Jan

519 posts

Jan

Jan

@Jan49144466

Katılım Eylül 2020
42 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@IamZeroIka This is how i imagine you, building and doing so many things at such a fast pace🔥
GIF
English
1
0
2
125
ZERO IKA 🗡️
ZERO IKA 🗡️@IamZeroIka·
⭕️ Announcement/product release: DTT ⭕️ I have another huge announcement to make. This is the new implementation that the Dojo will receive. I’ve always thought about how to improve and give people the opportunity to better themselves. From this idea came the development of this new terminal, which is designed to track all trades and help members to grow through: 1. Dashboard Analyze all your performances with key components like: P&L, consistency, setup/strategy, best&worse days and let the "Sensei" help you to improve your game 2. Trades Check your "battle record", add your trades manually 3. Import Import your trades through your exchange of reference 4. Terminal Check long/short ratio, funding fees, market news and more 5. Traders (bonus) Add your nationality and discover from which countries Dojo traders are from (national "battles" in the future?) All of this is being built for people who want to level up and want to put commitment. If you’re interested, I recommend joining the channel now, as this incredibly low price won't last forever.
English
30
19
175
7.8K
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@_MaxO22_ Excellent post thank you✍️👌
English
1
0
1
65
MaxO
MaxO@_MaxO22_·
I bet almost no one throwing around the word liquidity truly understands what it means. For most, it’s just a pattern on a chart an Order Block, Breaker Block, Supply & Demand, or Support & Resistance. While not entirely wrong, since these formations are indeed where liquidity tends to cluster, relying solely on textbook patterns leaves the bigger picture hidden. Liquidity is liquid: It flows and constantly shifts. In its rawest essence, liquidity is the act of buying and selling. Once you grasp this, you realise that every move traders make, whether retail or professional, is actively creating liquidity. Every execution provides the "other side" of someone else’s trade. However, there is a fundamental distinction between the two primary forms of liquidity: Planned and Forced. For the retail trader, liquidity typically manifests in the forced variety. Forced Liquidity consists of: · Stops&Liquidations: Automatic orders triggered when a price level is breached. · Unplanned Executions: Panic selling or FOMO buying where the trader is forced by emotion or margin calls to act. Unplanned trades are often triggered by the calculated actions of market makers, whales, and institutions. The moment a trade is executed, liquidity is either added to or removed from the order book, depending on the type of execution. For those in control, a forced, unplanned trade is the ideal mechanism to build or offload large positions. Institutional Size requires deep liquidity to operate without massive slippage. To generate this, they utilise every tool at their disposal: Social media figures, news cycles, political agendas, and most commonly, classic TA formations that trigger retail entries. These forced trades create a secondary wave of liquidity when they are eventually stopped out or liquidated. As this happens, capital flows back through the order books, ready to be harvested by the other side of the trade once again. Stops are either the direct result of these forced trades or simply a standard component of a disciplined execution. For the professional, a stop loss is a resting order in the book, a pre-planned exit placed behind a technical barrier that, if breached, invalidates the trade thesis. Even though a stop loss is technically forced liquidity (as it triggers against the trader’s primary direction), the prepared trader does not suffer because it was a calculated risk within their counter-thesis. To put it simply: Forced liquidity is almost always the result of a larger participant needing a counterparty to build or exit their own position. In the real world, institutions use sophisticated methods to engineer this, from news cycles to social media. While many traders focus only on these often messy external factors, they often miss the bigger picture. The market is a highly efficient wealth-transfer mechanism for those who understand its true nature. In reality, every common knowledge chart formation is a potential trap, just another tool in the arsenal used to manufacture the liquidity necessary for the smart money to operate. Your pattern might sound more sophisticated than the rest, but if it's shared across the internet and utilised by thousands, it isn't the secret weapon you imagine. When it comes to isolated formations, success often boils down to pure statistics. It is entirely possible to trade the market without understanding the mechanics behind the candles, provided you can execute a statistical edge while removing yourself from the equation. In reality, most traders are too emotionally and intellectually involved to maintain that level of detachment. They transition from zero knowledge to basic technical analysis and believe they’ve finally found the key. They find themselves stuck in the gap