John P Conley

That's the tweet.

@GainZillaX @balajis However,many authorization systems include a trusted intermediary. This needs to be fixed. Zero trust is the only sustainable way.

@balajis Exactly. The 20th century relied on *trust-based systems*: banks, notaries, wet signatures. The 21st century requires *verification-based systems*: blockchains, cryptography, digital signatures. Trust is fragile. Math isn’t.

Many 20th century systems will melt down in a low-trust, high-tech environment. Fraud rates will just get out of control. We’ll need to rebuild those systems with cryptography. Digital signatures are much harder to fake than signatures.

@ComplicatedIsOK It is even worse than that. Hard forks and reorgs like ETHs DOA show that majority approved protocol violations happen in real life. It is not just theory that says that the majority cannot be relied upon the identity the truth.

Personal note - my mind is blown, in a bad way - Putting here for the record that I had a discussion this morning with someone who wanted to challenge every technical result about Geeq and told me I wasn't being forthcoming or logical I've never been accused of that before in my entire life. I'm my own harshest critic about whether there any any qualifications I should be making about what I'm saying. What I said was rock solid, it was falling on deaf and antagonistic ears - If fud starts because there's talk that Geeqs don't know what they're talking about, you'll know where it came from and we are willing to refute any challenge. I don't need everyone to be a fan, in fact, I know most people won't care about diving into the weeds (I will give this person credit where credit is due). However, it is frustrating to see that even amongst those enlightened enough to want to go there, the entrenched blockchain commonplaces run deep - and those common beliefs have no basis in proof. This has, in fact, been shown - see last week's Geeq Spaces from my mathematical economics co-founder who does axiomatic game theory - and yes, this is every bit as rigorous as it sounds. Defending decentralized security on the basis of node count alone is a non-starter. It is based on a rosy view of the majority. It does not admit the possibility that it is possible for a majority to be wrong, or bribed, or co-opted, or taken over by bots. Even with people controlling the nodes - lots of people can vote for the wrong thing. That shouldn't be in dispute by anyone who is rational. With AI entering markets, the alarm should be increasing, not ignored. Crypto isn't rational. "Optimistic proofs" should be outlawed as a phrase. It is an oxymoron and should be called out as such. Just as the name "the blockchain trilemma" did so much damage because "trilemma" gave it the mathy gravitas it never earned, so it was taken as a serious fact when it was basically a diagram of a triangle, the appeal to "optimistic proofs" should be a clear signal that the integrity of your chain is based on wishful thinking. I'll go back to keeping my feelings to myself. Bookmark this if there is any problem because the one thing I cannot abide is having the integrity of our work questioned.

@GeeqOfficial Great job!

April is Here, Geeqsters! 🌟 So much happened last month—March was amazing! But trust us, April is going to be even better! Get the highlights and sneak peek in this video 📹 We hope you had a Magical March, and we wish you an Awesome April Ahead!

@ComplicatedIsOK Good point.

The data poisoning to AI inputs has already begun. Do you know what that means? It means AI must know the provenance of the data that's used. And the only one who can do that credibly, at scale, is Geeq. Otherwise you get caught in the Matrix.

@THENFTLIFE420 @GeeqOfficial Awesome.

@GeeqOfficial Mark your calendars. A date in December starting with a 1 will change blockchain forever. Geeq Testnet is almost here. 🚀 #Geeq #Testnet #BlockchainEvolution #InnovationForGood $GEEQ #BeAGEEQ #secured #almostthere #GoodVibes #L0 #CryptoNews #web3 #redpill

@GeeqOfficial Quackable

A Stack is a unique data object on-chain 🟦🟩where the order matters 🟦🟩and the entire object is stored as an asset 🟦🟩in a single account. Blockchain that works with your brain, not against it. Please show us you understand. Drop a reply!

@DavidSacks ..vm. Momma l.m m O ll I'm

@ComplicatedIsOK A proof is a proof. Two proofs probably mean two opinions

I don't know about this. In my world, if you do it right, one proof system is sufficient. You'd only need multiple if the first one isn't convincing for some reason.

@ComplicatedIsOK @js90828806 @GeeqOfficial Happy 2024 @GeeqOfficial #BeAGeeq

@js90828806 @GeeqOfficial Happy New Year!

🪩 Warm wishes to all for a Happy New Year 🪩 #BeAGeeq!

A NFT, a unique ID, and a protocol called Proof of Honesty. From theory to implementation, Season's greetings to all @GeeqOfficial mint.geeq.io

Happy Holidays 2023 - #BeAGeeq I've just created an NFT Holiday card using Geeq technology. Check it out at exploremint.geeq.io/nft/3242bac3bb… or create yours at nft.geeq.io

Still confused about the blockchain "trilemma"? You are not alone. It's 2023. Let's start over. This went out to the broader world in @CoinTelegraph's Report last week. Thoughts? Drop questions and comments below. Please stay on topic. @EconDAO research.cointelegraph.com/reports/layer-…

Re: Blockchain security It's been very nice to see censorship resistance re-emerge as a desirable property in general discussions. Some thoughts on Geeq's excellent censorship resistance. 🧵

Re: #blockchain security Danksharding, on the Ethereum roadmap, will "remove proposer-builder separation (PBS)". Geeq never included it in the first place. Security is not an afterthought. It's our first thought. #BeAGeeq

PSA: The GeeqOfficial account linked below is real! We encourage participation with HONEST discussion, about technology, with a livestream this Friday! There is another account that is fake and offering airdrops. It is a scam and those are NOT $Geeq! twitter.com/GeeqOfficial/s…

.@Scott_E_Page and @will_wjk roadmap re: decentralization @HarvardHBS Professor Shane Greenstein re: blockchain @FletcherSchool Bhaskar Chakravorti, I recall you write and speak well, here's the technology we need. #provability #ICT @GeeqOfficial geeq.io/roadmap/

.@Gladwell Do you remember including my research in your David and Goliath book? ("quality" economic grad programs) Another underdog true story for you, this time a personal one. I'm Chief Economist at small start-up @GeeqOfficial and it is paying off. geeq.io/u-s-patent-app…

And then there was something new. Brand new. Not PoW, Not PoS. Or any other. #beageeq @GeeqOfficial $GEEQ @John_P_Conley @ComplicatedIsOK @Communitech @StephHughes95 @DelRayMan geeq.io/u-s-patent-app…

In case you missed it: ⭐️Geeq's basic infrastructure does not use #SmartContracts, because sometimes they are neither smart nor contracts. Co-Founder @John_P_Conley presented these slides @morpheuslabs_io hackathon, sponsored proudly by @GeeqOfficial. slides.geeq.io/morpheus-labs/