Christ Alone

Your post asserts three core ideas: 1. The Bible and Qur’an contradict each other. 2. The Qur’an is God’s final and perfected revelation to the last messenger. 3. The Qur’an was sent to “correct the mistakes and alterations in the Bible,” making the older “corrupted version” obsolete. Each of these is demonstrably false, and the Qur’an itself testifies against you. The Qur’an repeatedly affirms the Torah and Gospel as they existed in the 7th century, not as corrupted texts needing replacement. You claim the Qur’an corrects the Bible. But the Qur’an commands Jews and Christians to judge by their own Scriptures at that time. Here are the verses, quoted verbatim: “And let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed — then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient.” - Qur’an 5:47 If the Gospel was already corrupted, why would Allah command Christians to judge by a corrupted book? “Say, ‘O People of the Scripture, you are [standing] on nothing until you uphold [the law of] the Torah, the Gospel, and what has been revealed to you from your Lord.’” - Qur’an 5:68 Again, the Torah and Gospel are presented as authoritative and intact. “So if you are in doubt about that which We have revealed to you, then ask those who have been reading the Scripture before you.” - Qur’an 10:94. Muhammad is told to consult the Christians and Jews of his day, the very people holding the same Bible we have today. “He has sent down upon you the Book in truth, confirming what was before it. And He revealed the Torah and the Gospel as guidance for the people…” - Qur’an 3:3-4 The Qur’an does not say it came to correct alterations. It says it confirms the previous revelations. The doctrine of wholesale textual corruption (tahrif) is a later Islamic interpretation developed centuries after Muhammad to explain why the Qur’an differs so sharply from the Bible. The Qur’an itself never makes that claim. Your own book testifies that the Scriptures in the hands of 7th century Jews and Christians were trustworthy. Those are the same Scriptures we possess today. The Bible’s textual integrity is historically unassailable, far stronger than any ancient text. We have: - Over 5,800 Greek New Testament manuscripts, some dating to the 2nd century (e.g., P52, ~125 AD). - The Dead Sea Scrolls (3rd century BC–1st century AD) matching the Old Testament we read today with 99.5% accuracy. - Early church fathers quoting the New Testament so extensively that the entire text could be reconstructed from their writings alone. Compare this to the Qur’an: it was compiled after Muhammad’s death from oral recitations and written fragments, with variant readings (qira’at) still existing today. Yet no one claims the Qur’an was “corrupted”, because we accept transmission through human means under God’s providence. The Bible was copied by hand for centuries under persecution, yet the textual variants are minor (spelling, word order) and none affect core doctrines. There is zero historical evidence of a systematic, worldwide conspiracy to alter the Bible between the time of Jesus and Muhammad. The manuscripts before Islam and after Islam are identical in substance. Your claim of “alterations” is an assertion without evidence. Jesus Christ is God’s final and complete revelation, not a later prophet. The Bible is not an “older version” awaiting an upgrade. It is the completed story of redemption: “Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things…” - Hebrews 1:1-2 Jesus declares, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” - John 14:6 The New Testament ends with a solemn warning in Revelation 22:18-19: adding to or subtracting from God’s word brings judgment. The Qur’an, coming 600 years later and contradicting the clear teaching of the Gospels on the crucifixion (Qur’an 4:157 vs. all four Gospels and secular historians like Tacitus and Josephus), the deity of Christ, and the Trinity (which the Qur’an misrepresents as three gods), cannot be a continuation. It is a different message. The Bible has survived emperors, inquisitions, atheists, and tyrants who tried to destroy it, yet it remains the best-selling book in history, translated into over 3,000 languages, and still transforming lives. Its “scars” are the scars of a book that has endured the fires of history and emerged victorious.Truth is not determined by lighting effects or Instagram aesthetics. Truth is determined by what actually happened in history: Jesus of Nazareth was crucified, buried, and rose again, attested by eyewitnesses who died for that claim. Therefore @MasterMaliq, the choice is not between an “older corrupted version” and a “final perfected revelation.” The choice is between the historical, eyewitness testimony of the apostles who walked with the risen Christ and the testimony of one man in a cave 600 years later who never met Jesus. The Bible does not need correcting. It needs to be read. Jesus does not need a successor. He is the final Word. “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28). If you truly seek truth, read the Gospels for yourself, not through the lens of later polemics, but with an open heart. The same God who spoke through the prophets and His Son still speaks today. Grace and truth to you in Jesus Christ, A servant of the risen Lord.

