Jedd

@amer7211 Ceplos bila ada bijak...tiap2 malam buat live kat tiktok sembang sama sendiri kat echo chambers mereka tentu lah tak tahu keadaan semasa...skrg byk cina yg lebih suka bn berbanding ph..ceplos ni yg akan buat byk lagi cina tk undi ph.

Ceplos masih lagi terciduk dengan kekalahan teruk Pakatan Hancing khususnya penolakan rakyat Johor terhadap DAP. Kemudian nak bawa naratif bahawa MCA mahu menghapuskan hak bumi tanpa fakta yang benar dan tepat. Chua Soi Lek ni dah tak ada apa2 jawatan dalam MCA. Jadi kenyataannya sudah tentulah tidak mewakili MCA. Lainlah kalau Wee Ka Siong yang cakap. Macam biasa, ceplos nak tembak, tapi tapi tertembak punai sendiri. 🤣 (Info : 3 kerusi DAP sudah kena tapau dengan MCA dan 1 kerusi DAP lagi sudah kena tapau pula dengan MIC. Kedua2nya di Johor) Meremang weyhhh! 🤣

@IranPolicyB Defending itself by shooting innocent vessel on Oman's sea? Go f yourself...

IRAN HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND IT'S SELF!!

@adamyusuf88 Dgn ceplos mcm ko ...i predict bn will takeover...but this lose will be more ber-maruah den johor one. Pkr will get more than 1 seats😂😂😂

Negeri Sembilan kekal Pakatan Harapan insya-Allah

@impolitejester @HormuzReport Haha looks like i triggered some terrorist sympathisers, any rebuttal instead of those childish insults that u hurl at me?

@JeddTe @HormuzReport Verified retarded

BREAKING: Iran has directly dismissed Donald Trump’s latest proposal for the U.S. to take over the Strait of Hormuz, declaring that “the United States shall never be allowed to interfere in the management of the Strait of Hormuz”, per Tasnim News. IRGC spokesperson said U.S. interference has “seriously jeopardized regional security and international trade,” warning regional governments that “any cooperation” with Washington over the Strait “constitutes an act of war against Iran.”

@BrettErickson28 Hahaha support terrorism now dont we? Two wrong does.not makes one right..whej diplomacy channel has opened u should have choosen that option first...and if u have rhe ballz u would have shot at the perpetrator,not innocent vessel on someone's else territory.what a retard.

Can we just… drop the facade of morality here for a minute and speak candidly? Iran is RIGHT for striking vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. I said it, I don’t care if you like it. You’re lying to yourself if you want to act like it’s wrong. The United States launched a war of aggression against a sovereign country, and this is an obvious and long-identified defense maneuver meant to create asymmetric downside against an overwhelmingly more powerful military adversary. “Ohhhh but it’s wronggg. What about international lawwwww” Last I checked, slaughtering 120 schoolchildren in Minab is against international law. Last I checked, launching a war of aggression against a sovereign nation like we see here is against international law. Last I checked, bombing water storage and infrastructure facilities is against international law… … last I checked, the United States killed three Indian sailors in the Strait of Hormuz by attacking a civilian vessel. “Ohhhhh but maritime lawwww. UNCLOS” Y’all check on Cuba lately? The last delivery of oil to Matanzas was the Anatoly Kolodkin in MARCH. The United States is the SOLE reason the Universal couldn’t deliver in May. They have blackouts for 22 hours a day. Their hospitals can’t function. You can whine all you want about morals and ethics, but maybe take a second to realize how stupid you sound doing it.

@Matt_Bracken48 @MarioNawfal Understand if the straits become unsafe due to external factor...but if the perpetrator are the one that are suppose to guarantee the safe passage , then MOU is effectively broken..when diplomacy opened, u pick up the phone n call, not by shooting innocent ship on foreign water.

@MarioNawfal Anyone can read it.

