Jeffrey Ordaniel

16.7K posts

Jeffrey Ordaniel banner
Jeffrey Ordaniel

Jeffrey Ordaniel

@JeffreyOrdaniel

Maritime Security | South China Sea

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo Katılım Temmuz 2009
1.9K Takip Edilen3.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
Such an honor to lead what has become one of the largest South China Sea conferences in the region — over 270 maritime experts, officials, academics & thought leaders from 25+ countries gathered for the #MNLDialogue. 🌊 Still recovering, but some reflections & photos 🧵
Jeffrey Ordaniel tweet mediaJeffrey Ordaniel tweet mediaJeffrey Ordaniel tweet mediaJeffrey Ordaniel tweet media
English
1
6
19
1.5K
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
Code for: “Set aside your rights under UNCLOS and let me take your oil, gas, and fishery resources in peace.” As former Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario once said, talks with China on this will always end the same way—with 🇨🇳Beijing essentially telling 🇵🇭Manila: “What is mine is mine. What is yours is also mine—but I am willing to share.” Theft packaged as “joint development.”
GMA Integrated News@gmanews

READ: The Chinese Embassy in the Philippines issued a statement on the possibility of a joint oil and gas exploration. “As long as the Philippine side demonstrates sincerity, China’s door to dialogue and cooperation will remain open,” part of the statement said. | via @jpsoriano

English
0
5
4
228
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
It’s not that *any* joint exploration is automatically unconstitutional. The Constitution allows joint arrangements—but only under strict conditions, including the 60/40 requirement and full operation under Philippine law. The real issue is: there is no indication China would agree to a framework that recognizes Philippine jurisdiction in PH EEZ inside the nine dash line. So in principle, a lawful arrangement is possible. In reality, past efforts suggest China is unlikely to accept one that keeps it compliant with the Arbitral Award and PH Constitution (i.e., they need Ph to implicitly recognize the nine dash line at the very least).
English
0
1
2
111
Poe Derridameron
Poe Derridameron@ilovechrissia·
@JeffreyOrdaniel is the issue here that *any* kind of joint exploration would be automatically unconstitutional, or an assumption that, realistically, China would never agree to the 60/40 provision required to keep such a venture within constitutional bounds?
English
1
0
0
105
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
It’s bizarre how joint exploration with China is being framed as one of the solutions to the Iran War-driven energy crisis in 🇵🇭. How does “joint exploration with China” solve the problem? Even if a deal were signed tomorrow, no oil flows next week, no gas lowers prices next month. Kowtowing to China now and accommodating its illegal claims will not deliver fuel to Filipinos. It will only cause Marcos to commit an impeachable offense, give 🇨🇳 more leverage to coerce 🇵🇭 in the future, and still do nothing to address the current crisis.
Tristan Nodalo@TristanNodalo

MIDDLE EAST CONFLICT MAY DRIVE PH, CHINA JOINT OIL AND GAS TALKS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA President Bongbong Marcos says the Middle East conflict could push the Philippines and China to revisit joint oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea. In an interview with Bloomberg, Marcos says shifting geopolitical dynamics may prompt a recalibration of ties, while stressing that peace and national interest remain the country’s guiding principles. @newswatchplusph

English
6
16
50
1.9K
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
Reassuring. Marcos should never follow Arroyo’s secret deals. Note that the previous 🇵🇭exploration deal with 🇨🇳 (circa 2005), which allowed Beijing to survey Reed Bank and even some areas within PH EEZ that lie outside the nine-dash line, contained the following provision: “This Agreement and all relevant documents, information, data and reports with respect to the joint marine seismic undertaking shall be kept confidential during the Agreement Term and within five (5) years after its expiration and shall not be disclosed by a Party to any third party without the written consent of the other Party.”
Tristan Nodalo@TristanNodalo

