JESPER outZEN retweetledi
JESPER outZEN
17.3K posts

JESPER outZEN
@JesperOutzen
Assistant Professor exploring emerging technologies, critical thinking and advancing the practical application of generative artificial intelligence.
Kobbersted, Denmark Katılım Mart 2009
180 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
JESPER outZEN retweetledi

@SinaHartung @MillionInt You don’t wait for ideal conditions before you act.
You commit with what is present, imperfect, unfinished.
Wisdom is not choosing the perfect army it is learning how to think, adapt, and win with the one that exists.
English
JESPER outZEN retweetledi

Social media are full of misinformation about AI history. To all "AI influencers:" before you post your next piece, take history lessons from the AI Blog, with chapters on:
Who invented artificial neural networks? 1795-1805
Who invented deep learning? 1965
Who invented backpropagation? 1676-1970
Who invented convolutional neural nets? 1979-1988
Who invented generative adversarial networks? 1990
Who invented Transformer neural networks? 1991-2017
Who invented deep residual learning? 1991-2015
Who invented neural knowledge distillation? 1991
Who invented the transistor? 1925
Who invented the integrated circuit? 1949
Who created the general purpose computer? 1936-1941
Who founded theoretical CS and AI theory? 1931-34
And many more ...
people.idsia.ch/~juergen/blog.…

English
JESPER outZEN retweetledi

we released our first State of Enterprise AI report today -- grounded in actual usage and survey data, it shows that enterprise AI adoption is not only broadening but deepening. some notes:
*enterprise messaging volume is up ~8× YoY, with the avg employee sending ~30% more messages
*coding-related messages increased 36% for workers outside of technical functions
*tech, healthcare, and manufacturing are the fastest growing sectors
*workers using AI report saving 40–60 minutes per day
*weekly users of GPTs and Projects are up ~19×, and ~20% of messages flow thru custom workflows
*frontier adopters (top 5%) send ~6× more messages than the median
English
JESPER outZEN retweetledi

Guys…I have a girlfriend.
Now I know what you’re thinking…how is it possible that anyone would want to be with me? I understand where you’re coming from. I think the answer is: her puzzle piece fits mine.
In my early twenties, I read the biography of the American founding father John Adams. He and his wife Abigail had one of the great partnerships in American history; intellectually matched, emotionally intertwined, and co-architects of something bigger than themselves. I wanted what they had.
But it wasn’t within reach. Years before, I’d married in a sort of arranged Mormon marriage. Unsure how else to explain it. We were functional, but we weren’t John and Abigail. We split after thirteen years.
At age 34, after selling Braintree Venmo, and emerging from a mismatched marriage and the repression of Mormonism, I set out to rebuild myself and find partnership. I met a woman in LA who became my first-ever girlfriend. Coming from a sheltered background, I was blind to the obvious warnings. I was dangerously naive. That relationship unraveled and was followed by litigation. The experience was unnerving and left me wondering if I could ever trust again.
By the time I was 44, I started reconciling with the possibility of a life without partnership.
@_katetolo and I met at my brain interface company Kernel. She’d discovered my work using neurotechnology to improve human well-being and merge human and AI. Even though she’d been dreaming of a career in fashion, she was drawn to what she foresaw as the defining question of our time: how will humans successfully co-evolve with AI. We shared the same obsession.
The puzzle piece fit was immediate, as immediate as either of us had ever experienced.
Yet we maintained our professional boundaries. When we worked on our first project together, the back and forth was effortless. She could conceptualize and feel what I couldn’t and vice versa. It helped that both Kate and I had a natural disposition towards hard work. Our joy came from creation.
Kate was luminescent. When I saw her about the office, butterflies fluttered in my stomach. Each day she’d show up wearing some unexpected combination of colors, textures, styles and accessories. Always tasteful, playful and interesting. She didn’t chase fancy brands. Most of her clothing was from the thrift store. It wasn’t how she looked but how her mind worked: original, eccentric, entirely her own. She was art.
We both worked very hard and valued every second of the day. One evening around 6:30 pm she dropped by my office and we talked for hours. It had been all business before. This was the first time we stepped into each other’s personal lives. My heart strings pulled but my brain pushed back. ‘We know we can’t trust again’, my mind firmly stated.
Our after-hours meet-ups in my office became a daily ritual. The favorite part of my day. We’d reminisce about work and tiptoe a bit deeper each time into each other’s personal lives.
I’d recently started my new anti-aging project and one night Kate suggested to me that I should put the entire thing online to allow others to follow on. We worked together to put up a website and got a v1 out. We pondered what to call it, and decided on ‘Project Blueprint’.
We were oddly from entirely different worlds but somehow the same person. Yet neither of us dared take the next step. We didn’t want to imperil our work relationship and we remained deeply skeptical of each other. The combination of Kate being raised to distrust all things and me still feeling the sting of the previous relationship left us stirring in a pot of anticipatory disaster.
Before long, whether we liked it or not, we’d become each other's favorite person. We’d spend every moment we could together. Social events and the weekends were still off-limits as our relationship was professional. We were both secretly wondering, ‘does the other person feel what I’m feeling?’
Unable to withstand any longer, after a year and a half of unspoken affection, one night I softly floated the balloon of inquiry. She confirmed it was reciprocal.
Still, with things being so new, neither of us wanted to make our relationship public. We needed time to stabilize, mature and assess whether this was short or long term. I’m a 48 year old American, raised Mormon, with three children. She’s a 30 year old Bosnian-Australian-American. It took time to bridge our worlds. In our years of knowing each other, three of them have been navigating a relationship. All while building a business and movement. There have been many times where we didn’t know if we’d make it.
In the last year, we’ve found our flow. I trust Kate as much as my mother. She knows how to scaffold trust. She anticipates your anticipation and knows your reaction before you react. She’s meticulous in the integrity of our relationship. She’s even been pivotal in helping my father and me reconcile and navigate the contours of our relationship.
In the past few years, Blueprint and Don’t Die have become global phenomena. Kate is the unsung hero. She and I have been stride on stride since inception. She’s proven an exceptional executor and despite her unconventional background, intuitively knows things. Her creativity keeps me forever guessing what she’ll say or come up with next. Our minds have become so intertwined that life feels naked without her.
Her story warrants being told as others will be better off emulating her practices and abilities.
What I find most impressive about Kate is her prescience and thoughtfulness. She sees forwards, backwards, and side to side. Relative to her, I feel myopic in my awareness of the world. She can see through others, as an x-ray would. She then structures all that information and can package it in simple, understandable terms. In ways that allow for everyone to win.
Kate is soft spoken, self-deprecating and understated. These attributes cloak her ferocious ambition, piercing intellect, and delightful creativity. Give her five minutes and she will reframe your world. But most people don’t know to look. They assume she’s my assistant. It’s such a loss because people are looking for what she has to offer.
My son Talmage, Kate, and I are family. Nothing makes us happier than being together. Our conversations are fast, dark, and rowdy. Family feeds the soul, and we are nourished. As my son considers possible partners, he wisely models them off of Kate.
Deep companionship is a universal human want. And while there are eight billion of us on this planet, most struggle to achieve it, including those in relationships. It’s the most fulfilling of human experiences and also the most elusive. The joy of being seen, appreciated and loved, and offering the same to another.
I wrote dozens of different sentences trying to capture what the want and struggle for deep companionship feels like. I deleted them all as none could holistically capture the emotional architecture of it.
Then one day while exercising, I realized what it feels like: what the explorer Ernest Shackleton and his crew must have felt returning to land after being shipwrecked and surviving 497 days adrift in brutal Antarctic.
It’s a bit of a dramatic comparison, however, I suspect many of you can relate. Kate feels like land to me after being adrift and searching for 25 years.
Life sinks or sails based upon the quality of our most intimate relationships. No amount of professional success can plug the sinking hole of an acrimonious personal relationship.
At this point, Kate and I have nearly become one person. We have entire conversations with a single look, sound, gesture or image. We independently come up with the same ideas and insights, suggesting to me that maybe it’s our tandem effort generating them. Our relationship is stable, positive, and calm.
I’ve wanted this my entire life and impatiently waited 25 years for it to arrive. It’s better than anything I imagined.
Lucky me, I found my Abigail Adams.

