Jeremy Profitt

12K posts

Jeremy Profitt banner
Jeremy Profitt

Jeremy Profitt

@Jeremy_Profitt

Community Engagement Div. @FairfieldPolice 🚓 #LESM #PIO Building A Stronger CommUNITY Together • Army MP (Ret) 10th Mtn. DIV 🪖 #OEF #OIF • Prior VA #PAO 🇺🇸

Fairfield, CA Katılım Eylül 2014
4.2K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
For God’s sake, can Congress come together for the men and women who sacrificed for our country and a better tomorrow? 🇺🇸 Both parties share responsibility. Politicians can come together to send Americans to war, yet too often can’t come together in the comfort of the halls of Washington, D.C., to care for those who answered the call. Our veterans deserve better. 🇺🇸
GIF
English
0
0
3
92
Senator Jerry Moran
Senator Jerry Moran@JerryMoran·
Congress has a critical opportunity to expand health care and benefits to millions of veterans through the Take Care of America’s Veterans Act, rather than allowing these funds to return to the federal treasury. With VA confirming that they are moving forward with the proposed rule change, I remain committed to working with my colleagues in both the House and Senate and the veteran service organization community to see this legislation pass and become law.
English
56
16
55
9.3K
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
@JimLaPorta I’m so torn on this. I don’t like the fine print. The language outlining the Richard Star Act is so convoluted. But some of the details will help. I just don’t like when they combining so many bills… it tends to hide the details or waters down standalone Veterans bills. 🙏🇺🇸
English
1
0
0
40
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
MLB home run derby on @netflix… Is like a UFC McGregor comeback.🤦‍♂️ Come on!!!!
GIF
English
0
0
1
263
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
USA! USA! USA! 🇺🇸⚽️
GIF
Indonesia
0
0
0
28
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
54,000 combat injured/retired Veterans are waiting for that honor part, @HouseGOP. Pass the clean Major Richard Starr Act. Not the gaslighting version. Honor those who sacrificed for our freedoms.
House Republicans@HouseGOP

Imagine waking up in the greatest country in human history, where people died for your freedom, and choosing grievance over gratitude. Which side are you on? The one that loves America and honors those who fought for it, or the one that hates it?

English
0
0
1
42
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
@HouseGOP 54,000 combat injured/retired Veterans are waiting for that honor part, @HouseGOP. Pass the clean Major Richard Starr Act. Not the gaslighting version. Honor those who sacrificed for our freedoms.
GIF
English
0
0
0
72
House Republicans
House Republicans@HouseGOP·
Imagine waking up in the greatest country in human history, where people died for your freedom, and choosing grievance over gratitude. Which side are you on? The one that loves America and honors those who fought for it, or the one that hates it?
English
353
96
647
96.7K
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
@HouseGOP 🤔…. I support this message in honor of the more than 54k combat injured, medical retired Veterans. Stop acting like these sacrifice and hard earned benefits belong to YOU! Pass the clean #MajorRichardStarAct
GIF
English
0
0
1
43
House Republicans
House Republicans@HouseGOP·
You work hard for your paycheck. Why do Democrats act like it belongs to them?
English
2K
356
3.9K
198.4K
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
@SpeakerJohnson Pass the Major Richard Star Act. Stop the gaslighting! And not the watered down bill! 🫡🇺🇸
Jeremy Profitt tweet media
English
0
0
0
79
49ers & NFL News 24/7
49ers & NFL News 24/7@49ersSportsTalk·
In their Prime, Which #49ers TE are you taking: Vernon Davis OR George Kittle Who’s your pick? 👇 🏈
49ers & NFL News 24/7 tweet media
English
323
20
419
158.3K
mike bski
mike bski@BskiMike22802·
mike bski@BskiMike22802

FOLLOW-UP — clarifying yesterday's post on the Bost Amendment, because precision matters and I owe you the exact receipts, not just my word for it. Here is the mechanism, page and line, so nobody has to take this on faith. Page 1, lines 2–5: the amendment strikes and replaces ONLY paragraph (2) of Section 1414(b). Paragraph (1) — the existing "career retiree" rule already sitting in the U.S. Code — is never touched. Never struck. Never reprinted. It just... stays. Exactly as written. Forever, apparently. Current, UNTOUCHED (b)(1): a Chapter 61 retiree with 20+ years under Section 1405, OR at least 20 years under Section 12732, gets routed to the old partial-offset formula. NEW (2)(C), pages 2–3: a combat-related Chapter 61 retiree with LESS than 20 years under Section 1405, OR less than 20 years under Sections 12732/12733, gets the new and far better "lesser of" formula — full Chapter 61 pay or a 20-year-equivalent calculation, plus full VA comp. Read those two side by side. Same two yardsticks. Opposite tests. Both written with "OR." A reservist who holds a 20-year letter (20+ good years under 12732) but has under 20 active-equivalent years under 1405 — meaning nearly every Reserve and Guard Chapter 61 combat retiree alive — satisfies BOTH conditions at the exact same moment. He is a "career retiree" through one door and an "under-20 retiree" through the other. Page 4, lines 3–6, the only place "paragraph (1)" gets mentioned again, tells you what happens if you qualify for NEITHER. It says nothing — not one word — about what happens when you qualify for BOTH. Here is the part I actually want to say plainly: this is not a hostile bill. The (2)(C) language is precisely, exactly, word-for-word what combat-wounded Reserve and Guard retirees needed. Someone in that room understood the problem well enough to write the correct fix. They just stopped revising one paragraph too early. They opened the wound, found the bleeder, started the repair — and walked out before tying off the last vessel. What is next, a bill that finally ends the wounded veteran tax for tens of thousands of combat retirees... wait, I was just told it might still leave some of them bleeding out on a technicality nobody bothered to close. The fix remains one sentence: "Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a member who meets the criteria of paragraph (2) shall be paid under paragraph (2)." That is it. That is the whole ask. Drop it in before this clears conference and the defect disappears entirely.

QME
1
3
10
1.2K
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
@HouseGOP I can say that about what you all are doing to the Major Richard Star Act. Do better, for those who have sacrificed so much.
GIF
English
1
3
8
419
House Republicans
House Republicans@HouseGOP·
Parents know what's best for their kids. Democrats think the government does.
English
334
124
1.2K
77K
Jeremy Profitt
Jeremy Profitt@Jeremy_Profitt·
@CoachCrocky I would give up the first round pick in 27/28, they can’t draft in the top two rounds. 🤷‍♂️
English
0
0
1
43
Eric Crocker
Eric Crocker@CoachCrocky·
If I’m the 49ers I’d trade for Max Crosby.
English
57
39
482
32.7K