“WALA PO SIYANG SECRET DEAL” WATCH: Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro says any move to revive joint oil and gas talks with China will be transparent, assuring the public there will be no secret agreements. "Sa lahat ng pagkakataon, sa lahat ng okasyon, ang Pilipinas ay laging sincere sa pakikipag-usap, pakikipagnegosasyon lalung-lalo na sa pamumuno po ni Pangulong Marcos Jr. Wala po siyang secret deal," said Castro. @newswatchplusph

English
0
5
20
851
Jeffrey Ordaniel retweetledi
justinbaquisal
justinbaquisal@justin_baquisal·
My new op-ed is here. The Iran-US/Israel conflict has raised uncomfortable but necessary questions about the risks of hosting US forces. In this article, I explain why Washington and Manila are not moving fast enough on EDCA.
ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute@ISEAS

Fulcrum Commentary by @justin_baquisal - There is robust public support for EDCA and deepening US-Philippines military cooperation, but Washington and Manila must plug gaps in integrated air and missile defence and weapons access policy. fulcrum.sg/dangers-of-del…

English
0
7
21
1.7K
Jeffrey Ordaniel retweetledi
Isaac Stone Fish
Isaac Stone Fish@isaacstonefish·
Can we stop with the "China's top priority is economics" op-eds, arguments, and justifications? Beijing's top priority is political. In China, politics dominates. That doesn't mean economics doesn't play a crucial role, it's just secondary to political and security realities.
Isaac Stone Fish tweet media
English
5
16
51
5.3K
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
The problem is, even kowtowing to China now—and violating the Philippine Constitution—will not deliver fuel to Filipinos. It will only cause Marcos to commit an impeachable offense, give Beijing more leverage to coerce Manila in the future, and still do nothing to address the current crisis.
English
2
0
3
272
Michael Colom
Michael Colom@mmcolom·
@JeffreyOrdaniel Well, if the alterative is a severe fuel shortage to the point where it threatens the very stability and integrity of the Philippines, then politicians had better find a way to expedite finding a solution.
English
1
0
0
430
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
Except, President Marcos can’t really do that without violating his oath of office: 1) Article XII, Section 2 of PH Constitution is clear: the exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources must remain under the full control and supervision of the State, and may be undertaken only by the State itself or through Filipino citizens or corporations that are at least 60% Filipino-owned. 2) Hence, any “joint exploration” in Philippine EEZ, even if inside the nine-dash line, cannot simply be a politically convenient 50-50 arrangement with China. It must comply with constitutional requirements, including Filipino control. 3) The Philippines could again propose a service contract or some form of technical/financial assistance arrangement—but that would still have to operate under Philippine law and within a legal framework that recognizes Philippine sovereign rights in its EEZ. 4) That is precisely the problem: China is unlikely to accept any arrangement that places its activities under Philippine law or implies recognition of Philippine jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea. How many times has PH tried to do this? I wonder why the President wasn’t briefed… or why the DFA’s institutional memory is not working here.
Tristan Nodalo@TristanNodalo

MIDDLE EAST CONFLICT MAY DRIVE PH, CHINA JOINT OIL AND GAS TALKS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA President Bongbong Marcos says the Middle East conflict could push the Philippines and China to revisit joint oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea. In an interview with Bloomberg, Marcos says shifting geopolitical dynamics may prompt a recalibration of ties, while stressing that peace and national interest remain the country’s guiding principles. @newswatchplusph

English
10
67
205
20K
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
@yogawithben Inside the nine-dash line? Unlikely. China will never agree to any mechanism that recognizes Philippine jurisdiction. Any FTAA would have to operate under Philippine law. Would China agree to that? Previous efforts suggest it would not.
English
1
0
1
195
Ben Bernabe
Ben Bernabe@yogawithben·
Actually, Article XII, Section 2 of the Constitution has been interpreted in a weird way by the Supreme Court in the La Bugal-B'laan vs. Ramos case. FTAAs (financial and technical assistance agreements) are now seen as a wide-range of permissive exploration, development, and utilization service contracts but "with safeguards". " Full control" has also been defined and interpreted weirdly. Applied to this case, it is possible that the Philippines would enter into an FTAA with a Chinese corporation like CNOOC or PetroChina. But we all know that the PRC government has its hands dipped in all Chinese corporations.
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel

