Bim Jean

3.1K posts

Bim Jean banner
Bim Jean

Bim Jean

@JimDuxhette

Butlarian Yokelist here to touch internet.

hinterwüste Katılım Mayıs 2022
894 Takip Edilen377 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bim Jean
Bim Jean@JimDuxhette·
ZXX
1
0
2
416
Bim Jean
Bim Jean@JimDuxhette·
@RepThomasMassie @sunnyright Then retire and do those productive things (excluding patents which are a heresy) If you keep rolling in the mud people may mistake you for a pig.
English
0
0
0
16
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
@sunnyright Nothing left but a wonderful family, 30 patents, 2 engineering degrees from MIT, a farm with a peach orchard, a herd of Wagyu cattle, a dozen inventions in my head, a clucks capacitor roaming my fields, and investors lined up to back whatever I invent next.
English
2.7K
5K
68.5K
895.2K
Bim Jean
Bim Jean@JimDuxhette·
@LPNH “He’s not talking about dating”
Bim Jean tweet media
English
0
0
1
75
Libertarian Party NH 🦔
The communist theater kids running the Libertarian Party just made quite a mistake. The tried to disaffiliate the greatest Libertarian affiliate in America. The only? We need your help: Reply or quote endorsing us, or share a favorite old post. Thanks - we need you!
Libertarian Party NH 🦔 tweet media
English
259
207
1.5K
101.6K
Dave Greene
Dave Greene@GreeneMan6·
New article on the blog: "How to Ride the Female-Brain Egregore" - I kind of banged this one out to give me time to work on other projects!
Dave Greene tweet media
English
4
5
113
5.4K
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
1 Start new audiobook about the Third Reich. 2 “Hitler wanted to [pause a beat] make Germany great again.” 3 Hurl phone against tree.
English
430
250
10K
1.1M
Bim Jean
Bim Jean@JimDuxhette·
@millerman Casually running my fingers across their spines
English
0
0
2
41
@jason
@jason@Jason·
@beffjezos Sports teams recruit the best of the best, globally, in order to win... the US should be no different.
English
734
3
152
555.7K
Beff (e/acc)
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos·
Ok, gloves off. Fuck it. CCP wants US open borders to dissolve the US and render it dysfunctional. FSB wants US closed borders to maximize multipolarity / break ties with allies in their backyard. Anybody pushing for any of these extremes is a useful idiot to foreign agents.
English
418
93
1.7K
823.2K
Auron MacIntyre
Auron MacIntyre@AuronMacintyre·
Paul Gottfried explains that Straussians have focused on answering their critics on the left, which generally frame Straussians as conservatives, while intentionally excluding criticism from the right that might reveal them as not very conservative at all
Auron MacIntyre tweet mediaAuron MacIntyre tweet media
English
16
33
306
26.5K
Bim Jean
Bim Jean@JimDuxhette·
If trad is anything it is that ‘no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid (which is Jesus Christ)’ so if wedding rings, a symbol for eternity and unity as old as time are deconstructed into the same category as rudolf and Santa, God forbid one discovers their chain of being ran through a bottle of consumerism(bourbon) or vice(pretty women)
GIF
English
0
0
2
72
Sun Optimist
Sun Optimist@CristusVictor·
My wife and I discuss this a lot. There are many conventions associated with being a tradwife that are totally born out of consumerism. Many things are like this. For instance, many Christmas traditions were created by or centered around major retailers. “Macy’s parade.” Rudolph the Red-Nose reindeer was invented by a retail chain. Popular depiction of Santa Clause was heavily influenced by Coca-Cola. Historically, women did not have time to be bored at home or isolated with in-door domestic tasks. See Proverbs 31 example of a virtuous woman. It’s important to be practical and to derive influence for how we structure our lives from true tradition and from scripture and from creation. Otherwise it’s easy to take for granted how much is just modern consumerism or similar.
Victor Amadeus@VittorioAmadeus

Men only started wearing wedding rings in the 1940s, to a broader point so much of modern culture even what is considered “trad” is made up consumerist nonsense from the 20th century, not any sort of actual tradition

