Jacob Melton

12.7K posts

Jacob Melton banner
Jacob Melton

Jacob Melton

@Jacob_Melton_

Christ Follower. Father. Music. Sports. Will forever Anchor Down!!! John 14:6

Katılım Haziran 2012
1.3K Takip Edilen687 Takipçiler
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@DanBilzerian It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
18
Dan Bilzerian
Dan Bilzerian@DanBilzerian·
Since quitting weed I’ve noticed better sleep, more confidence, no anxiety, and dramatically improved mental acuity. It was honestly one of the hardest addictions for me to beat, and looking back, it may have been the biggest net negative in my life. Crazy to say, but it’s true.
English
2.4K
1.9K
35.8K
2M
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@TheoVon It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@AlpacaAurelius It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
20
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@farmingandJesus I totally agree.. It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
15
🌷 LIZZIE🌷
🌷 LIZZIE🌷@farmingandJesus·
Just because a pastor’s voice gets louder or he is theatrical and it makes you feel a certain way doesn’t mean it’s correct. We aren’t led by feelings and emotions being stirred, we are led by the scriptures. Check the scriptures, always.
English
43
44
774
7.1K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@ScottRoberts I agree It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
20
Scott Roberts
Scott Roberts@ScottRoberts·
The Bible is 100% true.
English
197
618
7.3K
67.6K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@rumilyrics I totally agree! It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
Rumi
Rumi@rumilyrics·
Nothing is wrong with changing your opinion on something after learning new information. It's a sign of intelligence.
English
87
598
3.1K
51.6K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@BlackRifle_Co I totally agree… It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
12
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@MikhailaFuller It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@cheesyredrocket It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
4
🏁The iatrogenically harmed menstruatrix🤐🕷️
"SSRIs help billions." OK, I now think that this guy is actually a Temu-grade troll. 🤣
Dr Ahmad Rehan Khan@AhmadRehanKhan

Thank you for sharing your personal story. I am truly sorry you had to go through that experience, and I am glad you received appropriate help that ultimately benefited you. That is exactly what people need to understand. SSRIs help millions, if not billions, of people worldwide suffering from Major Depression, Anxiety Disorders, OCD, PTSD, Panic Disorder, Eating Disorders, and many other psychiatric illnesses. Like every medication in medicine, they can have side effects and withdrawal symptoms, which is why a responsible psychiatrist must carefully discuss risks, benefits, alternatives, and monitoring with patients so they can make an informed decision. If someone experiences severe or debilitating withdrawal symptoms, we should never dismiss or invalidate their experience. But using individual experiences to claim that SSRIs do not help anyone, or making exaggerated comparisons like “worse than heroin withdrawal,” is also scientifically inaccurate and deeply irresponsible. People also need to understand that many anti-psychiatry influencers carry zero responsibility for actual patient care. They do not manage suicidal patients at 3 AM, treat severe OCD, stabilize psychosis, or help patients recover from debilitating depression and anxiety disorders. Many are building personal brands and businesses around fear. Some run expensive “deprescribing clinics” charging thousands of dollars out of pocket, often not covered by insurance. Others sell unregulated supplements, online courses, or books. Patients deserve balanced, evidence based information, not fear mongering driven by anecdotes, ideology, or financial incentives.

