jeremy harris 🇺🇦 🇬🇧 🇮🇱

@IuliiaMendel How Julia?

In Zaporizhzhia and Dnipropetrovsk regions, 99% of cities are now preparing for “all-round defense” — digging in to fight attacks from every direction, bracing for encirclement. That’s not “winning.” That’s a country turning every city into a fortress because the war has ground into a nightmare with no end in sight. How many more Ukrainian men and families have to die before Brussels admits this isn’t a movie? It’s a slaughter. End it. Now.

@IuliiaMendel Julia, your Cassandra routine is tiresome. Set out the steps you suggest will bring the invasion to an end. Jeremy

The hard truth many do not want to admit: The longer this goddamn Russian war drags on, the more people in Ukraine die. Period. Full stop. Every single one of the laptop warriors screaming that Ukriane meeds to continue the war — while safe in their European capitals or American think tanks — would never, ever actually live in the country they’re so eager to keep bleeding. Not for a second. Look at Kaja Kallas — the Estonian prime minister turned EU foreign policy chief. She struts around with this giant Napoleon complex, wrapped in the flag of “defending democracy in Ukraine.” Give me a break. This has nothing to do with Ukrainian sovereignty or freedom. It’s about racking up political points on the corpse of a country. She’s betting on the image of democratic Zelensky, which is already crumbling because the reality on the ground has less and less to do with actual democracy. These people don’t care about Ukrainians. They care about their own status, their media profiles, and their pathetic little power games. Every heroic speech they give costs another hundred lives and another chunk of Ukraine’s future. The cold reality? The only victory Ukraine can still achieve right now is to end this war, stop the slaughter, and start rebuilding — the economy, the institutions, whatever is left of real democracy. Everything else is just cynical, blood-soaked grift by people who will never pay the price themselves. The dead Ukrainian kids, the ruined cities, the destroyed families — that’s not a price the West is paying. It’s a price Ukraine is paying so that politicians in Warsaw, Tallinn, and Brussels can feel important. Enough. Time to stop pretending this is noble. It’s grotesque. And the longer it goes, the more obvious it becomes.

@IuliiaMendel Hi Julia, it will be helpful to see your suggestions for achieving peace. You must have an outline in your mind…..

Finland’s President Stubb says Ukraine is in its best military position of the war thanks to ‘math’ — one Ukrainian soldier lost for every eight Russians. I seriously doubt both this approach and the numbers; and the strategy is far from winning or even realistic. Russia has 143 million people. Ukraine’s population has collapsed dramatically — from over 40 million pre-war to roughly 25 million or even lower today, with more than 10 million refugees abroad, heavy civilian deaths, and the country bleeding out demographically in a brutal war of attrition. Raw kill ratios (especially obviously dubious) ignore the hard truth of sustainability and the vastly different sizes of our nations. Stubb’s message could be useful only if this is the way to help Ukraine safe winning face in the approach in peace deal, not to justify the prolongation of the war. However, finishing this war is the victory for Ukraine anyway.

@IuliiaMendel Julia, isn’t it time for you to flesh out your proposals or suggestions for the specifics of how to end this war?

The U.S. Embassy in Kyiv has received information about a potentially major Russian air attack that could occur at any time within the next 24 hours. Another terrible attack that might take many more Ukrainian lives... How is this war justified? Ordinary Ukrainians have no real defence for the fifth year in a row...

@IuliiaMendel Julia, isn’t it time for you to flesh out your proposals or suggestions for the specifics of how to end this war?

When diplomacy is silent, more Ukrainians die. We have succeeded only in removing the sole influential actor who could have mediated the negotiations. We opted to lie — both to the media and to ourselves. The reality is simple: no one would accept the hardships ordinary Ukrainians now endure just to applaud the lofty slogans.

Wishing all who celebrate a joyful, peaceful, and abundant Shavuot from the Republic of Somaliland!