between seeing the full picture and maintaining statistical discipline. Simply put: They try to outsmart a market that thrives on their attempts to do so. Not everyone processes the market the same way. My approach is tailored for the discretionary thinker. My edge isn't found in repetitive statistical execution of static patterns, but in understanding fluidity, the constant, shifting movement of capital and the mechanics of the "trap." The game has many layers, each designed to trap players based on their specific level of knowledge. If you survive long enough and stay consistent, you eventually cycle through these stages yourself. You begin to recognise where others are in their journey, watching them fall into the same traps you once did. This perspective is invaluable. By listening to the opinions of others and assessing their level of competence, you can integrate their likely mistakes into your own decision-making process. The Second Form: Planned or Intentional Liquidity Every time you place an order, whether limit or market, you are participating in the creation or consumption of liquidity. One side makes (adds to the book), and the other takes (removes from the book). If these terms are unfamiliar, studying market microstructure is essential to understanding how the engine actually runs. As a small fish, you have the luxury of instant execution. You will almost always find enough resting liquidity to fill your orders, even at market price. Your trades do not create walls that price must struggle to breach. In short: Without significant size, your actions have no active influence on price movement (excluding, of course, the lowest-tier shitcoins or stocks). For a participant with size, the game changes entirely. To execute a large position, they require a counterparty, someone willing to sell to them or buy from them in equal volume. At a certain scale, the order books are simply too thin to execute a plan in a single transaction without causing massive, unfavorable price slippage. Consequently, they utilise limit orders, letting them rest in the books and waiting for the market to come to them. MMs are the grease in the gears. They are incentivised to provide a certain level of depth to keep the market liquid. They profit primarily from the bid-ask spread and small transaction fees. The real controversy arises with the second form of market making, where the house takes the direct opposite side of your trade. This is the behavior many crypto exchanges are accused of. However, in strictly regulated markets, the incentive is different: The exchange profits from frequency. Their goal is to keep you in the game and trading often. While they might use psychological tactics to encourage over-trading, they aren't hunting your specific stop loss on a chart while having all your data, they simply want you to keep clicking buttons. While the term market maker is used loosely in trading circles, we can define them as the entities that provide the structural liquidity required for the market to function. However, the true adversaries you face are the whales, institutions, and heavyweight traders. The nature of your opponent shifts depending on the asset class: Low-Cap & Unregulated (e.g., Altcoins, Shitstocks): You are often trading against faceless whales and predatory exchanges. In this wild west, influence is manufactured through social media hype and coordinated news cycles to lure retail into the wrong side of a trade. On shadier platforms, you may even face execution issues or flash events designed to wipe out the books. The supply of these assets is, more often than not, monopolised and used against you. High-Cap & Regulated (e.g., $BTC, $SPX): As volume and regulation increase, the shadiness diminishes, but the sophistication grows. In these markets, you aren't fighting a guy or group on twitter, you are fighting high-frequency algorithms and global macro-funds. There is no better or worse market, only different environments. While an edge can be found in either, regulated assets offer a level of safety and structural clarity. In these high-volume environments, price tends to move with less erratic noise. This structural stability provides a dual benefit: It often allows the discretionary thinker to read the fluidity of the tape with greater precision, while simultaneously providing the mechanical trader with the clean, repetitive data necessary to maintain a statistical edge. Ultimately, the market doesn't care how you perceive it. Whether you see it as a shifting sea of human emotion or a sequence of mathematical probabilities, the underlying engine remains the same: The constant search for liquidity. By recognising that size views forced liquidity as a structural necessity, you begin to see what the candles actually represent. Their options are not endless: If the goal is to move massive volume, they must engineer scenarios where large groups of traders act simultaneously. They bend the rules and they shape the game board, but they cannot break the fundamental laws of the market. This reveals their greatest weakness: They cannot move without being seen. You can't win against them, you can only trade alongside them by truly understanding