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran says the Islamabad deal with Washington is now in full crisis mode. FM spokesman Esmail Baghaei accused the U.S. of mutilating the 14-point memorandum, insisting Tehran has never been the side that breaks its word. He pointed to paragraph 5, the 60-day window for Iran's commitments on the Strait of Hormuz, and said the Americans blocked it from ever being implemented in the first place. Writer: Julie

@najam_ali When diplomacy has opened u dont simply shoot a 3rd party vessel, u call and ask what the hell happened...shooting an innocent 3rd party is Iran own choice, being a terrorist is also their choice, now they must face the consequences.

Many people are asking why Iran fired on commercial ships when the MoU spoke of free passage. Some are even saying Iran overplayed its hand. Iran’s reading of the agreement was very different. It believed the MoU promised free passage through a Strait still under Iranian control, not a Strait where the U.S. could decide who sailed and how. When ships began using routes (Omani route) that Tehran believed bypassed its authority, Iran responded by showing that control of Hormuz had never been part of the deal. Washington seems to have assumed Iran would be distracted by the funeral of its leaders. Instead, Tehran responded within hours, making one point unmistakably clear: the Strait of Hormuz remains its strongest strategic card.

@BrettErickson28 " safe passage" , u can argue that Iran has tried its best effort to make the passage safe but failed, but being the one that causes the unsafeness breaks the MOU. And Mou doesnt bind 3rd party, now move on and watch Iran get obilerated for being a terrorist.

Many people see to SEVERELY misunderstand the wording of Article 5 of the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States and Iran that led us to this most recent escalation. Let's take a look at Article 5, and the entire MOU for that matter, and dissect "who was wrong". In Article 5 of the MOU, it reads, in full: "Upon the signing of this MoU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels, with no charge for 60 days only, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman, and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles, and de-mining by the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman, to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz, in discussions with other Persian Gulf Littoral States, in line with applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz." Let's break this down piece by piece, and I will explain to you why Iran followed the wording to the letter: "Islamic Republic will make arrangements". This means that Iran will determine how vessels cross the Strait of Hormuz. They will make an arrangement in which vessels can cross. They did this by establishing the Iranian Corridor. Check. "Using its best efforts for safe passage of commercial vessels". How many commercial vessels were struck that utilized the Iranian Route? Zero. Check. "With no charge for 60 days only, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman, and vice versa." ... don't charge fees. They didn't. Check. "The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles, and de-mining by the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be instated within 30 days." This is... slightly more ambiguous depending on how you interpret the 30 day timeline vs 60 day timeline. Regardless, it states that the traffic of commercial vessels will start. It did. Check. "The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman, to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz, in discussions with other Persian Gulf Littoral States, in line with applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz." This states that Iran will work with Oman to determine... essentially how to charge "fees" instead of "tolls", which is a way to essentially look to circumvent the international maritime restrictions against tolls being imposed. IF you want to make the argument that by striking vessels utilizing the Omani Route, you run into Article 1: "The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, and their allies in the current war, by signing this MoU, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final Deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and other provisions of this paragraph." "Declare the immediate and permanent termination of military options on all fronts". Now... when the vessels were utilizing the Omani Route... was the United States not providing MILITARY air cover? Was the United States Navy NOT assisting in guiding vessels through the Strait? So while you can certainly argue that Iran broke Article 1 by conduct military operations and strikes, it is the United States who broke Article 1 before this. IF you want to make the moral argument that Iran is committing terrorism by striking civilian vessels... Good luck on your moral high ground after the United States killed 120 schoolchildren on the first day of the war and launched an illegal war of aggression against a sovereign nation. Put quite simply... There is not an argument to be made that this was any fault other than the United States. Technically speaking, Iran held up every end of the MOU. The United States, in turn, tried to use this window to directly undermine Iran's leverage in order to turn the tables in this conflict and resume hostilities with the advantage. The United States did NOT release the frozen assets as stipulated in the MOU. The United States DID impose new sanctions in direct violation of Article 9 of the MOU. The United States DID shred the oil sanction waivers in violation of Article 10 of the MOU. The United States DID conduct military operations in violation of Article 1 of the MOU. You can certainly also make an argument that the United States violated the sovereign territory of Iran in violation of Article 2 of the MOU. There is no other way to say it. If the United States and Iran return to all out war, the United States is ENTIRELY to blame.

