Jay Tolley

To my fellow British Jews, You cannot serve 2 masters. Either be loyal to Britain. Or be loyal to Israel. Israel’s interests are not Britains’s interests CHOOSE

The long history of Israeli false flags attacks dressed as arabs. @propandco

The campaign calling the Palestine movement antisemitic is blowing itself up. First, Met chief Mark Rowley lets real antisemite and Muslim hater ‘Tommy Robinson’ march to Parliament while we are barred. Then he is caught lying that we intentionally march to synagogues. 🧵👇

Palantir -- and I don't mean this as an exaggeration -- is the root of all evil.

>Be me >Look at list of Top 20 Wall Street criminals >It is 90 percent jewish >'You are just jealous' - jews

The funny thing about jews is that they appear to be completely blind to the fact that many of the 'arguments' they make about 'Palestinians not existing' could be - and have been - levelled against them with far more accuracy than against the Palestinians.

Communism is when you are ruled by jewish commissars. Capitalism is when you are ruled by jewish billionaires.

Israel is using dogs to sexually assault Palestinians. Where are the media investigations into this?

Top tip: If your house is being burgled and you want a proactive response, simply phone the police and tell them that you overheard the burglars saying something that sounded like holocaust-denial, and that you feel uncomfortable. They'll be there in two-minutes flat.

One of your constituents Majid Freeman (@Majstar7) has just been through a 3 week trial that ended in a hung jury. This man of justice spoke out against what is happening to those in Gaza and in Palestine, supporting them and speaking honest truths. For his honour of humanising those pure people who are resisting genocide and ethnic cleansing, he is facing 14 years for words. FOURTEEN YEARS for WORDS. Why are you not speaking about this? Why are you allowing the government you sit in to get away with what it does to its own nationals? To one of your constituents? Using terror laws to squash free speech and freedom of expression. This true man faces a retrial in September 2027. In reality this case should be dropped - it should have never gotten this far, pathetic. You have a duty to speak up for your constituent who is using his God given right of free speech to speak against genocide and support everyone’s God given right to resist occupation and repression. So why have you not? Show up for your people who you’re meant to represent.

'Israel is a terrorist state. They strapped bombs to our soldiers. They sent a hit squad to assassinate our foreign secretary, for being anti zionist.' - Graham Moore

NOT HUMAN. Monsters in human skin.

NOT HUMAN. Monsters in human skin.

'The gentiles will want to be our slaves. Being a slave to a Jew is the best. They’re glad to be slaves, they want to be slaves.' - Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel

“Did my grandfather molest Jeffrey Epstein, as it seems he did many of the other kids in the neighborhood?” Read Gabrielle Glancy’s story about growing up in Sea Gate, Brooklyn, in the ‘60s: rollingstone.com/culture/cultur…

Do not look at the rich guy with the £5 million undeclared donation who appointed a Russian spy to lead Wales! Look at the bloke making 66k who lived on a boat to save money and may have fumbled paying £4k on Council Tax 🙄🙄🙄

The father of Ari helped with the world's first terrorist attack Jews dressed as mulism and bombed the king David hotel killing 91 people mostly British

Professor @Tracking_Power makes an important point here. Christian zionism does NOT predate jewish zionism. 300 Rabbis immigrated from France and England between 1209–1211 after Salah ad-Din liberated Jerusalem in 1187 and reversed the Crusader-era ban on jews.

so what conclusion do you draw @petertatchell? @zackpolanski was not invited to speak to the 'Rally Against Antisemitism' despite being the only Jewish leader of a political party whereas Reform, whose leader Nigel Farage used to chant 'gas them, gas them' and is an all out bigot? Quite obviously it wasn't a rally against anti-Semitism but a rally against supporting the Palestinians and anti-Zionism. So I hope Zack wouldn't have gone anyway. Why does this need to be pointed out to you?

@A74973Anonymous @EvanWritesOnX is that people moving? no

@JayKay191 @EvanWritesOnX share.google/aimode/VkrXBo4… Data says otherwise

When the people closest to the money, the ones who actually read the balance sheet of the country they live in, start moving en masse, that is not a lifestyle trend. That is a leading indicator of capital flight. For 300 years, the Western cities was where the rich came to be rich. That stack is unbundling now. Watch where they go. Singapore, Riyadh, Lisbon, Mumbai, Dubai. Notice what these places have in common. They are not the cities that wrote the rules of the last hundred years. They are the cities that intend to write the rules of the next hundred. The capital is voting with its feet, and it is voting against its former hosts. When you look at the Western response to the rich fleeing, they won’t ask “why are they leaving?” That question is forbidden because the answer implicates the people asking it. Instead the response is “exit taxes,” “wealth taxes on departure,” “deemed disposal rules,” capital controls in everything but name. The UK abolished its non-dom regime and watched £10bn walk out the door in eighteen months. Norway raised wealth tax and lost more tax revenue than it gained because the base left. The US already taxes its citizens globally, and yet renunciations of US citizenship are at historic highs. This is what late-stage extraction looks like from the inside. The state, having lost the ability to tax mobile capital cooperatively, tries to tax it coercively. Capital, being mobile, leaves anyway. The state then tightens the net on the people who cannot leave; the salaried, the propertied middle, the pensioner, the small business owner who is too embedded to relocate. Those people pay more so the books still close. The smart money is not waiting around to be the bag-holder. You are watching two different rooms have two completely different conversations. In one room, your political class is arguing about migration, welfare, pronouns, and which flag belongs on which building. In the other room, the people who own the assets are quietly liquidating their exposure to the country those politicians govern. They are not having the same argument as you. They are not even in the same building. The wealth was extracted, over centuries, from peripheries into Western cores. Those cores became the most expensive real estate on earth because that is where the extracted wealth was parked. Now the extraction has slowed, the peripheries are pushing back, and the wealth itself - being a finite-game actor with no loyalty to any flag - is repositioning to wherever the next century’s growth is being underwritten. The Western city does not lose its skyline overnight. It loses its tax base, then its services, then its safety, then its prestige, then its skyline. In that order. We are somewhere between step one and step two in most major Western capitals right now. For the everyday Western person, this means the next decade will be defined by something the political class will refuse to name. Your country will keep the buildings, the museums, the airports, and the army. It will lose the people who were funding it. The fiscal hole that opens up will be closed by taxing whoever is left. Whoever is left is, statistically, you.