the game they play. Every formation creates liquidity upon execution. Trendlines, Swing Highs/Lows, FVGs, Order Blocks, and Support & Resistance are all markers where liquidity is manufactured. Institutional players even spoof order flow software to create false signals. The layers are endless, and there is no perfect TA that works with 100% certainty. The most robust strategies integrate these tools while remaining fluid. To understand what your opponents are up to, you must learn to read their footprints. You need to see where they executed and why. In every move the market makes, you must be able to identify the winners and the losers. You can certainly choose any single method, accept its win rate, and manage your risk to remain profitable in the long run. However, if your personality isn't naturally mechanical, you will likely become your own greatest obstacle. You must either learn to get out of the way and let statistics play out over hundreds of trades, or, if you simply cannot shut your brain off, move past the middle ground. This is where most traders are stuck: They are too emotionally and intellectually involved to be mechanical, yet not sophisticated enough to shift their perspective with the flow of the market. If you want to leave the middle of the bell curve, you must make a conscious choice about the trader you intend to become. There is no right or wrong, only the path that aligns with your psychological DNA. The Mechanical Trader: The System To be a mechanical trader, your strategy must be so objective that it could be executed by a computer. It is simple, repetitive, and anchored in proven statistics. This is arguably the fastest route to profitability because it removes the burden of constant choice. In this model, you accept that you will be forced liquidity (stopped out) 50% or even 70% of the time. It doesn't matter, because you trust the math to resolve in your favour over the long run. To build a strategy with a genuine statistical edge, you must still accept the universal truths about how the market truly works. The Discretionary Trader: The Intuition To be a discretionary trader, you must outplay the computer. Your edge is your adaptability. You do not remain static. You move with the tides, shifting between statistical probabilities by trusting a refined intuition and a subconscious mind trained on thousands of hours of screen time. This path requires you to feed your mind information that goes far deeper than "trading a key level." You must understand the market's deepest layers, the intent, the sentiment, and the traps. Because you are constantly involved in the decision-making process, you must maintain absolute self-control. You cannot afford to become forced liquidity due to an emotional lapse: You must be the one observing the force, not the one feeling it. Liquidity, order flow, buying and selling, whatever you choose to call it, is the foundation of everything in this game. To build a strategy that truly resonates with you, you have to understand its core mechanics. Look beyond "key levels" and the superficial definitions of these terms. Take the time to look behind the candles and into the order book. Learn to read the game for what it truly is, instead of hunting blocks you don’t understand, like you're playing Tetris. Stop being forced liquidity and start becoming intentional liquidity.
English
2
5
67
1.9K
Jan retweetledi
Stoic
Stoic@Stoiiic·
Stoic tweet media
ZXX
6
6
92
3.9K
Jan retweetledi
🎯 Master
🎯 Master@Moneytaur_·
The more you learn, the more you realize you've been lied to. If you don't believe you've been lied to, then you learned nothing at all.
English
20
117
1.1K
104.1K
The Composite Trader
The Composite Trader@Larskooistra_·
Genuine question: What advice would you have for someone that is missing out on +1.5 million dollar profit position on a setup that was preplanned for 19 days but confirmed when sleeping. Asking for a friend.
English
41
4
142
13.3K
Jan retweetledi
Stoic
Stoic@Stoiiic·
one of the highest ROI skills to develop is the ability to flow with the current especially when the going gets tough. the more you resist, the bigger the illusion of the obstacle in front of you gets. when you've gone through enough obstacles and have allowed yourself the ability to develop the insight for self-introspection, the natural instinct will be to accept, face things head on, quickly assess your bearings and what the path of least resistance is to circumnavigate the bump/s in front of you. adaptability is a skill that needs to be honed. be water.
Stoic tweet media
English
1
7
95
5.2K
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@TraderDune Yeah i was in doubt, and there was no real link to be made. Hindsight made me think it could have been something as it collided with the hack day.
English
0
0
0
58
Trader Dune
Trader Dune@TraderDune·
@Jan49144466 Not related, that’s just genuine dating of what he linked tbh
English
1
0
2
117
Trader Dune
Trader Dune@TraderDune·
Has anyone ever asked why the Lazarus Group always prefers to hack DeFi protocols when the entire market is within a bear market ? Is it just a coincidence, or just a blame game on the North Koreans while leaving out other actors ?
