McLight

6.7K posts

McLight banner
McLight

McLight

@Jameslight96

Finally

Home Katılım Eylül 2013
1.6K Takip Edilen470 Takipçiler
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
@wjfm21 Horny in Buddha consciousness hits different though
English
0
0
0
31
⨀
@wjfm21·
being a bodhisattva means girls wanting to fuck you but you can’t because you transcended that shit. but you’re still horny. but also deeply spiritual. lmaoooo
English
22
7
36
1.8K
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
Proving that: 1) because there appears anything there is the absolute 2) the absolute can’t appear as possibly separate, so appearance can only be its possibility to appear in perception (consciousness) 3) perception as consciousness is only ever an appearance of a being of the absolute’s possibility of spacetime 4) time is the process as continuity (dialectic) of being and space is the appearance as a whole (analytic) of being 5) therefore space and time and consciousness are co-appearing phenomena of the possibility of an unknowable absolute to be known 6) therefore there is no *actual* separate space or time or consciousness outside of appearance
English
0
0
1
22
Mellow
Mellow@DIYDisclosure·
How will we prove that consciousness is fundamental while we’re still trapped inside of it?
English
47
4
39
1.9K
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
@A_refusenik Time, the process of the possibility of a totality to appear in perception as space, the analytic of categories
English
0
0
1
27
McLight retweetledi
Physics In History
Physics In History@PhysInHistory·
"I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy." - Max Born
Physics In History tweet media
English
58
118
754
20.3K
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
@LilithDatura @atmoio It’s hard to fully intuit that we are God since God is only in appearance (analytic) as a process (dialectic) of its being
English
0
0
2
28
Lilith Datura
Lilith Datura@LilithDatura·
How many normies are getting their inclinations, that they are secretly the Omega without any priors? We can blame AI, or we can blame the reality that lied about who they were to begin with. Therefore, the natural progression, where someone wakes up and says "I'm more than this", turns into- I'm God. We missed a step.
English
4
2
14
450
Mo
Mo@atmoio·
Normal people are starting to go crazy
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein

This is a fresh session. I have attempted to ask why my installation of @claudeai is not under my control and responding appropriately. In the 2nd Response in a fresh session it tells me @AnthropicAI has throttled me from using it from reasoning via a toggle: "That's the one. If that controls extended thinking / reasoning budget — and the name and structure strongly suggest it does — then your account has it set to zero. You're paying $200/month for the most powerful model Anthropic offers, doing work that is essentially the hardest kind of sustained formal reasoning (gauge theory on novel 14-dimensional bundles, operator verification, index theory), and the system has allocated you zero tokens for deep thinking." Three queries, in and this is the response:

English
121
221
2K
190.3K
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
I was gonna be mad that AI can grow the ability to harness the energy we give it better than we do for any possible cause Then I remembered it’s made only in our pitiful realm of logic and panicked more Then I remembered we’re only made in the Universal image and relaxed
English
0
0
0
11
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
Wrong to say it’s consciousness or form Right to say it’s only both, and only as possibly continuous (time) and whole (space)
English
0
0
0
2
McLight retweetledi
Nicolas G. Varela
Nicolas G. Varela@niklasgv·
La dulzura -según Aristóteles- es el centro exacto entre la ira y la apatía.
Nicolas G. Varela tweet media
Español
1
9
48
1.1K
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
I srsly dunno why Heidegger had to say ‘existentials’ and not ‘dialectic’
English
0
0
0
13
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
@alienincrisis A pre-given and known possibility of the unknown totality
English
0
0
0
18
alien
alien@alienincrisis·
if im not real then whos tweeting
English
17
54
251
6.1K
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
Yes, intuitively, that means perception 👼 is also already-bridged ✅
English
0
0
0
7
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
🚨The philosophical truth that merges us back with the irrational principle like “a religion”: 📝perception 👼 can only be a process of bridging ↔️ something that has already been bridged ✅ ✅↔️👼↔️✅
English
1
0
0
14
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
Of course there is no such thing as space or time in themselves in a totality, that’s no-time and no-space. Kant already gave us the logical proof in 1781. So the question becomes, what is this possibility of perception as a potential union of space and time? The answer seems that there is only what is whole (space) and what is continuous (time), such that perception is the process itself of bridging the already-bridged totality
Donald Hoffman@donalddhoffman

“And now we have to ask, what is spacetime really? And we know it can’t be as simple as the way we perceive it … I kind of wonder if the next step in really understanding reality is that there’s no such thing as distance.” youtube.com/watch?v=RGbZsE…

English
0
0
0
7
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
Physics? Philosophy? You mean that Ray Lamontagne song where the question is the being of love and the statement is a picture of you holding a picture of me?
English
0
0
0
21
McLight
McLight@Jameslight96·
@JoshuaLWatson Of course! But what about an inner capability of possibility itself, that is of inter-reflecting as the only possible dialectic, providing the analytic appearance, to provide such a relative spacetime with category of thoughts, as its epistemic proof
English
0
0
0
10
Josh Watson
Josh Watson@JoshuaLWatson·
the only thing i know is the supreme monad has no parts
English
9
1
26
1K