Joseph Cusick

@pascalkwanten Schroedinger’s Cat solved by time jumps.

Fysici proberen Schrödingers kat steeds groter te maken share.google/yaZesh8rW2WMlm…

@SolvingForZ Poetry is often mathematical with rhythms and rhyme.

True

@mareig94 @CERN Electric charge doesn’t affect mass, so by symmetry, gravity doesn’t affect charge.

Link to my talk at the workshop "Symmetry and Topology in Particle Physics" at IHES about how to test Grand Unified Theories, both in field theory and in string theory, with axions: carmin.tv/en/collections… indico.math.cnrs.fr/event/16013/ @CERN

@sonukg4india A sphere is both 2D and 3D, like a four vector is a coordinate transformation to 2D.

🎁💎💎💎💎

@skdh Time has extension much like space extends over a distance.

The double slit experiment is the probably most misunderstood experiment ever. I have no idea who created the myth that if you 'look' at one of the slits, then the particles (photons/electrons) stop behaving as waves. It's wrong! They of course STILL behave as waves! Because particles are also waves, always. Photons and electrons make a self-interference EVEN ON A SINGLE slit. Don't believe it? Below an actual measurement from a laser diffracting on a single/double slit from Wikipedia. What happens if you measure which slit the particle goes through is that you get no interference between BOTH slits. And no, you don't need a conscious observer for this. Believe it or not, there have actually been experiments where they had people literally look at a double slit to see if that makes any difference and the answer is no, it does not. The entire mystery of the double slit is in the path of the particle TO the double slit. Because it seems that the particle must "know" whether it WILL be measured at one of the slits before it even gets there. It must "know" whether to go through both or just pick one. Seems like the future influences the past? Not really, it just means you have a consistency condition on the time evolution.

@mathsproofs @GeometricBites The cross product looks 3D, except that the resultant is along the axis of rotation. Rotation is in a plane, indicating two plus two dimensional spacetime for Quantum Gravity t,X and y,z.

The Art of The Cross Product Cross Product Mastery (Pages 5 and 6) The Derivation #vectors #crossproduct #furtherpuremaths

@CharlesMullins2 That’s like saying you can’t feel temperature, you can only feel molecules hitting you.

Nothing has ever truly “touched” anything. What you feel… is force. Resistance. A boundary. So the real question is what creates that boundary?

@teseKibun Paths split infinitely is zero path making quantum jumps like the cow jumped over the moon.

経路積分を博士論文で発表したFeynmanはやっぱバグだな

@zhigangsuo The speed of light equals the speed of gravitational waves, indicating two plus two dimensional spacetime t,x and y,z.

Electrodynamics in vacuum invokes two constants: permittivity and permeability. Their values are not set by electrodynamics in vacuum, but by human conventions and a mystery of nature.

@skglearning Quantum physics defies Boolean Algebra.

Boolean Algebra was invented by George Boole in his 1854 book An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. It works with only 0 (False) & 1 (True) using three operations: • AND • OR • NOT

@zhigangsuo Electromagnetic waves are transverse since Coulomb’s Law determines that electric charge resides on the outer surface of an isolated conductor, making spacetime two plus two dimensional t,x and y,z.

I wrote a section to derive electromagnetic wave from the four Maxwell equation. The algebra is very pretty. docs.google.com/document/d/17Y…

@skglearning 2D/4D is the wave/particle of Quantum Gravity.

Heisenberg uncertainty principle

@CharlesMullins2 Time can not be separated from space.

You’re right standard General Relativity is built on a torsion-free connection. But that’s also a choice in the formulation, not necessarily a limitation of reality. GR models gravity through curvature of spacetime. but it doesn’t include all possible geometric degrees of freedom. There are extensions (like Einstein–Cartan theory) that do introduce torsion. What I’m suggesting is slightly different again: not physical rotation of spacetime itself, but gradients in the time field that manifest as rotational effects. So “spin” or rotation wouldn’t need torsion in the classical sense. it could emerge from how time flows unevenly across a region. In that view, GR isn’t wrong it’s just describing the curvature part of a deeper structure. The question is Is curvature the full story. or just the projection of something happening in time?

What if dark matter… doesn’t exist? Galaxies shouldn’t spin the way they do. Stars on the edges move too fast. According to gravity, they should fly off. So we invented “dark matter.” Invisible mass. Never directly detected. But what if the mistake isn’t missing mass… it’s assuming time is uniform? In my τ-field model: • Mass = time compression • Gravity = flow along time gradients Now scale that up to a galaxy: The outer regions aren’t “missing gravity”… they’re sitting in a different time structure. So instead of adding invisible matter: The field itself changes how motion behaves Flat rotation curves aren’t a mystery. They’re what happens when time isn’t evenly distributed across the system. No particles needed. No hidden mass. Just geometry of time. So the real question is: Did we invent dark matter… because we assumed time was constant? #Physics #DarkMatter #Cosmology #Space #Science

@tonycahill1969 @PhilosophyOfPhy Physics works in 2D, 3D, or 4D depending upon the experimental arrangement. Whether 2D or 4D is the wave/particle of Quantum Gravity.

