JamesTor

@EricLDaugh so then she gets to prove it in court what is she afraid of?

🚨 UPDATE: Karen Bass is publicly RAGING after Spencer Pratt caught her blatantly violating election law, ILLEGALLY electioneering for her campaign Now a formal complaint was filed, and she's spiraling! "Spencer Pratt has filed an ethics complaint against Mayor Karen Bass. He is accusing her of breaking state election law by campaigning near a ballot box." PRATT: "We must protect our democracy, electioneering within 100 feet of a ballot box is against the law, soliciting votes at a ballot box is against the law. These clear violations show a reckless disregard for the rule of law and our democratic process."

@pensandpoison the "issue" is never the issue the issue is the revolution

Someone called me pretentious the other day for saying I read Dostoyevsky when I was 15, and that got me thinking—why have we created a culture where engaging deeply with ideas and challenging yourself is considered pretentious?

@StopAntisemites hopefully the dogs didn't hurt anyone and hopefully he gets prison time

Santa Monica, CA - watch as a man identified as Nay Min Tar exits his car, chases a Jewish couple while screaming that they are "genocidal," and then allows his dog to attack them. He has since been arrested and charged with assault, criminal threats, and additional offenses.

@GlobalBC what will they do if civil disobedience doesn't get them what they want?

Members of a Vancouver Island First Nation are threatening civil disobedience if the province doesn't pause approval of a neighbouring First Nation's treaty. globalnews.ca/news/11865596/…

@AaronGunn what is repeating "to the Chair" about? is LPC trial-ballooning a new form of land acknowledgement?

Wow. Liberal Minister of Housing Gregor Robertson says the quiet part out loud. Arguing his belief that Aboriginal title and fee simple title should co-exist on the private property of Canadian homeowners. When asked why then his government is appealing the Cowichan Decision, he attempts to duck the question, change the subject and finally accuse every Canadian with legitimate concerns of fearmongering and misinformation. Also, special thanks to Liberal floor-crosser MP Marilyn Gladu for her "incredibly useful" contribution near the end of the exchange…

@CarymaRules Rainbow Karen will be furious now

"Anti-hate" group loses federal funding, memos flag anti-Catholic bias junonews.com/p/anti-hate-gr…

Sometimes I wonder about the record for the longest period of time a Canadian politician has ever gone without once encountering reality. It's possible to have an entire week of meetings that are just moral panics, made-up genocides and men pretending to be women.

@TheLaurenChen yes

The problem isn't necessarily that girls have retarded political beliefs "Everyone is nice and we should all be welcoming 🥰" is a fine position for an 18 year-old girl to have The problem is that the rest of society actually listens to them and implements their horrible ideas

@finseraste and where is King Charles in her diagram?

@anniedufour99 @kinsellawarren where is King Charles and the GG in your diagram?

He stated a basic principle of our constitution and our law. Anyone who defends her interpretation is as addled as she is. "Kinew rebukes Smith over court decision on consulting First Nations | National Post" nationalpost.com/news/canada/ki…

@DVanLangenhove does the government and judiciary also consider elected representatives to be a protected class? if so, then *anything* other than *praise of government policies or persons* is now *illegal*? is promoting election of other political candidates during an election now illegal?

These two paragraphs of my verdict are crucial for everyone to read and understand. "Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” 1⃣ "For Van Langenhove to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the Anti-Racism Law." 2⃣ This means you can go to jail for "inciting hatred" even if your statements were 100% factual (see 1⃣) and even if you did NOT incite concrete acts of hate (see 2⃣). The benchmark of "inciting hatred" , a crime punishable by prison, is thus "saying something that has the potential of inciting someone to have a general attitude of disapproval regarding a protected group". This means literally any criticism of mass migration is now a punishable offence. If you cite a statistic, and someone could potentially think less of a protected group (like migrants) because of it, you can be jailed. The craziest part is that there is no defence possible against this. I brought the scientific studies that I cited to court, but the judge didn't care 1⃣. I also proved that the hundreds of students present at the lecture included students of all different political affiliations, and everyone was able to voice their opinion or ask questions. The lecture went very calmly, so obviously nobody was incited to hatred. But this too did not matter 2⃣, because if the judge says he believes there is the possibility that someone COULD be incited to "a general attitude of disapproval", this is enough for the judge to send me to jail, even without any evidence. I'm telling you this to warn you that by the time these hate speech laws have come into place, it's already too late. You will NEVER be able to beat these laws in court. You have to stop them before they are implemented. Let my fate be your warning.

@DeiCivitas Canadians I don't trust that there are enough trustworthy people living in Canada to ever feel safe while in Canada

Who do you trust the least, Canada? And why?

@bear_ing "beneficial" is in the eye of the beholder

Hasan Piker: "It's not even beneficial if I go to prison". Ok. But it would be pretty funny.

@Lianne_Rood LPC voters only care about whether people in other countries approve of what the LPC govt is doing

The numbers tell the story: Under the Liberals, Canada is poorer, uncompetitive and drowning in debt.

@neveragainlive1 and/or America

Mark Carney is working hard to promote Jews moving to Israel.

@LoveMy7Wood why would he change what has been for him a successful strategy of governance? (success for him is measured by his ability to force compliance with his decisions)

What Mark Carney must do. Will he?

@MarcNixon24 how gracious of LPC to allow them to waste 5 minutes of their time in the belief that the LPC hasn't already decided, "on behalf of Cdns", to do what the LPC think is best "for Cdns" LPC decisions are made in pvt, not public

EXPLOSIVE Canadians are watching a fast moving trainwreck. Brian Kingston Canadian Vehicle Manufacturer Association SCRAP the EV deal with China RIGHT NOW. CHECKMATE

@VerminusM it never stops with just Jews

The Palestinians are not separatists, they are annihilationists. Their goal is not to separate from Israel, it is to annihilate it.

@VerminusM the "issue" is never the issue the issue is the revolution

The reason climate change activists harass people in Europe and America but ignore the far greater polluters in China and India is the same reason animal rights activists harass old ladies in fur coats but not bikers in leather jackets.

@ryangerritsen year after year the message is "just give us more time! Why rush?"

Who does Wab Kinew think he is? I think he honestly believes he is more than just the Premier of Manitoba. It’s not up to him what Alberta does. What he did here is unacceptable. This type of rhetoric is only going to double the resolve of the separatists.