Jason D.G.

Well, well...

Behavior Analysis Experts EXPOSE Moderator Bias Against Trump in Tonight's Debate @DrPhil's guests bring the receipts. 1. “There was clearly a bias against Trump in their faces.” 2. Scott Rouse observed that Trump’s microphone was louder, making him appear aggressive. 3. Trump was “fact-checked” by moderators during his responses, while Harris's statements were left largely unchallenged. 4. Moderators frequently spoke over Trump as he tried to complete his answers. 5. Greg Hartley noticed that Trump received more questions with a negative framing, while Harris was given more neutral or "softball" questions. Overall, he called the moderators' treatment of Trump “a little heavy-handed at times.”

David Muir lied

Kamala repeats the “bloodbath” hoax and claims Trump said there will be a bloodbath if he’s not elected. The full clip shows Trump was referring to the auto industry. Kamala obviously knows this and is hoping you don’t see the full clip.

Last night, Harris said that the January 6th protest was worse than 9/11. On the eve of 9/11. Disgraceful.

@The_Trump_Train Yes

Do you agree Kamala Harris is reading from a script? YES or NO?

Did they really think Kamala wouldn’t get busted?

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. In this clip: 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check. To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators: "They did exactly what their bosses wanted."

Holy sht‼️ Sheriff Mike Boudreaux from California rips apart Kamala’s open border and describes a case as the “REIGN OF TERR0R” !!! “I have story after story but most recently what we’re starting to see is an influx of Mandarin, or those from China.” Must watch and listen to these stories because the media will never show you this!! It would be a shame if this went viral 🚨👇🏼

@IvankaNews_ Yes

@BehizyTweets Yep! Judge Judy agrees!

FREE Hat Alert! We're Giving Away 100 of these "I Stand with Trump" Hats today. Claim yours now: offers.libertypowerednews.com/standwithtrump…

BREAKING: Two of the Venezuelan gangsters who participated in the violent takeover of apartment buildings in Aurora, Colorado have been released on $1,000 BONDS They are now free to go back into the community and terrorize more Americans Does anyone remember when New York forced President Trump to pay $400 million just to appeal the hoax they brought against him? I guess Trump is far more dangerous than violent gangsters who go around pointing guns at innocent people.

Did Nigeria go too far?

@dom_lucre No

No one got to hear this!

“They’re r*ping, they’re robbing, stealing” New Yorkers go OFF about the migrant crisis in the city. Illegals have cost NYC $5 billion in 2 years, and costs are expected to DOUBLE next year.