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph

🚨 UPDATE: LayerZero says preliminary indicators suggest the $290M KelpDAO exploit was carried out by North Korea's Lazarus Group via a sophisticated RPC poisoning attack. The protocol confirms zero contagion to any other cross-chain assets or applications.

English
6
0
34
5K
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@Albert_618 Yes! your brain needs chart muscle memory. Not mindless staring, but actively looking at topping and bottoming and contiuation formations. Back test but also live pa to train the recognition
English
1
0
1
183
Albert
Albert@Albert_618·
I see price Bottoming and Topping every Day from Monday to Friday. My time on the Charts, the number of executed Trades - its something else. I made all mistakes way faster, I just speedrun gaining Experience. I traded so much, its all the same I just have an idea how it looks when bottoming and topping. Those who tell you to don’t be so much on charts are those who would try to fight Mike Tyson in his prime after having their first Boxing lesson. Probably they wont because they just sell you the idea its possible to beat him. Some Skin in the Game would change that but it is what it is.
English
6
1
97
3.7K
Jan retweetledi
MaxO
MaxO@_MaxO22_·
Whole generations have been programmed to feel guilty about their very existence. The agenda has been to make us feel guilty for what we eat, the resources we use, where we were born, and the actions of those who came before us. We are told to feel guilty for how we love, simply guilty for being alive. This is nothing new, but there are times when this pressure becomes more intense. Looking at the past decade, we have clearly been in one of those cycles. Now, when many are broken inside and burdened by the weight of simply existing, the script is slowly changing. This guilt is shifting toward hate and dissent, not against those running these agendas, as one might expect, but against those who fell for them, or those who now feel ashamed for having done so. Don’t get me wrong: As an apex species with the ability to choose, create, and shape our world, we have a great responsibility. We must protect the environment for the species living alongside us and preserve our own habitat. Yet, in nature, there is no "good" or "evil." Feeling guilty for being what we are does not help create a better world, instead it keeps people trapped in lower emotional states that make them easier to control. A truly happy, balanced, and awake human does not seek to destroy their environment, yet they will still consume resources simply to stay alive. Even the most eco-friendly human being will burn energy, which through the narrow lens of a single lifetime, can be viewed as a form of "destruction." However, breaking down energy is what every living being does. The difference today is that human technology has become so superior that we have shifted the balance, often to the detriment of other living beings. The Earth, in the grand scheme of things, is indifferent to our actions. It was here millions of years before us and will remain for millions of years after we are gone. It is our home, and instead of seeing ourselves as the enemy, we should see ourselves as inhabitants of this world, just like every other creature. Dystopian thinking adds no value to existence. It leads to suffering over events that may never happen. Thirty years ago, no one could have imagined the world exactly as it is today, why do we assume we can predict what it will be like thirty years from now? This is nothing more than the human mind obsessing over problems, 90% of which will never manifest. A depressed species, worn down by the perceived burden of its own existence, cannot lead to betterment. Only a strong, aware, intentional, and thankful human species can create a future worth living. Such beings possess hope and joy, and it is from those emotional states that good things are created. Cynics who claim to "know" we are going to erase ourselves are simply following the path laid out by the powerful, who shift agendas every other decade to maintain their positions. We might face such a fate, who knows, but even if we do, why suffer before it happens? Those who complain the loudest are often those who add the least value, preferring to point fingers rather than contribute to a solution. The best thing we can do is to be the best living beings we can be: Aware, respectful, and taking only what we need.
English
1
3
32
1.4K
Jan retweetledi
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@Albert_618 @melovemoney1 If someone pays, they really want it. If it's free, it just depends if they really want it, or think, oh that's nice info, will have a look at it when I'm bored, or something along those lines. Of course, not everyone treats free that way, but that's how it goes often imo
English
1
0
1
88
Albert
Albert@Albert_618·
@melovemoney1 You are absolutely right. I never understand why people devalue when its free but I thunk its natural? Idk.
