Jesse
689 posts


@paleochristcon Conceding the debate because you stretched the prompt far beyond its obvious intent with some hypothetical bs. Fine, you “won”. But it was a huge moral L for you dude. I love you Andrew, truly, but I can’t back you on this one. You were definitely on the wrong side bro, sorry.
English

@TheBrianShapiro @TheOmniLiberal @TPUSA "Conservatives need to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events." - Destiny.
You're one of the most idiotic and dishonest people I have ever heard speak.
English

Andrew,
@TheOmniLiberal has called out political violence on and off air.
You are a liar, and your @TPUSA grift is almost over.
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet
Here, Destiny refuses to condemn CKs assassination while on Piers Morgan's show.
English

@paleochristcon i think its fucking embarrassing how hard you go for morals and the way things USED to be while sticking your dick in another mans vagina like the pair of you are FAR FROM GOOD PEOPLE...Andrew the has been and his run thru ugly mutt
English


@TheBrianShapiro @paleochristcon @Rach4Patriarchy LMAO, you wrote yourself a letter!? Wow. AI detector even picked it up
English

Receiving emails like these is why I do what I do, thank you Brett!
This is an email that both @paleochristcon and @Rach4Patriarchy could never understand. They are incapable.
Hi Brian,
I just wanted to send an email to applaud you for your debate with Rachel Wilson on feminism. In particular, I applaud you for extending the olive branch at the end and for trying to create a real common ground moment that was ultimately denied by Rachel Wilson, which is a huge shame on her part. I also respect you for attempting to say something nice about her, because you paused and gave it thought whereas she immediately declined (for the views/sensationalism in my opinion). But you did your part, and please understand that what you say is a reflection of who you are, and what people say to you is just a reflection of who they are. And you represented yourself (and liberals/independents) in a very positive way and showed that you have human qualities whereas Rachel ultimately proved the opposite about herself. I think your comments showed a lot of maturity, understanding, and charity, and I think right now, it's incredibly hard to make these gestures to the other side in this problematic time we live in, so kudos.
Rachel's comments, something to the effect of accusing you of bringing up her dead son to disrupt her emotionally as a debate tactic is laughable if it weren't so sad. I invite you to replay this entire segment because in addition to the way that she spoke about millions of lives lost during Covid in a way that suggested she has no regard for human life, the way she spoke about her son and the way she avoided even expressing any sort of feelings for him was a huge tell about who she is. A normal person would have the ability to separate a debate from something real (your olive branch) and have capacity to relate to you. She clearly could not do that, and for a mother to not be able to do that, as someone who is a son who has lost his mother, it was incredibly hard to watch and comprehend, knowing these relationship dynamics are integral to who we are as human beings.
Thank you for being a voice of reason in this troubling time, and while I am 100% pro 1st amendment and while I respect you for going into opposition spaces and attacking poor arguments with logic and facts, my burning question for you and other political commentators/podcasters is at what point do we start to abandon these spaces? I'm in favor of debate, discussion, and compromise, but after your debate with Rachel in particular, I almost feel like it might be better to not engage with some people, especially when they express a disregard for life (her comments on millions of Covid deaths, the way she brushed away mention of her child as taking too much emotional energy to acknowledge and how she refused to relate to you and say "my condolences" for your losses). I'm not saying we should shut down debate/discussion, which I encourage, but if it helps, I recall Rachel mentioning at one point some comment about you saying you could sell more tickets for your side. Perhaps this is part of the problem -- maybe you should consider how cross-promotion of these far right platforms for debates ultimately draws eyeballs to their channels and fills their coffers, enabling them to continue to say outrageous things, misinform the public, and dilute our democracy. With ticket sales involved, that's more money feeding their movement.
By comparison, and I'm sure you have things like this too, I boycott companies with my money. Amazon and Walmart (unfair business practices/ethics issues), Chick-Fil-A (the owner's negative comments on gay/lesbian community), and McDonald's (low quality food designed to make people dull and fat and ill), are all places that don't get a cent from me. This has been long running -- about 10 years for all of these companies, and for WalMart, a lifetime. When I receive Amazon gift cards at work, since the money was spent and already exchanged with Amazon, I give these to nephews/nieces to make them happy and to still take the blood off my hands and transfer to someone else.
For what it's worth, I wanted to suggest that you consider engagements with the far right carefully, because when you work with them, you are essentially cross-promoting them. While intelligent, well-read, and articulate people like myself can parse the facts from lies and information from misinformation, we live in a society where many people are either feeble-minded/undereducated, want to go with what's popular because it's popular (regardless of having an understanding of it), or willfully corrupt/evil. They all have a right to having a platform, but I don't think that means you need to give them air, and I think if more of us did that, perhaps they would crawl back into their holes and perhaps we can stamp down this movement which is slowly setting our country back from all the progress we've made in 250 years. At the same time, I acknowledge I wouldn't be sending this email if I hadn't come across this particular debate which was posted by a far right channel (America Uncensored possibly or maybe just a lot of far right people attended this?). For Unfuck America stuff though, please don't give that up, because we do need to change the youth's perspective on politics, and I think that effectively, the clear abuse/manipulation of Charlie Kirk's image by his own organization is slowly unravelling their movement and bringing more youth and young adults back to reality. The new leaders shirk a lot of principles he stood for, exposing the grift completely.
Anyhow, I appreciate you for what you do, Brian, and your strength and wherewithal in these spaces is incredibly admirable. I hope to get a reply from you, but if not, I understand and know you're busy.
My condolences for you grandmother and sister, and I hope that all the false allegations against you soon cease. If they do not, I suggest looking into defamation cases against people -- this hits them in their pockets like I previously suggested we need to do, but by boycott or through the justice system, which are the proper avenues when exercised with integrity. I am glad you made it off life support during Covid, and I hope to call in to your show or connect with you at an event in the future as I'm politically engaged and also working in government contracting which has been completely turned upside down during this time, even in California where I am. I hope to talk to you, Destiny, or IRI about this some day.
Thank you for reading this lengthy email and keep doing you, Brian!
Best,
Brett Hoag
English