English
8
14
290
77.6K
Bim Jean
Bim Jean@JimDuxhette·
@RadicalLib Intelectual Property Profiteering? Well that’s a road far bridge too camels back fo me, as a libertarian in good standing i can no longer support him until her repents and forgoes this free market heresy.
English
0
0
0
22
Stephen W. Carson
Stephen W. Carson@RadicalLib·
“Massie will be fine. He is an MIT-trained engineer with a self-sufficient farmstead in Kentucky, several successful patents with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and a huge national fanbase that will allow him to land somewhere soft.” “several successful patents”!!
Joel Webbon@JoelWebbon

Thomas Massie lost a congressional primary this week, and most Americans will never hear the real story because the official version is too small for what actually happened. They’ll be told a retired Navy SEAL beat an incumbent in a tough race. They’ll hear the usual consultant language about messaging, turnout, coalition shifts, and changing demographics. What they will not hear is why one Kentucky congressman drew a tidal wave of outside money large enough to blot out the sun, why organizations tied explicitly to Israeli interests treated a rural Republican primary like a geopolitical emergency, or why Washington reacts with almost supernatural hostility toward anyone who consistently questions foreign aid, lobbying power, or the nature of America’s relationship with Israel. The names change every decade, but the pattern never does. And once you notice it, you start seeing it everywhere. For almost eighty years, the same sequence has repeated itself with the reliability of a ritual. An elected leader notices that American policy toward Israel operates under a different set of political laws than virtually any other subject in Washington. He happens to mention it, or maybe even complain about it, on the grounds that the United States should actually be the country in charge of the United States. The man is rebranded as unstable, hateful, reckless, or “dangerous.” Then, they throw a pile of money toward his opponent to take him out, or they wind up in one way or another ruined or dead. Then, when the next guy notices this and says something, Israel’s army of informal ambassadors all act as if they’ve never heard of anyone criticizing Israel before, swear they must be a lunatic, and the process repeats. *Read the full article at our website by using the link in my bio.

English
1
2
19
892
TimeStealer
TimeStealer@StealerTime·
@AcademicAgent_X You're still in the tutorial. Wait until you get to Velen and things will get more interesting.
English
2
0
10
304
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
would be funny if he wrote it using claude
Michael Millerman tweet media
English
4
1
19
1.4K
Bim Jean
Bim Jean@JimDuxhette·
@pmarca Don’t tell the luxury communist’s. 😲
English
0
0
0
37
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
The “it’s not AGI because machine intelligence is jagged” is dumb cope. It’s obviously AGI. If you had a friend who had a 130 IQ, could write production code flawlessly, could write academic papers of a high research caliber, pass any exam in any field with flying colors, create a sophisticate LBO model, draw technical diagrams perfectly, compose poetry in any language, and could find solutions to significant unsolved mathematical problems, you would call that person a world historical genius. Certainly, no single human has ever had intelligence that “general” before. Now you think it’s “not AGI” because it sometimes slips up and makes mistakes - so does any human that you would consider “extraordinarily intelligent.” The professor might forget a colleagues name that he has known for a decade. He is still considered intelligent. The math genius might be a little autistic and shy, unable to maintain polite conversation. Still intelligent. You might stare at the fridge for 30 seconds unable to find the butter, despite 5 million years of evolution perfecting your visual intelligence. We give intelligent humans a pass when they have jagged intelligence. So why the double standard? The qualities people list as “necessary for AGI” are important traits to have, but no longer pertain to intelligence. People will say things like “true AGI requires agency, long term goal setting, embodiment, self-direct action”. But none of those things are intelligence. Those are “things that humans have that AI lacks”. Raw intelligence, AI has it in spades. That other stuff - important yet, but broader than and different from intelligence. The unwillingness of people to acknowledge that AGI obviously exists and has existed for a while is due to a kind of anthropic chauvinism - a psychological need to believe that humans are superior in every respect, that we possess soft skills that no machine could replicate. Yes humans are different from machines, but if we are limiting the discussion solely to general intelligence, AI has it already. That battle is over. If you want to reframe the discussion to matters of human dignity and personhood, fine, but that’s not an AGI question. That’s something else. Just take the loss on AGI already. It’s over.
English
493
231
2.4K
669.3K
Bim Jean
Bim Jean@JimDuxhette·
Myth to Legend is a transmutation as old as time.
Curtis Yarvin@curtis_yarvin

@shortmagsmle You’d think words like “myth” would be a tipoff. From the introduction to Sydney Fisher’s True History of the American Revolution (1903):

English
0
0
0
18