English
2
0
14
982
Albert
Albert@Albert_618·
I really want everybody to win... And I really try to support a lot of people. But many questions are repeating. You can find a Series of Videos if you click Highlights on my page. It answers a lot. I will never recommend any broker. I did that before yes and it's wrong. Choose your problem by yourself please. And I sadly can't answer every question. I gave a lot away here. What I built on the $DAX with Taurs teachings is public. Not everything but more than enough. Why I did that? It's my form of being grateful for the gift I got here. You get what I worked out in thousands of hours with thousands of Dollars that I lost in the process here for free. The blood, the sweat, the pain, the sleepless nights, the stress.. I know many pretend thats not part of the process in trading, but be honest - you don't trade. I saw a lot. And I know a lot. And I don't forget. If you want to trade more with me and the Team, look for knowledge or whatever you are very welcome to join the Discord. If you look for a link scroll down. Yes I monetize my time - Imagine I wouldn't after giving all that away. If you don't like it, just move on.
English
14
2
180
5.9K
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@gannwyck Ik zie het in Nederlands
Nederlands
0
0
0
41
Gann Wyck
Gann Wyck@gannwyck·
Omdat X posts nu automatisch vertaalt, kan ik in het Nederlands posten. Ik vraag me af of dat evenveel bereik oplevert. Zien jullie dit in het Engels?
Nederlands
9
0
24
1.4K
Jan retweetledi
🎯 Master
🎯 Master@Moneytaur_·
You haven't reached your full potential yet because you've been sticking to what your parents, your financially unsuccessful friends, and your school teachers taught you. They told you to get a job, pay the bills, start a family, and wait for retirement. To break free from the usual, you need to aim higher and keep pushing. Don't just do what everyone else does, and if your life is financially average or poor you must do something different from what you've been doing for the last several years. And if your excuse will be "i'm too old", then just give up for good already. The world will reward you based on the value you can provide to it, regardless of your age. And if it's not to achieve milestones in life, to conquer your fears and your biggest dreams, why even be here? Just drifting around waiting for your last day?... It's time to move past the "I need a job" mindset, or "I need more money so I will ask my boss to give me more hours of work". You must start thinking of ways to never rely on a job again, and to take control of your time instead of selling it for little money. Buy time, and then use it wisely. Use it to improve yourself, mentally and physically. Pick a field with no limits on what you can earn, master a valuable skill in it, and take charge of your path. Avoid following the traditional path because it is outdated.
English
17
102
727
47.7K
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
Now i need a guide on how to get fat fast for genetically skinny people..jk. Very informative post, as i have often seen how vulnerable i am to social proof, and even when using logic and fact checking, it's hard to go against the herd if it's sensitive and sets people in general against you.
English
1
0
1
133
Albert
Albert@Albert_618·
The Potential Power of Putting Out Your Opinion Monkey See, Monkey Do… Monkey Die The Werther Effect - to make clear how powerful it can be. This is - again - not meant to offend anyone. If you feel offended, we have a saying in German for that: only affected dogs bark. Yeah it’s written provocative - but for a reason. If you survived the first lines, I think you ready for the read. What I wrote is based on facts. You can find the Facts in "Influence - the Psychology of Persuasion" by Robert B. Cialdini. And if you are interested you can just look it up and check the facts elsewhere. The Werther Effect: „Die Leiden des jungen Werthers“ (The Sorrows of Young Werther) by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, from 29. September 1774 is telling a story about a guy called Werther. The Book was very successful when released and provided Goethe with fame. Werther - the main role - committed Suicide in the Book. So Goethe got his fame. A crazy byproduct was a wave of suicides across Europe. Why? To make that understandable we need to understand the human behavior. Many of us look for confirmation and - I know you believe you are super individual (me too btw) - are part of a herd. It can be a herd in the herd in a form of subculture but you are still looking for people that you can identify with. It’s not always bad. It’s just what it is. We can identify best with people that share similar attributes. Age. Clothing. Origin. Whatever. But why are we doing it? We are looking for Social Proof. And thats a very strong Effect. Definition: Social Proof is a psychological and social phenomenon where people mirror the actions of others to reflect correct behavior, especially in uncertain situations." When