Ich hab jetzt ne ganze Weile gesucht und nix Vergleichbares gefunden. Die Blechbüchse fand ebenfalls nichts. Kein einziges mehrheitlich muslimisches Land oder irgendein nennenswertes seiner Regierungsmitglieder oder Ministerien spricht an Shawuot freundliche Wünsche aus. Das einzige Land, welches diese freundliche Geste erweist, wird vom Westen nicht anerkannt, weil man dort der Meinung ist, Somaliland gehöre weiterhin zu seinem Failed State Shithole Nachbarn Somalia. Falls jemand doch noch vergleichbare Posts aus anderen Ländern findet - umso schöner. Widerlegt mich gerne. Darum ging es nicht. Es ging darum, die Bemühungen eines Landes anzuerkennen, das Anschluss an den Westen sucht statt es weiterhin zu ignorieren. Solche Gesten sind nicht egal.

@IuliiaMendel Your customary plea for peace

There is no justification for Russian aggression. But it is time to face the truth. Today, in Ukraine, speaking the truth is considered unpatriotic. True patriotism, we are told, means glorifying the Territorial Recruitment Centers (TCC), urging everyone to dedicate their lives to an endless war, turning a blind eye to corruption, silencing the suffering of frontline regions, praising soldiers at the front while tossing them five hryvnias in donations as a convenient excuse for the fact that these people have been risking their lives every single day for the fifth year — without rest and with their last remaining strength. Patriotism today means repeating propaganda, attacking any dissenting opinion, and looking away from uncomfortable facts. Yet even today, rosy Facebook posts cannot replace reality. I am stepping forward to thank you for the incredible wave of support I have received. I know I spoke the truth. Let the frenzied critics rage and pour dirt on me — I know that truth is now the only thing that can save Ukraine. Unfortunately, many in Kyiv have grown accustomed to the normalization of this war. They secure grants, stable salaries, political patronage, money-laundering schemes, or build careers on the back of the conflict. Such people exist in every war. But conscience still matters. Sooner or later, profiting from Ukrainian blood must come to an end. I am incredibly grateful to the Ukrainian people. There is no force stronger than the people. As a Ukrainian poet Pavlo Tychyna once wrote: “I am the people, whose power of truth no one has yet conquered. No matter what disaster or plague has mowed me down, my strength has bloomed again.” Today, I urge every Ukrainian above all to preserve yourselves. Protect your families, your children, your loved ones. Because what is Ukraine without Ukrainians? And believe that peace will come. There are many people fighting for the Ukrainian people — fighting for peace. Humanity is our greatest strength. And with it, we will prevail.

@adam_cannon @michaelgove @spectator Mr Gove, your good intentions seem clear yet you were a minister in the Government which increased immigration by importing millions of people known to widely hold anti Jewish views

A brilliant, unflinching leader in @Spectator. As they powerfully argues, antisemitism is a virus that has mutated once again—this time into a "new variant" of anti-Zionism that seeks to delegitimize the only Jewish state. We cannot ignore how this sickness is being spread through radical rhetoric and institutional failure. A must-read for anyone who cares about the soul of our democracy. 🦠🛡️ spectator.com/article/anti-s… @michaelgove #Antisemitism #UKPolitics #TheSpectator

8/8 — The man who chose Ukraine over $5,000 a month There is a kind of quiet heroism in this story that deserves to be named clearly. Yevhen Morev was not drafted. He was not pressured. He had a contract waiting, a flight booked, and every legal and ethical justification to walk away from the war that was about to begin. He went to the recruitment office anyway — shaking, scared, fighting his own instincts every step of the way. Today, he leads the senior sergeants of an entire army corps. He has fought in Vuhledar, Bakhmut, Avdiivka, and Pokrovsk. He has helped build a brigade that broke a Russian Spetsnaz regiment with four incomplete battalions. When he talks about leadership, he doesn't talk about heroism. He talks about example. "When a 25-year-old soldier sees that a 40-year-old in body armour can do more than he can — that's a powerful example. They start working on themselves. Personal example and communication work miracles." There are thousands of Yevhen Morevs in Ukraine's army right now. Men and women who chose service over comfort, who walked toward the war when they could have walked away from it, who decided that "I have to" mattered more than self-preservation. This is who is fighting this war. — Source: ArmiyaInform, May, 2026 #UAF #SeniorSergeant #12thArmyCorps #UkraineWillWin #UkrainianArmy #Leadership

FEDOROV: We had meeting with SAAB today. We believe Gripen jets can change situation in Ukraine’s skies. This is one of the best aircraft in the world, and we're working to acquire them. In few months, there will be good news for Sweden and Ukraine, and bad news for Russians.