Except, President Marcos can’t really do that without violating his oath of office: 1) Article XII, Section 2 of PH Constitution is clear: the exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources must remain under the full control and supervision of the State, and may be undertaken only by the State itself or through Filipino citizens or corporations that are at least 60% Filipino-owned. 2) Hence, any “joint exploration” in Philippine EEZ, even if inside the nine-dash line, cannot simply be a politically convenient 50-50 arrangement with China. It must comply with constitutional requirements, including Filipino control. 3) The Philippines could again propose a service contract or some form of technical/financial assistance arrangement—but that would still have to operate under Philippine law and within a legal framework that recognizes Philippine sovereign rights in its EEZ. 4) That is precisely the problem: China is unlikely to accept any arrangement that places its activities under Philippine law or implies recognition of Philippine jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea. How many times has PH tried to do this? I wonder why the President wasn’t briefed… or why the DFA’s institutional memory is not working here.

English
1
3
12
3.2K
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
Lots of discussion in Manila today about potentially restarting “joint exploration” talks with the 🇨🇳PRC in the South China Sea. Mostly hype. Unlikely to happen. We’re hosting a National Symposium on the Law of the Sea and the West Philippine Sea next week to help clarify these issues—and more 👇🏼
WPS - We Protect our Seas@wps_ph

🇵🇭National Symposium on the Law of the Sea and the West Philippine Sea🇵🇭, happening on March 30-31 at the Marco Polo Ortigas. In partnership with UA&P School of Law, the @Official_UPD College of Law, @ABSCBNNews, @onenewsph and @PIADesk. Catch the conversations on YouTube, live! @wpstransparency @jaytaryela @IvanAtHome @nscphilippines @coastguardph @ConstantKC @JeffreyOrdaniel

English
2
5
20
1.8K
Jeffrey Ordaniel
Jeffrey Ordaniel@JeffreyOrdaniel·
Surely… joint exploration of resources inside the nine dash line but outside PH EEZ (i.e., high seas portion of the South China Sea) for example. Doable. No intl law and domestic law violations. Can be framed as confidence-building measures. But why would China “share” those resources with PH? Another example: Service Contract 57 (SC 57) outside the nine dash line but inside PH EEZ. PRC can come in as Service Contractor — but why should PH share those resources with the PRC given the maritime coercion in other parts of PH EEZ? Maybe American, Japanese, or European companies can provide technical/financial capacity.
English
1
0
8
711
Jeffrey Ordaniel retweetledi
Manila Bulletin News
Manila Bulletin News@manilabulletin·
The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) revealed Tuesday, March 24, that it has called out China after the latter’s warship allegedly pointed its fire control radar on BRP Miguel Malvar (FFG-6), a guided-missile frigate of the Philippine Navy (PN), during a maritime patrol near Escoda (Sabina) Shoal in the Kalayaan Island Group (KIG) or Spratly Islands earlier this month. READ: mb.com.ph/2026/03/24/afp…
Manila Bulletin News tweet media
English
4
35
83
2.6K
Jeffrey Ordaniel retweetledi
Jeffrey Ordaniel retweetledi
Bianca Dava-Lee 🐱
Bianca Dava-Lee 🐱@biancadava·
WATCH: The China Coast Guard declared so-called “clearing operations” in parts of Bajo de Masinloc or Scarborough Shoal on Monday, warning vessels within a specified area to leave between 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. Philippine Coast Guard spokesperson for the West Philippine Sea RADM Jay Tarriela believes the move was meant to intimidate Filipino fishermen. @ABSCBNNews
English
10
44
133
14.4K
Jeffrey Ordaniel retweetledi
GMA Integrated News
The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) slammed the China Coast Guard (CCG)’s latest alleged harassment of Filipino fishermen at the Bajo de Masinloc on Sunday, March 22.  gmanetwork.com/news/topstorie…
English
2
7
11
1.3K