English
JESPER outZEN retweetledi

Regeringens nye velfærdspakke: bøger uden moms, slik og chokolade uden afgifter og to år med strøm til EU’s minimumspris.
Det ligner en national strategi for det søde, det oplyste og det læste liv … og ja, det lugter af valgflæsk. #dkpol
Dansk

@JanEJoergensen @venstredk Jeg forstår ikke modstanden mod at sænke afgifter / moms på sunde fødevarer, frugt og grønt. Det er blevet efterlyst i årevis, men der sker bare ikke noget. Det vil være godt for folkesundheden + gøre det billigere at være dansker.
Dansk

Så lykkedes det. En sejr for @venstredk Punktafgifterne var det første, jeg kastede mig over som nyt FT-medlem i 2011, hvor jeg blev forbrugerordfører. Vi fik afskaffet afgiften på te - og nødder - det var ikke særlig dyrt sammenlignet med kaffe og chokolade.

Dansk

We chase the right answer from #ChatGPT. But our beauty lies in the wrong: mistakes, hesitation, and detours. If we forget that, we lose something no model can give us back.
English

@AgentNaeem @sama ChatGPT didn't work in the Safari browser but in the Chrome browser on my MacBook.
English

@sama Why is it not updating on some browsers or ChatGPT apps
Works on mobile browser but not the app. Works on MacBook app but not browser … 🤷♂️ totally not working on my pc 😩
English

Wanted to provide more updates on the GPT-5 rollout and changes we are making heading into the weekend.
1. We for sure underestimated how much some of the things that people like in GPT-4o matter to them, even if GPT-5 performs better in most ways.
2. Users have very different opinions on the relative strength of GPT-4o vs GPT-5 (just the chat model, not the advanced reasoning one). This is a cool thing you can try: x.com/flowersslop/st…
3. Long-term, this has reinforced that we really need good ways for different users to customize things (we understand that there isn't one model that works for everyone, and we have been investing in steerability research and launched a research preview of different personalities). For a silly example, some users really, really like emojis, and some never want to see one. Some users really want cold logic and some want warmth and a different kind of emotional intelligence. I am confident we can offer way more customization than we do now while still encouraging healthy use.
4. We are going to focus on finishing the GPT-5 rollout and getting things stable (we are now out to 100% of Pro users, and getting close to 100% of all users) and then we are going to focus on some changes to GPT-5 to make it warmer. Really good per-users customization will take longer.
5. The team is doing heroic work to optimize our systems and find more capacity, but still, we are looking at a severe capacity challenge for next week. We are still deciding what we are going to do, but we will be transparent with our principles. Not everyone will like whatever tradeoffs we end up with, obviously, but at least we will explain how we are making decisions.
Thanks for your patience with us; we will continue to react and improve quickly!
English