is the principle of Social Proof and its effect the strongest? When people are unsure of themselves - thats when humans tend to follow the lead of others. You will find a lot of more examples, let me give you one: On March 31 in 2017 Netflix released a series called 13 Reasons why. In the series a young high school student commits suicide. She leaves thirteen tapes behind with reasons for doing it. In the next thirty days the number of suicides among young adolescents rose by 28.9 percent. So the persons committing suicide all identified heavily with this actress and did what was kinda the „right thing“ to do?! Now you see how strong social proof really is. To give some less brutal examples from the daily life: Why do people often queue at a red light in one lane but the other is free while both lanes pointing same direction? Why does it always take someone "special" in supermarket who is "brave" enough to ask for a second cashier? Now I want to come back to why I am a strong believer not everybody should have and post an opinion. And yeah I love to discuss, but pretty often it’s absolutely useless and a waste of time, because a lot of discussions would never happen if we just check the facts before. But the discussion isn't an issue if we just accept the Facts after discussing. Once we accept the Facts we can start to really discuss and look for more facts that might lead to a theory. Problematic are discussions that happen where people just deny facts, too lazy to look them up but still allow themselves to speak. To compare the behavior, it's similar like waiting in the long queue and stating the empty queue will take longer time. The problem is not the discussion itself, but that people gonna join the uneducated opinion camp and design their choices by that - you want that? But thats not why I’m posting this. And when you ask yourself why I discuss - to put out facts. Only st*pid people don’t accept to be wrong - so if you have a fact that proves me wrong, please drop it! I post this, because some are maybe not aware what they can cause with putting out their opinion. Now we make a small thought experiment: Let’s just say its the last Month before Germany is absolutely cooked and it happens - man will be forced into military service. I mean it’s not that long time ago but yeah… Okay we are now in this last Month. And Albert makes this post that he did… Albert did his research and only released facts, nothing else. Some people might identify with the Persona Albert and grab the opportunity and do whatever they believe is useful to do. Leave the country maybe, find an alternative, get super fat to not be considered by the army (come on a small joke here n there huh?) So all these people are now feed with something that secures their future - we still in the thought experiment ok? But now you release your opinion in the comments. Maybe someone is in there who identifies heavily with you and you just say thats not true, or whatever. We now conquer a fact based post with an opinion based on something thats - what? What is an opinion? "An opinion is a personal belief, judgment, or sentiment about someone or something that is not based on absolute proof or certainty. It reflects feelings, attitudes, or interpretations, as opposed to objective facts. It can also refer to a formal expert appraisal or public consensus." First it isn’t a problem. But the effects of Social Proof turn it into one. The month passes. All Albert followers, packed with the fact, left the country. All of those who identified with you are now in a very bad situation. Why am I typing this? It’s not about a single situation. It happens very often and the more you get into the thought process the more you maybe stumble over some things the government, the media, the world itself you live in, has installed only to… (mis)lead you? What if you heavily identify with persons between 18 and 25 that trade crypto? What if you buy always when they buy and sell when they sell? What if thats a perfectly installed and prepared trap you get rekt in every time it’s placed in front of you? Now think more - how many times you heard „if you want to be wealthy in life you have to go to school, university bla bla bla“… Maybe you did. How does the average life taste? Nothing bad with it, but you follow me because you don't want to live that life I think. I mean you did what everybody else did or told you, now you are here. Someone had an opinion, but instead of a 911 in Heidelberg you are driving a Passat in Leipzig because your Boss, the person you really studied for, says thats where you have to work the next month. This could have been avoided with just checking the facts. Its not that complicated to look the average income of someone who studied what you thought gonna make you rich - while you nosedived into the rat race. You don't identify with the 911 driving Boss, but with your public transportation user coworker. Social Proof confirms that you do right - while you failed your target. But the Social Proof was so strong, you