Starmer and Hermer chose to tear up the protections, that Conservatives put in place, to stop our brave veterans being dragged through the courts in their old age. They claim the courts had left them no choice. Well guess what? My Shadow Attorney General stepped in, acted pro bono for veterans and won: the UKSC have reinstated immunities and confirmed that the vast majority of our Act is lawful. When a lower court said the Legacy Act breached the ECHR and the Windsor Framework, Labour did not appeal. It suited them to hide behind international law rather than stand up for those who served our country. There was no legal duty to betray our veterans. Starmer and Hermer chose to do that. Conservatives chose to fight for them. I'm proud of @DXW_KC, @AWNDinsmore and my Shadow Northern Ireland & Defence Teams for keeping up this fight. We are the ONLY party actually holding Labour to account. Farage did not bother to turn up last Monday and vote against Labour’s terrible anti-veterans bill. Another reason to VOTE CONSERVATIVE today.

⚡️After returning from the war with an injury sustained near Bakhmut, 🇺🇦Ukrainian veteran Dmytro Ostapenko didn’t spend months searching for the “perfect startup idea.” He simply wanted to rebuild his life. Together with his wife, he opened a grooming salon despite having zero experience in the industry. The numbers looked irrational from day one: a $36k veteran grant, another $10k raised by selling their car, premium equipment costs, generators, rent, imported products from the 🇪🇺EU and 🇨🇦Canada - yet first-day revenue was only $17‼️Most people would quit. Instead, they focused obsessively on service, transparency, and customer trust. Today the business serves 12–15 pets daily, employs 8 people, pays groomers $700–950/month, expanded inventory from 300 to 1,500 products, and already launched a second location. Real economies recover not through headlines, but through small businesses built by people who learned that doing nothing is far riskier than starting small. #UkraineEconomy #SmallBusiness #Entrepreneurship Photo: @epravda

Just to be clear: Switching from Keir Starmer to Andy Burnham is like changing your pants you've pissed in, to ones you've shat in. 🥴

The visibility of all pro‑Ukrainian accounts, including mine, has dropped dramatically. Please help me fight the algorithm by visiting my profile and boosting posts about today’s Russian war crimes. Pic for attention.

@BohuslavskaKate I see all your posts. Thank You. Take care of yourself and those you love

@DanielJHannan You mention Conservative MPs who supported citizenship for this man. You suggest Kemi should suspend the whip from these MPs. How about naming them? Voters need to see the reality of the MPs for whom they may be thinking to vote in the wake of Kemi’s robust & persuasive speeches

Trump’s constant complaints about the "hatred" between Putin and Zelenskyy are a childish approach to peacemaking. Blaming the war on personal feelings is reductive and will achieve nothing. ​This is an imperial war of colonial conquest. Its cause isn't a hatred to Zelenskyy, and its goal isn't to express Putin's personal dislike for him, it is to erase Ukraine as a sovereign state. ​Ukraine refuses Russia’s ridiculous demands not out of hetrad, but because history has proven that russian occupation equals death. They demand our most fortified regions, territory they cannot conquer on the battlefield, specifically to jeopardize our future statehood. ​Furthermore, we refuse to abandon our people to the FSB. Leaving civilians to be tortured and murdered is not a concession we are willing to make.

Despite the so-called "ceasefire", the enemy continues to do what it has been doing. Today, around 17:30 near Gulyaypole, using fpv-drones, the ru worms killed a group of our wounded. t.me/DeepStateUA/23…