Why couldn’t both be true? God leaves the universe to work by its mechanics to do so. But it can also be equally sentient enough to recognise where equilibrium needs implemented, outwith universal adjustment? God creating a sentient universe would include both points, I think. 🙏🌍

Debate between Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is one of the most profound philosophical clashes in the history of science and metaphysics, centered on a simple yet deeply compelling question: What are space and time? In the early 18th century, this disagreement unfolded through a series of letters, most notably in the Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence, where Leibniz challenged Newton’s ideas through Newton’s supporter, Samuel Clarke. Newton believed that space and time were absolute realities. To him, space existed like an invisible stage on which all physical events take place, and time flowed uniformly everywhere, unaffected by anything in the universe. Even in a completely empty universe, space and time would still exist, unchanged and real. Leibniz strongly opposed this view. He argued that space and time are not independent entities but relationships between objects and events. Space is simply the arrangement of things, and time is the sequence in which changes occur. Without objects or events, space and time have no meaning. The debate extended beyond physics into deeper philosophical and theological questions. Leibniz used logical reasoning to argue that absolute space makes little sense because there would be no reason for the universe to exist in one position rather than another. Newton’s side, defended by Clarke, responded that space is real and ultimately grounded in the existence and will of God. This debate remains important even today because it shaped how we think about the universe. Newton’s ideas dominated classical physics for centuries, but later developments, especially relativity, reintroduced a more relational understanding of space and time, bringing modern physics closer to what Leibniz had imagined.

@CharlesMullins2 The Equation of General Relativity has no torsion, no rotation.

That’s a really interesting way to look at it. What you’re describing as “spin” could actually be the effect we observe from a deeper process. In my model, it’s not the universe physically spinning like a rigid object… it’s the τ-field (time field) forming rotational gradients. So instead of centrifugal force causing expansion: regions of time are flowing at different rates that creates a directional “drift” outward which looks like expansion from inside the system Galaxies might then form along these rotational time gradients which is why we see consistent spin patterns and structure. So the question becomes: Is the universe spinning… or are we seeing the effect of time itself twisting?

@KirkDBorne The General Relativity Metric Tensor is rank two because physics takes place in a plane.

Tensors - The Geometric Tool That Solved Einstein’s General Relativity Problem: quantamagazine.org/the-geometric-… #Geometry #Calculus #Mathematics

@cosmosarcive Heisenberg black hole: As the time difference approaches zero, the in falling object jumps to the center of the black hole.

Two black holes spiral, twist spacetime into a luminous storm, and merge into one. A newborn giant fires cosmic jets as gravitational waves ripple through reality. This same dance of creation and power lives inside you.

@oprydai Gauss’s Law for electric charge only determines the net charge.

maxwell’s equations define how fields behave, not just forces they replace “action at a distance” with local interactions in space and time four constraints: → gauss (electric) ∇·E = ρ/ε₀ charge density creates divergence in the electric field → gauss (magnetic) ∇·B = 0 no magnetic sources, only loops → faraday ∇×E = −∂B/∂t changing magnetic field induces circulation in E → ampere – maxwell ∇×B = μ₀J + μ₀ε₀ ∂E/∂t currents and changing E generate B structure: → divergence ties fields to sources → curl ties fields to dynamics key move: → maxwell added the displacement current term (∂E/∂t) without it, symmetry breaks and waves don’t exist result: → combine curls → wave equations → fields sustain each other and propagate c = 1 / √(μ₀ε₀) light = electromagnetic wave implications: → no medium required → information carried by field oscillations in engineering: → antennas radiate by accelerating charges → circuits leak energy as radiation at high frequency in computation: → full-wave solvers approximate these PDEs interpretation: → not four separate laws → a coupled system defining allowable field evolution maxwell’s equations are a constraint system on reality everything electromagnetic must satisfy them

@tomislav_rupic Complex numbers in Dirac matrices is due to gimbal lock.

Paul Dirac's Aesthetic Physics Dirac is still one of the clearest examples of what happens when mathematics stops being description and starts acting like a detector. Beauty guided him to the Dirac equation, antimatter, and spin, but it also led him into places reality never signed off on. That’s the real lesson: beauty is a powerful compass, not a guarantee.