haven't been able to do your research. My life was kinda different, I nosedived into a different problem. But same effect. So you maybe discuss things for the sake of discussing, but before you really release an opinion out into the world be very clear to yourself, that you maybe influence people in their decision making. Now think about people that post only because they look for validation - and now think about the people that identify with those people. WTF. You get the point? With the post that I released about the facts that I researched before I just stated something that is what it is: A fact that is public black on white written down in the law and is freshly changed. Some nice people discussed and accepted the facts. Some didn't. Thats not too important, whats way more fascinating is if you look into society how they handle these facts. Same like Covid lovers, they now say it’s „fake news“ or „click-bait“ - and thats dangerous. Why? Putting out that opinion will lead to a domino effect - we had that in the past and we gonna have that in the future. So Imagine someone who says it’s „fake news“ is a person that thousands identify with - they spread it and find per person another 500 who identify with them. This is how weak societies are build. This is why people still send their children to Wing Tsun Courses - yeah your son is gonna get beaten up, send him to real combat sports ffs... that waving hand BS wont scare anyone. No he wont disarm anybody. Yes he gonna get stabbed if he believes he can. Combatsports are factchecked via MMA and Wing Tsun doesn't exist there but people still pay coaches for - what!? You can put the whole text over everything we are witnessing. Be it in social media, in real life, in your family, your society or whatever. The Werther Effect is the evil brother of the Bannister Effect. Both are triggered by Social Proof. Conclusion: If you really have checked the Facts and you are aware of the power your opinion carries, that you put out into the world, the things you have to say might be important - or it might be important to say nothing. If you didn’t check the facts, you might start a negative domino effect that, if you are a good person, you would avoid to kick off. Now the most important question after we have an understanding of the Effects: Why are people defending the German Government without a Factcheck? This is not a fact but my opinion: it's a form of defending - spreading wrong things in favor of the government. I would even go a step further - its close to Stockholm Syndrome if you live in Germany. What does that say about the collective intelligence we (should/could) have as a species? There is something installed in our brains - and that happened with a force btw (you are forced to bring your kid to school here) - that lets many people identify with the system. Why people are instinctively reacting? Is it so hard to accept that the war machine just rotates? Gaining data of the available future Soldiers and war participants is a form of preparation. Same like a Shopowner checks the inventory before he opens. If I would like to control the Society and create behavioral patterns there are a lot of ways. Let's do another small thought experiment: We have a plan. The plan is to test how far we can go and if people really stay locked up at home. First we create uncertainty - not that hard... Flood them with a lot of different perspectives and those who carry their opinion do the rest - everything unclear = uncertainty. We go to the next step. We use the effects Social Proof for it and let strong Personas just lock themselves up, use masks and so on. But you have to think further. The conspiracy theorists who release things first are very often people that I would be embarrassed to show myself with. Weird people that are super uncomfortable to listen to, that I would never identify with transport sometimes an important fact - whats the effect? The Social Proof Effect gets inverted. It's pretty easy if you understand all that to discover how often you get influenced/controlled. Important questions that should be asked: Why does the Media spread the news right now? To be honest I don't know it, but it isn't random as usual. The law is active since 1. January 2026. It's a fact and not deniable before you argue please read the law - but why did it got spread right now? Why am I typing all this? In my life I often got affected by that. I grew up in uncertainty and it was easy for me to jump into the next best Social Proof situation to feel good. Many people suffer this and are mislead into a Life full of pain. In an optimal world, only those who have a fact speak about something. There would be only truth, nobody would be mislead. I know it's utopian to think like that. But if I do one step into that direction it gets a bit more real. Discipline your words. You might save someone. And reflect your decisions. Too many people just say "yes" to things that are super easy to fact check. In the Picture is a small example how the Truth dies.