English
1
3
13
308
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@NewsfromScience It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
13
News from Science
News from Science@NewsfromScience·
The Trump administration is moving to appoint two people who have pushed to reduce the use of antidepressants to the advisory board for the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health. scim.ag/4uaDJl4
English
32
28
128
18.2K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@naomicfisher It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
Naomi Fisher
Naomi Fisher@naomicfisher·
Why does it matter, if the claim that children with ADHD hear 20,000 more critical comments than other children isn’t based on any data, but was a thought experiment by a psychiatrist in 2010? Surely the point holds, because children with ADHD may well hear more critical comments than others? It matters to me because we are building narratives on sand. In 2010, a time when most people diagnosed with ADHD were hyperactive boys, a psychiatrist suggests that they might hear 20,000 more critical comments than other children. In 2016, as more women are being diagnosed in adulthood, another psychiatrist suggests that women with ADHD are more sensitive to rejection than others. Both just ideas. Not based on research. The two suggestions are combined, so the story becomes ‘children with ADHD hear 20,000 more critical comments than others, and then this turns them into rejection sensitive adults’. Even though one suggestion was about early- diagnosed boys, and another about late-diagnosed women. No real reason to assume they have the same experience. Many influencers lean heavily into this – with Alex Partridge, for example, referring constantly throughout his book to the extra 20,000 critical comments he feels he received in childhood, which, he says, turned him into a rejection sensitive adult. So much so that he says he is paralysed by his rejection sensitivity. But there are so many assumptions here. Many children are criticised, not just those with ADHD – in which case, why do they not all become rejection sensitive? Extra critical comments are not, sadly, confined to those with ADHD. Many people are highly sensitive to rejection and yet describe a childhood of people-pleasing and being ‘good’ – so how does that happen? Many people says they spent their childhood masking – which implies others did not notice – so how did they also attract 20,000 extra critical comments? Can we conclude that one really leads to the other, because we know there are many different ways for children to react to criticism (and for adults to become highly sensitive)? These are the sorts of questions that scientists have to ask, because assumptions like this have real world consequences and they aren’t all positive. They can make parents feel terrible even though they know they were not constantly critical. They can make people think they have ADHD when in fact they are just sensitive to rejection (which is extremely common). They can make people look back on their childhoods with a highly negative lens, discounting the good and accentuating the bad. They could even make people more sensitive to rejection, by the nocebo effect. That’s the opposite of the placebo effect. Tell people they are likely to experience something negatively and many of them will. And they can stop us asking important questions about the individual and what happened to them. These are explanations built on sand. They may feel true for many, but that doesn’t mean we should just all nod along. People deserve better than this.
English
6
0
36
5.2K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@sukh_saroy It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
Sukh Sroay
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy·
Peter thiel asked a room of stanford students one question that made most of them quietly stop typing. He asked them what important truth do very few people agree with you on. Then he said the reason most of them could not answer it was the same reason their careers would be average. His name is Peter Thiel, and he has funded more zero to one companies than almost anyone alive. Here is what he said, and why it changes how you should be thinking about your work right now. He said the most valuable thing a person can own in the next decade is not a skill, not a network, and not capital. It is a real contrarian belief that turns out to be true. For most of history, being right about things everyone else was also right about was enough to build a good career. In the world that is arriving, consensus knowledge is free. Anyone can ask a model and get the answer the smart people would have given. The only thing that compounds is being correctly early on something the room thinks is wrong. His framework for testing your contrarian belief is brutally simple. He calls it the three layer test. The first layer is whether your belief is actually contrarian. Most people fail here instantly. They think they have a contrarian view, but when they say it out loud, half the room nods. If your belief is one a smart person at a dinner party would agree with after thinking for ten seconds, it is not contrarian. It is just slightly under the surface consensus. The second layer is whether your belief is specific enough to act on. Saying education is broken is not contrarian, it is a t-shirt. Saying a specific category of credential will collapse in a specific industry within a specific window is something you can build a company around. Most people stop at the t-shirt and wonder why they never compound. The third layer is the one almost everyone skips. Are you actually willing to look stupid for it. Thiel said the number one predictor of which of his students went on to build something important was not intelligence. It was tolerance for being publicly wrong-sounding for years before being right. He said the students who held their contrarian belief privately, waiting for it to be socially safe to say, almost always watched someone else build the thing they had quietly believed in for a decade. The people who are actually winning right now are not the ones with the most knowledge. They are the ones who picked one uncomfortable truth, said it out loud before it was safe, and stayed there long enough for the world to catch up.
Sukh Sroay tweet media
English
26
107
463
84.3K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@larryvc It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
10
Larry Cheng
Larry Cheng@larryvc·
A major competitive advantage for those with this DNA: "Thiel said the number one predictor of which of his students went on to build something important was not intelligence. It was tolerance for being publicly wrong-sounding for years before being right."
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy

Peter thiel asked a room of stanford students one question that made most of them quietly stop typing. He asked them what important truth do very few people agree with you on. Then he said the reason most of them could not answer it was the same reason their careers would be average. His name is Peter Thiel, and he has funded more zero to one companies than almost anyone alive. Here is what he said, and why it changes how you should be thinking about your work right now. He said the most valuable thing a person can own in the next decade is not a skill, not a network, and not capital. It is a real contrarian belief that turns out to be true. For most of history, being right about things everyone else was also right about was enough to build a good career. In the world that is arriving, consensus knowledge is free. Anyone can ask a model and get the answer the smart people would have given. The only thing that compounds is being correctly early on something the room thinks is wrong. His framework for testing your contrarian belief is brutally simple. He calls it the three layer test. The first layer is whether your belief is actually contrarian. Most people fail here instantly. They think they have a contrarian view, but when they say it out loud, half the room nods. If your belief is one a smart person at a dinner party would agree with after thinking for ten seconds, it is not contrarian. It is just slightly under the surface consensus. The second layer is whether your belief is specific enough to act on. Saying education is broken is not contrarian, it is a t-shirt. Saying a specific category of credential will collapse in a specific industry within a specific window is something you can build a company around. Most people stop at the t-shirt and wonder why they never compound. The third layer is the one almost everyone skips. Are you actually willing to look stupid for it. Thiel said the number one predictor of which of his students went on to build something important was not intelligence. It was tolerance for being publicly wrong-sounding for years before being right. He said the students who held their contrarian belief privately, waiting for it to be socially safe to say, almost always watched someone else build the thing they had quietly believed in for a decade. The people who are actually winning right now are not the ones with the most knowledge. They are the ones who picked one uncomfortable truth, said it out loud before it was safe, and stayed there long enough for the world to catch up.

English
127
154
797
78.5K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@VinoNStrosGal It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
10
Sassy Devil Dog 🔥
Sassy Devil Dog 🔥@VinoNStrosGal·
This replier sees a “choice.” I see a country that ripped stable chronic pain patients off prescribed opioids, pushed many into a fentanyl-poisoned street supply, then pretended the aftermath was a character flaw instead of a policy failure. Not everyone standing on that sidewalk started there. Some started in doctors offices, after surgeries, injuries, military service, or catastrophic pain, until fear-driven medicine pulled the rug out from under them. And even if he did make bad choices, what kind of society turns a dying or poisoned human being into content with a soundtrack and a comment section? The real sickness here is how eager people are to dehumanize suffering when it makes them feel morally superior.
UniquelyMoi@AliceTemple12

@VinoNStrosGal @MbarkCherguia He made a choice to take it. He’ll probably expect someone else to rescue him. It’s his problem that he brought on himself.

English
7
12
48
890
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@spirituallock It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
1
16
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@MarijuanaPolicy It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Marijuana Policy Project
Marijuana Policy Project@MarijuanaPolicy·
"If the goal is truly protecting children from cannabis, the evidence points toward regulation and education, not incarceration." -Kevin Caldwell, MPP's Southeast Legislative Manager nola.com/opinions/guest…
English
3
6
17
701
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@abolishthedea It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
1
19
TheDrugWarPhilosopher
TheDrugWarPhilosopher@abolishthedea·
If Fentanyl kills, then alcohol massacres. The problem is drug prohibition, not drugs.
English
3
21
74
1.3K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@Whowaa It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
9
K
K@Whowaa·
Chronic pain patients are treated like criminals across the land. They would rather you suffer than have a quality of life. You can’t convince me otherwise Until homegrown is legal worldwide 💯 Free the Plant 💚
English
3
6
25
390
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@Forte4r It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
Forte😶‍🌫️
to be very honest with you, weed is safer than alcohol
English
14
42
189
6.6K
Jacob Melton
Jacob Melton@Jacob_Melton_·
@KatieMiller It’s almost like the legal definition of “drug” itself is nonsensical with the use of formal semantics in the word “substance” Genesis 1:29 (which is also part of the Torah btw)
Jacob Melton tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
Katie Miller
Katie Miller@KatieMiller·
Antidepressants are massively overprescribed. They ruin the lives of too many girls and women — which is incredibly similar to the poisonous effects of hormonal birth control.
The Washington Post@washingtonpost

For years, patients were told that coming off antidepressants was straightforward. But some have described intense and prolonged symptoms. Now, doctors and health officials are reckoning with the challenges of getting off SSRIs. wapo.st/42yetJq

English
76
93
931
27.4K