Woozle

@catholicpat Stop giving people like this the attention they want

Spending an eternity in Hell after a lifetime on the sex offender registry for public indecency CATHOLICS OWNED!!

@Shu1471869 @InvictvsXV Christpilled

@InvictvsXV Xhe is from Texas and married a latina

Mein Führer, your opps are still pure cattle as always

@NewOrderGoy @DannyKPolitics Well he was Italian

@DannyKPolitics Dante had dark skin? Lol

Nick Fuentes is an uneducated moron. Not only did he call the black Haitian Alexander Dumas white culture, he also said that was picking and choosing and said Dante was white. Unfortunately Nick is wrong again. Dante was dark skinned. And this is your head of Groyper University?

@nospinbill2 Account posting from Sweden complaining about Norway 😹

“Dey Norwegian cumskin crakkkas not be national cause they mummas been fuc.ked by many”

@kalebRetvrn Some bum and the goat Spence

LEEETSS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOO!!!

@EamonnClark lol very very true

@Jesuitxosting The archeology of finances

Almost at the end of the theology doctorate. Thinking about an archeology degree. Just for fun. Idk.

@Realist_HH @Preslavets Looks at larp

@Preslavets Christians are already trying to destroy it now.

God will be absolutely right if he destroys our world

@vrody_jerome_ This is fake because it involves a Catholic following Catholic moral teaching

This is fake for the simple reason that a Catholic that knows enough moral theology to say something like this would not word it that way. "Your relationship doesn't follow Catholic teaching" sounds like something that a retard like this imagines a Catholic would say.

@AnonPresby Truke

White evangelicals are the lone bulwark against moral insanity in America

@ETHANGOMEZ222 @thegmnn Ukrainians as a people will not exist as a group in 50 years

@thegmnn Any day now, any day now ukraine will fall and palestine will reappear on the world map, any daaaay now

It’s so fucking funny how these people got on the Ukraine bandwagon right at the end lmao

@nolibertarians I do hate to be that guy but the polling included laity for the Catholics, not for anyone else polled. Still bad though

This in hindsight should’ve probably been obvious considering they’re infallibly bound by Vatican 2 which while not making this exact pronouncement, makes it an easy next step.

@spikesguides It’s still weird getting into it in a public park

This is why barely anyone dances at clubs or gets really excited in public or really tries to express themselves other than online. Some antisocial person with a smart phone is on standby, ready to capitalize on it for clout or a dollars of revenue sharing.

@punishedlinusst Chad

“ermmm there’s a problem with your constitution but i’m not gonna tell you”

@FinnishZoomer @ChudThomist If Finnish groyper isn’t my bishop, I’m changing dioceses

@ChudThomist People are saying that Im next

They’re consecrating everyone nowadays

@Osarseph0 @JohnTzimiskes97 He’s an actual converso

@JohnTzimiskes97 Tfw St. Paul’s natural theology led to the destruction of the Church…

Its ironic that RZ is blaming natural theology and systematic philosophy for theological liberalism when he’s literally a Barthian. Historically liberal Christianity was fideistic, driven by existentialists or mystics like Kierkegaard or Schleiermacher.

@nospinbill2 @Thomisticae

@Thomisticae 15k+

Add “thousands of dollars”

Church, State, and Religious Freedom according to the manual Christ's Church(1957) by Monsignor Van Noort, Pages 349-387. The following are direct quotations from Monsignor Van Noort's treatment of Church and State, specifically focusing on freedom of religion and conscience and the obligations of the catholic state. This will be divided in 3 parts: 1. Principle 5, A really Catholic State is per se obliged to profess Catholicism publicly (🧵, 1) 2. Scholten 1. The position of non-Catholics in a Catholic State. ( 🧵, 2-3) 3. Scholion 2: Where the idea relationship is not obtainable. (🧵, 4) Starting with the following remarks: Before summarizing the points taught by Leo(I'm not summarizing but for the summary see manual pages 349-352), it is important to notice that Leo is concerned primarily with stating what is the ideal relationship that should obtain between the Catholic Church and a Catholic State. The pope is concerned with the relationship between the Church and states with a pluralistic religious background only secondarily and incidentally. Still, in dealing with the latter question, the pope-in a few memorable paragraphs which we shall quote later on—does clearly show how Catholic governments may grant full religious liberty to its non-Catholic citizens without being inconsistent with Catholic principles. Obviously, we neither expect, nor can we reasonably demand that non-Catholics, whether Protestants, Jews, Agnostics, or Atheists, fully recognize the rights of the Church so long as they fail to recognize the Church for what she is: the Mystical Body of Christ and the Kingdom of God on earth. The facts that God has instituted a supernatural order and a supernatural society are known only from revelation and by faith. Indeed, the whole nub of the Church-State problem for non-Catholics lies not in the logical consequences the Church deduces from her premises but in those very premises themselves. Hypothetically they can see the logic of concluding that there should be harmonious cooperation between the State and the Roman Catholic Church if: (1) Jesus Christ is really the Son of God; (2) Jesus Christ did institute a real church destined for all mankind; (3) that church established by Christ is none other than the Roman Catholic Church. If non-Catholics deny any one of these three premises they necessarily and logically deny the Church’s conclusions about the Church-State relationship. These premises are dealt with prior to the Church-State problem. Of course if a non-Catholic is totally unaware of these prior premises, it is impossible to carry on an intelligent discussion of the Church-State problem with him even in hypothetical terms.