Albert tweet media
English
12
3
95
4.8K
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@MariusSm1th Perhaps he needs proof of steak🥩 lol. Just kidding, hope he finds his ways. As for you, i view you as one of the few genuine people on x that actually gives a shit about others, and provides value as well. Keep doing you💪
English
0
0
1
100
Marius 👁️⚡🌱
Marius 👁️⚡🌱@MariusSm1th·
I could answer this in so many ways. But mainly I feel just sad for him! He must have had some terrible things happening to him in his life, if someone feels the need to answer like this to a genuine post I feel could help everyone achieve their desired dream life! (it worked and is still working for me) A lesson for everyone reading this is, if you can feel empathy towards the people that are cruel or negative towards you, your life will change dramatically! People like him that write/say such things, which they are plenty of, normally talk the same way to themselves, otherwise they wouldn't feel that way about others! Also making such an emotionally charged statement, I know for sure he is not a long term profitable trader and way off from living a peaceful life! So the only thing I can say, I hope you work through the things you still cling on to from your past and can resolve them. The best person to listen to is imo Dr John Demartini Even the free stuff he puts out is enough to get you through most things (he helped me in my 20s, when I was at my rock bottom phsically and in deep depression)
CBBTC@hp_hp_hp_x

@MariusSm1th I'm bored of your goofy shit. You shouldn't even talk about what to do. You've been psyoped to be a vegan while meat is crucial to the human body. And also you've been nailing nothing on top. You made another indicator BS just like all the MT members have paid gro... What a pity.

English
6
1
58
4.5K
ZERO IKA 🗡️
ZERO IKA 🗡️@IamZeroIka·
We are living in a time when people are proud of what they should be ashamed of.
English
19
19
234
8.5K
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@TraderDune Mind you, circle, usdc stock, dumped on this news. Possibly part of the trap🫣
English
0
0
0
348
Trader Dune
Trader Dune@TraderDune·
With the news breaking that Tether will finally go through a full independent audit with the "Big Four" accounting firms, let's not forget FTX was audited prior to the 2022 collapse. The auditors were later sued by the SEC for falsifying audits. Many of these firms have also faced lawsuits by the SEC, especially Deloitte which has already audited USAT (Tether's US stablecoin). Tether has already been under major scrutiny from the SEC over lying about the company's reserves, financial statements and fraud - If so clean, why wait 10+ years to finally get an audit ? Also, the Big Four once claimed to not want to work with Tether because they feared it would damage their reputation. So what changed ?
Trader Dune tweet mediaTrader Dune tweet mediaTrader Dune tweet media
English
4
4
76
7.1K
Jan retweetledi
ATH
ATH@CryptoChaseCase·
Living On PnL✍️ A big problem in trading is not just the outcome of a trade, but how deeply it affects your normal life. When you have a good win, you can start to feel very good even when AFK. You have direct results from your hard work, and they align with your goal of becoming a profitable trader. This feeling can however act like a drug. Without it, you feel off. When you were winning, it started to influence your life in a positive way. With its absence, you feel heavier. This is where a big problem starts. A simple trade outcome can begin to carry a heavy emotional effect: living in bliss or living in Emotional heaviness. It starts to affect the way you experience your day, your mood, and even yourself, and this is dangerous. A win should not become something you use to brighten your day, and a loss should not put you in a state that follows you around even when you are AFK. You have to make every day a good day - independent of the results. A losing day can still be epic because you focus on how even with a loss, you still experienced a beautiful day. With a win, you simply inform yourself that you did well, but you do not let it become the reason your day feels better. If a day feels much better because of a win, and worse because you are in drawdown, then PnL is too connected to your personal life. Distance has to be created to make the trading experience less heavy. This same win / drawdown mindset also creates problems inside trading itself. Even when you win, playing with house money can affect the quality of a trade because you feel like you are just playing with profits anyway. Sketchy setups start to dilute your edge. PnL-based decision making starts to happen. When you are in a loss, you often want to get back to break-even or into profit as soon as possible, so patience becomes harder to maintain. This is also PnL-based trading. A trade is just a trade. It is the action you take based on your best guesses. PnL should be seen as something more administrative, and it comes at the end. The more distance you create between your life and your trading results, the more stable you become.
English
7
7
42
4K
Jan
Jan@Jan49144466·
@MariusSm1th He's been so loud about taking Cuba, that Bolivia could come first as a surprise
English
0
0
0
199