@IranIRGCC Guarantee safe passage became shooting at innocent vessel? Which part of it was in accordance to the mou?

🚨 JUST IN: 🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran says the Islamabad agreement with Washington has entered a critical phase. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei accused the U.S. of altering the 14-point memorandum, insisting Iran has upheld its commitments. He specifically cited Paragraph 5, which outlined a 60-day implementation period for Iran's obligations regarding the Strait of Hormuz, claiming the U.S. prevented the provision from ever being put into effect.

@MarioNawfal That is what terrorist do

🇴🇲🇮🇷 Oman refused Iran’s demands. Now there’s an active alert for Iranian strikes on Omani territory this morning. According to former U.S. Ambassador to Oman Marc Sievers, Iran is lashing out at those who don’t play along. Writer: Claudio

@tjerealjoker Johor is Reeeeeeeeddddddd!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Tahniah BN. Takziah PN. Terima Kasih Rakyat Johor yg Undi Harapan. You made the right choice. Sekarang, tuntutlah segala janji manifesto BN dari Onn. Kepada yg kalah semua sampai hilang deposit, lol + lmfao. Not worth my time and breath.🤣

Hahahah takut tak sekarang? 🤣🤣🤣

@adamyusuf88 HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

@adamyusuf88 Haha saving this post so i can laugh at it later 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Keputusan tidak rasmi analisa AI berdasarkan realtime data. Keputusan berubah mengikut data terkini dan sentimen isu semasa dan perbualan di media sosial. *Menarik sebagai rujukan akademik. Keputusan sebenar masih ditangan pengundi Johor ke depan Pilih HARAPAN

AI jangka menang besar hahahahahaba

@tjerealjoker Johor is Reeeeeeeeddddddd!!!!!!!! LOL

@tjerealjoker Dont mind me...coming back to this post after prn for a good laugh😂

Johor Is Red‼️ Seriously.. Last tengok sambutan macam ni masa PRU 2018 semasa Rakyat bangkit dan kalahkan BN buat pertama kali sejak Merdeka. Tonight, it feels like that again. Meremangggg weyhhhh.

@SamiSLIM2016 @MKshattry @kajakallas N u answered nothing, 1) is Mou binding to 3rd party? Yes or no 2) do u condemn the attack of Iran towards innocent vessel? Yes or no( u justified it, ao i take it that u supported it) 3. Does iran has the right over hormuz? Yes or no.(Maybe yes, because u justified terrorism)

@JeddTe @MKshattry @kajakallas I answered your questions

The exchanges of fire between the US and Iran further complicate already fraught talks to end the war. Iran’s attacks on Bahrain and Kuwait are unacceptable. Under the memorandum, Tehran committed to reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Its recent attacks on ships near the Strait violate that commitment and threaten to disrupt the resumption of energy supplies. Freedom of navigation must be unimpeded. Next Monday, EU Foreign Ministers will meet with their Gulf counterparts to discuss how we can work together to support the implementation of the agreement and preserve freedom of navigation in the Strait as well as the Red Sea.

@SamiSLIM2016 @MKshattry @kajakallas Had no choice? There are always choices: diplomacy, retaliation against military targets, legal action nt attacking innocent vessels. Especially after a ceasefire was in place and an MOU had been signed. "No choice" is the excuse terrorists have always used to justify terrorism.

@JeddTe @MKshattry @kajakallas You want me to blame indigenes of the USA for one Indian attacked a fort after they massacred his tribe like in last Mohican

@SamiSLIM2016 @MKshattry @kajakallas Nt going to engage further until u answer my 3 questions( as yr non-answer has proven my point) , u said u will answer my question after i answered yours but u did nt stay true to yr word like certain country u r supporting.

@SamiSLIM2016 @MKshattry @kajakallas Thanks for proving my point. Instead of answering, you reached for the usual "but Europe" and "but Palestine." I've already condemned Israel's and USA actions. Seems you're only capable of condemning one side. Like i said u r nt against terrorism u r trying to justify it