@Cimoooooooo Glad to hear you're alive and recovering man. Happy Belated Birthday.
English

@TheBrianShapiro @paleochristcon @Rach4Patriarchy You are a disgusting human being. Not only did you lost spectacularly, you then tried to use the death of their son for sympathy. How pathetic can you get.
English

@TheOmniLiberal "I only declined because I cant justify my beliefs" - Destiny
English

You have dodged more debates with me than times we have actually debated lol. Why are you trying to compare me not wanting to debate meta-debate topics with you for 10 hours to people having a policy of having ZERO adversarial conversations? You think the only two options are “I never allow my ideas to be critically confronted” and “I accept every single debate request no matter the person and the topic”?
This is why people call you a debate-lord, it’s an obviously stupid point you’re raising to object to something I’m stating that’s incredibly fair: for a marketplace of ideas to exist, there needs to be some kind of back-and-forth exchange.
Andrew Wilson@paleochristcon
@ReedHawk2 Cool so why won't destiny debate me on the ethical proposition I gave him? You now will no longer take him seriously correct?
English

@TheBrianShapiro I think you have a masochistic need to be destroyed by one of the Wilsons. Its really sad, and the only thing worse is how you cope about it.
English

2 fake mysogynyst Christians certainly deserve one another.
Unlike you, I don't tell other people to live out the lives they want.
I.also dont take an entire afternoon tweeting to strangers and trying to convince them how hot my girl is.......but hey, you do you. Look forward to embarrassing you Tuesday.
Rachel Wilson@Rach4Patriarchy
@TheBrianShapiro I’m just gushing about being married to the man I think is the most attractive man I have ever seen. I’ve been head over heels for Andrew for almost two decades. He is gorgeous, funny and cool. I’m very blessed 🥰😍
English

@coulterculture Again. Kim refuses to go into specifics so that you can hide behind vague and broad generalizations. Its low tier and sad.
English

Lords of War - NewsBrief - 4.24.25 - 🔴SPECIAL - Kim Vs Andrew Wilson Watch Party x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English

@TheBrianShapiro You'll never learn brian. You have to contend with what the person is actually arguing in order to win. It has nothing to do with who agrees with who, the strength of the argument is what matters in logic. When you fail to content with the argument, you lose. And you lost, bad.
English

Andrew Wilson VS Brian Shapiro Live Debate x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English

@RationalMale @paleochristcon I love the pickle jar thing. Easiest way to identify the retards
English

@paleochristcon Or they think it was a pickle jar instead of an olive jar. 😎
English

@paleochristcon But they feel like you hold those positions so obviously you must
English

@WaltGogins4head @paleochristcon The funny part is, it wasnt even a pickle jar. Everytime you see one of these cucks mention a pickle jar, you know theyre idiots. OLIVE JAR you fucking moron.
English

@paleochristcon You’re a fkn clown show. How’s that pickle jar… what kind of genius alpha male falls for that fkn bait…. The grift you got is good, but man it’s costing you your dignity.
English

@paleochristcon @SchizoJung @RFlo90 Its always funny to see them call it a pickle jar. Fucking morons.
English

@SchizoJung @RFlo90 I have never failed to open a pickle jar.
God could of saved you from those lies.
English

@DrienaSixto Youre literally the most boring and sophistic debate opponent i have seen Rachel have. You didnt make coherent and logical arguments and then said logic doesnt have laws. I dont even know where the biggest insult for you is.
English

A 6hr debate summarized in 3 minutes for ya. You’re welcome 🫶🏻 lol But seriously, this is what it all boiled down to. Hypocrisy. In every sense of the word.
She doesn’t practice what she preaches, and what she preaches is something she knows will never actually happen as policy. Yet she and her husband Andrew Wilson grift off of calling everyone that actually DOES something tangible for the movement, or simply believe women should vote, a “feminist” or a “simp”.
They’re both hypocrites. They both sell “debate lessons” to people online yet can’t have a debate without interrupting, purposely, lol They wouldn’t last 5 minutes in a formal, regulated discussion where their mics cut off their maniacal screaming 😂
They’re both toxic for the relations between men and women, which I find the most egregious of the offenses, because it weakens our society.
And I’ll happily call it out to their faces, anywhere, anytime 💅😉😘 #whatever
English

@ModernDayDebate @notsoErudite @Rach4Patriarchy Get ready for "but can you explain agrippa's trilemma" over and over
English

One of the highlight debates at DC8 on July 26th in Dallas, TX will be @notsoErudite & @Rach4Patriarchy on feminism! Come out to meet & see your favorite speakers debate LIVE (tickets in bio)! It's gonna be AMAZIN'!

English