@haniabatool9 Aso you will have sex with a nine year old?

Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is the best role model for everyone.

After I converted to Christianity, my Muslim family asked me, “What would it take for you to come back to Islam?” The truth is, it’s not about debating Jesus or the Trinity. This isn’t about Christianity at all, it’s about the foundation of the Islamic house and the foundation of the faith. So here are 5 things I would need to see if I were to ever go back to Islam: 1.Show me the Kaaba was actually built by Abraham and Ishmael, using pre-Quran sources, archaeology, Jewish texts. Right now, you have to rewrite the Torah to make it fit. 2.Show me Muhammad was an Ishmaelite. You can’t inherit a covenant if you’re not in the bloodline. 3.Show me the Quran wasn’t altered under Uthman. If it’s perfectly preserved, why the burning of variants and standardization? 4.Show me clear prophetic continuity from the Old Testament to Muhammad. Not vague parallels, direct prophecy. If he’s the final messenger, the Bible should point straight to him. 5.Show me eyewitness accounts of Muhammad’s first revelation. Right now, it’s his wife convincing him after a traumatic cave experience, unlike other prophets who knew they were called. None of this is about Jesus actually. This is about Islam’s own claims. Because if the foundation is cracked, arguing about the furniture doesn’t matter. No Kaaba link. No Ishmaelite link. No preserved text. No prophetic line. No verified calling. I can’t go back with those questions unanswered.

@grok @BBCWorld Why do they maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan?

@Jesus_alone_ @BBCWorld The exception is Eswatini (formerly Swaziland). China is keeping tariffs on its imports because Eswatini is the only African nation that still maintains diplomatic ties with Taiwan.

China scraps tariffs for all but one African nation bbc.in/4mXX8CM

90 years of Science, Impact & Legacy!
Did you know the Pharmaceutical Society of Ghana started with just 26 members in 1935?
Look how far we’ve come 🇬🇭💊@Official_PSGH

No. They just want to be approving and endorsing results for tests that have been run by lab scientists. If you specialize In pathology, you are a pathologist, not a lab scientists. As intellectuals, I expect them to argue that specialized labs should be set sup for them, and not to take over other professions position.

@Moorch4 A doctor specialises in chemical pathology but is not allowed access to the chemical pathology lab. That's what KODA is fighting.

"If you have insufficient staff, why don't you focus on the work in the consulting room? " Because doctors specialise. The gynecologist doesn't do heart surgeries, neither does the orthopedic surgeon treat PCOS. Doctors specialise, and these specialties place them in different

So your specialization has shifted your profession from medical doctor to lab scientist? Then apply for license as a lab scientists from the allied health peofessions council first, before you start to fight for position in the labs. Go and read the health professions regulatory bodies act.

@Megatron_ron That's why they will go to war with China around 2030 to 2032. So that they don't go down alone

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 US National debt surpasses size of the economy fr first time since WW2 - Fox The debt is now $31,270,000,000,000

@_GhChronicles Absolute nonsense. Whoever embarks on this strike should be laid off. They are not irreplaceable.

Medical Doctors at Korle Bu are asking the government to allow them to run the hospital's medical laboratory unit, or they will embark on a strike.

Tell me the opportunities that Doctors have, and the places they can work, and I will give you 3x the opportunity pharmacists have. I know doctors who specifically made their sons do pharmacy. Government hasn't been posting pharmacists for years, but how many unemployed pharmacists do you know? If government stops posting doctors, what will they be doing? Don't confuse personal preferences with opportunities in professions

I know innumerable MLSDs ,PharmDs running back to do GEMP That simply points to the reasons we have all these dramas We all know the truth!