Here's my @Telegraph column on that foul @jonathanliew piece, 'Gail’s derangement syndrome is getting out of hand' telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/03/1… It is entirely possible to be in favour of a Palestinian state, to vilify Benjamin Netanyahu, to regard the presence of Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich in the Israeli government as appalling and to oppose Israeli policy generally – and also to be rational, decent and not in any way anti-Semitic. Of course it is; that’s the position of many Israelis, after all. But it’s striking how many of those who espouse such positions take things to another level altogether. Not only do they start to see the Palestinian cause in every walk of life, they see the malign influence of Jews – or Zionists, as they usually put it – everywhere. Even, as we learned this weekend, in cake. On Saturday the Guardian published an article by one of its sports writers, Jonathan Liew. It could hardly be bettered as an example of this “Palestinianism”, the obsession among so many Western progressives which treats the cause as the great moral issue of our time – indeed the only truly consequential moral issue – and at the same time uses many of the most virulent historic antisemitic tropes to explain why Palestine is such a core moral issue. Liew takes the opening of a new branch of the bakery chain Gail’s as an example of the perfidious behaviour of the Zionists. You may have read in recent days how this new café in Archway, north London, has been repeatedly vandalised by self-described Palestine activists. Protestors have tried to enforce a boycott, standing outside with placards such as “Boycott Israel for genocide and war crimes in Gaza”. On its opening day, the local Islington branch of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign posted an Instagram message saying: “This morning, Gail’s tried to quietly open up in Archway and we made sure to give them the welcome they deserve.” Gail’s has no Israelis involved in its management. I have no idea if it has Jews involved, since – for now, although if the boycotters had their way I’m sure this would change – we Jews are not forced to identify ourselves as such on legal documents. But it was founded, years ago, by an Israeli (who is no longer involved), and its owner is the US private equity firm Bain Capital, which has investments in Israel. That is enough to damn it in the eyes of the obsessives. Liew contrasts the opening of Gail’s with an existing café nearby, which is owned by two Palestinians. For Liew, this is deeply symbolic, with one deserving support and the other deserving to be treated as villainous. pariah status. They have, he writes, “two almost entirely separate clienteles”. The “almost” does all the work in that sentence, because it is nonsense. Unless you are, like Liew, an obsessive, you do not ask your barista for his or her stance on Gaza before ordering, let alone finding out if they are sufficiently Palestinian to serve you. Indeed, I have been into that very “Palestinian” cafe many times, just as I have been into other branches of Gail’s. I didn’t check on the political or ethnic background of the pastry chef in any of them before ordering. If that was Liew’s only argument it would be ludicrous but amusing, albeit unintentionally. But it gets a lot worse. He describes the “Palestinian” café as “a fixture of the north London social scene, a source of comfort and community in troubling times”. That may be true. I have no idea as the only comfort I have ever sought from a barista, whether in Archway’s community or elsewhere, is a double espresso. But Gail’s, on the other hand, is the epitome of nasty, corporate, Zionist evil: “its parent company, Bain Capital, invests heavily in military technology, including Israeli security companies.” For Liew, Gail’s is the Zionist chain, expanding its way through innocent communities and brooking no opposition to its might: “its very presence 20 metres away from a small independent Palestinian cafe feels quietly symbolic, an act of heavy-handed high-street aggression”. Heavy-handed, indeed – Liew’s use of oh-so-hackneyed tropes of greed and power is about as heavy-handed as it gets. I did actually wonder if Liew was high when I read this: “And so somehow these two north London cafes, from two entirely separate worlds, with what we have to assume are two almost entirely separate clienteles, have found themselves on the frontline of a war. A deeply asymmetric war, defined by gross imbalances in power and resources and platforms, but a war nonetheless, and one that simultaneously feels more distant and more local than ever.” War? He is talking about two cafes competing for customers, as happens on most high streets in most towns in most countries. But when one is a Zio café – in the mind of Liew and his compadres, rather than in reality – then it is really about Palestine rather than cinnamon buns. Which means, for Liew, that the vandalism and the protests are not only right but, he implies, the only moral course to take: “Palestinian activism has arguably never been less capable of exerting a meaningful influence on global events, and so is increasingly defined by small acts of petty symbolism. A smashed window. A provocative sticker. You can’t lay a glove on the US-Israeli military-industrial complex, and you can’t get your local council to boycott Israeli goods, and you couldn’t stand with Palestine Action and the protest march on Sunday has been banned by the Metropolitan police. So some people then direct their ire at the bakery with distant links to Israeli security funding.” No one will be surprised to see such a piece in the Guardian. But when a mainstream newspaper publishes a screed attacking the arrival of a business on the grounds of the most tenuous linkage to Israel, it’s clear that the rise of anti-Semitism has a long way further to go.