_Bill Lame answer, but more draw in more colors

What do we want to see from Winterspell? 🤔 The angel card with the singer mechanic when going second realllly intrigues me. Hoping we see more of things like that 🤩 Mitigating the play/draw disparity feels like a very necessary thing to do for this set 🎯

🚨 GIVEAWAY! 🚨 The team is sharing our set champs spoils! We’re giving away 8 scars (yes 8!). We will have 5 winners with a playset going to one winner! ✅Follow ✅Like this post ❤️ ✅Repost ✅Join our discord : discord.gg/aNWu9N9pEY 📅 Ends: April 4th 📍 U.S. residents

@RobertJBye Works for me!

“no code” used to be a dirty word to me I’ve been building with @flutterflow the past few weeks and it has totally changed my mind In a couple of weeks I now have a full fledged app running on my phone with no dev experience

@anuatluru It was written awhile ago on an old project. I view something’s differently now, but overall still interesting thx for checking it out and lmk if you have any thoughts

@JacksonGrassli thx for sharing! will check it out

the rise of Accountability as a Service

@adele_bloch @anuatluru Write this awhile ago so I view some of the things slightly differently now, but overall the same though! Excited to follow along and see how the board walks and nova go! Always down to chat about projects too

@JacksonGrassli @anuatluru This is an INCREDIBLE article I love how you structured the different axes & thought about accountability I host cohorts that offer accountability to work toward your personal goals A lot of what you highlighted is why I’m excited to keep building! novastudio.framer.website

@ormanclark They blend together because every “thing” can be evaluated on the two independent scales of Aesthetics and Utility x.com/JacksonGrassli…

@garrettgee @bucketlistfam So exciting! Literally no better fit for a partnership out there

The day has come! youtu.be/deUmXsCE3_4

We’re hypocrites in the product world. We say we’re outcome focused and not output focused… …but the entire framing of “product” and “product teams” focuses on output, and NOT outcomes

@peteships 😂 💯

@JacksonGrassli Something about Senior Zoommeeter just doesn’t seem as attractive

Calling ourselves “product teams” is hypocritical if we actually care about outcomes over output It’s like accountants calling themselves “spreadsheeters” because it’s a common output they create

New Behavior Enablement Team > Product Team

Changing your perspective from- “we’re building a product” ⬇️ “we’re enabling better user behaviors” dramatically changes how you approach your work

I’m coming to the realization that I don’t actually care about “product” I care about finding better ways to do things, then helping people adopt that behavior Products just happen to be the best way to enable and teach those new behaviors

@jsngr I totally believe this, or at least something very close to it. If we want “dynamic” products where they truly accept any type of command we give it, the input can’t be the only thing that is dynamic. The whole stack needs to be more dynamic, to accomplish this.

future apps and apis are LLM-based

@heyakshay_ @getairchat 👀👋

im trying to get all the remarkable ppl from here on @getairchat who needs an invite?

How do we bridge the gap between Outcomes and Products? Link to new article in thread

@p_millerd I’ve been working on a “lifestyle calculator” exactly for this reason. My guess is if we define how much we actually want/need, it’ll help us set our own personal goals instead of “make as much money as possible forever” and lower financial stress.

its been three years since I memed myself into not worrying too much about retirement by actually doing the math and realizing if I broke even for 30 years, I could have about $5k a month in retirement (which still seems plenty) now I've saved even more, need to re-run the numbers pmillerd.com/how-i-think-ab…