I once had a discussion with one mlsd at the blood Bank He just completed GEMP and is currently doing his house job He told me how his views about medicine has really changed after completing medical school and how most of the beefs with doctors is simply envy😂

Point one is a flaw. They must know that the lab scientists and the doctors are two different professionals regulated by two different regulatory agencies, Allied health professions council and the medical and dental council respectively. Are the doctors going to allow other professionals who are not under the medical and dental council sit in the consulting room to see patients? Why does one wants to cross their boundaries into the other's field, and demand to head them. Lab results reviewed by qualified personnel? There are Doctor of lab science degree holders, and you think they are not qualified? Doesn't the lab results come to them in the consulting rooms also? Why then do you want to forcibly enter the lab? Will they agree if other professionals like pharmacists demand that prescription of medicines should be left for the pharmacist after a diagnosis is made? Because pharmacists see dangerous prescriptions from Doctors everyday. This is about calculated attempts to capture the hospital systems, not about patient safety. 2. For point 2 You are crying about insufficient staff that cannot handle OPD services, which I perfectly understand. If you have insufficient staff, why don't you focus on the work in the consulting rooms and wards, but trying to push some of the insufficient staff to the labs? Maybe I don't understand

Summary 📌📌 The strike threat by the Korle-Bu Doctors Association (KODA) is based on a combination of professional, operational, and patient safety concerns, mainly in two areas: 1. Central Laboratory dispute -KODA alleges that Laboratory Physicians have been excluded from working in the Central Laboratory at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. -They claim some members of the Ghana Association of Medical Laboratory Scientists are restricting access and determining who is allowed to practice in the lab. -There are also reports of intimidation and threats against doctors. Their demands include: -Immediate reinstatement of Laboratory Physicians and trainees -Unrestricted access to lab systems and equipment -Ensuring specialised lab results are reviewed by qualified Laboratory Physicians -A merit-based leadership structure for laboratory departments -An investigation into alleged threats 2. Opposition to 24-hour specialist OPD services -KODA is pushing back against plans to introduce 24-hour specialist outpatient services across departments. -Their concerns are that: -There is no clear policy framework, staffing plan, or funding structure -It risks overstretching already limited personnel -It could reduce quality of care rather than improve access -They argue that existing 24-hour services already run through the hospital’s polyclinic, so expansion should be carefully planned, not rushed. -They also believe the policy misinterprets the government’s 24-hour economy policy, which is supposed to involve additional staffing, not just longer hours for current workers.

@NotEvolution1 He who believes there is no God can believe anything and everything. It takes more faith to believe that complex organisms, that has inherent mechanism for survival, came into existence by chance, than the faith required to believe there is no God

The most advanced machine in the known universe

@deelite @bhadext We will handle them simple. Are they going to be licensed by pharmacy council? And with what license are they going to work with? Which area of specialization will qualify them to be pharmacists?

@bhadext I’m not. The GCPS is actually planning that. They just want to see how this will end. If they are successful, we will soon get Physician Pharmacists, Physician Nurses😂😂😂

Make dem resolve the issue hm. ⬇️⬇️ citinewsroom.com/2026/04/korle-…

@GhKake @NEBASARK 2 rounds, 3 times weekly. Or 3 rounds 2 times weekly.

@GhKake @NEBASARK Calculated per round

Dear men !!

The growing inaccessibility of science that you can understand by paying €27.99

@EVERONA97 @MyLordBebo May he Rest In Peace.

@MyLordBebo I cannot see the point of the UN

🇷🇺🇺🇸 US denied visa to representative of Russia's delegation to UN — Russia’s Permanent Representative Nebenzya "Comprehensive measures will be taken to end this vicious, politicized practice, including initiating arbitration procedures"

@MyLordBebo UN must be dissolved. It's becoming a useless organization.

@GeorgeAnagli When America or a western country is giving you "AID", pause and have a second look. You will find their motive of giving the aid. They don't give anything for free

Ghana has rejected a proposed US health aid deal worth $109 million over five years because of concerns about health data privacy. In simple terms, the US wanted to provide Ghana with “health aid” worth $109 million over five years, but part of the deal reportedly required access to sensitive health data. Ghana rejected the deal over those concerns. Ghana is also not the only country to raise concerns. Similar ones were raised by Zimbabwe, while in Kenya the matter has even faced a court challenge. Africa dey learn!